Assessing ESL students' pronunciation in the Pakistani context

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 19 - 30, 31.12.2014

Muhammad Javed Atezaz Ahmad

Öz

The present study is an investigation of ESL secondary school students’ pronunciation. A sample of 440 ESL students of grade 10 was randomly selected from the Southern Punjab, Pakistan. A test was developed to assess the ESL students’ pronunciation. The test consisted of monosyllabic, disyllabic, trisyllabic, quadrisyllabic, and multisyllabic words, diphthongs, triphthongs, stress and intonation, tongue twisters, voiced and unvoiced sounds, and interrogative, declarative, imperative, and exclamatory sentences. The students’ overall performance in pronunciation was computed using appropriate statistical analysis. The mean scores of male and female students, urban and rural students and public and private school students were compared through t-values. It was concluded, based on the findings, that ESL students’ pronunciation was good in articulating monosyllabic, disyllabic, trisyllabic, and quadrisyllabic words, stress and intonation, tongue twisters, voiced sounds, and imperative and exclamatory sentences. On the other hand, the participants poorly pronounced multisyllabic words, diphthongs, triphthongs, unvoiced sounds, interrogative sentences, and declarative sentences. Calculated t-values indicated that there was no significant difference in mean scores of male and female students, urban and rural students, and public and private school students. Some recommendations were made to improve the ESL students’ pronunciation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ESL students; pronunciation; sounds; words; phrases; sentences; assessment

Kaynakça

• Bauer, L., & Trudgill, P. (1998). Language myths. England: Penguin.
• Baumgardner, R. J. (1993). The English language in Pakistan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Bahawalpur (2013). Grading Formula. Retrieved on August 21, 2013 from http://www.bisebwp.edu.pk/grading.php
• Brown, A. (1995). The effect of rater variables in the development of an occupation-specific language performance test. Language Testing, 12(1), 1-15.
• Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (1996). Teaching Pronunciation Audio Cassette: A Reference for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ellis, A. J. (1869). I.–On the only English proclamation of henry iii.,18 October, 1258, and its treatment by former editors and translators. Transactions of the Philological Society, 13(1), 1-1. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 968X.1869.tb00045.x
• Fayer, J. M., & Krasinski, E. (1987). Native and nonnative judgments of intelligibility and irritation. Language Learning, 37(3), 313-326.
• Gimson, A. C., & Ramsaran, S. (1970). An introduction to the pronunciation of English (pp. 85-89). London: Edward Arnold.
• Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., & Tourville, J. A. (2006). Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain and language, 96(3), 280-301.
• Haque, A. R. (1982). The position and status of English in Pakistan. World Englishes, 2(1), 6-9.
• Hickey, R. (1998). The Dublin vowel shift and the historical perspective. Trends in linguistics studies and monographs, 112, 79-106.
• Hooper, J. B. (1976). An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.
• Howell, P., Cross, I., & West, R. (1985). Musical structure and cognition. New York: Academic Press.
• Jones, D. (1917). An English Pronouncing Dictionary:(on Strictly Phonetic Principles). London: JM Dent & sons, limited.
• Jones, D. (1966). The pronunciation of English (vol. 369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kim, Y. H. (2009). An investigation into native and non-native teachers' judgments of oral English performance: A mixed methods approach. Language Testing, 26(2), 187-217.
• Kramer, C. (1974). Women's speech: Separate but unequal? Quarterly Journal of Speech, 60(1), 14-24.
• Kuhl, P. K. (1987). Perception of speech and sound in early infancy. Handbook of infant perception, 2, 275-382.
• Larsen-Freeman, D., Long, M. H., & Jiang, Z. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research (pp. 153-219). London: Longman.
• Pennington, M. C. (1996). Phonology in English language teaching: An international approach. London: Longman.
• Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th Ed). London: Pearson.
• Roach, P. (1983). English Phonetics and Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Shamim, F. (2008). Trends, issues and challenges in English language education in Pakistan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(3), 235-249.
• Soanes, C., & Stevenson, A. (2004). Concise Oxford English dictionary (vol. 11). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Upton, C. (2004). Received pronunciation. In W. Edgar, Schneider, K. Burridge, B. Kortamaan, R. Mesthrie (Eds). A handbook of varieties of English (pp. 217-230). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• İkinci Dil Olarak İngilizce Öğrenenlerin Telaffuzlarının Değerlendirilmesi: Pakistan Örneği