Investigating the Relationship between the Level of Reflective Thinking and Learner Autonomy Readiness of Turkish EFL Student Teachers

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 205 - 218, 29.12.2025

Hande Çetin , Betül Kınık Gülek , Sibel Kahraman Özkurt

https://doi.org/10.51726/jlr.1820667

https://izlik.org/JA24KE83TM

Öz

This study investigates the relationship between reflective thinking and readiness for learner autonomy among Turkish EFL student teachers, and examines how reflective capacity contributes to student teachers’ preparedness to take responsibility for their own learning. The data were collected from a total of 139 student teachers from three universities in Türkiye through the Learner Autonomy Readiness Questionnaire (LARQ) and the Reflection Questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, t-tests, ANOVA, and regression analyses. The findings revealed a moderate-to-strong correlation between reflective thinking and autonomy readiness, with the ‘reflection’ component emerging as the strongest predictor of autonomy (β = .48). While the components of ‘understanding’ and ‘critical reflection’ also contributed significantly, ‘habitual action’ did not show predictive impact. Gender-based differences indicated that male participants scored higher in ‘habitual action’, whereas females outperformed in ‘understanding’. Institutional differences were also observed in student teachers’ perceptions of ‘learner roles’. Overall, the study demonstrates that reflective thinking, particularly deliberate cognitive reflection, is a key factor in fostering learner autonomy. The findings highlight the need for teacher education programs to integrate structured reflective practices to enhance student teachers’ readiness for autonomy and their capacity to foster it in practice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

reflective thinking , learner autonomy , readiness for autonomy , EFL student teachers , teacher education

Etik Beyan

The study was conducted in accordance with institutional research ethics guidelines, and participation was voluntary and anonymous.

Destekleyen Kurum

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Türk İngilizce Öğretmeni Adaylarının Yansıtıcı Düşünme Düzeyleri ile Öğrenen Özerkliği Hazırbulunuşlukları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

https://izlik.org/JA24KE83TM

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türk İngilizce öğretmeni adaylarının yansıtıcı düşünme düzeyleri ile öğrenen özerkliğine hazırbulunuşlukları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemekte ve yansıtıcı kapasitenin öğretmen adaylarının kendi öğrenmelerinden sorumluluk almaya hazır olmalarına nasıl katkıda bulunduğunu incelemektedir. Veriler, Türkiye'deki üç üniversiteden toplam 139 öğretmen adayından Öğrenen Özerkliği Hazırlık Anketi (LARQ) ve Yansıtma Anketi aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Veriler, tanımlayıcı istatistikler, Pearson korelasyonu, t-testleri, ANOVA ve regresyon analizleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, yansıtıcı düşünme ile özerklik hazırlığı arasında orta ila güçlü bir korelasyon olduğunu ortaya koymuş ve “yansıtma” bileşeni özerkliğin en güçlü belirleyicisi olarak ortaya çıkmıştır (β = .48). ‘Anlama’ ve ‘eleştirel yansıtma’ bileşenleri de önemli ölçüde katkı sağlarken, ‘alışkanlık haline gelmiş eylem’ belirleyici bir etki göstermemiştir. Cinsiyete dayalı farklılıklarda erkek katılımcıların “alışkanlık hâline gelmiş eylem” boyutunda daha yüksek puan aldığı, kadın katılımcıların ise “anlama” boyutunda daha başarılı olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca öğretmen adaylarının öğrenen rolleri algılarında kurumsal farklılıklar da gözlemlenmiştir. Genel olarak çalışma, özellikle kasıtlı bilişsel yansıtmanın, öğrenen özerkliğini geliştirmede kilit bir faktör olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bulgular, öğretmen eğitimi programlarının, öğretmen adaylarının özerkliğe hazırbulunuşluklarını ve gelecekteki öğretim uygulamalarında bu özerkliği geliştirme kapasitelerini artırmak için yapılandırılmış yansıtıcı uygulamaları müfredata entegre etme gerekliliğine dikkat çekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

yansıtıcı düşünme , öğrenen özerkliği , özerkliğe hazırbulunuşluk , İngilizce öğretmeni adayları , öğretmen eğitimi

Kaynakça

• Agnihotri, S., Mamoria, P., Moorthygari, S. L., Chandel, P., & Gopala Raju, S. S. S. V. (2024). The role of reflective practice in enhancing teacher efficacy. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(6), 1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i6.5574
• Balcikanli, C. (2010). Learner autonomy in language learning: student teachers' beliefs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n1.8
• Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958
• Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). Routledge.
• Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (2013). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315059051
• Burkert, A. & Schwienhorst, K. (2008). Focus on the student teacher: The European portfolio for student teachers of languages (EPOSTL) as a tool to develop teacher autonomy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501220802158941
• Chan, V. (2001). Readiness for learner autonomy: What do our learners tell us? Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 505-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120078045
• Chan, V., Spratt, M., & Humphreys, G. (2002). Autonomous language learning: Hong Kong tertiary students' attitudes and behaviours. Evaluation & Research in Education, 16(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790208667003
• Chinpakdee, M. (2021). Using learning journals to promote learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 76(4), 432-440. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab056
• Cooke, S. D. (2013). Examining transcription, autonomy and reflective practice in language development. RELC Journal, 44(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473271
• Cotterall, S. (1995). Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 23(2), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00008-8
• Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson.
• Çetin, H., & Çakır, C. (2021). An investigation of Turkish high school EFL teachers’ readiness to promote learner autonomy. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 81–97.
• Dam, L. (1995). Learner autonomy 3: From theory to classroom practice. Authentik.
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath.
• Farrell, T. S. C. (2015). Promoting teacher reflection in second language education: A framework for TESOL professionals. Routledge.
• Farrell, T.S.C. (2016). Does writing promote reflective practice? In W. Renandaya & H. Widodo (Eds). English language teaching today: Linking theory and practice (pp. 83-94). Springer.
• Genc, Z. S. (2010). Teacher autonomy through reflective journals among teachers of English as a foreign language in Turkey. Teacher Development, 14(3), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2010.504028
• Gülbak, G. M. (2025). Professional autonomy revisited: Pre-service teachers’ perspectives during practice teaching. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 14(2), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1390999
• Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Pergamon.
• Holec, H. (1988). Autonomy and self-directed learning: Present fields of application. Council of Europe.
• Jiménez Raya, M. (2011). Enhancing pedagogy for autonomy: The potential of a case-based approach in promoting reflection and action. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2011.577531
• Kember, D., Leung, D. Y., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., ... & Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611442
• Körkkö, M., Kyrö-Ämmälä, O., & Turunen, T. (2016). Professional development through reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.014
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537–560.
• Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Authentik.
• Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00006-6
• Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt040.0
• Little, D. (2009). Language learner autonomy and the European language portfolio: Two l2 English examples. Language Teaching, 42, 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005636
• Mann, S., & Walsh, S. (2017). Reflective practice in English language teaching: Research-based principles and practices. Routledge.
• Mezirow, J. (1977). Perspective transformation. Studies in Adult Education, 9(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.1977.11730750
• Mezirow, J. (1985). A critical theory of self-directed learning. New Directions for Continuing Education, 25, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719852504
• Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
• Mezirow, J. (1992). Transformation theory: Critique and confusion. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(4), 250-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369204200404
• Mezirow, J. (2009). An overview of transformative learning theory. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning (pp. 90–105). Routledge.
• Nakata, Y. (2011). Teachers’ readiness for promoting learner autonomy: A study of Japanese EFL high school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.03.001
• Nasöz, M. (2015). Turkish EFL learners ‘readiness for autonomy and attitudes toward self-access center (Master's thesis, Bilkent University, Turkey).
• Nguyen, S. V., & Habók, A. (2021). Designing and validating the learner autonomy perception questionnaire. Heliyon, 7(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06831
• Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Heinle & Heinle.
• Orakcı, Ş. (2021). Exploring the relationships between cognitive flexibility, learner autonomy, and reflective thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100838
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.
• Pedro, J. Y. (2005). Reflection in teacher education: Exploring pre-service teachers’ meanings of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 6(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462394042000326860
• Porto, M. (2007). Learning diaries in the English as a foreign language classroom: A tool for accessing learners’ perceptions of lessons and developing learner autonomy and reflection. Foreign Language Annals, 40(4), 672–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02887.x
• Reinders, H. (2010). Towards a classroom pedagogy for learner autonomy: A framework of independent language learning skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n5.4
• Reinders, H. (2011). Learner autonomy and new learning environments. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 1–4.
• Rodgers, C. R. (2002). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 230–253.
• Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
• Schmidt, R., Boraie, D., & Kassabgy, O. (1996). Foreign language motivation: Internal structure and external connections. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 14(2), 1-72
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
• Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
• Şener, B., & Mede, E. (2023). Promoting learner autonomy and improving reflective thinking skills through reflective practice and collaborative learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 364 - 379. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2047694.
• Teng, F. (2019). Understanding teacher autonomy, teacher agency, and teacher identity: Voices from four EFL student teachers. English Teaching & Learning, 43(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-019-00024-4
• Teng, M. F., & Yue, M. (2023). Metacognitive writing strategies, critical thinking skills, and academic writing performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Metacognition and Learning, 18(1), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09328-5
• Vieira, F., Barbosa, I., Paiva, M., & Fernandes, I. S. (2008). Teacher education towards teacher (and learner) autonomy: What can be learnt from teacher development practices?. In Terry Lamb & Hayo Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and response (pp. 217-235). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• White, C. (2008). Language learning strategies in independent language learning: An overview. In S. Hurd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 3–24). Multilingual Matters.
• Xu, H. (2015). The development of teacher autonomy in collaborative lesson preparation: A multiple-case study of EFL teachers in China. System, 52, 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.05.007
• Yıldırım, Ö. (2008). Turkish EFL learners’ readiness for learner autonomy. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 65-80.
• Yuan, R., & Lee, I. (2015). The cognitive, social and emotional processes of teacher identity construction in a pre-service teacher education programme. Research Papers in Education, 30(4), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2014.932830
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2