Integrating AI Literacy into Initial Teacher Education for English Language Teaching

Öz

The paper takes the argument that AI has significant potential in teacher education, especially English Language Teaching (ELT) but teachers’ preparedness, classroom practices, and institutional support may all be factors that hinder or facilitate the adoption of AI. What the study did was it used TPACK and TELL frameworks to analyze how teacher education might incorporate AI. The study’s context was AI in teacher education. One hundred English language teacher educators out of five universities were the participants of the purposive sampling method. All of them were familiar with or interested in AI, supported teaching. The data were collected via a structured questionnaire on the interviewees readiness, pedagogical influence, and adoption barriers. Data were also gathered through open-ended questions in order to gain additional qualitative data. The study showed that the teachers who were able to incorporate AI in their teaching were very satisfied due to the feedback that the students got from the AI, as well as the increase in enthusiasm among the students. Most importantly, AI was still just another teaching tool used alongside others, not the one effecting a complete transformation in the teaching, learning process. Lack of enough institutional support, lack of infrastructures, poor teacher training, and ethical issues in terms of problems such as privacy, data, and algorithmic bias, were some of the issues identified as barriers to AI adoption.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial Intelligence
• English Language Teacher Education
• TPACK Theory
• Technology-enhanced Language Learning (TELL)

İngilizce Dil Öğretimi İçin Öğretmen Yetiştirme Programlarına Yapay Zeka Okuryazarlığının Entegrasyonu

Öz

Makale, yapay zekanın öğretmen eğitiminde, özellikle İngilizce Dil Öğretiminde (ELT) önemli bir potansiyele sahip olduğu, ancak öğretmenlerin hazırlığı, sınıf uygulamaları ve kurumsal desteğin yapay zekanın benimsenmesini engelleyen veya kolaylaştıran faktörler olabileceği argümanını savunmaktadır. Çalışma, TPACK ve TELL çerçevelerini kullanarak öğretmen eğitiminin yapay zekayı nasıl dahil edebileceğini analiz etmiştir. Çalışmanın konusu, öğretmen eğitiminde yapay zeka idi. Beş üniversiteden yüz İngilizce öğretmeni, amaçlı örnekleme yöntemiyle çalışmaya katıldı. Katılımcıların tümü yapay zeka ile aşina veya ilgileniyordu ve öğretimi destekliyordu. Veriler, katılımcıların hazırlık durumu, pedagojik etkisi ve benimseme engelleri hakkında yapılandırılmış bir anket aracılığıyla toplandı. Ek nitel veriler elde etmek için açık uçlu sorular da kullanılarak veri toplanmıştır. Çalışma, AI'yı öğretimlerine dahil edebilen öğretmenlerin, öğrencilerin AI'dan aldıkları geri bildirimler ve öğrencilerin artan hevesleri nedeniyle çok memnun olduklarını göstermiştir. En önemlisi, AI hala diğerleriyle birlikte kullanılan bir başka öğretim aracıydı, öğretim ve öğrenim sürecinde tam bir dönüşüm yaratan bir araç değildi. Yeterli kurumsal desteğin olmaması, altyapı eksikliği, öğretmenlerin yetersiz eğitimi ve gizlilik, veri ve algoritmik önyargı gibi sorunlarla ilgili etik konular, AI'nın benimsenmesinin önündeki engeller olarak belirlenen sorunlardan bazılarıydı.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapay Zeka
• İngilizce Öğretmenliği Eğitimi
• TPACK Teorisi
• Teknoloji Destekli Dil Öğrenimi (TELL)

Kaynakça

1. Alakrash, H. M., & Razak, N. A. (2021). Technology-based language learning: Investigation of digital technology and digital literacy. Sustainability, 13(21), 12304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112304
2. Amir, H. S., & Rustam, U. (2025). The role of technology in English language learning in the digital era. Lingeduca: Journal of Language and Education Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.70177/lingeduca.v4i1.2048
3. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
4. Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023). Not quite eye to A.I.: Student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0
5. Becirovic, S., Brdarevic-Celjo, A., & Delic, H. (2021). The use of digital technology in foreign language learning. SN Social Sciences, 1, 246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00254-y
6. Binns, R., & Veale, M. (2021). Is that your final decision? Multi-stage profiling, selective effects, and Article 22 of the GDPR. International Data Privacy Law, 11(4), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipab020
7. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives (Vol. 2). New York: Longmans, Green.
8. Bower, M. (2019). Technology-mediated learning theory. British Journal Education Technology, 50, https://doi.org/1035-1048.https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12771

9. Buddha, H., Shuib, L., Idris, N., & Eke, C. (2024). Technology-assisted language learning systems: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 12, 33449–33472. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3366663
10. Cao, J., Bhuvaneswari, G., Arumugam, T., & Aravind, B. R. (2023). The digital edge: Examining the relationship between digital competency and language learning outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1187909
11. Chai, C., Koh, J. & Tsai, C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16, 31-51
12. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. Ieee Access, 8, 75264-75278.
13. Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D. & Hwang, G. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002
14. Crompton, H.& Edmett, A. & Ichaporia, N. & Burke, D. (2024). AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55, 2503-2529. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13460
15. Dell, A. G., Newton, D. A., & Petroff, J. G. (2020). Assistive technology in the classroom: Enhancing the school experiences of students with disabilities (3rd ed.). Pearson.
16. Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105.
17. Hasumi, T., & Chiu, M.-S. (2024). Technology-enhanced language learning in English language education: Performance analysis, core publications, and emerging trends. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2346044
18. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 1–12.
19. Holmes, W. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education and information technologies (pp. 88–103). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_107
20. Huang, H., & Li, M. (2024). The impact of technology-enhanced language learning environments on second language learners’ willingness to communicate: A systematic review of empirical studies from 2012 to 2023. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73593
21. Iberahim, A., Yunus, M. M., & Sulaiman, N. (2023). A Review on Technology Enhanced Language Learning (TELL). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i2/16496
22. Islam, M. (2024). English Language Instructors’ readiness for using artificial intelligence for teaching in Bangladesh ?Unpublished Doctoral dissertation?. Brac University.
23. Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2018). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
24. Kim, K., & Kwon, K. (2023). Exploring the AI competencies of elementary school teachers in South Korea. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100137.
25. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1).
26. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). Exploring generative artificial intelligence preparedness among university language instructors: A case study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100156.
27. Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST.
28. Nasution, A. K. P., & Batubara, M. H. (2024). Research trends in technology-enhanced language learning: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching (JLLLT), 3(2), 111-130.https://doi.org/10.37249/jlllt.v3i2.779
29. Owan, V. J., Abang, K. B., Idika, D. O., Etta, E. O., & Bassey, B. A. (2023). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), 2307.
30. Patty, J. (2024). The use of AI in language learning: What you need to know. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 7(1), 642-654.
31. Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. Roscongress Building Trust.
32. Peng, H., Ma, S., & Spector, J. M. (2019). Personalized adaptive learning: An emerging pedagogical approach enabled by a smart learning environment. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0089-y
33. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497.
34. Puentedura, R. R. (2013). SAMR: Getting to transformation. Retrieved May, 31, 265-283.
35. Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2022). Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students’ writing performance, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: a mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2627-2674. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2021.1888753
36. Sellar, S., & Gulson, K. N. (2021). Becoming information centric: the emergence of new cognitive infrastructures in education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 36(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1678766
37. Selwyn, N. (2016). Digital downsides: exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(1-16). 10.1080/13562517.2016.1213229.
38. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.
39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Yeh, H. C. (2025). The synergy of generative AI and inquiry-based learning: transforming the landscape of English teaching and learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(1), 88-102.
41. Zainuddin, N. (2023). Technology Enhanced Language Learning Research Trends and Practices: A Systematic Review (2020–2022). Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.2.2835
42. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0