Effects of Recasts and Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback on the Acquisition of Implicit and Explicit L2 Knowledge

Abstract

The current study explored the effects of recasts and metalinguistc feedback on the acquisition of implicit and explicit knowledge of English by Persian EFL learners. Three intact EFL classrooms, labeled as two experimental groups and a control group, provided participants for the current study. Learners in one experimental group received recasts whenever they made an error during task-based interactions with their interlocutors while learners in the second experimental group received metalinguistic corrective feedback for their errors while performing the same tasks. Learners in the control group also performed the same tasks but received no corrective feedback for their errors. Learners’ achievements as a result of treatments were investigated via timed and untimed grammaticality judgment tests and also an elicited oral imitation test. The results indicated that metalinguistic corrective feedback is more effective than recasts in promoting the acquisition of both implicit and explicit L2 knowledge.

Keywords

• recasts, metalinguistic feedback, corrective feedback, implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge

Kaynakça

1. Braidi, S. M. (2002). Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interactions. Language Learning, 52 (1), 1–42.
2. Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.
3. Egi, T. (2010). Uptake, modified output, and learner perceptions of recasts: Learner responses as language awareness. The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 1-21.
4. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Ellis, N. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism, and language learning. Language Learning, 48, 631-664.
6. Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227-275.
7. Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141-172.
8. Ellis, R., Loewen, S. & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339-68.

9. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J. & Reinders, H. (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in a second language learning, testing and teaching. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
10. Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543–572.
11. Han, Z-H. (2003). On a dual approach to L2 reading instruction. Paper presented at the meeting of International TESOL, Baltimore, MD.
12. Han, Y. and Ellis, R. (1998). Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge, and general language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 2, 1-23.
13. Huljstin, J. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing, and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18, 193-223.
14. Huljstin, J. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing, and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18, 193-223.
15. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman. Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48(2), 183–218.
16. Lyster, R., & L. Ranta. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 37–66.
17. Lyster , R. , & Izquierdo , J. ( 2009 ). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning ,59, 453 – 498.
18. Mackey, A. & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338–356.
20. Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 459- 481.
21. Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(3), 573–595.
22. Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186–214.
23. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 206–226.
24. Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.
25. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
26. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263–300.
28. Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361–392.
29. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: a collection of empirical studies (pp. 301-322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A, & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytic ability. In A. Macky (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: a collection of empirical studies (pp. 171-195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. VanPatten, & Okennon, S. (1996). Explanation vs. structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510.
32. VanPatten, B. & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.
33. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
34. VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755-803.