Prososyal Davranış Kavramı Üzerine Yapılan Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 175 - 199, 27.03.2025

Metin Karaca

https://doi.org/10.22139/jobs.1624744

Öz

Prososyal davranış, başkalarına yardım etme, destek sağlama, paylaşma ve toplumun iyiliği için gönüllü olarak katkıda bulunma gibi olumlu davranışları ifade etmektedir. Prososyal davranış örgütlerde çalışanların ve yöneticilerin örgüt içindeki ilişkilerini, örgüt kültürünü ve genel anlamda verimliliği etkileyen davranışlardır. Diğer taraftan prososyal davranış örgüt içindeki ilişkileri güçlendiren, çalışan memnuniyetini artıran, verimliliğin artmasıyla birlikte uzun vadeli başarıya katkı sağlayan bir temel oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı, bu alandaki akademik literatürün incelenmesi ve prososyal davranış konusundaki araştırmaların gelişimi, eğilimi ve önemli bulguların ortaya konulmasıdır. Ayrıca hangi ülkelerin konuya daha fazla ağırlık verdiğini, öne çıkan yazar, kurum, dergi ve yayınların hangileri olduğunu belirlemek çalışmanın amaçları arasında yer almaktadır. Web of Science veri tabanından elde edilen veriler kullanılarak yönetim alanında prososyal davranışla ilgili 968 yayın üzerinde bir analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, 2020 (91) ve 2022 (90) yılları en fazla yayın yapılan yıllar, en fazla yapılan yayın türü makale (846), en fazla yayın yapan ülke ABD (411), atıf bakımından en fazla atıf alan yazar JA LePine (3027), dergi Journal of Applied Psychology (6886), kurum Michigan State University (3028), en fazla kullanılan anahtar kelime altruism (119), en çok bibliyometrik eşleşmesi olan dergi Journal of Applied Psychology (6886) ve yazar Mark C. Bolino (677) olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Prososyal Davranış, Altruizm, Ekstra-Rol Davranışı, Bibliyometrik Analiz

The Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on the Concept of Prosocial Behavior

Öz

Prosocial behavior refers to positive behaviors such as helping others, providing support, sharing, and voluntarily contributing to the good of society. Prosocial behavior is behavior that affects the relationships between employees and managers within the organization, organizational culture, and productivity in general. On the other hand, prosocial behavior forms a basis that strengthens relationships within the organization, increases employee satisfaction, and contributes to long-term success by increasing productivity. The aim of the study is to examine the academic literature in this field and to present the development, trend and important findings of research on prosocial behavior. In addition, determining which countries give more importance to the subject and which prominent authors, institutions, journals and publications are are among the aims of the study. Based on data obtained from the Web of Science database, an analysis was conducted on 968 works in the field of management on prosocial behavior. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the years 2020 (91) and 2022 (90) were the years with the most publications, the most published type was article (846), the country with the most publications was the USA (411), the most cited author in terms of citations was JA LePine (3027), the journal was Journal of Applied Psychology (6886), the institution was Michigan State University (3028), the most used keyword was altruism (119), the journal with the most bibliometric matches was Journal of Applied Psychology (6886) and the author was Mark C. Bolino (677).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Prosocial Behavior, Altruism, Extra-Role Behavior, Bibliometric Analysis

Kaynakça

• Ahearne, M., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Gruen, T. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of customer-company identification: Expanding the role of relationship marketing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 574.
• Akbari, M., Kashani, S. H., & Hooshmand Chaijani, M. (2016). Sharing, caring, and responsibility in higher education teams. Small Group Research, 47(5), 542-568.
• Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., & Baharun, R. (2020). Bibliometric analysis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 98(15), 2948-2962.
• Baron, D. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(1), 7-45.
• Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 36-59.
• Baynal Doğan, T. G. B., Doğan, S., & Aykan, E. (2021). Liderlik tarzlarının bibliyometrik analizi. Erciyes Akademi, 35(1), 161-189.
• Bettencourt, L. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Contact employees: Relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction and prosocial service behaviors. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90014-2
• Bierhoff, H. W. (2002). Prosocial behaviour, Psychology Press.
• Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599-670.
• Chang, H. H., & Chuang, S. S. (2011). Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator. Information & Management, 48(1), 9-18.
• Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119-135.
• Dirik, D., Eryılmaz, İ., & Erhan, T. (2023). Post-truth kavramı üzerine yapılan çalışmaların VOSviewer ile bibliyometrik analizi. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 4(2), 164-188.
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
• Eisenberg, N. (1982). The development of prosocial behavior, Academic Press.
• Garrigos-Simon, F. J., Narangajavana-Kaosiri, Y., & Lengua-Lengua, I. (2018). Tourism and sustainability: A bibliometric and visualization analysis. Sustainability, 10(6), 1976.
• George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 299.
• Gürbüz, C., Kıymık, H., & Bitlisli, F. (2021). Türkiye’de muhasebe eğitimi konusunda yapılan akademik çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 24(1), 173-186.
• Hart, R. (2024). Prosocial behaviors at work: Key concepts, measures, interventions, antecedents, and outcomes. Behavioral Sciences, 14(1), 78.
• Hsu, C. L., & Lin, J. C. C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45(1), 65-74.
• Karadağ, E., & Mutafçılar, I. (2009). Prososyal davranış ekseninde özgecilik üzerine teorik bir çözümleme. FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8, 41-69.
• Klotz, A. C., Bolino, M. C., Song, H., & Stornelli, J. (2018). Examining the nature, causes, and consequences of profiles of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(5), 629-647.
• Kumar, S. (2015). Co-authorship networks: A review of the literature. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(1), 55-73.
• Lazauskaite-Zabielske, J., Urbanaviciute, I., & Bagdziuniene, D. (2015). The role of prosocial and intrinsic motivation in employees’ citizenship behaviour. Baltic Journal of Management, 10(3), 345-365.
• Lemmon, G., & Wayne, S. J. (2015). Underlying motives of organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing egoistic and altruistic motivations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(2), 129-148.
• LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52.
• Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee's perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543-1567.
• Mulet-Forteza, C., Martorell-Cunill, O., Merigó, J. M., Genovart-Balaguer, J., & Mauleon-Mendez, E. (2018). Twenty five years of the Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing: A bibliometric ranking. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(9), 1201-1221.
• Özkan, O. S., Aksoy Kürü, S., Üzüm, B., & Ulu, Ö. (2024). Enhancing prosocial behavior in the aviation industry through responsible leadership and importance of ethics and social responsibility: Examining a moderated mediation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(2), 208-230.
• Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99-116.
• Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 845-874.
• Shannahan, R. J., Bush, A. J., Shannahan, K. L., & Moncrief, W. C. (2017). How salesperson perceptions of customers' pro-social behaviors help drive salesperson performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 62, 36-50.
• Spitzmuller, M., & Van Dyne, L. (2013). Proactive and reactive helping: Contrasting the positive consequences of different forms of helping. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 560-580.
• Surwase, G., Sagar, A., Kademani, B. S., & Bhanumurthy, K. (2011). Co-citation analysis: An overview. BOSLA National Conference Proceedings. Mumbai, India.
• Thompson, P. S., & Bolino, M. C. (2018). Negative beliefs about accepting coworker help: Implications for employee attitudes, job performance, and reputation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(8), 842.
• Tokmak, M. (2023). Kötü amaçlı yazılım tespit çalışmalarının bibliyometrik analizi. B. Akdemir & U. Özkaya (Ed.), Mühendislikte güncel yaklaşımlar (ss. 281-298), Duvar Yayınları.
• Tremblay, M., Cloutier, J., Simard, G., Chênevert, D., & Vandenberghe, C. (2010). The role of HRM practices, procedural justice, organizational support and trust in organizational commitment and in-role and extra-role performance. The İnternational Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(3), 405-433.
• Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
• Walter, C., & Ribière, V. (2013). A citation and co-citation analysis of 10 years of KM theory and practices. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 11(3), 221-229.
• Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). “It is what one does”: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic İnformation Systems, 9(2-3), 155-173.
• Wong, C. S., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 243-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00099-1
• Zan, B. U. (2019). Doğrudan atıf, ortak atıf ve bibliyografik eşleşme yaklaşımlarına dayalı olarak araştırma alanlarının değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 501-516.
• Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068.