The Movement Toward a Monolingual Nation in Russia: The Language Policy in the Circassian Republics of the Northern Caucasus
Öz
In the context of an institutionalized multi-nationalist ideology, the language policy in Russia is based on the distinction of the native language of Russian people and the languages of all other non-Russians. Such a distinction is reflected in ‘The Constitution of the Russian Federation,’ federal and regional laws and policy practices that have given advantage to Russian over the other titular languages of the indigenous people in the Russian Federation. This article charts the grand "shift" in Russian state policy toward ethnic diversity. The Soviet-era multinational Leninist/Stalinist approach summarized in the slogan "druzhba narodov" (friendship of peoples) shifted toward a more assimilationist nation-building model. Such ideology reduced the ethnic diversity into just a cultural, folkloric feature of an otherwise monolingual, mono-cultural nation-state. What is the purpose of discriminatory ethnic and language policy? Our case study of Circassians, one of the ethnic groups in the North Caucasus, demonstrates that, after many decades, such a policy only caused political and cultural damages to all sides and alienation between them. On the one hand, the assimilationist language policy continues to cause problems with the non-Russian ethnic groups adding to the major challenges that the Russian state faces today. On the other hand, non-Russian ethnic groups, though not yet assimilated by Russian culture, have undergone significant decrease in terms of their rights to develop their languages.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- AKTÜRK, Ş. 2009. "Persistence of the Islamic Millet as an Ottoman Legacy: Nationhood." Middle Eastern Studies, 45/6, 893-909. and Anti-Ethnic Definition of Turkish
- AKTÜRK, Ş. 2010. "Passport Identification and Nation-Building in Post- Soviet Russia." Post-Soviet Affairs, 26/4, 314-341.
- AKTÜRK, Ş. 2013. "The Four Pillars of Ottoman Identity: Religious Toleration, Diversity and the Four Millets under the 'Eternal State'." Turkish Review, 3/1, 16-23.
- AKTÜRK, Ş. 2012. Regimes of Ethnicity and Nationhood in Germany, Russia, and Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- ARUTYUNOV, S.A. 2014. “Three Women’s View on Circassian People (review).” Bulletin of the Institute for Humanities Research of the KBSC of RAN, vestnik_2014_3(22).pdf (last accessed September 3, 2015).
- http://www.kbigi.ru/fmedia/izdat/ vestnik/2014/
- BAKU, K.I. 2014. “Adygebzer: Dyguase, Nobe, Pshedei.” Bulletin of the Institute for Humanities Research of the KBSC Of The RAN, 21, 69-80. (In Circassian language.)
- BALABAS, E. 2015. “Viktor Sadovnishii: My Teriaem Kavkaz.” Moskovskii Komsomolets, http://www.mk.ru/social/2015/07/17/ viktor-sadovnichiy- my-teryaem-kavkaz.html (last accessed September 3, 2015).
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yayımlanma Tarihi
19 Eylül 2015
Gönderilme Tarihi
8 Haziran 2015
Kabul Tarihi
13 Ağustos 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2015 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1
Cited By
Memory, History, and the Construction of Self in Dina Arma’s Novel The Road Home (Doroga domoy) (2009)
Journal of Caucasian Studies
https://doi.org/10.21488/jocas.27782The Role of the Organization of Turkic States in Ensuring the Cultural/Language Security of the Turkic Peoples/Turkic Speaking People Living in the Arctic and Sub-Arctic Region
Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.1114572(Un)Learning to forget: Circassian narratives on education in Turkey (1940–1990) and beyond
Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education
https://doi.org/10.1080/15595692.2025.2563868