Sürdürülebilir Bamya (Abelmoschus esculentus) Üretimi İçin Toprak Altı ve Yaprak Uygulamalı Fermente Biyo-Düzenleyicilerin Optimizasyonu

Öz

Çalışma, sebze üretiminin sürdürülebilir yoğunlaştırılması için geleneksel gübreleme yöntemlerine çevre dostu alternatifler geliştirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu araştırmada, yerel olarak üretilen fermente düzenleyicilerin ve bunların bamya (Abelmoschus esculentus) üzerindeki uygulama yöntemlerinin etkisi değerlendirilmiştir. Deney, rastgele tam blok deneme deseni kullanılarak dokuz farklı uygulamayı içermektedir. Dört fermente hazırlık (bitki suyu, meyve suyu, balık amino asitleri ve yumurta kabukları), toprak altı veya yaprak uygulama yöntemleriyle, geleneksel toprak analizine dayalı gübreleme önerileriyle karşılaştırılmıştır. Biyo-düzenleyiciler, toprak besin durumunu koruma açısından üstün performans göstermiş ve fermente düzenleyiciler, geleneksel gübrelemeye göre daha yüksek organik madde içeriğini (3,32%) sağlamıştır (geleneksel gübreleme: 3,18%). Fermente meyve suyu (FFJ) yaprak uygulaması, en uzun bitkileri üretmiştir (90. gün sonunda 62,32 cm), FFJ-toprak altı uygulaması ise çiçeklenmeyi önemli ölçüde hızlandırmıştır (30,50 gün). Balık amino asidi yaprak uygulaması, en yüksek pazar değerindeki meyve sayısını (3,00) sağlamış, FFJ-yaprak uygulaması ise en ağır pazar değerindeki meyve ağırlığını (72,50 g) elde etmiştir. Biyo-düzenleyici uygulamaları, meyve besin bileşimini de etkilemiştir. FAA-toprak altı ve FPJ-yaprak uygulamaları, geleneksel gübrelemeye (24,46%) kıyasla önemli ölçüde daha düşük lif içeriği (24,35%) sağlamış, aynı zamanda kül (6,37-6,42%), protein (10,38-10,42%) ve yağ (1,38-1,41%) seviyelerini tutarlı bir şekilde korumuştur. Sonuçlar, yerel kaynaklı fermente biyo-düzenleyicilerin uygun uygulama yöntemleriyle kullanıldığında geleneksel gübrelemeyle eşit veya üstün performans gösterebildiğini ve toprak sağlığını desteklediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu araştırma, sürdürülebilir bamya üretimi için pratik rehberlik sağlamakta ve biyo-düzenleyici uygulama sistemlerinin optimizasyonuna ilişkin anlayışı geliştirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fermente biyo-düzenleyiciler
• Yaprak uygulama yöntemleri
• Toprak altı gübreleme
• Balık amino asitleri
• Sürdürülebilir tarım

Optimization of Fermented Bio-Regulators Applied to Soil and Leaves for Sustainable Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Production

Öz

The study aims to develop eco-friendly alternatives to conventional fertilization for the sustainable intensification of vegetable production. This research assessed the impact of locally produced fermented amendments and methods of their application on okra, Abelmoschus esculentus. The experiment employed a randomized complete block design with nine treatments comparing four fermented preparations (plant juice, fruit juice, fish amino acids, and eggshells) applied through subsurface or foliar methods against conventional soil test recommendations. Bio-amendments demonstrated superior performance in maintaining soil nutrient status, with fermented amendments maintaining higher soil organic matter (3.32%) than conventional fertilization (3.18%). Foliar application of fermented fruit juice (FFJ) produced the tallest plants (62.32 cm at 90 DAS), while FFJ-subsurface significantly accelerated flowering (30.50 days). Fish amino acid foliar application yielded the highest number of marketable fruits (3.00), while FFJ-foliar treatment achieved the maximum marketable fruit weight (72.50 g). Bio-amended treatments also influenced fruit nutritional composition, with FAA-subsurface and FPJ-foliar treatments resulting in significantly lower fiber content (24.35%) compared to conventional fertilization (24.46%), while maintaining consistent levels of ash (6.37-6.42%), protein (10.38-10.42%), and fats (1.38-1.41%). Results demonstrate that locally sourced fermented bio-amendments can effectively match or exceed conventional fertilization while supporting soil health, particularly when applied through appropriate delivery methods. This research provides practical guidance for sustainable okra production while advancing the understanding of bio-amendment delivery system optimization.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Foliar application methods
• Subsurface fertilization
• Fish amino acids
• Sustainable agriculture
• Fermented bio-amendments

Kaynakça

1. Bilias, F., Kalderis, D., Richardson, C., Barbayiannis, N and Gasparatos, D. (2022). Biochar application as a soil potassium management strategy: A review. The Science of the Total Environment, 858, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159782
2. Chattoo, M.A., Ahmed, N.A., Wani, M.H., Mir, S.A., Khan, S.H and Jabeen, N. (2011). Effect of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of Okra [Abelmochus esculentus (L.) Moench]. Vegetable Science, 38, 135-139.
3. Wagh, S.S., Laharia, G.S., Iratkar, A.G and Gajare, A.S. (2014). Effect of INM on nutrient uptake, yield and quality of okra [Abelmoschus esculents (L.) Moench]. Asian Journal of Soil Science, 9, 21-24.
4. Sulok, K.M., Ahmed, O.H., Khew, C.Y., Zehnder, J.A., Jalloh, M.B., Musah, A.A and Abdu, A.B. (2021). Chemical and biological characteristics of organic amendments produced from selected agro-wastes with potential for sustaining soil health: A Laboratory Assessment. Sustainability, 13, 4919. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094919
5. Urra, J., Alkorta, I., Mijangos, I and Garbisu, C. (2020). Commercial and farm fermented liquid organic amendments to improve soil quality and lettuce yield. Journal of environmental management, 264, 110422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110422
6. Luo, Y., Chavez-Rico, V.S., Sechi, V., Bezemer, T.M., Buisman, C.J and Heijne, A. (2023). Effect of organic amendments obtained from different pretreatment technologies on soil microbial community. Environmental research, 116346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.11634
7. Ahuja, I., Daukšas, E., Remme, J.F., Richardsen, R.N and Løes, A. (2020). Fish and fish waste-based fertilizers in organic farming - With status in Norway: A review. Waste management, 115, 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.025
8. Teshome, Y. (2021). Review for fermentation on the rate of plant nutrient management practices in Ethiopia. International Journal of Research in Agronomy. 4(2), 127-131 https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2021.v4.i2a.139

9. Bhuiyan, M.N., Rahman, A., Loladze, I., Das, S and Kim, P.J. (2023). Subsurface fertilization boosts crop yields and lowers greenhouse gas emissions: A global meta-analysis. The Science of the Total Environment, 876, 162712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162712
10. Krishnasree, R.K., Raj, S.K and Chacko, S.R. (2021). Foliar nutrition in vegetables: A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 10(1), 2393-2398. https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2021.v10.i1ah.13716
11. Thomas, G.W. (1996). Soil pH and soil acidity. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods, 5, 475-490. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16
12. Nelson, D.W and Sommers, L.E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 9, 539-579. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29
13. Olsen, S.R and Sommers, L.E. (1982). Phosphorus. Pp: 403-430. Methods of Soil Analysis, Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Part, 2. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c24
14. Helmke, P.A and Sparks, D.L. (1996). Lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, and cesium. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods, 5, 551-574. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c19
15. Cunniff, P and Washington, D. (1997). Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Journal of AOAC International, 80(6), 127A. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/80.1.277
16. Marshall, M.R. (2010). Ash analysis. Food analysis, 4, 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1478-1_7
17. Nehring, K. (1966). Crude fibre or crude cellulose. The development of Weende analysis of feedingstuffs. Archiv für Tierernährung, 16, 77-102
18. Van Soest, P.V., Robertson, J.B and Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
19. Mariotti, F., Tomé, D and Mirand, P.P. (2008). Converting nitrogen into protein-beyond 6.25 and Jones' factors. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 48(2), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390701279749
20. De Castro, M.L and Priego-Capote, F. (2010). Soxhlet extraction: Past and present panacea. Journal of Chromatography A, 1217(16), 2383-2389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.11.027
21. Herencia, J.F., Ruiz, J.C., Melero, S., Garcia Galavís, P and Maqueda, C. (2008). A short-term comparison of organic v. conventional agriculture in a silty loam soil using two organic amendments. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 146, 677 - 687. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859608008071
22. Kim, H.W., Choi, H.S., Kim, B.H., Kim, H.J., Choi, K.J., Jeong, D.Y and Jeong, S.K. (2012). Changes in rice yield according to surface and full-layer application of organic fertilizer. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture, 20 (1), 81-89.
23. Nayakekorola, H and Woodard, H.J. (1995). Profile distribution of extractable phosphorus following a knife-applied subsurface phosphorus fertilizer band. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 26, 3193-3203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629509369520
24. Bao, Z., Dai, W., Su, X., Liu, Z., An, Z., Sun, Q., Jing, H., Lin, L., Chen, Y and Meng, J. (2024). Long‐term biochar application promoted soil aggregate‐associated potassium availability and maize potassium uptake. GCB Bioenergy, 16, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13134.
25. Sheoran, H.S., Kakar, R., Kumar, N and Seema, J. (2019). Impact of organic and conventional farming practices on soil quality: A global review. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 17(1), p951. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1701_951968
26. Herencia, J.F and Maqueda, C. (2016). Effects of time and dose of organic fertilizers on soil fertility, nutrient content and yield of vegetables. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 154, 1343 - 1361. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859615001136.
27. He, C., Zhang, L and Li, X. (2022). Plant performance and soil fungal community impacts of enhancing Dioscorea opposita with spraying foliar fertilizer with different nutrient element combinations. Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092017.
28. Haytova, D.I. (2013). A review of foliar fertilization of some vegetables crops. Annual Review & Research in Biology, 3(4), 455-465.
29. Fahrurrozi, F., Muktamar, Z., Setyowati, N., Sudjatmiko, S and Chozin, M. (2019). Comparative effects of soil and foliar applications of tithonia-enriched liquid organic fertilizer on yields of sweet corn in closed agriculture production system. AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science. 41(2), 238-245. https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v41i2.1256
30. Aslani, M and Souri, M.K. (2018). Growth and quality of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under foliar application of organic-chelate fertilizers. Open Agriculture, 3, 146 - 154. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2018-0015
31. Cox, J., Hue, N.V., Ahmad, A.A and Kobayashi, K.D. (2021). Surface-applied or incorporated biochar and compost combination improves soil fertility, Chinese cabbage and papaya biomass. Biochar, 3(2), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-020-00081-z
32. Derrick, O. (2009). Foliar fertilization: Mechanisms and magnitude of nutrient uptake. In Proceedings of the fluid forum (pp. 15-17).
33. Zhang, J., Akyol, Ç and Meers, E. (2023). Nutrient recovery and recycling from fishery waste and by-products. Journal of Environmental Management, 348, 119266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119266
34. Ziogas, V., Michailidis, M., Karagiannis, E., Tanou, G and Molassiotis, A. (2020). Manipulating fruit quality through foliar nutrition. In Fruit crops (pp. 401-417). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818732-6.00029-0
35. Zhang, J., Pang, H., Tian, J., Liu, M., Ji, Q and Yao, Y. (2017). Effects of apple fruit fermentation (AFF) solution on growth and fruit quality of apple trees. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 41, 11 - 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-017-0418-8
36. Urjintseren, P and Byambaa, J. (2024). Determination of egg shell structure and mineral composition using SEM - EDS and identification the possibility to produce fertilizer. Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering. 12(3), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2024.123003
37. Alzamel, N.M., Taha, E.M., Bakr, A.A and Loutfy, N.M. (2022). Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil properties, growth yield, and physiochemical properties of sunflower seeds and oils. Sustainability. 14(19), 12928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912928
38. Gulzar, O., Shoqer, L.M., Bahaa, L.F and Mahmood, Y.M. (2024). Utilization of eggshell-derived calcium carbonate as an eco-friendly fertilizer enhancing growth of Rosa abientina, Rosa, and Fragaria × ananassa, and soil health. British Journal of Environmental Studies. 4(1), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjes.2024.4.1.4
39. Blackshaw, R.E., Semach, G and Janzen, H.H. (2002). Fertilizer application method affects nitrogen uptake in weeds and wheat. Weed Science, 50(5), 634-641. https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0634:FAMANU]2.0.CO;2
40. Dao, V.T and Kim, J. (2011). Scaled-up bioconversion of fish waste to liquid fertilizer using a 5 L ribbon-type reactor. Journal of Environmental Management, 92 10, 2441-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.003
41. de Hita, D., Fuentes, M., Fernández, V., Zamarreño, Á.M., Olaetxea, M and García-Mina, J.M. (2020). Discriminating the short-term action of root and foliar application of humic acids on plant growth: emerging role of jasmonic acid. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 493. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00493
42. Dong, C., Zhou, J.M., Fan, X.H., Wang, H.Y., Duan, Z and Tang, C. (2005). Application methods of calcium supplements affect nutrient levels and calcium forms in mature tomato fruits. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 27, 1443 - 1455. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-200025861
43. Benjamin, Y.N., Edith, K.N., Marie-Michel, C.A., Jules, S.K and Kablan, T. (2020). Comparative study of the effects of two types of organic fertilizers (R1 and R4) and a chemical fertilizer (NPK) on some physico-chemical and biochemical parameters of lettuce (Latuca sativa L.). Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research, 3(3), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.26502/jfsnr.2642-11000048
44. Dabiré, C., Sérémé, A., Parkouda, C., Somda, M.K and Traoré, A.S. (2016). Influence of organic and mineral fertilizers on chemical and biochemical compounds content in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) var. Mongal F1. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 4, 631-636. https://doi.org/10.18006/2016.4(Issue6).631.636
45. Sharma, A. (2017). A Review on the effect of organic and chemical fertilizers on plants. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 677-680. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2017.2103
46. Ebel, R and Kissmann, S. (2019). Fermented leaf fertilizers-principles and preparation. Organic Farming, 5(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.12924/of2019.05010014
47. Kannan, S.V. (2010). Foliar Fertilization for Sustainable Crop Production. Genetic Engineering, Biofertilisation, Soil Quality and Organic Farming, 371-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8741-6_13
48. Gayathri, K and Krishnaveni, K. (2015). Effect of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on certain quality parameters of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L). Moench] cv. Arka Anamika. Advance Research Journal of Crop improvement, 6, 116-118. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/ARJCI/6.2/116-118
49. Nithiya, T. (2015). Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer on growth, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of Solanum nigrum L. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4(5), 808-822.