Aim: Today, sepsis is the most common cause of death in intensive care units. In this study, we aimed to compare presepsin with procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) which are commonly used in the early diagnosis and treatment of sepsis.
Material and Method: One hundred-eighty three patients who were hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit were included in the study. While 138 of these patients were followed with the diagnosis of sepsis, 45 were hospitalized in the intensive care unit for reasons other than sepsis. Blood, urine, stool and tracheal aspirate cultures were obtained from these patients. Simultaneous procalcitonin, CRP and presepsin levels were measured. Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assesment (QSOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Assessment-II (APACHE-II) scores were calculated. The data obtained were analyzed statistically by SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) 20.0 package program.
Results: 45.5% of the patients were female and the mean age of the patients was 75.74 ± 11.35. Patients had concomitant chronic diseases, 14% of patients had diabetes mellitus, 45% had hypertension, 54% had renal failure and 26% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. No significant relationship was found between the levels of presepsin and the patients with septic and non-septic patients (p>0.05). However, a strong positive correlation was found between elevated presepsin levels and CRP levels (r=0.853; p<0.001).
Conclusion: As a result of the study, no significant difference was found between presepsin levels of patients with and without sepsis, while presepsin was a valuable biomarker for early diagnosis of sepsis in culture positive septic patients. It also showed a strong correlation with CRP and PCT, thus it may used in the daily clinical practice of septic patients.
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
Bölüm | Research Articles [en] Araştırma Makaleleri [tr] |
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 28 Haziran 2020 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2020 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2 |
Dergimiz; TR-Dizin ULAKBİM, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, Google Scholar, Researchgate, WorldCat (OCLC), CrossRef (DOI), ROAD, ASOS İndeks, Türk Medline İndeks, Eurasian Scientific Journal Index (ESJI) ve Türkiye Atıf Dizini'nde indekslenmektedir.
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI, ProQuest dizinlerine müracaat yapılmış olup, değerlendirme aşamasındadır.
Makaleler "Çift-Kör Hakem Değerlendirmesi”nden geçmektedir.
Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği: Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN].
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. About predatory/questionable journals and journal charge policy
Not: Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q sınıflamasına dahil değildir.
Yağmacı/şüpheli dergilerle ilgili Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kararları ve yazar açıklama metni ile dergi ücret politikası: Yağmacı/Şaibeli Dergiler ve Dergi Ücret Politikası