Environmental Justice Education: Awareness Or Transformation In Classrooms? A Systematic Review

Öz

The escalating environmental crisis has underscored the urgent need for a paradigm shift in environmental education (EE), particularly toward models that integrate environmental justice (EJ) and foster critical engagement. This systematic review examines whether classroom-based EE interventions between January 2010 and February 2025 have primarily cultivated awareness or catalyzed transformative learning rooted in justice. Using the PRISMA methodology, 49 peer-reviewed articles were analyzed, encompassing interventions across early childhood education, primary school settings, and pre-service teacher training programs. Four core dimensions were evaluated: thematic content, pedagogical depth, student engagement, and instructional resources. Findings reveal a persistent emphasis on ecological content transmission, with limited incorporation of social or distributive justice themes. Most interventions promoted individual behavior change rather than collective, critically informed action. Student tasks often lacked depth, prioritizing information recall over participatory inquiry or civic engagement. Additionally, the widespread use of teacher-generated materials, while creative, seldom reflected interdisciplinary or socio-political complexities of EJ. This trend signals a missed opportunity to empower learners as agents of systemic change. The review concludes that although awareness of environmental issues is growing in educational contexts, the integration of environmental justice remains marginal and superficial.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Environmental justice
• environmental education
• transformative learning
• critical pedagogy
• teacher education

Environmental Justice Education: Awareness or Transformation in Classrooms? A Systematic Review

Öz

Artan çevresel kriz, çevre eğitiminin (ÇE) yeniden ele alınmasını ve bu eğitimin adalet temelli, eleştirel ve dönüştürücü bir yaklaşımla yapılandırılmasını zorunlu kılmaktadır. Bu sistematik derleme, Ocak 2010 ile Şubat 2025 tarihleri arasında yayımlanmış 49 sınıf temelli uygulamayı PRISMA protokolüne göre inceleyerek, erken çocukluk, ilkokul ve öğretmen adaylarının eğitimi bağlamlarında çevresel adalet (ÇA) perspektifinin ne ölçüde yer bulduğunu ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. İnceleme kapsamında “içerik”, “uygulamaların derinliği”, “öğrenciden beklenen eylemler” ve “kullanılan materyaller” değişkenleri dikkate alınmıştır. Bulgular, uygulamaların çoğunlukla ekolojik farkındalığı arttırmaya yönelik olduğunu; ancak eleştirel düşünme, katılım ve toplumsal dönüşüm kapasitesi açısından sınırlı kaldığını göstermektedir. Öğrencilere verilen görevler, çoğunlukla bilgi aktarımına dayalı olup, katılımcı ve sorgulayıcı bir öğrenme ortamı yaratmakta yetersizdir. Kullanılan materyallerin büyük ölçüde öğretmen yapımı ve bireysel farkındalığı hedefleyen yapıda olması, ÇA bakış açısının sınıf pratiğine yeterince entegre edilmediğini göstermektedir. Bu durum, sistem düşüncesi, eleştirel okuryazarlık ve eylem yetkinliği gibi temel kazanımların arka planda kalmasına yol açmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çevresel adalet
• çevre eğitimi
• dönüştürücü öğrenme
• eleştirel pedagoji
• öğretmen eğitimi

Kaynakça

1. Agyeman, J. (2014). Environmental justice and sustainability. In G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, E. Neumayer, & M. Agarwala (Eds.), Handbook of sustainable development (2nd ed., pp. 188–205). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782544708.00021
2. Almond, R. E. A., Grooten, M., & Petersen, T. (2020). Living Planet Report 2020—Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. World Wildlife Fund. https://www.wwf.org.uk/updates/living-planet-report-2020
3. Ardoin, N. M., & Bowers, A. W. (2020). Early childhood environmental education: A systematic review of the research literature. Educational Research Review, 31, 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100353
4. Bächtold, M., Pallarès, G., De Checchi, K., & Munier, V. (2022). Combining debates and reflective activities to develop students’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(5), 761–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21843
5. Bartlett, M., Larson, J., & Lee, S. (2022). Environmental justice pedagogies and self-efficacy for climate action. Sustainability, 14(22), 15086. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215086
6. Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., & Knippels, M. C. P. J. (2022). Lessons learned: Synthesizing approaches that foster understanding of complex biological phenomena. In Fostering understanding of complex systems in biology education (pp. 249–278). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82750-2_13
7. Brocos, P., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2022). Social responsibility and critical disposition for considering and acting upon conflicting evidence in argumentation about sustainable diets. In B. Puig & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Critical thinking in biology and environmental education (pp. 211–227). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86100-2_11
8. Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin.

9. Clark, S. S., & Miles, M. L. (2021). Assessing the integration of environmental justice and sustainability in practice: A review of the literature. Sustainability, 13(20), 11238. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011238
10. Dawson, V., & Carson, K. (2020). Introducing argumentation about climate change socioscientific issues in a disadvantaged school. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 863–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9724-2
11. Dimick, A. S. (2012). Student empowerment in an environmental science classroom: Toward a framework for social justice science education. Science Education, 96(6), 990–1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21035
12. Esquivel-Martín, T., Pérez-Martín, J. M., & Bravo-Torija, B. (2023). Does pollution only affect human health? A scenario for argumentation in the framework of One Health education. Sustainability, 15(9), 6984. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15096984
13. Güler Yıldız, T., Öztürk, N., İlhan İyi, T., Aşkar, N., Banko Bal, Ç., Karabekmez, S., & Höl, Ş. (2021). Education for sustainability in early childhood education: A systematic review. Environmental Education Research, 27(6), 796–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1895364
14. Herman, B. C., Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2021). Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction on students’ contextualization of socioscientific orientations. Science Education, 105(3), 585–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21611
15. Herman, B. C., Poor, S. V., Oertli, R. T., & Schulte, K. (2023). Promoting young learners’ NOS views through place-based SSI instruction. Science Education, 32(4), 947–992. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21869
16. Hofman-Bergholm, M. (2018). Could education for sustainable development benefit from a systems thinking approach? Systems, 6(4), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6040043
17. Lele, S. (2017). Sustainable Development Goal 6: Watering down justice concerns. WIREs Water, 4(6), e1224. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1224
18. Liefländer, A. K., & Bogner, F. X. (2014). The effects of children’s age and sex on acquiring pro-environmental attitudes through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2013.875511
19. Lorenzo-Rial, M. A., Pérez-Rodríguez, U., Varela-Losada, M., & Vega-Marcote, P. (2020). Do pre-service teachers’ personal characteristics influence their attitudes towards transformative environmental education? Pensamiento Educativo, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.7764/PEL.57.1.2020.1
20. Martínez-Medina, R., & Arrebola, J. C. (2019). Analysis of sustainability activities in Spanish elementary education textbooks. Sustainability, 11(18), 5182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185182
21. Medir, R. M., Heras, R., & Magin, C. (2016). Una propuesta evaluativa para actividades de educación ambiental para la sostenibilidad. Educación XXI, 19(1), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.16436
22. Menton, M., Larrea, C., Latorre, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Peck, M., Temper, L., & Walter, M. (2020). Environmental justice and the SDGs: From synergies to gaps and contradictions. Sustainability Science, 15, 1621–1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00789-8
23. Mogensen, F., & Mayer, M. (2009). Perspectivas sobre la educación ambiental: Un marco de trabajo crítico. In F. Mogensen, M. Mayer, S. Breiting, & A. Narga (Eds.), Educación para el desarrollo sostenible. Tendencias, divergencias y criterios de calidad (pp. 21–42). Graó.
24. Moore, E. B. (2023). Utilization of a novel pedagogical framework to create and implement an environmental justice strategies undergraduate course: A case study. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00844-2
25. Mora, P., & Guerrero, G. (2022). Las competencias ambientales clave en las actividades docentes del profesorado de ciencias. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 51, 299–316. https://doi.org/10.15366/tp2022.51.17
26. Olsson, D., & Gericke, N. (2016). The adolescent dip in students’ sustainability consciousness. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1075464
27. Olsson, D., Gericke, N., & Boeve-de Pauw, J. (2022). The effectiveness of education for sustainable development revisited—A longitudinal study on secondary students’ action competence for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 28(3), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1954053
28. Otto, S., & Pensini, P. (2017). Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behavior. Global Environmental Change, 47, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009
29. Otto, S., Evans, G. W., Moon, M. J., & Kaiser, F. G. (2019). The development of children’s environmental attitude and behavior. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101947
30. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
31. Pérez-Martín, J. M., & Bravo-Torija, B. (2018). Experiencias para una alfabetización científica que promueva la justicia ambiental en distintos niveles educativos. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 7(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2018.7.1.006
32. Pérez-Martín, J. M., Esquivel-Martín, T., & Guevara-Herrero, I. (2022). En busca de la dimensión abandonada: La Didáctica de la Educación Ambiental. In J. M. Pérez-Martín, T. Esquivel-Martín, & I. Guevara-Herrero (Eds.), Educación Ambiental de Maestros Para Maestros (pp. 9–15). Dykinson.
33. Puig, B., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2022). The integration of critical thinking in biology and environmental education. In B. Puig & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Critical thinking in biology and environmental education (pp. 269–276). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86100-2_13
34. Rodríguez Aboytes, J. G., & Barth, M. (2020). Transformative learning in the field of sustainability: A systematic literature review (1999–2019). International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(5), 993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2019-0168
35. Shukla, H., & Ferrara, A. (1986). Rapid estimation of insertional length of umbilical catheters in newborns. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 140(8), 786–788. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1986.02140220068034
36. Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education (pp. 65–88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_5
37. Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. Dori, Z. Mevarech & D. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 65–88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_5
38. Stapp, W. B., Bennett, D., Bryan, W., Fulton, J., MacGregor, J., Nowak, P., Swan, J., Wall, R., & Havlick, S. (1969). The concept of environmental education. Environmental Education, 1(1), 30–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139254.1969.10801479
39. Tsuji, S. R. J. (2021). Indigenous environmental justice and sustainability: What is environmental assimilation? Sustainability, 13(15), 8382. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158382
40. UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
41. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
42. Uskola, A., & Puig, B. (2023). Development of systems and futures thinking skills by primary pre-service teachers for addressing epidemics. Research in Science Education, 53, 741–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10019-w
43. Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific literacy and social transformation. Science Education, 30(4), 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00237-0
44. Varela-Losada, M., Vega-Marcote, P., Pérez-Rodríguez, U., & Álvarez-Lires, M. (2016). Going to action? A literature review on educational proposals in formal Environmental Education. Environmental Education Research, 22(3), 390–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1101751
45. Walter, M., Weber, L., & Temper, L. (2020). Learning and teaching through the online Environmental Justice Atlas: From empowering activists to motivating students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 161, 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20408