Araştırma Makalesi

Uses of Probiotic Sources to Decrease the Phytic Acid Content of Chickpea

Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2 16 Mart 2026
PDF İndir
TR EN

Uses of Probiotic Sources to Decrease the Phytic Acid Content of Chickpea

Öz

Soaking is a common household practice used to improve the cooking quality and digestibility of legumes; however, its effect on phytic acid, a major antinutritional factor, varies depending on the soaking medium. This study investigated the impact of soaking chickpeas in some liquids—kefir, pickle juice, and their water-based mixtures—on phytic acid content and selected chemical and color properties. Chickpea samples were soaked for 24 or 48 hours in five different liquids, and phytic acid, moisture, ash, protein, fat, and color (L*, a*, b*) values were determined. Kefir and pickle juice were selected due to their probiotic content, which is believed to contribute to the breakdown of phytic acid. The initial phytic acid content of unsoaked chickpeas was 757.98 mg/100 g. Soaking significantly reduced phytic acid levels in all treatments (p<0.01), with kefir showing the strongest effect, lowering the value to 514.08 mg/100 g. Extending the soaking duration further enhanced the reduction, resulting in an average decrease of approximately 43% after 48 hours. This indicated that probiotic sources can reduce the phytic acid content in legumes when used as soaking liquid Soaking also caused significant changes in moisture, ash, and fat contents, while color parameters were influenced by both the type of soaking liquid and the duration. These findings indicate that probiotic sources, particularly kefir, may enhance phytate breakdown during soaking, potentially improving the mineral bioavailability of chickpeas. This practical approach can be easily applied in household cooking and may guide the development of nutritionally improved legume-based products. The lack of direct microbial enumeration and the use of a single chickpea variety are acknowledged as limitations and are discussed in the manuscript.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

Necmettin Erbakan University Scientific Research Projects (BAP) Coordination Unit

Proje Numarası

191322002

Etik Beyan

There is no need to obtain permission from the ethics committee for this study.

Kaynakça

  1. AACC (1990). Approved Method of the American Association of Cereal Chemists.
  2. Abd El-Hady, E. A. and Habiba, R. A. (2003). Effect of soaking and extrusion conditions on antinutrients and protein digestibility of legume seeds. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 36(3): 285-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(02)00217-7
  3. Abdel-Gawad, A. S. (1993). Effect of domestic processing on oligosaccharide content of some dry legume seeds. Food Chemistry, 46(1): 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(93)90070-V
  4. Ahire, J. J., Jakkamsetty, C., Kashikar, M. S., Lakshmi, S. G. and Madempudi, R. S. (2021). In vitro evaluation of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum UBLP40 isolated from traditional indigenous fermented food. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 13(5): 1413-1424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-021-09775-7
  5. Albarracín, M., González, R. J. and Drago, S. R. (2013). Effect of soaking process on nutrient bio-accessibility and phytic acid content of brown rice cultivar. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 53(1): 76-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2013.01.029
  6. Alves E., Ntungwe E. N., Gregório J., Rodrigues L. M., Pereira-Leite C., Caleja C., Pereira E., Barros L., Aguilar-Vilas M. V., Rosado C. and Rijo P. (2021). Characterization of kefir produced in household conditions: Physicochemical and nutritional profile, and storage stability. Foods, 10(5): 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051057
  7. Andrabi, S. T., Bhat, B., Gupta, M. and Bajaj, B. K. (2016). Phytase-producing potential and other functional attributes of lactic acid bacteria isolates for prospective probiotic applications. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 8: 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-016-9220-3
  8. Atudorei, D., Stroe, S. G. and Codină, G. G. (2021). Impact of germination on the microstructural and physicochemical properties of different legume types. Plants, 10(3): 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030592

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Hububat Teknolojisi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

16 Mart 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

28 Mayıs 2025

Kabul Tarihi

26 Şubat 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Okur, B., & Madenci, A. B. (2026). Uses of Probiotic Sources to Decrease the Phytic Acid Content of Chickpea. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 774-784. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1708065
AMA
1.Okur B, Madenci AB. Uses of Probiotic Sources to Decrease the Phytic Acid Content of Chickpea. JOTAF. 2026;23(2):774-784. doi:10.33462/jotaf.1708065
Chicago
Okur, Beyza, ve Ayşe Büşra Madenci. 2026. “Uses of Probiotic Sources to Decrease the Phytic Acid Content of Chickpea”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 23 (2): 774-84. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1708065.
EndNote
Okur B, Madenci AB (01 Mart 2026) Uses of Probiotic Sources to Decrease the Phytic Acid Content of Chickpea. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 23 2 774–784.
IEEE
[1]B. Okur ve A. B. Madenci, “Uses of Probiotic Sources to Decrease the Phytic Acid Content of Chickpea”, JOTAF, c. 23, sy 2, ss. 774–784, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.33462/jotaf.1708065.
ISNAD
Okur, Beyza - Madenci, Ayşe Büşra. “Uses of Probiotic Sources to Decrease the Phytic Acid Content of Chickpea”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 23/2 (01 Mart 2026): 774-784. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1708065.
JAMA
1.Okur B, Madenci AB. Uses of Probiotic Sources to Decrease the Phytic Acid Content of Chickpea. JOTAF. 2026;23:774–784.
MLA
Okur, Beyza, ve Ayşe Büşra Madenci. “Uses of Probiotic Sources to Decrease the Phytic Acid Content of Chickpea”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 23, sy 2, Mart 2026, ss. 774-8, doi:10.33462/jotaf.1708065.
Vancouver
1.Beyza Okur, Ayşe Büşra Madenci. Uses of Probiotic Sources to Decrease the Phytic Acid Content of Chickpea. JOTAF. 01 Mart 2026;23(2):774-8. doi:10.33462/jotaf.1708065