University of Cape Verde
Recently it was shown through simulations studies that Sub-D produces estimates with unbiased and lower variance-covariance estimates than the ANOVA-based estimator, ex- cept in case of random “one-way” balanced designs. In this designs the simulations studies suggested they have the same variance-covariance estimates. This paper aims to compare the common ANOVA-based estimator to Sub-D in random “one-way” designs with two groups of treatment and in random “one-way” balanced designs. The comparison will be conducted through theoretical results and corroborated with simulation studies. It will be proved that the ANOVA-base estimator and Sub-D have exactly the same variance- covariance estimates in both above referred designs. The proof will be given firstly for random “one-way” designs with two groups of treatment and then for random “one-way” balanced designs.
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | İstatistik |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 31 Aralık 2020 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2020 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2 |