Türkiye-AB İlişkilerinde Bir İmkan Olarak Gümrük Birliği ve Harici Farklılaştırılmış Entegrasyon

Yıl 2022, , 897 - 921, 30.04.2022

Önder Aytaç Afşar

https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.1063454

Öz

Münasebetleri eskiye dayanan taraflar olarak AB ile bölgesinde önemli bir ülke olan Türkiye arasındaki ilişkilerin kopmadan belirli bir düzeyde devam etmesi her iki tarafında faydasınadır. Brexit sonrası genişleme yorgunu bir AB ve entegrasyonun geleceği tartışılırken, Türkiye’nin bu bütünleşme içinde nasıl ve ne şekilde yer alacağı da merak konusudur. AB’den uzun yıllar boyunca üyelik için olumu işaret alamayan ancak bununla beraber AB ile de belirli bir çizgide ilişkisini sürdürmek isteyen Türkiye ile Türkiye’yi tamamen kaybetmek istemeyen bir AB vardır. Taraflar arasındaki münasebetlerin belirli bir düzeyde devamı için mevcut Gümrük Birliği entegrasyonu korunması, geliştirilmesi gereken bir ortaklık biçimi olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Türkiye’nin AB ile geliştirdiği Gümrük Birliği ilişkileri, iktisadi nitelikli, üyelik harici derin ve kapsamlı münasebetlerin mümkün olabildiği bir alandır. Tam üyelik yakın gelecekte mümkün olmayacaksa karşılıklı menfaatlerin yüksek olduğu ekonomik alanda Gümrük Birliği zemininde gelişecek iyi ilişkilerin siyasi alana da olumlu yansıması olacaktır. Çalışma, Gümrük Birliği ekseninde harici farklılaştırılmış entegrasyon kuramları ışığında Türkiye ile AB arasındaki ilişkilerin seyrini ve bütünleşme ihtimalini araştırmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türkiye-AB ilişkileri, Gümrük Birliği, Farklılaştırılmış Entegrasyon

Customs Union and External Differentiated Integration as an Opportunity in Turkey-EU Relations

Öz

It is to the benefit of both parties that the relations between the EU and Turkey, which is an important country in its region, as parties with long-standing relations, continue at a certain level without breaking. While discussing a post-Brexit-weary EU and the future of integration, it is also a matter of curiosity how and how Turkey will take part in this integration. There is an EU that does not want to lose Turkey completely, and Turkey, which has not been able to get a positive sign for membership from the EU for many years, but still wants to maintain its relationship with the EU in a certain line. In order for the relations between the parties to continue at a certain level, the existing Customs Union integration is considered as a form of partnership that needs to be maintained and developed. The Customs Union relations that Turkey has developed with the EU is an area where deep and comprehensive relations with an economic nature are possible. If full membership will not be possible for Turkey in the near future, good relations that will develop on the basis of the Customs Union in the economic field, where mutual benefits are high, will also have a positive reflection on the political field. The study investigates the course of relations between Turkey and the EU and the possibility of integration in the light of external differentiated integration theories on the axis of the Customs Union

Anahtar Kelimeler

Turkey-EU relations, Customs Union, Differentiated Integration

Kaynakça

• AB Delegasyonu (2018). Varna'da (Bulgaristan) AB-Türkiye liderleri toplantısı. 27.03.2018. Erişim tarihi: 10.12.2021 https://www.avrupa.info.tr/tr/pr/varnada-bulgaristan-ab-turkiye-liderleri-toplantisi-7529
• AB Delegasyonu (2019). Avrupa Birliği-Türkiye Ortaklık Konseyi 54. toplantısı sonrası Yapılan Basın Açıklaması, 15.03.2019. Erişim tarihi: 10.12.2021 https://www.avrupa.info.tr/tr/news/avrupa-birligi-turkiye-ortaklik-konseyi-54-toplantisi-sonrasi-yapilan-basin-aciklamasi-bruksel
• Andersen, S. S. & Sitter, N. (2006) Differentiated ıntegration: what is it and how much can the eu accommodate?. Journal of European Integration, 28(4) 313-330.
• Avrupa Birliği Başkanlığı (2019). Türkiye-Avrupa Birliği İlişkileri, 19.07.2019. Erişim tarihi: 23.12.2021 https://www.ab.gov.tr/4.html
• Avrupa Komisyonu (2012). Positive EU-Turkey agenda launched in Ankara. Brussels, 17.05.2012. MEMO/12/359 Erişim tarihi: 23.12.2021 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_12_359 Avrupa Komisyonu (2016). Impact Assessment, Commission Staff Working Document Brussels, 21.12.2016, SWD(2016) 475 final, Erişim tarihi: 23.12.2021 http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/january/tradoc_155238.pdf
• Avrupa Komisyonu (2017). White paper on the future of europe reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025, Brussels, 01.03.2017, COM(2017), Erişim tarihi: 27.12.2021 https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/white-paper-future-europe_en
• Avrupa Konseyi (2014). European Council 26/27 June 2014 conclusions, Brussels, 27.06.2014, EUCO 79/14. Erişim tarihi: 27.12.2021 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/143478.pdf
• Avrupa Konseyi (2016). Outcome of the Councıl meeting, Brussels, 13.12.2016, 15536/16, Erişim tarihi: 29.12.2021, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21524/st15536en16.pdf
• Avrupa Konseyi (2018). Outcome of proceedings, Brussels, 26.06.2018, 10555/18, Erişim tarihi: 29.12.2021, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21524/st15536en16.pdf
• Avrupa Konseyi (2019). European Council Conclusions, Brussels, 12.12.2019, EUCO 29/19, Erişim tarihi: 29.12.2021, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/41768/12-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdf
• Avrupa Konseyi (2020). Special meeting of the European Council Conclusions, Brussels, 02.10.2020, EUCO 13/20, Erişim tarihi: 29.12.2021, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/45910/021020-euco-final-conclusions.pdf
• Avrupa Konseyi (2021). Outcome of the Proceedings, Brussels, 25.06.2021, EUCO 7/21, Erişim tarihi: 09.12.2021, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/50763/2425-06-21-euco-conclusions-en.pdf
• Avrupa Parlamentosu (2016). European Parliament resolution of 24 November 2016 on EU-Turkey relations, Brussels, 24.11.201 2016/2993(RSP), Erişim tarihi: 29.12.2021, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0450_EN.html
• Baç, M. M. (2005). Turkey’s political reforms and the impact of the European Union, South East European Society and Politics, 10(1), 17-19.
• Bertoncini, Y. (2017). Differentiated integration and the EU: a variable geometry legitimacy, In EU60: Re-Founding Europe The Responsibility to Propose, IAI Paper Series.1-17.
• Çalış, Ş. (1995). The Turkish State's Identity and Foreign Policy Decision-Making Process. Mediterranean Quarterly, 6(2) 135-155.
• Deutsche Welle (28.05.2017). Germany rejects calls for EU to end Turkey accession talks. Erişim tarihi: 17.12.2021, https://www.dw.com/en/germany-rejects-calls-for-eu-to-end-turkey-accession-talks/a-38629155
• Deutsche Welle (29.08.2021). Almanya Dışişleri Bakanı Maas'tan Türkiye'ye ziyaret. Erişim tarihi: 17.12.2021, https://www.dw.com/tr/almanya-d%C4%B1%C5%9Fi%C5%9Fleri-bakan%C4%B1-maastan-t%C3%BCrkiyeye-ziyaret/a-59013497
• Deutsche Welle, (22.02.2018). Hahn: Stratejik ortaklığa yoğunlaşalım. Erişim tarihi: 17.12.2021, https://www.dw.com/tr/hahn-stratejik-ortakl%C4%B1%C4%9Fa-yo%C4%9Funla%C5%9Fal%C4%B1m/a-42689640?maca=tur-rss-tur-all-1495-rdf
• Dışişleri Bakanlığı. (2019). Gümrük Birliği, 12.07.2019. Erişim tarihi: 21.12.2021 https://www.ab.gov.tr/gumruk-birligi_46234.html
• Dünya Bankası. (2014). AB-Türkiye Gümrük Birliği değerlendirmesi. Rapor No. 85830-TR, Erişim tarihi: 15.12.2021.
• https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/eca/turkey/tr-eu-customs-union-tr.pdf
• Ekonomi Bakanlığı. (2017). Gümrük Birliği güncellenmesi etki analizi basın bildirisi, Erişim tarihi: 29.12.2021 https://ticaret.gov.tr/blog/ekonomi-haberleri/gumruk-birligi-guncellenmesi-etki-analizi-basin-bildirisi
• Euronews. (5.112018). Erdoğan: Avrupa Birliği üyeliği için referanduma gideriz. Erişim tarihi: 09.12.2021, https://tr.euronews.com/2018/10/05/erdogan-avrupa-birligi-uyeligi-icin-referanduma-gideriz
• Express (29.082018). You don’t understand fury as Macron brands Turkey anti-European. Erişim tarihi: 07.12.2021, https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1010174/emmanuel-macron-news-turkey-european-union-latest.
• George, S. (1998). An awkward partner: Britain and the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gotev, G. (2017). Commission urges, different type of relations with Turkey, EurActiv, 25.05.2017, Erişim tarihi: 09.12.2021, http://www.euractiv.com/section/justice-home-affairs/news/commission-urges-different-type-of-relations-with-turkey/
• Gstöhl, S. (2015). Models of external differentiation in the EU’s neighbourhood: an expanding economic community? Journal of European Public Policy 22(6), 884–870.
• Gstöhl, S. (2016). Brexit’ lessons from third countries’ differentiated integration with the EU’s internal market. College of Europe Policy Brief. Erişim tarihi: 29.12.2021, http://aei.pitt.edu/93089/1/gstohl_cepob_14-16_final.pdf
• Holzinger, K. & Schimmelfennig, F. (2012). Differentiated integration in the European Union: many concepts, sparse theory, few data. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), 292-305.
• İktisadi Kalkınma Vakfı (2019). Turkey-EU High level economic dialogue meeting was held ın Istanbul, IKV Monthly Newsletter, 47, Erişim tarihi: 27.12.2021 https://www.ikv.org.tr/ikv.asp?id=606
• Janning, J. & Zunneberg, C. (2017). The invisible web: from interaction to coalition-building in the European Union. European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). 22.05.2017.
• Karakaş, C. (2013). EU–Turkey: Integration without full membership or membership without full ıntegration? A conceptual framework for accession alternatives. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6), 1057–1073.
• Karpat, K H. (2013). Türk demokrasi tarihi sosyal, ekonomik, kültürel temeller. İstanbul: Timaş.
• Keohane, O. R., & Nye, S. J. (1987). Power and interdependence revisited. International Organization, 41(4), 725–753.
• Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanization of national administrations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Koenig, N. (2015). A differentiated view of differentiated integration. Policy Paper, Jacques Delors Institut, Erişim tarihi: 09.12.2021 http://www.delorsinstitut.de/2015/wpcontent/uploads/2015/07/20150723_DifferentiatedIntegration_JDIB_Nicole-Koenig.pdf.
• Lavenex, S. (2015). The external face of differentiated integration: third country participation in EU sectoral bodies. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 836-853.
• Leruth, B., Gänzle, S. & Trondal, J. (2019). Exploring differentiated disintegration in a post‐brexit European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(5), 1013-1030.
• Leuffen, D., Rittberger, B., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2012). Differentiated integration: explaining variation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Moravcsik, A. & Schimmelfennig F. (2009). Liberal Intergovernmentalism. In A. Wiener T. Diez, (Ed). European Integration Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Müftüler-Baç, M. (2017). Turkey’s future with the European Union: an alternative model of differentiated integration.” Turkish Studies 18(3), 416–438.
• Müftüler-Baç, M. (2005). Turkey’s political reforms and the impact of the European Union. South East European Society and Politics, 10(1) s.16-30.
• Nas, Ç. Türkiye-AB ilişkilerinde yeni dönem: olasılıklar, beklentiler. PerspektifOnline, Erişim tarihi: 12.12.2021. https://www.perspektif.online/turkiye-ab-iliskilerinde-yeni-donem-olasiliklar-beklentiler/
• Olsen, J. P. (2010). Governing through ınstitution building. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Reuters (30.11.2016). Merkel does not see EU expanding membership talks with Turkey. Erişim tarihi: 19.12.2021, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-europe-germany-idUSKBN13O2YY.
• Saatçioğlu, B., Tekin, F., Ekim, S., & Tocci, N. (2019). The future of EU-Turkey relations: a dynamic association framework amidst conflictual cooperation. FEUTURE synthesis paper, Istituto Affari Internazionali, Cologne: University of Cologne, 1-37.
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2016). Good governance and differentiated integration: Graded membership in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 55, 789-810.
• Schimmelfennig, F., Leuffen, D., & Rittberger, B. (2015). The European Union as a system of differentiated ıntegration: ınterdependence, politicization and differentiation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 764-782.
• Stubb, Alexander C. G. (1996). A categorization of differentiated integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(2), 283-295.
• Ticaret Bakanlığı (2021a). Gümrük Birliği Neden Güncelleniyor? 21.09.2021, Erişim tarihi: 15.12.2021, https://ticaret.gov.tr/dis-iliskiler/avrupa-birligi/gumruk-birliginin-guncelleme-sureci
• Ticaret Bakanlığı (2021b). Turkey and the EU. Erişim tarihi: 29.12.2021 https://www.trade.gov.tr/turkey-and-eu/turkey-and-the-eu
• Turhan, E. (2018). External differentiated integration between Turkey and the EU: challenges and prospects. Global Review of Social Sciences 1(2), 1-12.
• Ülgen, S. (2012) Avoiding a divorce: a virtual EU membership for Turkey, The Carnegie Papers, Brussels: Carnegie Europe. Erişim tarihi: 23.12.2021, https://carnegieeurope.eu/2012/12/05/avoiding-divorce-virtual-eu-membership-for-turkey-pub-50218
• Yabancı, B. (2016). The Future of EU-Turkey Relations: Between Mutual Distrust and Interdependency. FEUTURE Online Paper 1, https://www.feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/user_upload/Yabanci_Online_Paper_No1_new.pdf.
• Yalcin, E. & Felbermayr, G. (2021). The EU-Turkey Customs Union and trade relations: what options for the future? In-depth Analysis required by the INTA Committee, 28-29.07.2021 Erişim tarihi: 19.12.2021 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2021/653640/EXPO_IDA(2021)653640_EN.pdf
• Yılmaz, K. (2015). TTIP and EU-Turkish economic relations: deepening the customs union, global Turkey in Europe 21. Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali, March 2015, Erişim tarihi:11.12.2021 http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/gte_pb_21.pdf