Rightful Resistance: A Discursive Third Realm?
Öz
This article aims to bring a new angle to the literature by joining ‘rightful resistance’ of O’Brien and ‘third realm’ of Huang. It questions whether rightful resistance is a third realm or not. The main thesis is that rightful resistance is a discursive third realm. This thesis is expounded in five parts. After the introduction of ‘rightful resistance’ in the first part; in the second part, civil society and public sphere as first alternatives coming to mind are examined in terms of applicability and conceptualization. It is argued that such applications and conceptualizations have some difficulties preventing the accurate grasp of the reality because of the historical baggage and ambivalent definitions of the concepts. In the third part, Huang’s concept of ‘third realm’ is delineated. In the fourth part, it is explained how rightful resistance constructs a third realm. It is claimed that this is a discursive third realm since the construction is realised through the discourse. Besides, feasibility of rightful resistance’s operationalization is discussed. Fragmented authoritarianism is suggested to make an efficient third realm for resisters possible. In the last part, these arguments are demonstrated through the Wukan Incident. In the conclusion, some potential criticisms are handled.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Bayat, A. (2013). Areas and Ideas. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 33(3), 260-3.
- Bohman, J. (2004). Expanding Dialogue: The Internet, the Public Sphere and Prospects for Transnational Democracy. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 131-55.
- Brandtstӓdter, S. (2006). Book review of ‘Rightful Resistance in Rural China’. Journal of Peasant Studies, 33(4), 710-2.
- Calhoun, C. (1998). Community without Propinquity Revisited: Communications Technology and the Transformation of the Urban Public Sphere. Sociological Inquiry, 68(3), 373-97.
- Chakrabarty, D. (2009). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.
- Chuang, J. (2014). China's Rural Land Politics: Bureaucratic Absorption and the Muting of Rightful Resistance. The China Quarterly, 219, 649-69.
- Dirlik, A. (2013). Thinking Modernity Historically: Is ‘Alternative Modernity’ the Answer. The Asian Review of World Histories, 1(1), 5-44.
- Hua, R., Yuxin H., & Deng, G. (2015). Instrumental Civil Rights and Institutionalized Participation in China: A Case Study of Protest in Wukan Village. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1-19.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
Sosyoloji
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Sümeyye Sakarya
SOCIAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF ANKARA
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
31 Ocak 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi
17 Mayıs 2017
Kabul Tarihi
29 Ocak 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2018 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1