PERFORMATİF BİR BAKIŞ AÇISINDAN ALMANYA’DAKİ TÜRKÇE KONUŞANLARIN DİL HAKLARINI ARAMA PRATİKLERİ

Yıl 2020, , 1320 - 1332, 01.07.2020

Anlam Filiz

https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.731162

Öz

Almanya’daki Türkçe konuşan nüfusun dil hakları, onların Türk kültürüyle olan bağları ve Almanya toplumundaki konumları hakkındaki tartışmaların merkezinde yer almaktadır. Akademisyenler, dil haklarını insan hakları ve kültürel haklar bağlamlarında kavramsallaştırarak bu tür tartışmaları anlamamıza katkıda bulunmuşlardır. Bu kavramsallaştırmalar, yasal eşitsizlikleri ortaya çıkarmış ve bunların üstesinden gelmenin yollarını bulmayı amaçlamıştır. Bu makalede, bu yazından yararlanmakla birlikte tartışmanın odak noktasını Türklerin dil haklarından onların hak arama pratiklerine çevirmekteyim. Bunun için de feminist siyaset bilimci Karen Zivi’nin haklar konusundaki performatif (gerçekleştirici) yaklaşımını Almanya’da Türkçe konuşan nüfusun dil hakları konusundaki tartışmaya dahil ediyorum. Bu performatif bakış açısı, çokça kullanılan entegrasyon, ayrımcılık, insan hakları ve kültürel haklar çerçevelerine bir alternatif sunar. Bu yaklaşım, Almanya’daki Türkçe konuşan nüfusun dil haklarını talep etme yoluyla toplumlarındaki yerlerini müzakere ettiklerini ortaya koyar. Aynı zamanda, bu makale, bu tartışmalardaki odak noktasını Almanya Devleti’nden uzaklaştırıp Almanya’daki Türkçe konuşanlara çevirir ve onları eylemliliği olan siyasi aktörler, onların hak iddia etme pratiklerini de Almanya toplumunda anlaşılma biçimlerini yeniden şekillendirme girişimleri olarak kurar.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Almanya'daki Türkçe konuşanlar, Dil hakları, Hak arama, Feminist siyaset kuramı, Performativite

TURKISH SPEAKERS’ LINGUISTIC RIGHTS CLAIMING PRACTICES IN GERMANY FROM A PERFORMATIVE PERSPECTIVE

Öz

Turkish speakers’ linguistic rights in Germany have been central to the debates about their ties to Turkish culture as well as their place in the German society. Scholars have contributed to our understanding of such debates by conceptualizing linguistic rights as human rights and as cultural rights. These conceptualizations reveal legal inequalities and aim at finding ways to overcome them. In this article, I build on this literature, shifting the focus from Turks’ linguistic rights to their rights claiming practices. For this, I introduce feminist political scientist Karen Zivi’s performative approach to rights into the discussion on Turkish speakers’ linguistic rights in Germany. This performative perspective provides an alternative to the widely used frameworks of integration, discrimination, human rights and cultural rights. This approach demonstrates that Turkish speakers in Germany negotiate their place in their society by claiming their linguistic rights. This article also shifts the focus in these discussions away from the German state and to Turkish speakers themselves and establishes Turkish speakers in Germany as political actors with agency and their rights claiming practices as attempts to reshape the way they are understood in the German society.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Turkish speakers in Germany, Linguistic rights, Rights claiming, Feminist political theory, Performativity

Kaynakça

• Referans1 Adıgüzel, Y. (2011). Almanya’da kültürel çatışma alanı olarak ‘Türkçe.’ Sosyoloji Dergisi, 3(22), 231–251.
• Referans2 Adler, A. & Beyer, R. (2018). Languages and language policies in Germany/Sprachen und sprachpolitik in Deutschland. In Stickel, G. (Ed), National Language Institutions and National Languages. Contributions to the EFNIL Conference 2017 in Mannheim.. 221–242: Budapest: Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
• Referans3 Arzoz, X. (2007). The nature of language rights. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe. 6(2), 1–35.
• Referans4 Baubock, R. (1996). Cultural minority rights for immigrants. The International Migration Review, 30(1), 203–250.
• Referans5 Beck, E. (1999). Language rights and Turkish children in Germany. Patterns of Prejudice, 33(2), 3–12.
• Referans6 Bachner, A. (2019, March 19). Konzern bestätigt vorfall: Türkisch-verbot für mitarbeiter in BMW-abteilung. Bild Deutschland, 6.
• Referans7 Brown, W. (1995). States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
• Referans8 Bruns, H. (2016, October 12). Diskussion um Berliner schule: Türkischer Bund Berlin: ‘Deutschpflicht in der pause ist diskriminierend.’ BZ-Berlin. Retrieved from https://www.bz-berlin.de/berlin/tuerkischer-bund-berlin-deutschpflicht-in-der-pause-ist-diskriminierend (Accessed: 25.02.2020).
• Referans9 Dahre, U. J. (2010). There are no such things as universal human rights – on the predicament of indigenous peoples, for example. The International Journal of Human Rights, 14(5), 641–657.
• Referans10 Focus Online (2019, March 20). Kuriose order: Chef verbietet mitarbeitern in Münchener BMW-Werk Türkisch zu reden. FOCUS Online. Retrieved from https://www.focus.de/finanzen/news/vorfall-in-garchinger-abteilung-vorarbeiter-verbietet-mitarbeitern-in-muenchener-bmw-werk-tuerkisch-zu-reden_id_10471224.html. (Accessed: 25.02.2020).
• Referans11 Garcia, N. (2014). Debating language regimes and citizenship: The politics of multilingualism and the (non)recognition of multiple identities in Germany. IPSA 23rd World Congress of Political Science. Montreal, Québec - Canada. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/73ba/1c2ea8ac7e4b2cdd0dba30f50b90865ed5de.pdf
• Referans12 Göktürk, D., Gramling, D., & Kaes, A. (Eds) (2007). Germany in transit: Nation and migration 1955-2005. Berkeley: Los Angeles: London: University of California Press.
• Referans13 Jovanović, M. A. (2005). Recognizing minority identities through collective rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 27(2), 625–651.
• Referans1 4 Koçak, M. (2012). Almanya’da yaşayan Türklerin Türkçe dil becerileri üzerine bir inceleme. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken, 4(1), 303–313.
• Referans15 Koopmans, R. (2010). Trade-offs between equality and difference: Immigrant integration, multiculturalism and the welfare state in cross-national perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(1), 1–26.
• Referans16 Koopmans, R. & Statham, P. (1999). Challenging the liberal nation‐state? Postnationalism, multiculturalism, and the collective claims making of migrants and ethnic minorities in Britain and Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 652–696.
• Referans17 Lill, T. (2019, March 29). Rassismus-streit bei BMW: Man spricht deutsch. Retrieved from https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/rassismus-streit-bei-bmw-gibt-es-ein-fremdsprachen-verbot-a-e6a0a5f8-ed2d-417c-ac45-05954b1bb9e8. (Accessed: 25.02.2020).
• Referans18 Martin, L. (2008). ‘Speak German or sweep the schoolyard’: Linguistic human rights in Germany. Profession, 2008(1), 130–145.
• Referans19 Sakın, B. (2018). Almanya Türklerinin dil tutumları üzerine toplumdilbilimsel bir araştırma. Curr Res Soc Sci, 4(1), 1–17.
• Referans20 Skutnabb-Kangas, T. & Phillipson, R. (1998). Language in human rights. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands), 60(1), 27–46.
• Referans21 Soysal, Y. N. (1994). Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Referans22 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (1996). World conference on linguistic rights: Barcelona Declaration. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000104267 (Accessed: 29.02.2020).
• Referans23 Voss, K., Silva, F. & Bloemraad, I. (2019). The limits of rights: Claims-making on behalf of immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–29.
• Referans24 Williams, P. J. (1991). The alchemy of race and rights: Diary of a law professor. Cambridge, Massachusetts: London, England: Harvard University Press.
• Referans25 Woodiwiss, A. (2002). Human rights and the challenge of cosmopolitanism. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(1–2), 139–155.
• Referans26 Yurdakul, G. (2009). From guestworkers into Muslims: The transformation of Turkish immigrant associations in Germany. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Referans27 Zivi, K. (2005). Feminism and the politics of rights: A qualified defense of identity-based rights claiming. Politics & Gender, 1(3), 377–397.