Araştırmanın tüm aşamaları etik ilkelere uygun olarak yürütülmüştür. Bu çalışmanın gerekli etik kurul izinleri, Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırma Önerisi Etik Değerlendirme Kurulu'ndan 30.04.2023 tarihinde 290527 evrak numarası ve E-50704946-100-290527 karar numarası ile alınmıştır.
Bu çalışma, TÜBİTAK Bilim İnsanı Destek Programları Başkanlığı (BİDEB) tarafından yürütülen 2209-A Üniversite Öğrencileri Araştırma Projeleri Destekleme Programı kapsamında desteklenmiştir.
1919B012222448
Bu çalışma, TÜBİTAK Bilim İnsanı Destek Programları Başkanlığı (BİDEB) tarafından yürütülen 2209-A Üniversite Öğrencileri Araştırma Projeleri Destekleme Programı kapsamında desteklenmiştir. Çalışma, 2022 yılı 2. döneminde e numaralı başvuru ile destek almaya hak kazanmıştır. Sağlanan destek için TÜBİTAK’a teşekkür ederiz.
This study was conducted using the scaling method based on classification judgments in order to determine the reasons for the department preference among students at the Faculty of Sport Sciences. The study was conducted at Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Sport Sciences, during the 2022-2023 academic year and was completed with the participation of 297 students from the departments of Physical Education and Sports Teaching, Coaching Education, and Sport Management. Within the scope of the research, data were collected through a questionnaire that was revised based on expert opinions and comprised 37 statements. The data obtained were analyzed using Excel and R statistical programs. The results showed that individual factors played a primary role in students’ reasons for choosing their department. The results indicate that individual factors are the most significant determinants of students’ departmental preferences, with “my aptitude for the profession” and “my interest in the profession” cited most frequently. These were followed by environmental factors, particularly job opportunities and institutional infrastructure. In contrast, social influences, such as advice from family and peers, played a less prominent role. Notable differences emerged between departments: Coaching Education students prioritized career aptitude, while those in Physical Education and Sports Teaching emphasized alignment with future goals and job prospects. Sport Management students, on the other hand, focused more on the enjoyment derived from participation in sporting activities. Overall, while personal interests and career objectives were central to students’ choices, departmental characteristics also contributed to shaping their preferences.
Faculty of sport sciences Reasons for department preference Classification and ranking scaling Motivational factors in university choice
1919B012222448
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Pedagojisi, Egzersiz ve Spor Bilimleri (Diğer) |
| Bölüm | Orijinal Makale |
| Yazarlar | |
| Proje Numarası | 1919B012222448 |
| Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 24 Haziran 2025 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Haziran 2025 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 1 Ocak 2025 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 24 Haziran 2025 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2025 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2 |