Sudan'da Güney Ayrılıkçı Hareketi ve İç Savaş Yılları, 1955-1972

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 189 - 207, 30.12.2024

Abdullah Özdağ

https://doi.org/10.38000/juhis.1520969

Öz

20. yüzyılın ilk yarısında İngiltere ve Mısır’ın eş idaresinde yönetilen Sudan’ın toplumsal yapısındaki çeşitlilik, idari kurumların tesis edilmeye başlamasıyla modern devlet yapılanmasına geçiş aşamasında önemli krizlerin doğmasına neden olmuştur. Dil, din ve gelenekler bakımından Kuzey’in İslam’ı ve Arap kültürünü önceleyen toplumsal yapısına uyum sağlayamayan Güney Sudanlıların, yeni organize olan kurumlar üzerinde eşit haklar talep etmeleri iç huzursuzluğun çıkmasına neden olmuştur. Bağımsızlık sonrasında Güneyliler, ülkelerinin geleceğinde daha fazla söz sahibi olmak için Merkezi hükümete karşı örgütlü olarak mücadele etmişlerdir. Kuzeyli liderlerin baskın, egemen ve merkeziyetçi yönetim biçimleri, Güneylilerin otonomi ve sonrasında tam bağımsızlık söylemleriyle radikalleşmesinin arkasındaki itici güç olmuştur. Ülkenin egemenlik mücadelesinin silahlı örgütler aracılığıyla organize olarak yürütüldüğü 1960'lı yıllar Sudan’daki toplumsal barışı ortadan kaldırdığı gibi taraflar arasında onarılması güç düşmanlıklar yaratmıştır. Bu çalışmada Sudan’ın bağımsızlık öncesi ve sonrasında kurumlar üzerindeki temsil meselesi (Güney-Kuzey mücadelesi) ve iç savaşa neden olan politik süreçler analiz edilmeye çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sudan, Güney Sudan, Ayrılıkçılık, Otonomi, İç Savaş

The Southern Separatist Movement and the Civil War Years in Sudan, 1955-1972

Öz

The diversity regarding the social construct of Sudan, co-ruled under Anglo-Egyptian Condominium, during the former half of 20th century led to remarkable crises with the administrative organisations commencing to be instituted during the process of transition into modern governmental structuring. The Southern Sudanese, unable to adapt to the Northern social construction prioritising Islam and Arabic culture regarding language, religion and traditions, claiming equal rights concerning newly organised institutions sparked civil unrest. Upon independence, Southerners struggled against the central government in an organized way to have more say on the future of their country. The dominant, sovereign and center-oriented policies of the Northerner leaders posed as the trigger underlying the Southerners being radicalized with their discourses incorporating initially autonomy, and later total independence. The 1960’s, when the independence effort of the nation was carried out via armed organisations systematically, not only eradicated the peaceful atmosphere, but also brought out hostility between the parties formidable to overcome. This study analyzes the representation issue (South-North Rivalry) regarding institutions during pre and post-independence periods and the political processes bringing forth the civil war.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sudan, South Sudan, Separatism, Autonomy, Civil War.

Kaynakça

• [1]A.B.H (1955), “The Sudan for the Sudanese: The Threshold of Self-Determination”, The World Today, V.11/10, (421-230).
• [2]Abd Al-Rahim, Muddathir (1970), “Africanism, and Self-Identification in the Sudan”, The Journal of Modern African Studies, 8/2. (233-249).
• [3]Aguda, Oluwadare (1973), “Arabism and Pan-Arabism in Sudanese Politics”, The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, (177-200).
• [4]Agwanda Billy and Özoral Başak (2020), “The Sixth Zone: Historical Roots of African Diaspora and Pan-Africanism in African Development”, Journal of Universal History Studies (JUHIS), 3(1), (53-72).
• [5]An-Na'im, Abdullahi Ahmed (1989), “Constitutionalism and Islamization in the Sudan”, Africa Today, 1989, Vol. 36, No. 3/4, (11-28).
• [6]Awad, Mohamed Hashim (1974), “The Southern Sudan: Planning For National Integration”, Sudan Notes and Records, Khartoum, Vol. 55, (88-95).
• [7]Beshir, M. O. (1980), “Ethnicity, Regionalism And National Cohesion In The Sudan”, Sudan Notes and Records, Vol. 61, (1-14).
• [8]Bob, Ali (1990), “Islam, The State And Politics In The Sudan”, Northeast African Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2/3, (201-220).
• [9]Collins, Carole (1976), “Colonialism and Class Struggle in Sudan”, MERIP Reports, No: 46, (3-17).
• [10]Collins, Robert and Herzog, Richard (1961), “Early British Administration In The Southern Sudan”, The Journal of African History, 2/1, (119-135).
• [11]Collins, Robert O. (1963), “The Independent Sudan”, Current History, North Africa, Vol. 44, (13-21).
• [12]Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn (1990), “Islamization in Sudan: A Critical Assessment”, Middle East Journal, 44/4, (610-623).
• [13]Gosnell, Harold F. (1958), “The 1958 Elections in the Sudan”, Middle East Journal, Vol. 12, No. 4, (409-417).
• [14]Gray, Richard (1971), “The Southern Sudan”, Journal of Contemporary History, 6/1, (108-120).
• [15]Henderson, K.D.D.(1965), Sudan Republic, Ernest Benn Limited, London.
• [16]Holt, Peter M. (1961), A Modern History of the Sudan, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.
• [17]Holt, Peter M. and Daly, M.W. Daly (1979), A History of The Sudan, Longman, London.
• [18]Howell, John and M. Beshir Hamid (1969), “Sudan and the outside World, 1964-1968”, African Affairs, 68/273. (299-305).
• [19]Howell, John (1973), “Politics in the Southern Sudan, African Affairs”, Vol. 72, No. 287, (163-178)
• [20]Kok, Peter (1996), Sudan: Between Radical Restructuring and Deconstruction of State Systems, Review of African Political Economy, 23/70, (555-562).
• [21]Kyle, Keith (1966), The Southern Problem in the Sudan, The World Today, Vol. 22, No. 12, (512-520).
• [22]Leriche, Matthew and Arnold, Matthew (2013), South Sudan From Revolution to Independence, Oxford University Press, Newyork.
• [23]Malwal, Bona (2015), Sudan and South Sudan, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• [24]McClintock, David Wm. (1970), “The Southern Sudan Problem: Evolution of an Arab - African Confrontation”, Middle East Journal, 24/4, (466-478).
• [25]Mihatsch, Moritz A. (2021), “Dependence after independence: Sudan’s bounded sovereignty 1956–1958”, Journal of Eastern African Studies, 15/2, (236-254).
• [26]Özdağ, Abdullah (2024), “The Self-Determination Process in Sudan Towards the End of the Condominium”, Gazi Akademik Bakış, 17(34), 43-63.
• [27]Rolandsen Øystein H. (2011), “The making of the Anya-Nya insurgency in the Southern Sudan”, 1961–64, Journal of Eastern African Studies, 5/2, (211-232).
• [28]Rolandsen, Øystein H. and Daly, M. W. (2016), A History of South Sudan, Cambridge University Press, London.
• [29]Sudan Archive Durham (SAD)
• [30]The National Archieve, Public Record Office Foreign Office (PRO.FO.)
• [31]Wai, Dunstan M. ( 1979), “Solution, Rhetoric, and Reality in the Sudan”, The Journal of Modern African St2dies, 17/1, (71-93).
• [32]Wakoson, Elias Nyamlell (1990), “Sudan's Addis Ababa Peace Treaty: Why It Failed”, Northeast African Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2/3, (19-53).
• [33]Warburg, Gabriel (2005), “From Mahdism to Neo-Mahdism in the Sudan: The Role of the Sudanese Graduates in Paving the Way to Independence, 1881-1956”, Middle Eastern Studies, 41/6, (975-995).
• [34]Warburg, Gabriel (2013), Islam, Nationalism and Communism in a Traditional Society The Case of Sudan, Routledge, London.
• [35]Willis, Justin (2015), “The Southern Problem: Representıng Sudan's Southern Provınces To C. 1970”, The Journal of African History, 2015, Vol. 56, No. 2, (281-300).
• [36]Woodward, Peter (1981), “Nationalism and Opposition in Sudan”, African Affairs, 80/320, (379-388).
• [37]Young, John (2019), South Sudan’s Civil War Violence, Insurgency And Failed Peacemaking, Zedbooks Ltd., London.