Psikolojik Güçlendirmenin İş Performansına Etkisinde Çalışmaya Tutkunluğun Aracı Rolü

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 77, 1 - 22, 31.01.2025

Gülçin Eren , Serdar Bozkurt

https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.1489730

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı psikolojik güçlendirmenin iş performansı üzerine etkisinde çalışmaya tutkunluğun aracılık rolünü incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini İstanbul’da farklı özel sektör ve kamu sektöründe görev yapan 158 beyaz yakalı çalışan oluşturmaktadır. Nicel araştırma yöntemi tercih edilmiş ve araştırmanın verileri elektronik ortamda anket tekniği ile toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde SPSS 28.0 ve SmartPLS 4.0 programları kullanılmıştır. Frekans analizi ile demografik değişkenlere yönelik frekans ve yüzdeler belirlenmiştir. Geçerliliği test etmek amacıyla birleşme geçerliliği ve ayrışma geçerliliği, güvenilirliği test etmek amacıyla da iç tutarlılık güvenilirliği analizleri uygulanmıştır. Araştırma hipotezleri ise regresyona dayalı PLS-SEM analiz yöntemi aracılığıyla test edilmiştir. Araştırma analizleri sonucunda; psikolojik güçlendirmenin çalışmaya tutkunluk üzerinde ve çalışmaya tutkunluğun da iş performansı üzerinde pozitif yönde anlamlı bir etkisi vardır. Psikolojik güçlendirmenin iş performansı üzerinde ise doğrudan bir etkisi olmamakla birlikte, diğer taraftan çalışmaya tutkunluk bu etki üzerinde kısmi aracılık rolüne sahiptir. Yani özetle psikolojik güçlendirme, çalışmaya tutkunluk aracılığıyla iş performansına pozitif yönde etki etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

performans , iş performansı , psikolojik güçlendirme , çalışmaya tutkunluk

The Mediating Role of Work Engagement in the Effect of Psychological Empowerment on Job Performance

Öz

This study aims to examine the mediating role of work engagement (WE) in the effect of psychological empowerment (PE) on job performance (JP). The research sample comprises 158 white-collar employees in different private and public sectors in Istanbul. The quantitative research method was preferred, and the research data was collected electronically using the survey technique. SPSS 28.0 and SmartPLS 4.0 programs were used to analyze the data. Frequencies and percentages for demographic variables were determined by frequency analysis. Convergent and discriminant validity were used, and internal consistency reliability analyses were applied to test reliability. The research hypotheses were tested through the regression-based PLS-SEM analysis method. As a result of research analysis, PE has a positive, statistically significant effect on WE, and WE has a significant impact on JP. Although PE does not directly affect JP, WE has a partial mediating role in this effect. In short, PE positively affects JP through WE.

Anahtar Kelimeler

performance , job performance , psychological empowerment , work engagement

Kaynakça

• Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W. ve Sidek, M. M. (2017). Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker Criterion versus HTMT Criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890(1), 1-5.
• Acaray, A. ve Pelenk, S. E. (2018). İşe Adanmışlığın Öncüllerine ve Sonuçlarına Yönelik bir Araştırma. İTOBİAD KONGRE/18 I. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Kongresi (pp.68-80). Alanya, Turkey.
• Alizadeh, R. C. ve Cheraghalizadeh, R. (2015). The Effect of Organizational Supports on Job Performance in Construction Projects. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges), 5(6), 86-91.
• Alma’aita, A. ve Abdullah, A. (2021). Impact of Job Characteristics on Job Performance with the Moderating Role of Perceived Supervisor Support: Manufacturing Companies in Jordan. First International Conference on Science, Technology, Engineering and Industrial Revolution (ICSTEIR 2020) (pp.57-60). 10.2991/assehr.k.210312.009.
• Alok, K. ve Israel, D. (2012). Authentic Leadership & Work Engagement. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(3), 498-510.
• Alotaibi, S. M., Amin, M. ve Winterton, J. (2020). Does Emotional Intelligence and Empowering Leadership Affect Psychological Empowerment and Work Engagement?. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(8), 971-991.
• Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of Employee Engagement and Their Impact on Employee Performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 308-323.
• Ardianto, R. E. (2020). The Effect of Work Experience and Work Discipline on the Employee Performance of Quality Control Department of PT Eunsung Indonesia. International Journal of Research, 7(2), 214-218.
• Ariani, D. W. (2013). The Relationship between Employee Engagement, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Counterproductive Work Behavior. International Journal of Business Administration, 4(2), 46.
• Ariani, D. W. (2014). Relationship Leadership, Employee Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 4(8), 74-90.
• Babcock-Roberson, M. E. ve Strickland, O. J. (2010). The Relationship between Charismatic Leadership, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. The Journal of Psychology, 144(3), 313-326.
• Bakker, A. B. (2014). Daily Fluctuations in Work Engagement: An Overview and Current Directions. European Psychologist, 19(4), 227-236.
• Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L. ve Leiter, M. P. 2011. Key Questions Regarding Work Engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 4-28.
• Bakker, A. B. ve Leiter, M. P. (Eds.). (2010). Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. Psychology Press.
• Balkaş, J., Tülemez, S. ve Mehtap, Ö. (2022). Lidere Güvenin İhmalkârlık Üzerindeki Etkisinde Örgütsel Sinizmin Aracı Rolü: Tıbbi Mümessiler Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 37(3), 828-848.
• Benitez-Amado, J., Henseler, J. ve Castillo, A. (2017). “Development and Update of Guidelines to Perform and Report Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in Information Systems Research”. PACIS 2017 Proceedings. 86.
• Berraies, S., Chaher, M. ve Yahia, K. B. (2014). Employee Empowerment and Its Importance for Trust, Innovation and Organizational Performance. Business Management and Strategy, 5(2), 82-103.
• Blaique, L., Ismail, H. N. ve Aldabbas, H. (2023). Organizational Learning, Resilience and Psychological Empowerment as Antecedents of Work Engagement during COVID-19. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(6), 1584-1607.
• Bhatnagar, J. (2012). Management of Innovation: Role of Psychological Empowerment, Work Engagement and Turnover Intention in the Indian Context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(5), 928-951.
• Carless, S. A. (2004). Does Psychological Empowerment Mediate the Relationship between Psychological Climate and Job Satisfaction?. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(4), 405-425.
• Cesário, F. ve Chambel, M. J. (2017). Linking Organizational Commitment and Work Engagement to Employee Performance. Knowledge and Process Management, 24(2), 152-158.
• Chiang, C. F. ve Hsieh, T. S. (2012). The Impacts of Perceived Organizational Support and Psychological Empowerment on Job Performance: The Mediating Effects of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), 180-190.
• Chiang, C. F. ve Jang, S. (2008). The Antecedents and Consequences of Psychological Empowerment: The Case of Taiwan’s Hotel Companies. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 32(1), 40-61.
• Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295-336.
• Dakhoul, Z. M. (2018). The Determinants of Employee Performance in Jordanian Organizations. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 5(1), 137-143. 
• Danish, R. Q., Khalid Khan, M., Shahid, A. U., Raza, I. ve Humayon, A. A. (2015). Effect of Intrinsic Rewards on Task Performance of Employees: Mediating Role of Motivation. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 4, 33-46.
• Daryoush, Y., Silong, A. D., Omar, Z. ve Othman, J. (2013). Improving Job Performance: Workplace Learning is the First Step. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 1, 100-107.
• Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P. ve Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-Determination in A Work Organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580-590.
• Demerouti, E., Cropanzano, R., Bakker, A. ve Leiter, M. (2010). From Thought to Action: Employee Work Engagement and Job Performance. Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research, 65, 147-163.
• Díaz-Vilela, L. F., Rodríguez, N. D., Isla-Díaz, R., Díaz-Cabrera, D., Hernández-Fernaud, E. ve Rosales-Sánchez, C. (2015). Relationships between Contextual and Task Performance and Interrater Agreement: Are There Any?. PloS One, 10(10), 1-13.
• Erkmen, T., Bozkurt, S. ve Burcu Yiğit. (2016). “Çalışanın İyi Olma Hali ve İş Performansı Arasındaki İlişkide İşten Ayrılma Niyetinin Aracılık Etkisi”. 4. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 4-5 Kasım 2016. Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi, 400-404.
• Ertürk, A. (2012). Linking Psychological Empowerment to Innovation Capability: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Supervisory Trust. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(14), 153-165.
• Farooqui, M. S. ve Nagendra, A. (2014). The Impact of Person Organization Fit on Job Satisfaction and Performance of the Employees. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 122-129.
• Fauzi, M. A. (2022). Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) in Knowledge Management Studies: Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 14(1), 103-124.
• Feiz, D., Dehghani Soltani, M. ve Farsizadeh, H. (2019). The Effect of Knowledge Sharing on the Psychological Empowerment in Higher Education Mediated by Organizational Memory. Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 3-19.
• Goodman, S. A. ve Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person-Organization Fit and Contextual Performance: Do Shared Values Matter. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55(2), 254-275.
• Griffin, M. A., Neal, A. ve Neale, M. (2000). The Contribution of Task Performance and Contextual Performance to Effectiveness: Investigating the Role of Situational Constraints. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), 517-533.
• Gutermann, D., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Boer, D., Born, M. ve Voelpel, S. (2017). How Leaders Affect Followers’ Work Engagement and Performance: Integrating Leader-Member Exchange and Crossover Theory. British Journal of Management, 28, 299-314.
• Hahm, S. W. (2018). Roles of Authentic Leadership, Psychological Empowerment and Intrinsic Motivation on Workers’ Creativity in E-Business. Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 19(1), 113-122.
• Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. ve Sarstedt, M. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Hampton, D., ve Rayens, M. K. (2019). Impact of Psychological Empowerment on Workplace Bullying and Intent to Leave. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(4), 179-185.
• Hanaysha, J. (2016). Testing the Effects of Employee Empowerment, Teamwork, and Employee Training on Employee Productivity in Higher Education Sector. International Journal of Learning and Development, 6(1), 164-178.
• Harzer, C., ve Ruch, W. (2014). The Role of Character Strengths for Task Performance, Job Dedication, Interpersonal Facilitation, and Organizational Support. Human Performance, 27(3), 183-205.
• Hechanova, M. R. M., Alampay, R. B. A. ve Franco, E. P. (2006). Psychological Empowerment, Job Satisfaction and Performance among Filipino Service Workers. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(1), 72-78.
• Hemakumara, M. G. G. (2020). The Impact of Motivation on Job Performance: A Review of Literature. Journal of Human Resources Management and Labor Studies, 8(2), 24-29.
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C., ve Sinkovics, R. (2009). The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-319.
• Hoole, C. ve Bonnema, J. (2015). Work Engagement and Meaningful Work across Generational Cohorts. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(1), 1-11. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/236927/employee-engagement-drives-growth.aspx
• Huang, C. C., Wang, Y. M., Wu, T. W. ve Wang, P. A. (2013). An Empirical Analysis of the Antecedents and Performance Consequences of Using the Moodle Platform. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(2), 217-221.
• Jankingthong, K. ve Rurkkhum, S. (2012). Factors Affecting Job Performance: A Review of Literature. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 12, 115-128. 
• Jin-Liang, W. ve Hai-Zhen, W. (2012). The Influences of Psychological Empowerment on Work Attitude and Behavior in Chinese Organizations. African Journal of Business Management, 6(30), 8938-8947.
• Joo, B. K. ve Shim, J. H. (2010). Psychological Empowerment and Organizational Commitment: The Moderating Effect of Organizational Learning Culture. Human Resource Development International, 13(4), 425-441.
• Jose, G. ve Mampilly, S. R. (2014). Psychological Empowerment as a Predictor of Employee Engagement: An Empirical Attestation. Global Business Review, 15(1), 93-104.
• Juyumaya, J. (2022). How Psychological Empowerment Impacts Task Performance: The Mediation Role of Work Engagement and Moderating Role of Age. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-9.
• Kalia, N. ve Bhardwaj, B. (2019). Contextual and Task Performance: Do Demographic and Organizational Variables Matter?. Rajagiri Management Journal. 13(2), 30-42.
• Kaplan, M. ve Fırat, E. (2022). Çalışmaya Tutkunluk ve Algılanan Aşırı Nitelikliliğinin Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkileri. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 12(1), 549-564.
• Kaplanseren, S. ve Örücü, E. (2018). İşe Tutkunluğun Örgütsel Vatandaşlığa Etkisi: Otel Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Trakya Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi E-Dergi, 7(1), 1-19.
• Khair, H. ve Sari, A. P. (2023). Work Engagement: Determinants and Its Effect On Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Jurnal Manajemen, 27(2), 254-275.
• Khan, S. ve Mashikhi, L. S. (2017). Impact of Teamwork on Employees Performance. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 4(11), 14-22.
• Kock, N. (2020). Using Indicator Correlation Fit Indices in PLS-SEM: Selecting the Algorithm with the Best Fit. Data Analysis Perspectives Journal, 1(4), 1-4.
• Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E. ve Liden, R. C. (1999). Psychological Empowerment as A Multidimensional Construct: A Test of Construct Validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 127-142.
• Llorente-Alonso, M., García-Ael, C. ve Topa, G. (2023). A Meta-Analysis of Psychological Empowerment: Antecedents, Organizational Outcomes, and Moderating Variables. Current Psychology, 1-26.
• Memon, M. A., Jun, H. C., Ting, H., ve Francis, C. W. (2018). Mediation Analysis Issues and Recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 2(1), 1-ix.
• Meng, Q. ve Sun, F. (2019). The Impact of Psychological Empowerment on Work Engagement among University Faculty Members in China. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 983-990.
• Moura, D., Orgambídez-Ramos, A. ve de Jesus, S. N. (2015). Psychological Empowerment and Work Engagement as Predictors of Work Satisfaction: A Sample of Hotel Employees. Journal of Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, 3(2), 125-134.
• Murray, L., Nguyen, H., Lee, Y., Remmenga, M., ve Smith, D. (2012). Varience Inflation Factors in Regression Models with Dummy Variables. Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture. 10.4148/2475-7772.1034.
• Nangoy, R., Mursitama, T.N., Setiadi, N. J. ve Pradipto, Y. D. (2020). Creating Sustainable Performance in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era: The Effect of Employee’s Work Well-Being on Job Performance. Management Science Letters, 10, 1037-1042.
• Olgaç, S. ve Yılmaz, V. (2023). Kısmi En Küçük Kareler Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (KEKKYEM). Kısmi En Küçük Kareler Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi ve Sosyal Bilimlerde Uygulama Örnekleri (pp. 3-25), Ankara: İKSAD Yayınevi.
• Örücü, E. ve Hasırcı, I. (2021). Örgütsel Destek Algısı ve İşe Tutkunluk İlişkisi: Bankacılık Sektörü ile İlgili Bir Araştırma Örneği. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 1-22.
• Özyılmaz, A. ve Süner, Z. (2015). İşe Adanmışlığın İşyeri Tutumlarına Etkisi: Hatay’daki 9 İşletmede Yapılan Ampirik Araştırmanın Sonuçları. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(3), 143-164.
• Park J. ve Kim J. (2024). The Relationship between Perceived Organizational Support, Work Engagement, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Customer Orientation in the Public Sports Organizations Context. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 1-18.
• Perangin-Angin, M. R., Lumbanraja, P. ve Absah, Y. (2020). The Effect of Quality of Work Life and Work Engagement to Employee Performance with Job Satisfaction as An Intervening Variable in PT. Mopoly Raya Medan. International Journal of Research and Review, 7(2): 72-78.
• Perkins, D. D. ve Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Empowerment Theory, Research, and Application. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 569-579.
• Phuong, T. T. K. ve Vinh, T. T. (2020). Job Satisfaction, Employee Loyalty and Job Performance in the Hospitality Industry: A Moderated Model. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 10(6), 698-713.
• Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M. ve Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Innovative Behavior: The Moderating Role of Psychological Empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609-623.
• Polatçı, S. ve Özçalık, F. (2013). Yapısal ve Psikolojik Güçlendirmenin İşyeri Nezaketsizliği ve Tükenmişliğe Etkisi. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, 1(1), 17-34.
• Prabowo, R., Mustika, M. D. ve Sjabadhyni, B. (2018). How A Leader Transforms Employees’ Psychological Empowerment into Innovative Work Behavior. Psychological Research on Urban Society, 1(2), 90-99.
• Pradhan, R. K., Panda, M. ve Jena, L. K. (2017). Transformational Leadership and Psychological Empowerment: The Mediating Effect of Organizational Culture in Indian Retail Industry. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(1), 82-95.
• Rahman, A. A. A., Panatik, S. A. ve Alias, R. A. (2014). The Influence of Psychological Empowerment on Innovative Work Behavior among Academia in Malaysian Research Universities. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 78, 108-112.
• Rasoolimanesh, S. M. (2022). Discriminant Validity Assessment in PLS-SEM: A Comprehensive Composite-Based Approach. Data Analysis Perspectives Journal, 3(2), 1-8.
• Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A. ve Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job Engagement: Antecedents and Effects on Job Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635.
• Rothmann, S. ve Olivier, A. L. (2007). Antecedents of Work Engagement in A Multinational Company. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 33(3), 49-56.
• Saif, N. I. ve Saleh, A. S. (2013). Psychological Empowerment and Job Satisfaction in Jordanian Hospitals. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(16), 250-257.
• Saragih, M., Yustina, A. I. ve Santosa, S. (2020). Mediating Influence of Self-Esteem on Relationship between Ethical Leadership and Job Performance. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 8(1), 1-18.
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. ve Bakker, A. B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. ve Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
• Seibert, S. E., Wang, G. ve Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and Consequences of Psychological and Team Empowerment in Organizations: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981-1003.
• Sönmez Çakır, F. (2019). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and an Application. Sosyal Araştırmalar ve Davranış Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(9). 111-128.
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
• Spreitzer, G. M., De Janasz, S. C. ve Quinn, R. E. (1999). Empowered to Lead: The Role of Psychological Empowerment in Leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 20(4), 511-526.
• Sürgevil, O., Tolay, E. ve Topoyan, M. (2013). Yapısal Güçlendirme ve Psikolojik Güçlendirme Ölçeklerinin Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Analizleri. Journal of Yasar University, 8(31), 5371-5391.
• Şahin, S. ve Çankır, B. (2018). İş Tatmininin İş Performansına Etkisinde Çalışmaya Tutkunluğun Aracı Rolü: Satış ve Pazarlama Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 17. UİK Özel Sayısı, 389-402.
• Taipale, S., Selander, K., Anttila, T. ve Nätti, J. (2011). Work Engagement in Eight European Countries: The Role of Job Demands, Autonomy, and Social Support. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(7/8), 486-504.
• Turgut, T. (2011). Çalışmaya Tutkunluk: İş Yükü, Esnek Çalışma Saatleri, Yönetici Desteği ve İş-Aile Çatışması ile İlişkileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(3-4), 155-179.
• Turgut, T. (2010). Çalışmaya Tutkunluk, G. İslamoğlu içinde, Kurumlarda İyilik de Var (s. 57-89), Ankara: Özyurt Basımevi.
• Tuuli, M. M. ve Rowlinson, S. (2009). Performance Consequences of Psychological Empowerment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(12), 1334-1347.
• Viswesvaran, C. ve Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on Models of Job Performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216-226.
• Vupa, Ö., ve Gürünlü Alma, Ö. (2008). Doğrusal Regresyon Çözümlemesinde Çoklu Bağlantı Probleminin Sapan Değer İçeren Küçük Örneklemlerde Bir Simülasyon Çalışması ile Saptanması ve Sonuçları. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi, 2(32), 41-51.
• Wang, G. ve Lee, P. D. (2009). Psychological Empowerment and Job Satisfaction: An Analysis of Interactive Effects. Group & Organization Management, 34(3), 271-296.
• Wasilah, S. ve Tauhid, F. (2018). The Advancement of the Built Environment Research through Employment of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 126. 012001. 10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012001.
• Zeng, N., Liu, Y., Gong, P., Hertogh, M., ve König, M. (2021). Do Right PLS and Do PLS Right: A Critical Review of the Application of PLS-SEM in Construction Management Research. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 8(3), 356-369.
• Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological Empowerment: Issues and Illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581-599.