THE İMPORTANCE OF THE TRUTH EFFECT AND SOURCE CREDILIBLITY FOR NEW FMCGS ADVERTISING

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

 THE İMPORTANCE OF THE TRUTH EFFECT AND SOURCE CREDILIBLITY FOR NEW FMCGS ADVERTISING

Öz

This study (N=348) examined the correlation for demographics of Turkish consumers, product trial, the type of media, and the credibility of advertising. The data was gathered by a telephone survey using the systematic sampling in Turkey. The results showed that higher household income, product trial, and certain types of media contributed to the credibility of advertising in a positive way. Price, quality, and word-of mouth were found to be important factors that affected Turkish consumers’ shopping decisions. The results were discussed in accordance with the truth effect and source credibility

Anahtar Kelimeler

• advertising, price, quality, word-of-mouth, source credibility, the truth effect, FMCGs

Kaynakça

1. A Dictionary of Business (1996), 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. BUDA, R. & ZHANG, Y. (2000), Consumer Product Evaluation: The Interactive Effect of Message Framing, Presentation Order, and Source Credibility, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9 (4), 229-242.
3. CELSI, R. L. & OLSON, J. C. (1988), The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Process, The Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 210-224.
4. CHOI, S. M. (2002), Attributional Approach to Understanding Celebrity/Product Congruence Effects: Role of Perceived Expertise, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, Michigan.
5. CORNELISSEN, J. P. & LOCK, A. R. (2001), The Appeal of Integration: Managing Communications in Modern Organizations, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19 (6), 425- 431.
6. ÇELEBİ, S. İ. (2007), The Credibility of Advertising vs. Publicity for New FMCGs in Turkey, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12 (2), 161-176.
7. DUNCAN, T. (2002), IMC: Using Advertising & Promotion to Build Brands, New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. ENNEW, C. T., BANERJEE, A. K. & Lİ, D. (2000), Managing Word of Mouth Communication: Empirical Evidence from India, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18 (2), 75-83.

9. FERGUSON, R. (2008), Word of Mouth and Viral Marketing: Taking the Temperature of the Hottest Trends in Marketing, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25 (3), 179-182.
10. GODIN, S. (2000), Unleashing the Ideavirus, Retrieved February 22, 2005, from http://www.ideavirus.com
11. GUENTHER, R. K. (1998), Human Cognition, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
12. HALLAHAN, K. (1999), Content Class as a Contextual Cue in the Cognitive Processing of Publicity versus Advertising, Journal of Public Relations Research, 11 (4), 293-320.
13. HAWKINS, S. A. & HOCH, S. J. (1992, September), Low-Involvement Learning: Memory without Evaluation, Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (2), 212-225.
14. HAWKINS, S. A., HOCH, S. J. & MEYERS-LEVY, J. M. (2001), Low-Involvement Learning: Repetition and Coherence in Familiarity and Belief, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11 (1), 1-11.
15. HEAT, R., (2001), Low Involvement Processing-A New Model of Brand Communication, Journal of Marketing Communications, 7, 27-33.
16. HEM, L. E., CHERNATONY, L. & IVERSEN, N. M. (2003), Factors Influencing Successful Brand Extensions, Journal of Marketing Management, 19, 781-806.
17. HITCHON, J. C. & THORSON, E. (1995, Summer), Effects of Emotion and Product Involvement on the Experience of Repeated Commercial Viewing, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39 (3), 377-390.
18. JO, S. (2004), Effect of Content Type on Impact: Editorial vs. Advertising, Public Relations Review, 30 (4), 503-512.
19. KRUGMAN, H. E. (1962, Winter), An Application of Learning Theory to TV Copy Testing, Public Opinion Quarterly, 26 (4), 626-634.
20. KRUGMAN, H. E. (1965, Autumn), The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning without Involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (3), 349-356.
21. KRUGMAN, H. E. (1966-1967, Winter), The Measurement of Advertising Involvement, Public Opinion Quarterly, 30 (4), 583-596.
22. KRUGMAN, H. E. (1977, August), Memory without Recall, Exposure without Perception, Journal of Advertising Research, 17 (4), 7-12.
23. LIU, W. L. (2002), Advertising in China: Product Branding and Beyond, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7 (2), 117-125.
24. LUSCH, R. F. (2007), Marketing’s Evolving Identity: Defining our Future, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 26 (2), 261-268.
25. OHANIAN, R. (1990, Summer), Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness, Journal of Advertising, 19 (3), 39-53.
26. OLSON, J. M. & CAL, V. A. (1984), Source Credibility, Attitudes, and the Recall of Past Behaviors, European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 203-210.
27. Production Logistics Tools to Improve Productivity in the FMCG Industry, (n.d.). [Online] Retrieved May 1, 2008, from http://www.x85byflexlink.com/Documents/5374_WP_FMCG.pdf
28. ROGGEVEEN, A. L. & JOHAR, G. V. (2002), Perceived Source Variability Versus Familiarity: Testing Competing Explanations for the Truth Effect, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12 (2), 81-91.
29. SHAVITT, S., LOWREY, P., & HAEFNER, J. (1998), Public Attitudes Toward Advertising: More Favorable Than You Might Think, Journal of Advertising Research, 38 (4), 7-22.
30. SWEENEY, J. C., SOUTAR, G. N. & MAZZAROL, T. (2008), Factors Influencing Word of Mouth Effectiveness: Receiver Perspectives, European Journal of Marketing, 42 (3/4), 344- 364.
31. WELLS, W., BURNETT, J. & MORIARTY, S. (1995), Advertising: Principles and Practice (3rd ed.), Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
32. ZAICHKOWSKY, J. L. (1985), Measuring the Involvement Construct, Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (3), 341-352.
33. ZAICHKOWSKY, J. L. (1986), Conceptualizing Involvement, Journal of Advertising, 15 (2), 4-14.
34. ZAICHKOWSKY, J. L. (1994), The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising, Journal of Advertising, XXIII (4), 59-70.