ÖRGÜTLER ARASI İLİŞKİLERDE SÖZLEŞME TASARIMINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER / DRIVING FACTORS OF CONTRACT DESIGN IN INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS

Öz

The aim of this study is to provide an assessment of the empirical studies on the economic rationality of designing a contract. For this purpose, this study set out Parkhe’s work (1993) that explores the transactional and relational determinants of the degree of contractual complexity. This study shows that transaction-related factors, trust, experience gained from prior relationships and inter-organizational learning efforts are the determinants of contractual design. In addition, the factors affecting the contract design have different effects on each dimension of the contract (contractual complexity, term specificity, contingency planning and contractual obligatoriness). Hence, future research can contribute to the literature if it aims to explore the antecedents of contract design by considering the relationships between governance problems (safeguarding, coordination and adaptation) and contractual dimensions (contractual complexity, duration of the contract, term specificity, contractual obligatoriness etc.). In conclusion, this study proposes an integrative conceptual model based on the perspectives of organizational economics and strategic management for future research that aims to explore the antecedents of contractual design.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Contractual Complexity, Contractual Completeness, Transaction-related Factors, Experience-related Factors.

ÖRGÜTLER ARASI İLİŞKİLERDE SÖZLEŞME TASARIMINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sözleşme tasarımının ekonomik rasyonelini araştıran çalışmalar üzerine bir değerlendirme yapmaktır. Bu amaçla Parkhe’nin (1993) sözleşmenin karmaşıklık derecesini etkileyen işlemsel ve ilişkisel belirleyiciler üzerine gerçekleştirdiği çalışmadan yola çıkılarak bir literatür taraması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sözleşme tasarımı üzerinde işlemle ilişkili faktörler, güven, önceki ilişkilerden elde edilen deneyim ve örgütler arası öğrenme çabalarının belirleyici olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca sözleşme tasarımını etkileyen faktörlerin sözleşmenin boyutları (sözleşmenin karmaşıklığı, sözleşme şartlarının özgüllüğü, koşul planlaması ve sözleşmenin bağlayıcılığı) üzerinde farklı etkiler yaratmakta olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Bu nedenle sözleşme tasarımını etkileyen faktörleri yönetişim meseleleri (teminat, eşgüdümleme ve uyarlanma) ve sözleşmenin boyutları (sözleşmenin karmaşıklığı, sözleşmenin süresi, sözleşme şartlarının özgüllüğü, koşul planlaması, sözleşmenin bağlayıcılığı vs.) arasındaki ilişkileri dikkate alarak açıklayan gelecek çalışmaların literatüre katkı sağlayabileceği düşünülebilir. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma sözleşme tasarımını etkileyen faktörleri araştırmayı hedefleyen gelecek çalışmalar için örgüt iktisadı ve stratejik yönetim bakış açıları temelinde bütünleştirici bir kavramsal model önermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sözleşmenin Karmaşıklığı, Sözleşmenin Eksiksizliği, İşlemle İlişkili Faktörler, Deneyimle İlişkili Faktörler

Kaynakça

1. Anderson, S.W. & Dekker, H.C. (2005). Management control for market transactions: The relation between transaction characteristics, incomplete contract design, and subsequent performance. Management Science, 51(12): 1734–1752.
2. Argyres, N. & Mayer, K. (2007). Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 32: 1060–1077.
3. Argyres, N., Bercovitz, J. & Mayer, K. (2007). Complementarity and evolution of contractual provisions: An empirical study of IT services contracts. Organization Science, 18: 3-19.
4. Ariño, A. & Reuer, J.J. (2004). Alliance contractual design. University of Navarra, Anselmo Rubiralta Center for Globalization and Strategy, Working Paper, No: 572.
5. Barthelemy, J. & Quelin, B. (2006). Complexity of outsourcing contracts and ex post transaction costs: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8): 1775-1797.
6. Cavusgil, S.T., Deligonul, S. & Zhang, C. (2004). Curbing foreign distributor opportunism: An examination of trust, contracts, and the legal environment in international channel relationships. Journal of International Marketing, 12(2): 7-27.
7. Dyer, J.H. & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 600-679.
8. Dyer, J.H. (1997). Effective inter-firm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 535-556.

9. Elfenbein, D.W. & Lerner, J. (2012). Exclusivity, contingent control rights, and the design of internet portal alliances. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 28(1): 45-76.
10. Furlotti, M. (2007). There is more to contracts than incompleteness: A review and assessment of empirical research on inter-firm contracts. Journal of Management and Governance, 11(1): 61
11. Goo, J., Kishore, R. & Rao, H.R. (2009). The role of service level agreements in relational management of information technology outsourcing: An empirical study. MIS Quarterly, 33(1): 119-145.
12. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Journal of Sociology, 91: 481-510.
13. Gulati, R. (1995a). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 85-112.
14. Gulati, R. (1995b). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 619-652.
15. Hagedoorn, J. & Hesen, G. (2007). Contract law and the governance of inter-firm technology partnerships-An analysis of different modes of partnering and their contractual implications. Journal of Management Studies, 44(3): 342-366.
16. Hendrikse, G. & Windsperger, J. (2011). Determinants of contractual completeness in franchising. Tuunanen, M., Windsperger, J., Cliquet, G. & Hendrikse, G. (Ed.), New Developments in the Theory of Networks: Franchising, Alliances and Cooperatives (s: 13-30), New York: Springer. Joskow P.L. (2008). Vertical integration. Ménard, C. & Shirley, M.M. (Ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics (s. 319-348), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
17. Klein, B., Crawford, R.G. & Alchian, A.A. (1978). Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law and Economics, 21(2): 297-326.
18. Li, J.J., Poppo, L. & Zhou, K.Z. (2010). Relational mechanisms, formal contracts, and local knowledge acquisition by international subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 349-370.
19. Liu, Y., Luo, Y. & Liu T. (2009). Governing buyer-supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms: Evidence from China. Journal of Operations Management, 27(4): 29430
20. Luo, Y.D. (2002). Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10): 903-919.
21. Luo, Y.D. (2005). Transactional characteristics, institutional environment and joint venture contracts. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2): 209-230.
22. Mayer, K. & Argyres, N. (2004). Learning to Contract: Evidence from the Personal Computer Industry. Organization Science, 14: 394-410.
23. Mayer, K.J. & Bercovitz, J. (2008). The influence of inertia on contract design: Contingency planning in information technology service contracts. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29: 149-163. Mesquita, L.F. & Brush, T.H. (2008). Untangling safeguard and production coordination effects in long-term buyer-supplier relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4): 785-807.
24. Nooteboom, B., Berger, H. & Noorderhaven, N.G. (1997). Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2): 308–336.
25. Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4): 794-826.
26. Poppo, L. & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8): 707-725.
27. Reuer, J. & Ariño, A. (2007). Strategic alliance contracts: Dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 313–330.
28. Reuer, J., A. Ariño, and T. Mellewigt (2006). Entrepreneurial alliances as contractual forms. Journal of Business Venturing, 21: 306-325.
29. Reuer, J.J. & Ariño, A. (2003). Strategic alliances as contractual forms. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings.
30. Reuer, J.J. & Ariño, A. (2002). Contractual heterogeneity in strategic alliances. Barcelona: IESE Working Paper No. D/482.
31. Reuer, J.J., Ariño, A. & Mellewigt, T. (2006). Entrepreneurial alliances as contractual forms. Journal of Business Venturing, 21: 306-325.
32. Ryall, M.D. & Sampson, R.C. (2009). Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: Evidence from technology development projects. Management Science, 55(6): 906-9
33. Ryall, M.D. & Sampson, R.C. (2006). Do prior alliances influence alliance contract structure? Ariño, A. & Reuer, J. (Ed.), Strategic Alliances (s: 206-216). Houndsmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
34. Saussier, S. (2000). Transaction costs and contractual incompleteness: The case of Electricite´ De France. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42(2): 189-206.
35. Solis-Rodriguez, V. & Gonzalez-Diaz, M. (2012). How to design franchise contracts: The role of contractual hazards and experience. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(4): 652-677. Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations. American Sociological Review, 61: 674-698.
36. Williamson, O.E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. The Journal of Law and Economics, 22: 233-261.
37. Williamson, O.E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.
38. Williamson, O.E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 269-296.
39. Zollo, M., Reuer, J.J. & Singh, H. (2002). Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 13: 701-713.