BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME KAVRAMI VE İLETİŞİM ETKİNLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 9, 1011 - 1027, 01.06.2008

Dr.ipek Kalemci Tüzün Doç. Dr. İrfan Çağlar

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Albert, S. Ashforth, B.E. ve J.E. Dutton (2000) “Organizational Identity and Identification: Charting New Waters and Building New Bridges”, Academy of Management Journal, 25, Special Issue.
  • Andrews, S. Basler, C.R. ve Coller, X. (1999) “Organizational structures, cultures and identities: overlaps and divergences”, Research in the Sociology of Organization içinde. Der: Andrews, S.B.ve Konke D. Greenwich , CT:JAI.
  • Ashforth, B.E. (2001) Role Transitions in Organizational Life: An Identity Based Perspective, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ashforth, B.E. ve Mael F. (1989) “Social Identity Theory and the Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
  • Cheney, G. (1983) “On The Various And Changing Meaning of Organizational Membership: A Field Study of Organizational Identification”, Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362.
  • Cheney, G. ve Tompkins P.K. (1987) “Coming to Terms with Organizational Identification and Commitment”, Central States Speech Journal, 38:1,1-15.
  • Cherim S. (2002) “Influencing Organizational ıdentification During Major Change: A Communication based Perspective”, Human Relations, 55, 1117-1137.
  • Disanza J.R. ve Bullis C. (1999) “Everybody Identifies with Smokey the Bear: Employee Responses to Newsletter Identification Inducements at the U.S. Forest Service”, Management Communication Quarterly, 12:3, 347-399.
  • Dukerich J.M., Golden, B. ve Shortell S.M. (2002) “Beauty Is In The Eye of The Beholder: The Impact of Organizational Identification, Identity and Image On Physician Cooperative Behavior”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47:3.
  • Dutton, J., Dukerich, J.ve Harquail C.V. (1994) “Organizational Images and Membership Commitment”, Administrative Science Quarterly,34, 239-263.
  • Erickson, B. (1988) “The Relational Basis of Attitudes”. Social Structure: A Network Approach içinde. Der: Berkowitz, S. ve Wellman B. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fiol, C.M. (1991) “Managing Culture as A Competitive Source: An Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17,191-211.
  • Fiol, C.M. (2001) “Revisiting an Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 27, 691-699.
  • Garmon, M. (2004) “The Relationship Between Organizational Learning, CultureImage, Identity and Identification, An Empirical Study” Touro University International College of Business Administration, Cypress, California.
  • Gioia D.A. ve Thomas J.B. (1996) “Identity, image and issue interpretation: Sense making during strategic change in academia”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 370-403.
  • Haslam, S.A., Eggins R.A. ve Reynolds K.J. (2003) “The ASPIRe Model: Actualizing Social and Personal Identity Resources to Enhance Organizational Outcomes, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76:1.
  • Hatch, M. ve Schultz M. (2002) “The Dynamics Of Organizational Identity”, Human Relations, 55:8, 989-1005.
  • Kramer, R.M., Brewer M.B. ve Hanna B. (1996) “Collective Trust and Collective Action in Organizations: The Decision to Trust As a Social Decision.” Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research içinde. Der: Kramer, M.R. ve Tyler R.T. Sage Publications, London.
  • Kreiner, G.E. ve Ashforth B.E. (2004) “Evidence Toward an Expanded Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25:1.
  • Kuhn, T ve Nelson N. (2002) “Reengineering Identity: A Case Atudy of Multiplicity and Duality in Organizational Identification”, Management Communication Quarterly, 16:1, 5-38.
  • Larson, G.S. ve Pepper, G.L. (2003) “Strategies for Managing Multiple Organizational Identifications”, Management Communication Quarterly, 16:4, 528-557.
  • Liponnen, J. Helkama, K. Olkkonen M.E. ve diğerleri (2005) “Predicting The Different Profiles of Organizational Identification: A Case of Shipyard Subcontractors”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 97-112.
  • Mael, F. ve Ashforth B. (1992) “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of The Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizational Behavior Vol 13;103-123.
  • Pfeffer, J.(1981) “Management as Symbolic Action: Creation and Maintenance of Organizational Paradigms”, Research in Organizational Behavior, içinde. Der: Cummings L.L. ve Staw B.M., 7, 1-52.
  • Pratt M.G. (2000) “The Good and the Bad, and the Ambivalent”: Managing Identification among Amway Distributors”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45:3, 456-493.
  • Pratt, M.G. (1998) “To be or not to be”: Centarl Question in Organizational Identification” Identity in Organizations: Building Theory Through Conversatio içinde. Der:. Whetten D.A ve Godfrey P.C. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Ravasi, D. ve Van Rekom J. (2003) “Key Issues In Organizational Identity and Identification Theory”, Corporate Reputation Review, 6:2, 118-132.
  • Russo T.C. (1998) “Organizational and professional Identification: A Case of Newspaper Journalist”, Management Communication Quarterly, 12:1, 72-111.
  • Sass, J.S. ve Canary, J.D. (1991) “Organizational Commitment and Identification: An Examination of Conceptual and Operational Convergence”, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 275-293.
  • Scott C. R. (1997) “Identification with Multiple Targets in a Geographically Dispersed Organization”, Management Communication Quarterly, 10:4, 491-522.
  • Scott, C R. Corman, S.R. ve Cheney, G. (1998) “Development of Strucurational Model of Identification in the Organization” Communication Theory,8:3, 298-336.
  • Scott, S.G. ve Lane, V.R. (2000) “A stakeholder approach to Organizational identity”, Academy of Management Review,25 :1 ,43-62.
  • Shamir, B (1990) “Calculations, values and Identities: The Sources of Collectivist Work Motivation”, Human Relations, 43, 313-332.
  • Simon, B. ve Brown, R.J. (1987) “Perceived Intragroup Homogenity in Minority-majority Contexts”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 703-711.
  • Smitdhs, A. Pryun, A. ve. Van Riel C.B.M (2001) “The Impact of Employee Communication and Perceived External Prestige On Organizational Identification”, Academy of Management Journal, 44:5, 1051-1062.
  • Sproull, L. ve Kiesler S. (1986) “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mailing Organizational Commitment” Management Science, 32:1492-1512. Tajfel, H. (1978) Differentiation between Social Groups. Study In Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.
  • Tajfel, H. (1982) “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations”, Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
  • Tajfel, H. ve Turner J.C. (1985) “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior”. The Psychology of Intergroup Relations içinde Der: Worchel, S.ve Austin, W.G.2, 7-24, Chicago: Nelson Hall.
  • Tompkins, P.K. ve Cheney G. (1985) “Communication and Unobtrusive Control inContemporary Organizations” Organizational Communication: Traditional Themes and New Directions içinde. Der: McPhee, R.D.ve. Tompkins, P.K.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage, 179-210.
  • Van Dick, R. Wagner, U. Stellmacher, J. ve diğerleri (2004) “The Utility of A Broader Conceptualization Organizational Identification: Which Aspect Really Matter?”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77:171-191. Van Dick, R. Wagner
  • U.Stellmacher J. ve diğerleri (2005) “Category Salience and Organizational Identification”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78:273-285.
  • Van Knippenberg, D. ve Van Schie E.C.M. (2000) “Foci correlates of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137-147.
  • Wiesenfeld, B.M. Raghuram, S ve Garud R. (1998) “Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization” Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 3:4.

ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME KAVRAMI VE İLETİŞİM ETKİNLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 9, 1011 - 1027, 01.06.2008

Dr.ipek Kalemci Tüzün Doç. Dr. İrfan Çağlar

Öz

Örgütsel özdeşleşme araştırmacılar ve uygulamacılar tarafından, bireyin örgütle istenen bağı olarak görülmüştür. Öte yandan iletişimin özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisi ise pek çok çalışmaya konu olmuştur. İletişim, çalışanların örgütün normları değerleri ve kültürü gibi tanımlanan özellikleriyle ilgili öznel algılamasını oluşturma ve paylaşma fırsatı yaratır. Böylece örgüt üyelerinin örgütün kimliğiyle ilgili düşüncelerinin ortaya çıkması beraberinde üye özdeşleşmesini güçlendirir. Bu çalışmanın amacı özdeşleşme kavramının önemini açıklamak ve kavramla ilgili tartışmaları ortaya koymaktır. Çalışma, her hangi bir önerme içermemesine karşın, özdeşleşme kavramının örgüt içindeki rollerini tartışması ve örgüte olan etkilerini göz önüne sermesi anlamında önemli bir perspektif çizmektir. Konu ile ilgili literatür taranmış, örgütsel özdeşleşme kavramı incelenmiş ve özdeşleşmeyi güçlendiren bir unsur olarak örgütsel iletişim örüntüsüne dikkat çekilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

özdeşleşme örgütsel özdeşleşme örgütsel iletişim

Kaynakça

  • Albert, S. Ashforth, B.E. ve J.E. Dutton (2000) “Organizational Identity and Identification: Charting New Waters and Building New Bridges”, Academy of Management Journal, 25, Special Issue.
  • Andrews, S. Basler, C.R. ve Coller, X. (1999) “Organizational structures, cultures and identities: overlaps and divergences”, Research in the Sociology of Organization içinde. Der: Andrews, S.B.ve Konke D. Greenwich , CT:JAI.
  • Ashforth, B.E. (2001) Role Transitions in Organizational Life: An Identity Based Perspective, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ashforth, B.E. ve Mael F. (1989) “Social Identity Theory and the Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
  • Cheney, G. (1983) “On The Various And Changing Meaning of Organizational Membership: A Field Study of Organizational Identification”, Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362.
  • Cheney, G. ve Tompkins P.K. (1987) “Coming to Terms with Organizational Identification and Commitment”, Central States Speech Journal, 38:1,1-15.
  • Cherim S. (2002) “Influencing Organizational ıdentification During Major Change: A Communication based Perspective”, Human Relations, 55, 1117-1137.
  • Disanza J.R. ve Bullis C. (1999) “Everybody Identifies with Smokey the Bear: Employee Responses to Newsletter Identification Inducements at the U.S. Forest Service”, Management Communication Quarterly, 12:3, 347-399.
  • Dukerich J.M., Golden, B. ve Shortell S.M. (2002) “Beauty Is In The Eye of The Beholder: The Impact of Organizational Identification, Identity and Image On Physician Cooperative Behavior”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47:3.
  • Dutton, J., Dukerich, J.ve Harquail C.V. (1994) “Organizational Images and Membership Commitment”, Administrative Science Quarterly,34, 239-263.
  • Erickson, B. (1988) “The Relational Basis of Attitudes”. Social Structure: A Network Approach içinde. Der: Berkowitz, S. ve Wellman B. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fiol, C.M. (1991) “Managing Culture as A Competitive Source: An Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17,191-211.
  • Fiol, C.M. (2001) “Revisiting an Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 27, 691-699.
  • Garmon, M. (2004) “The Relationship Between Organizational Learning, CultureImage, Identity and Identification, An Empirical Study” Touro University International College of Business Administration, Cypress, California.
  • Gioia D.A. ve Thomas J.B. (1996) “Identity, image and issue interpretation: Sense making during strategic change in academia”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 370-403.
  • Haslam, S.A., Eggins R.A. ve Reynolds K.J. (2003) “The ASPIRe Model: Actualizing Social and Personal Identity Resources to Enhance Organizational Outcomes, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76:1.
  • Hatch, M. ve Schultz M. (2002) “The Dynamics Of Organizational Identity”, Human Relations, 55:8, 989-1005.
  • Kramer, R.M., Brewer M.B. ve Hanna B. (1996) “Collective Trust and Collective Action in Organizations: The Decision to Trust As a Social Decision.” Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research içinde. Der: Kramer, M.R. ve Tyler R.T. Sage Publications, London.
  • Kreiner, G.E. ve Ashforth B.E. (2004) “Evidence Toward an Expanded Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25:1.
  • Kuhn, T ve Nelson N. (2002) “Reengineering Identity: A Case Atudy of Multiplicity and Duality in Organizational Identification”, Management Communication Quarterly, 16:1, 5-38.
  • Larson, G.S. ve Pepper, G.L. (2003) “Strategies for Managing Multiple Organizational Identifications”, Management Communication Quarterly, 16:4, 528-557.
  • Liponnen, J. Helkama, K. Olkkonen M.E. ve diğerleri (2005) “Predicting The Different Profiles of Organizational Identification: A Case of Shipyard Subcontractors”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 97-112.
  • Mael, F. ve Ashforth B. (1992) “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of The Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizational Behavior Vol 13;103-123.
  • Pfeffer, J.(1981) “Management as Symbolic Action: Creation and Maintenance of Organizational Paradigms”, Research in Organizational Behavior, içinde. Der: Cummings L.L. ve Staw B.M., 7, 1-52.
  • Pratt M.G. (2000) “The Good and the Bad, and the Ambivalent”: Managing Identification among Amway Distributors”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45:3, 456-493.
  • Pratt, M.G. (1998) “To be or not to be”: Centarl Question in Organizational Identification” Identity in Organizations: Building Theory Through Conversatio içinde. Der:. Whetten D.A ve Godfrey P.C. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Ravasi, D. ve Van Rekom J. (2003) “Key Issues In Organizational Identity and Identification Theory”, Corporate Reputation Review, 6:2, 118-132.
  • Russo T.C. (1998) “Organizational and professional Identification: A Case of Newspaper Journalist”, Management Communication Quarterly, 12:1, 72-111.
  • Sass, J.S. ve Canary, J.D. (1991) “Organizational Commitment and Identification: An Examination of Conceptual and Operational Convergence”, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 275-293.
  • Scott C. R. (1997) “Identification with Multiple Targets in a Geographically Dispersed Organization”, Management Communication Quarterly, 10:4, 491-522.
  • Scott, C R. Corman, S.R. ve Cheney, G. (1998) “Development of Strucurational Model of Identification in the Organization” Communication Theory,8:3, 298-336.
  • Scott, S.G. ve Lane, V.R. (2000) “A stakeholder approach to Organizational identity”, Academy of Management Review,25 :1 ,43-62.
  • Shamir, B (1990) “Calculations, values and Identities: The Sources of Collectivist Work Motivation”, Human Relations, 43, 313-332.
  • Simon, B. ve Brown, R.J. (1987) “Perceived Intragroup Homogenity in Minority-majority Contexts”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 703-711.
  • Smitdhs, A. Pryun, A. ve. Van Riel C.B.M (2001) “The Impact of Employee Communication and Perceived External Prestige On Organizational Identification”, Academy of Management Journal, 44:5, 1051-1062.
  • Sproull, L. ve Kiesler S. (1986) “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mailing Organizational Commitment” Management Science, 32:1492-1512. Tajfel, H. (1978) Differentiation between Social Groups. Study In Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.
  • Tajfel, H. (1982) “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations”, Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
  • Tajfel, H. ve Turner J.C. (1985) “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior”. The Psychology of Intergroup Relations içinde Der: Worchel, S.ve Austin, W.G.2, 7-24, Chicago: Nelson Hall.
  • Tompkins, P.K. ve Cheney G. (1985) “Communication and Unobtrusive Control inContemporary Organizations” Organizational Communication: Traditional Themes and New Directions içinde. Der: McPhee, R.D.ve. Tompkins, P.K.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage, 179-210.
  • Van Dick, R. Wagner, U. Stellmacher, J. ve diğerleri (2004) “The Utility of A Broader Conceptualization Organizational Identification: Which Aspect Really Matter?”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77:171-191. Van Dick, R. Wagner
  • U.Stellmacher J. ve diğerleri (2005) “Category Salience and Organizational Identification”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78:273-285.
  • Van Knippenberg, D. ve Van Schie E.C.M. (2000) “Foci correlates of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137-147.
  • Wiesenfeld, B.M. Raghuram, S ve Garud R. (1998) “Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization” Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 3:4.
Toplam 43 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Dr.ipek Kalemci Tüzün Bu kişi benim

Doç. Dr. İrfan Çağlar Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2008
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2008 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 9

Kaynak Göster

APA Tüzün, D. K., & Çağlar, D. D. İ. (2008). ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME KAVRAMI VE İLETİŞİM ETKİNLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 3(9), 1011-1027. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.32776
AMA Tüzün DK, Çağlar DDİ. ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME KAVRAMI VE İLETİŞİM ETKİNLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. Haziran 2008;3(9):1011-1027. doi:10.19168/jyu.32776
Chicago Tüzün, Dr.ipek Kalemci, ve Doç. Dr. İrfan Çağlar. “ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME KAVRAMI VE İLETİŞİM ETKİNLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 3, sy. 9 (Haziran 2008): 1011-27. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.32776.
EndNote Tüzün DK, Çağlar DDİ (01 Haziran 2008) ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME KAVRAMI VE İLETİŞİM ETKİNLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 3 9 1011–1027.
IEEE D. K. Tüzün ve D. D. İ. Çağlar, “ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME KAVRAMI VE İLETİŞİM ETKİNLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ”, Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, c. 3, sy. 9, ss. 1011–1027, 2008, doi: 10.19168/jyu.32776.
ISNAD Tüzün, Dr.ipek Kalemci - Çağlar, Doç. Dr. İrfan. “ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME KAVRAMI VE İLETİŞİM ETKİNLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 3/9 (Haziran 2008), 1011-1027. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.32776.
JAMA Tüzün DK, Çağlar DDİ. ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME KAVRAMI VE İLETİŞİM ETKİNLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. 2008;3:1011–1027.
MLA Tüzün, Dr.ipek Kalemci ve Doç. Dr. İrfan Çağlar. “ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME KAVRAMI VE İLETİŞİM ETKİNLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, c. 3, sy. 9, 2008, ss. 1011-27, doi:10.19168/jyu.32776.
Vancouver Tüzün DK, Çağlar DDİ. ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME KAVRAMI VE İLETİŞİM ETKİNLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. 2008;3(9):1011-27.
 Kapak Resmi İndir