BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

KÜÇÜK VE ORTA BOY İŞLETMELERDE (KOBİ) ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME VE YENİLİK PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİNİN GENEL PERFORMANSA ETKİLERİ

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 29, 4872 - 4895, 01.06.2013

Selim Said Eren Hasan Gül Emrah Tokgöz

Öz

In this study, it is asserted that innovation performance plays mediater role in the relation of organizational learning and firm performance of organizations using structural equation model (SEM). Questionnaire prepared for this purpose is implemented to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operating in different provinces of Turkey. According to the results obtained from the 480 questionnaires; there are positive and significant relationships between organizational learning, innovation performance and firm performance. In addition, innovation performance plays mediater role in the relation of organizational learning and firm performance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational Learning Innovation Performance Firm Performance SMEs

Kaynakça

  • Akman, G. ve Yılmaz, C. (2008), “Innovative Capability, Innovation Strategy and Market Orientation: An Empirical Analysis in Turkish Software Industry”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 12 (1), 69- 111.
  • Alegre, J. ve Chiva, R. (2008), “Assessing The Impact of Organizational Learning Capability on Product Innovation Performance: An Empirical Test”, Technovation, 28, 315- 326.
  • Alpay, G.; Bodur, M.; Yılmaz, C. ve Büyükbalcı, P. (2012), “How Does Innovativeness Yield Superior Firm Performance? The Role Of Marketing Effectiveness, Innovation: Management”, Policy & Practice, 14 (1), 107- 128.
  • Aragon, J. A. C.; Morales, V.J. G. ve Pozo, E. C. (2007), “Leadership and Organizational Learning’s Role On Innovation and Performance: Lessons From Spain”, Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 349- 359.
  • Argyris, C. ve Schon, D. A. (1996), Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice, AddisonWesley Pub. Com. New York, USA.
  • Avcı, N. ve Küçükusta, D. (2009), “Konaklama İşletmelerinde Örgütsel Öğrenme, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İşten Ayrılma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki”, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 20, Sayı: 1, 33Avcı, Umut (2009), “Öğrenme Yönelimliliğin Yenilik Performansı Üzerine Etkisi: Muğla Mermer Sektöründe Bir İnceleme”, ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5, Sayı: 10, 121- 138.
  • Aydoğan, E.; Orhan, F.; Naldöken, Ü.; Beylik, U. ve Aksay, K. (2011), “Sağlık Kurumlarında Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi: Bir Kamu Hastanesi Örneği”, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 12, 2, 191- 213.
  • Baker, W.E. ve Sinkula, J.M. (1999), “The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Organizational Performance”, Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 27 (4), 411- 427.
  • Barrett, P. (2007), Structural Equation Modelling: Adjudging Model Fit, Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815- 824.
  • Brockman, B. K. ve Morgan, R. M. (2003), “The Role of Existing Knowledge in New Product Innovativeness and Performance”, Decision Sciences, 34, 2, 385- 415.
  • Bulut, Ç; Tütüncüoğlu, M. ve Aksoy, E. (2009), “Gelişmekte Olan Ekonomilerde Faaliyet Gösteren KOBİ’lerdeki Firma İçi Girişimcilik Faktörleri ve Yenilikçiliğe Etkileri”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 9 (4) 1357- 1374.
  • Calantone, R. J.; Cavusgil, S. T. ve Zhao, Y. (2002), “Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance”, Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515‐ 524.
  • Calantone, R. J.; Chan, K. ve Cui, A. S., (2006), “Decomposing Product İnnovativeness And İts Effects On New Product Success”, Journal Of Product Innovation, Management, 23, 5, 408- 421.
  • Çetin, C. ve Mutlu, E. (1999), Yönetim Teori, Süreç ve Uygulama, Beta Basım Yayım, İstanbul.
  • Çokluk, Ö.; Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010), Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları, Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
  • Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organizational Innovation: A Meta- Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators”, Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 555- 590.
  • Day, G. S. (1994), “The Capabilities Of Market- Driven Organizations”, Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37–
  • Ellinger, A. D.; Ellinger, A. E.; Yang, B. ve Howton, S. W. (2004), “The Relationship Between The Learning Organization Concept and Firms' Financial Performance: An Empirical Assessment”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13, 1.
  • Enders, C. K. ve Gottschall, A. C. (2011), Multiple Imputation Strategies for Multiple Group Structural Equation Models, Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 35- 54.
  • Erdem, B.; Gökdeniz, A. ve Met, Ö. (2011), “Yenilikçilik ve İşletme Performansı İlişkisi: Antalya’da Etkinlik Gösteren 5 Yıldızlı Otel İşletmeleri Örneği”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 26 (2), 77- 112.
  • Eren, M.Ş.; Yücel, R. ve Eren, S.S. (2010), “Firma Performansına Etkileri Kapsamında Çevresel Olumsuzluk Pazar Dinamizmi Müşteri Odaklılık ve Yenilikçilik Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi”, Journal of Yasar University, 18 (5), 3102‐ 3116.
  • Fiol, C. M. ve Lyles, M. A. (1985), “Organizational Learning”, The Academy of Management Review, 10 (4), 803- 813.
  • Frenz, M ve Lambert, R. (2012), “Mixed Modes of Innovation: An Empiric Approach to Capturing Firms' Innovation Behaviour”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2012/06, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k8x6l0bp3bp-en
  • Fu, F. Q.; Jones, E. ve Bolander, W., (2008), “Product Innovatıveness, Customer Newness, And New Product Performance: A Tıme-Lagged Examınatıon Of The Impact Of Salesperson Sellıng Intentıons On New Product Performance”, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 28 (4), 351- 364.
  • Gül, H. (2012), “İşletmelerin Kuruluş Şekilleri”, (Ed. Yelkikalkan, N.), Temel İşletmecilik Bilgileri, Kriter Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Günday, G.; Ulusoy, G.; Kılıç, K. ve Alpkan, L. (2011), “Effects of Innovation Types On Firm Performance”, Int. J. Production Economics, 133, 662- 676.
  • Hult, G. T. M.; Hurley, R. F. ve Knight, G. A. (2004), “Innovativeness: Its Antecedents and Impact on Business Performance”, Industrial Marketing Management, 33: 429‐ 438.
  • Hung, R. Y. Y.; Lien, B. Ya-Hui; Yang, B.; Wu, Chi-Min and Kuo, Yu-Ming, (2011), “Impact of TQM and Organizational Learning on Innovation Performance in The High-Tech Industry”, International Business Review, 20, 213- 225.
  • Hurley, R. F. ve Hult, G. T. M. (1998), “Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empiricail Examination”, Journal of Marketing, 62, 42- 54.
  • İbicioğlu H. ve Avcı, U. (2005), “Örgütsel Öğrenmede Paylaşılmış Vizyon ve Paradigmatik Uyumun Önemi”, Muğla Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 14, 157- 166.
  • Ihinmoyan, T. ve Akinyele, S. T., (2011), “Relationship Between Market Orientation, Firm Innovativeness and Innovative Performance”, The Journal Contemporary Management Research, 5 (2), 42- 54.
  • Jiang, X. ve Li Y. (2008), “The Relationship Between Organizational Learning and Firms’ Financial Performance in Strategic Alliances: A Contingency Approach”, Journal of World Business, 43, 365- 379.
  • Jimenez, D. J. ve Valle, R. S. (2011), “Innovation, Organizational Learning, and Performance”, Journal of Business Research, 64, 408- 417.
  • Kafouros, Mario I.; Buckley, Peter J.; Sharp, John A. ve Wang, Chengqi, (2008), “The Role of Internationalization in Explaining Innovation Performance”, Technovation, 28, 63- 74.
  • Karahan, A. ve Yılmaz H. (2011), “Örgütsel Öğrenme, Personel Güçlendirme ve Takım Performansı Arasındaki İlişkilerin Analiz Edilmesi: Sağlık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14 (25), 136- 156.
  • Kennerley, M. ve Neely, A. (2002), “A Framework of The Factors Affecting The Evalution of Performance Measurement Systems”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22 (11), 1222- 1245.
  • Kirner, E.; Kinkel, S. ve Jaeger, A. (2009),” Innovation Paths and The Innovation Performance of LowTechnology Firms- An Empirical Analysis of German Industry”, Research Policy, 38, 447- 458. Ma, W; Zhu, G. ve Hou, Y. (2011), “Learning Orientation, Process Innovation, and Firm Performance in Manufacturing Industry”, Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences (AISS) 3 (11), doi : 10.4156/AISS.
  • Matsuo, M. (2006), “Customer Orientation, Conflict, and Innovativeness in Japanese Sales Departments”, Journal of Business Research, 59, 242- 250.
  • Mawer, D. (2003), Enlivening Analysis Through Performance: Practising Set Theory, Ed. B. J. Music, Cambridge University Press, 20 (3).
  • Miller, D. (1983), “The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms”, Management Science, 29 (7), 770- 791.
  • Miller, D. (1996), “Configurations Revisited”, The Strategic Management Journal, 17 (7), 505- 512. Miller, D. ve Friesen, P. H., (1982), “Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum”, Strategic Management Journal, 3 (1), 1- 25.
  • Morales, V. J. G.; Montes, F. J. L. ve Verdu, A. J. J. (2007), “Influence of Personal Mastery on Organizational Performance Through Organizational Learning and İnnovation in Large Firms and SMEs”, Technovation, 27, 547- 568.
  • Morales, V. J. G.; Barrionuevo, M. M. ve Gutiérrez, L. G. (2012), “Transformational Leadership Influence on Organizational Performance Through Organizational Learning and Innovation”, Journal of Business Research, 65, 1040- 1050.
  • Nonaka, Ikujiro ve Takeuchi, Hirotaka (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create The Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • OECD (2012), “Innovation in Science, Technology and Industry, Innovation For Development”, evelopment.htm> (Erişim tarihi: 25.12.2012)
  • Panayides, P. M. (2007), “The Impact of Organizational Learning on Relationship Orientation, Logistics Service Effectiveness and Performance” Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 68
  • Phillips, W.; Noke, H.; Bessant, J. ve Lamming, R. (2006), “Beyond The Steady State: Managing Discontınuous Product and Process Innovation”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 10 (2), 175- 196.
  • Podsakoff, P. M; MacKenzie, S. B; Lee, Jeong-Yeon ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2003), “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of The Literature and Recommended Remedies”, Journal of Appl. Psychol., 88, (5), 879- 903.
  • Ramos, M. T. B.; Morales, V. J. G. ve Sanchez, E. G. (2012), Technological Distinctive Competencies and Organizational Learning: Effects on Organizational Innovation To Improve Firm Performance, Journal of English Technology Management, 29, 331- 357.
  • Reiner, G. (2004), “Customer- Oriented Improvement and Evaluation of Supply Chain Processes Supported By Simulation Models”, International Journal of Production Economics (22): 3813
  • Rodrigues, H. S.; Dorrego, P. F. ve Jardon, C. F. (2010), “The Influence Of Human Capital on The Innovativeness Of Firms”, International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9, 9.
  • Rubera, G. ve Kirca, Ahmet H. (2012), “Firm Innovativeness and Its Performance Outcomes: A MetaAnalytic Review and Theoretical Integration”, Journal of Marketing, 76, 130- 147.
  • Ryan, A. (2012), “Innovation Performance”, 468-4125.pdf > (17.11.2012)
  • Sahaya, N. (2012), “A Learning Organization As A Mediator of Leadership Style and Firms' Financial Performance”, International Journal of Business and Manegement, 7 (14): ISSN 1833-3850 EISSN 1833-8119.
  • Salavou, H. ve Lioukas, S. (2003), “Radical Product Innovations In SMEs: The Dominance of Entrepreneurial Orientation”, Creativity and Innovation Management, 12, 2.
  • Salim, I. M. ve Sulaiman, M. (2011), “Organizational Learning, Innovation and Performance: A Study of Malaysian Small and Medium Sized Enterprises”, International Journal of Business and Management, 6 (12), 118- 126.
  • Senge, P. M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art And Practice Of The Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday Currency.
  • Slater, S. F. ve Narver, J. C. (1995) “Market Orientation and The Learning Organization”, Journal of Marketing, 59 (3), 63- 75.
  • Stata, R. (1989), “Organizational Learning: The Key To Management Innovation”, Sloan Management Review. 30 (3), 63-74.
  • Şimşek, M. ve Nursoy, M. (2002), Toplam Kalite Yönetiminde Performans Ölçme, Hayat Yayınları, No.128, İstanbul.
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007), Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş Temel İlkeler ve LISREL Uygulamaları, Ekinoks, Ankara.
  • Tarım, M. (2004), “Sağlık Sektöründe Performans Ölçme ve Dengeli Puan Cetveli”. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 2 (7), 233- 248.
  • Tosunoğlu, B. T. (2009), Girişimcilik ve Ekonomik Gelişme, (Ed. Odabaşı, Y.), Girişimcilik, Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayını, No: 824, Eskişehir.
  • Tsai, Kuen-Hung. (2009), “Collaborative Networks And Product Innovation Performance: Toward A Contingency Perspective”, Research Policy, 38, 765- 778.
  • TÜİK. (2012), “Küçük ve Orta Büyüklükteki Girişim İstatistikleri, 2011”, Haber Bülteni, Sayı: 13146, 19/10/2012
  • Ussahawanitchakit, Phapruke (2011), “Moderating Effects of Environment on The Strategic Leadership, Organizational Learning, Innovation, and Performance Relationships”, Journal of International Business and Economics, 11 (2), 45- 55.
  • Ürper, Y. (2009), “Girişimcilikte Yenilik”, (Ed. Odabaşı, Y.), Girişimcilik, Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayını, No: 824, Eskişehir.
  • Verhees, Frans J. H. M. and Meulenberg, Matthew T. G. (2004), “Market Orientation, Innovativeness, Product Innovation, and Performance in Small Firms”, Journal of Small Business Management, 42 (2), 134- 154.
  • Wattanasupachoke, T. (2012), “Design Thinking, Innovativeness and Performance: An Empirical Examination”, International Journal of Management and Innovation, 4 (1), 1.
  • Yang, Mei-Ling; Wang, Andrew Ming-Long ve Cheng, Kuo-Chih, (2009), “The Impact of Quality of is Information and Budget Slack on Innovation Performance”, Technovation, 29, 527- 536.
  • Yılmaz, C.; Alpkan, L. ve Bulut, Ç. (2009), “Firmaların Kültürel Oryantasyonlarının Çeşitli Performans Boyutlarına Etkileri: Türk İmalat ve Hizmet İşletmeleri Üzerinde Bir Saha Çalışması”, Journal of Yasar University, 4 (16), 2469- 2500.
  • Yılmaz, H. ve Görmüş, A. Ş. (2012), “Stratejik Girişimciliğin, Algılanan Örgütsel Destek ve Örgütsel Öğrenme Üzerine Etkilerinin Araştırılması: Tekstil Sektöründe Ampirik Bir Çalışma”, Journal of Yasar University, 26 (7), 4483- 4504.

KÜÇÜK VE ORTA BOY İŞLETMELERDE (KOBİ) ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME VE YENİLİK PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİNİN GENEL PERFORMANSA ETKİLERİ

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 29, 4872 - 4895, 01.06.2013

Selim Said Eren Hasan Gül Emrah Tokgöz

Öz

Bu çalışmada işletmelerdeki örgütsel öğrenmenin genel performans üzerindeki etkisinde yenilik performansının aracılık rolü yapısal eşitlik modeli (YEM) yardımıyla incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla hazırlanan soru anketi, Türkiye’nin farklı illerinde faaliyet gösteren küçük ve orta büyüklükteki işletmelere (KOBİ) uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen 480 adet anket sonuçlarına göre; örgütsel öğrenme, yenilik performansı ve genel performans arasında anlamlı ve pozitif ilişkiler vardır. Ayrıca, yenilik performansı, örgütsel öğrenme ve genel performans arasındaki ilişkide aracılık rolü oynamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel öğrenme Yenilik performansı İşletme performansı KOBİ

Kaynakça

  • Akman, G. ve Yılmaz, C. (2008), “Innovative Capability, Innovation Strategy and Market Orientation: An Empirical Analysis in Turkish Software Industry”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 12 (1), 69- 111.
  • Alegre, J. ve Chiva, R. (2008), “Assessing The Impact of Organizational Learning Capability on Product Innovation Performance: An Empirical Test”, Technovation, 28, 315- 326.
  • Alpay, G.; Bodur, M.; Yılmaz, C. ve Büyükbalcı, P. (2012), “How Does Innovativeness Yield Superior Firm Performance? The Role Of Marketing Effectiveness, Innovation: Management”, Policy & Practice, 14 (1), 107- 128.
  • Aragon, J. A. C.; Morales, V.J. G. ve Pozo, E. C. (2007), “Leadership and Organizational Learning’s Role On Innovation and Performance: Lessons From Spain”, Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 349- 359.
  • Argyris, C. ve Schon, D. A. (1996), Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice, AddisonWesley Pub. Com. New York, USA.
  • Avcı, N. ve Küçükusta, D. (2009), “Konaklama İşletmelerinde Örgütsel Öğrenme, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İşten Ayrılma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki”, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 20, Sayı: 1, 33Avcı, Umut (2009), “Öğrenme Yönelimliliğin Yenilik Performansı Üzerine Etkisi: Muğla Mermer Sektöründe Bir İnceleme”, ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5, Sayı: 10, 121- 138.
  • Aydoğan, E.; Orhan, F.; Naldöken, Ü.; Beylik, U. ve Aksay, K. (2011), “Sağlık Kurumlarında Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi: Bir Kamu Hastanesi Örneği”, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 12, 2, 191- 213.
  • Baker, W.E. ve Sinkula, J.M. (1999), “The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Organizational Performance”, Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 27 (4), 411- 427.
  • Barrett, P. (2007), Structural Equation Modelling: Adjudging Model Fit, Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815- 824.
  • Brockman, B. K. ve Morgan, R. M. (2003), “The Role of Existing Knowledge in New Product Innovativeness and Performance”, Decision Sciences, 34, 2, 385- 415.
  • Bulut, Ç; Tütüncüoğlu, M. ve Aksoy, E. (2009), “Gelişmekte Olan Ekonomilerde Faaliyet Gösteren KOBİ’lerdeki Firma İçi Girişimcilik Faktörleri ve Yenilikçiliğe Etkileri”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 9 (4) 1357- 1374.
  • Calantone, R. J.; Cavusgil, S. T. ve Zhao, Y. (2002), “Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance”, Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515‐ 524.
  • Calantone, R. J.; Chan, K. ve Cui, A. S., (2006), “Decomposing Product İnnovativeness And İts Effects On New Product Success”, Journal Of Product Innovation, Management, 23, 5, 408- 421.
  • Çetin, C. ve Mutlu, E. (1999), Yönetim Teori, Süreç ve Uygulama, Beta Basım Yayım, İstanbul.
  • Çokluk, Ö.; Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010), Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları, Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
  • Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organizational Innovation: A Meta- Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators”, Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 555- 590.
  • Day, G. S. (1994), “The Capabilities Of Market- Driven Organizations”, Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37–
  • Ellinger, A. D.; Ellinger, A. E.; Yang, B. ve Howton, S. W. (2004), “The Relationship Between The Learning Organization Concept and Firms' Financial Performance: An Empirical Assessment”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13, 1.
  • Enders, C. K. ve Gottschall, A. C. (2011), Multiple Imputation Strategies for Multiple Group Structural Equation Models, Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 35- 54.
  • Erdem, B.; Gökdeniz, A. ve Met, Ö. (2011), “Yenilikçilik ve İşletme Performansı İlişkisi: Antalya’da Etkinlik Gösteren 5 Yıldızlı Otel İşletmeleri Örneği”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 26 (2), 77- 112.
  • Eren, M.Ş.; Yücel, R. ve Eren, S.S. (2010), “Firma Performansına Etkileri Kapsamında Çevresel Olumsuzluk Pazar Dinamizmi Müşteri Odaklılık ve Yenilikçilik Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi”, Journal of Yasar University, 18 (5), 3102‐ 3116.
  • Fiol, C. M. ve Lyles, M. A. (1985), “Organizational Learning”, The Academy of Management Review, 10 (4), 803- 813.
  • Frenz, M ve Lambert, R. (2012), “Mixed Modes of Innovation: An Empiric Approach to Capturing Firms' Innovation Behaviour”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2012/06, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k8x6l0bp3bp-en
  • Fu, F. Q.; Jones, E. ve Bolander, W., (2008), “Product Innovatıveness, Customer Newness, And New Product Performance: A Tıme-Lagged Examınatıon Of The Impact Of Salesperson Sellıng Intentıons On New Product Performance”, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 28 (4), 351- 364.
  • Gül, H. (2012), “İşletmelerin Kuruluş Şekilleri”, (Ed. Yelkikalkan, N.), Temel İşletmecilik Bilgileri, Kriter Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Günday, G.; Ulusoy, G.; Kılıç, K. ve Alpkan, L. (2011), “Effects of Innovation Types On Firm Performance”, Int. J. Production Economics, 133, 662- 676.
  • Hult, G. T. M.; Hurley, R. F. ve Knight, G. A. (2004), “Innovativeness: Its Antecedents and Impact on Business Performance”, Industrial Marketing Management, 33: 429‐ 438.
  • Hung, R. Y. Y.; Lien, B. Ya-Hui; Yang, B.; Wu, Chi-Min and Kuo, Yu-Ming, (2011), “Impact of TQM and Organizational Learning on Innovation Performance in The High-Tech Industry”, International Business Review, 20, 213- 225.
  • Hurley, R. F. ve Hult, G. T. M. (1998), “Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empiricail Examination”, Journal of Marketing, 62, 42- 54.
  • İbicioğlu H. ve Avcı, U. (2005), “Örgütsel Öğrenmede Paylaşılmış Vizyon ve Paradigmatik Uyumun Önemi”, Muğla Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 14, 157- 166.
  • Ihinmoyan, T. ve Akinyele, S. T., (2011), “Relationship Between Market Orientation, Firm Innovativeness and Innovative Performance”, The Journal Contemporary Management Research, 5 (2), 42- 54.
  • Jiang, X. ve Li Y. (2008), “The Relationship Between Organizational Learning and Firms’ Financial Performance in Strategic Alliances: A Contingency Approach”, Journal of World Business, 43, 365- 379.
  • Jimenez, D. J. ve Valle, R. S. (2011), “Innovation, Organizational Learning, and Performance”, Journal of Business Research, 64, 408- 417.
  • Kafouros, Mario I.; Buckley, Peter J.; Sharp, John A. ve Wang, Chengqi, (2008), “The Role of Internationalization in Explaining Innovation Performance”, Technovation, 28, 63- 74.
  • Karahan, A. ve Yılmaz H. (2011), “Örgütsel Öğrenme, Personel Güçlendirme ve Takım Performansı Arasındaki İlişkilerin Analiz Edilmesi: Sağlık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14 (25), 136- 156.
  • Kennerley, M. ve Neely, A. (2002), “A Framework of The Factors Affecting The Evalution of Performance Measurement Systems”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22 (11), 1222- 1245.
  • Kirner, E.; Kinkel, S. ve Jaeger, A. (2009),” Innovation Paths and The Innovation Performance of LowTechnology Firms- An Empirical Analysis of German Industry”, Research Policy, 38, 447- 458. Ma, W; Zhu, G. ve Hou, Y. (2011), “Learning Orientation, Process Innovation, and Firm Performance in Manufacturing Industry”, Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences (AISS) 3 (11), doi : 10.4156/AISS.
  • Matsuo, M. (2006), “Customer Orientation, Conflict, and Innovativeness in Japanese Sales Departments”, Journal of Business Research, 59, 242- 250.
  • Mawer, D. (2003), Enlivening Analysis Through Performance: Practising Set Theory, Ed. B. J. Music, Cambridge University Press, 20 (3).
  • Miller, D. (1983), “The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms”, Management Science, 29 (7), 770- 791.
  • Miller, D. (1996), “Configurations Revisited”, The Strategic Management Journal, 17 (7), 505- 512. Miller, D. ve Friesen, P. H., (1982), “Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum”, Strategic Management Journal, 3 (1), 1- 25.
  • Morales, V. J. G.; Montes, F. J. L. ve Verdu, A. J. J. (2007), “Influence of Personal Mastery on Organizational Performance Through Organizational Learning and İnnovation in Large Firms and SMEs”, Technovation, 27, 547- 568.
  • Morales, V. J. G.; Barrionuevo, M. M. ve Gutiérrez, L. G. (2012), “Transformational Leadership Influence on Organizational Performance Through Organizational Learning and Innovation”, Journal of Business Research, 65, 1040- 1050.
  • Nonaka, Ikujiro ve Takeuchi, Hirotaka (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create The Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • OECD (2012), “Innovation in Science, Technology and Industry, Innovation For Development”, evelopment.htm> (Erişim tarihi: 25.12.2012)
  • Panayides, P. M. (2007), “The Impact of Organizational Learning on Relationship Orientation, Logistics Service Effectiveness and Performance” Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 68
  • Phillips, W.; Noke, H.; Bessant, J. ve Lamming, R. (2006), “Beyond The Steady State: Managing Discontınuous Product and Process Innovation”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 10 (2), 175- 196.
  • Podsakoff, P. M; MacKenzie, S. B; Lee, Jeong-Yeon ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2003), “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of The Literature and Recommended Remedies”, Journal of Appl. Psychol., 88, (5), 879- 903.
  • Ramos, M. T. B.; Morales, V. J. G. ve Sanchez, E. G. (2012), Technological Distinctive Competencies and Organizational Learning: Effects on Organizational Innovation To Improve Firm Performance, Journal of English Technology Management, 29, 331- 357.
  • Reiner, G. (2004), “Customer- Oriented Improvement and Evaluation of Supply Chain Processes Supported By Simulation Models”, International Journal of Production Economics (22): 3813
  • Rodrigues, H. S.; Dorrego, P. F. ve Jardon, C. F. (2010), “The Influence Of Human Capital on The Innovativeness Of Firms”, International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9, 9.
  • Rubera, G. ve Kirca, Ahmet H. (2012), “Firm Innovativeness and Its Performance Outcomes: A MetaAnalytic Review and Theoretical Integration”, Journal of Marketing, 76, 130- 147.
  • Ryan, A. (2012), “Innovation Performance”, 468-4125.pdf > (17.11.2012)
  • Sahaya, N. (2012), “A Learning Organization As A Mediator of Leadership Style and Firms' Financial Performance”, International Journal of Business and Manegement, 7 (14): ISSN 1833-3850 EISSN 1833-8119.
  • Salavou, H. ve Lioukas, S. (2003), “Radical Product Innovations In SMEs: The Dominance of Entrepreneurial Orientation”, Creativity and Innovation Management, 12, 2.
  • Salim, I. M. ve Sulaiman, M. (2011), “Organizational Learning, Innovation and Performance: A Study of Malaysian Small and Medium Sized Enterprises”, International Journal of Business and Management, 6 (12), 118- 126.
  • Senge, P. M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art And Practice Of The Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday Currency.
  • Slater, S. F. ve Narver, J. C. (1995) “Market Orientation and The Learning Organization”, Journal of Marketing, 59 (3), 63- 75.
  • Stata, R. (1989), “Organizational Learning: The Key To Management Innovation”, Sloan Management Review. 30 (3), 63-74.
  • Şimşek, M. ve Nursoy, M. (2002), Toplam Kalite Yönetiminde Performans Ölçme, Hayat Yayınları, No.128, İstanbul.
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007), Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş Temel İlkeler ve LISREL Uygulamaları, Ekinoks, Ankara.
  • Tarım, M. (2004), “Sağlık Sektöründe Performans Ölçme ve Dengeli Puan Cetveli”. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 2 (7), 233- 248.
  • Tosunoğlu, B. T. (2009), Girişimcilik ve Ekonomik Gelişme, (Ed. Odabaşı, Y.), Girişimcilik, Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayını, No: 824, Eskişehir.
  • Tsai, Kuen-Hung. (2009), “Collaborative Networks And Product Innovation Performance: Toward A Contingency Perspective”, Research Policy, 38, 765- 778.
  • TÜİK. (2012), “Küçük ve Orta Büyüklükteki Girişim İstatistikleri, 2011”, Haber Bülteni, Sayı: 13146, 19/10/2012
  • Ussahawanitchakit, Phapruke (2011), “Moderating Effects of Environment on The Strategic Leadership, Organizational Learning, Innovation, and Performance Relationships”, Journal of International Business and Economics, 11 (2), 45- 55.
  • Ürper, Y. (2009), “Girişimcilikte Yenilik”, (Ed. Odabaşı, Y.), Girişimcilik, Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayını, No: 824, Eskişehir.
  • Verhees, Frans J. H. M. and Meulenberg, Matthew T. G. (2004), “Market Orientation, Innovativeness, Product Innovation, and Performance in Small Firms”, Journal of Small Business Management, 42 (2), 134- 154.
  • Wattanasupachoke, T. (2012), “Design Thinking, Innovativeness and Performance: An Empirical Examination”, International Journal of Management and Innovation, 4 (1), 1.
  • Yang, Mei-Ling; Wang, Andrew Ming-Long ve Cheng, Kuo-Chih, (2009), “The Impact of Quality of is Information and Budget Slack on Innovation Performance”, Technovation, 29, 527- 536.
  • Yılmaz, C.; Alpkan, L. ve Bulut, Ç. (2009), “Firmaların Kültürel Oryantasyonlarının Çeşitli Performans Boyutlarına Etkileri: Türk İmalat ve Hizmet İşletmeleri Üzerinde Bir Saha Çalışması”, Journal of Yasar University, 4 (16), 2469- 2500.
  • Yılmaz, H. ve Görmüş, A. Ş. (2012), “Stratejik Girişimciliğin, Algılanan Örgütsel Destek ve Örgütsel Öğrenme Üzerine Etkilerinin Araştırılması: Tekstil Sektöründe Ampirik Bir Çalışma”, Journal of Yasar University, 26 (7), 4483- 4504.
Toplam 72 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Selim Said Eren Hasan Gül Emrah Tokgöz Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2013
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 29

Kaynak Göster

APA Tokgöz, S. S. E. . H. G. . E. (2013). KÜÇÜK VE ORTA BOY İŞLETMELERDE (KOBİ) ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME VE YENİLİK PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİNİN GENEL PERFORMANSA ETKİLERİ. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 8(29), 4872-4895. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.54804
AMA Tokgöz SSEHGE. KÜÇÜK VE ORTA BOY İŞLETMELERDE (KOBİ) ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME VE YENİLİK PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİNİN GENEL PERFORMANSA ETKİLERİ. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. Haziran 2013;8(29):4872-4895. doi:10.19168/jyu.54804
Chicago Tokgöz, Selim Said Eren Hasan Gül Emrah. “KÜÇÜK VE ORTA BOY İŞLETMELERDE (KOBİ) ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME VE YENİLİK PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİNİN GENEL PERFORMANSA ETKİLERİ”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 8, sy. 29 (Haziran 2013): 4872-95. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.54804.
EndNote Tokgöz SSEHGE (01 Haziran 2013) KÜÇÜK VE ORTA BOY İŞLETMELERDE (KOBİ) ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME VE YENİLİK PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİNİN GENEL PERFORMANSA ETKİLERİ. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 8 29 4872–4895.
IEEE S. S. E. . H. G. . E. Tokgöz, “KÜÇÜK VE ORTA BOY İŞLETMELERDE (KOBİ) ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME VE YENİLİK PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİNİN GENEL PERFORMANSA ETKİLERİ”, Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, c. 8, sy. 29, ss. 4872–4895, 2013, doi: 10.19168/jyu.54804.
ISNAD Tokgöz, Selim Said Eren Hasan Gül Emrah. “KÜÇÜK VE ORTA BOY İŞLETMELERDE (KOBİ) ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME VE YENİLİK PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİNİN GENEL PERFORMANSA ETKİLERİ”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 8/29 (Haziran 2013), 4872-4895. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.54804.
JAMA Tokgöz SSEHGE. KÜÇÜK VE ORTA BOY İŞLETMELERDE (KOBİ) ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME VE YENİLİK PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİNİN GENEL PERFORMANSA ETKİLERİ. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. 2013;8:4872–4895.
MLA Tokgöz, Selim Said Eren Hasan Gül Emrah. “KÜÇÜK VE ORTA BOY İŞLETMELERDE (KOBİ) ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME VE YENİLİK PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİNİN GENEL PERFORMANSA ETKİLERİ”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, c. 8, sy. 29, 2013, ss. 4872-95, doi:10.19168/jyu.54804.
Vancouver Tokgöz SSEHGE. KÜÇÜK VE ORTA BOY İŞLETMELERDE (KOBİ) ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME VE YENİLİK PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİNİN GENEL PERFORMANSA ETKİLERİ. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. 2013;8(29):4872-95.