Dilin Kökeni Üzerine Klasik İslâmî Söylem: Kültürel Hafıza ve Sünnîliğin Savunusu

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 495 - 516, 30.06.2022

Çevirmen: Sibel Dinçaslan , Çevirmen: Rumeysa Uysal

https://doi.org/10.18317/kaderdergi.1103930

Öz

Erken dönem İslâm düşünce geleneğinde, dilin kökeni (aslu’l-luga) konusunda iki temel görüş geliştirildi. Genelde tevkîf olarak bahsedilen, ilahi failin dilin vaz‘ edilmesinde üstün rol oynadığını vurgulayan ve bu açıdan ispat gerektirmeyen (axiomatic) birinci görüş şudur: lafızların manaları başlangıçta Tanrı tarafından belirlenmiştir. Bu tutuma karşı tez olarak sunulan ve ıstılâh olarak adlandırılan ikinci doktrin ise dilin –sonradan- kurulduğunu, genel uylaşım ve anlaşma süreciyle evrildiğini esas alır: Kelimeler anlamlarıyla birlikte insanlar tarafından tayin edilmiştir. Ancak hem tevkîf hem de ıstılâh doktrinleri, kelimelerin muayyen manaları ile olan gerçek ilişkilerinin doğal olduğunu reddederek tamamen nedensiz (arbitrary) olduğunu ileri sürmüştür. Her ne kadar müteahhir İslam düşünce geleneği, her ikisinin de mantıklı olduğunu kabul etse de, dokuz ve onuncu yüzyıllarda konu hakkındaki görüşler dikkate değer biçimde, sünnî (orthodox) ve arch-rasyonalist şeklinde fırkalara ayrılmıştır ki bunlardan ilki tevkîfi ikincisi de ıstılâhı onaylamıştır. Geleneksel tevkîf argümanlarının kavramsal bir savunusunu sağlamada Sünnî kelâmcılar, birleştirici bir yapı oluşturmak zorundaydı. Bu yapının hatırlama (remembrance), sürdürme (continuation) ve özdeşlik (identitiy) üzerinden ifade edilmesi kelamcılara, tevkîfin kurgusunu, selefle ilişkilendirilmiş metin yorumu ve sünnî simgeler üzerine formel bir biçimde dayandırma olanağı sağladı. Geçmişe yapılan referanslarla sağlanan bu yapı, sünnî inanç olarak kabul edileni savunmada, kültürel hafızanın rolünü onaylamış gibi görünebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İslâm, Dilin kökeni, Nahivciler, Sünnîlik, Mu‘tezile, Eş‘arîyye

Teşekkür

Makale çevirisinde kendisinden sık sık yardım aldığımız ve istifade ettiğimiz kıymetli hocamız Dr. Öğr. Gör. Emine Enise Yakar 'a teşekkürü borç biliriz.

Classical Islamic Discourse on the Origins of Language: Cultural Memory and the Defense of Orthodoxy

Öz

Classical Islamic scholarship developed two principal theses on the subject of the origin of language (aṣl al-lugha). The first of these theses, commonly referred to as tawqīf, accentuated the pre-eminent role that divine agency played in the imposition of language; axiomatic within this perspective is the view that words (lafẓ pl. alfāẓ) have been assigned their meanings (maʿnā pl. maʿānī) primordially by God. Presented as something of an antithesis to this position, the second doctrine, labeled iṣṭilāḥ, predicates that language was established and evolved via a process of common convention and agreement: words together with their meanings were assigned by human beings, although both the doctrines of tawqīf and iṣṭilāḥ posit that the actual relationship between words and their assigned meanings remains entirely arbitrary, rejecting any sort of natural link between the two. Although later Islamic scholarship accepted that both theses were plausible, within the course of the 9th/10th centuries opinions on the subject were ostensibly polarized between orthodox and arch-rationalist camps with the former endorsing tawqīf and the latter iṣṭilāḥ. In the quest to achieve a conceptual defense of traditional arguments for tawqīf it was necessary for orthodox theologians to create a connective structure, as articulated through reference to remembrance, continuation, and identity, which enabled them to anchor the construct of tawqīf in a formalized way to the scriptural exegesis and emblems of orthodoxy associated with the pious ancestors. That this was successfully accomplished through references to the past would seem to confirm the role which cultural memory played in the defense of what was deemed an orthodox belief.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Islam, Origins of language, Arabic grammarians, Orthodoxy, Muʿtazilites, Ashʿaris

Kaynakça

• ʿAbd al-Jabbār, al-Qāḍī Aḥmad al-Asadābādī. al-Mughnī fī abwāb al-tawḥīd waʾl-ʿadl. vol. 5. Maḥmūd Muḥammad al-Khuḍayrī (ed.). Cairo: al-Dār al-Miṣriyya liʾl-Taʾlīf waʾl-Tarjama, 1965.
• ʿAbd al-Jabbār, al-Qāḍī Aḥmad al-Asadābādī.Mutashābih al-Qurʾān, Muḥammad Zarzūr(ed.). Cairo: Dār al-Turāth, 1969.
• Abū ʾl-Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī. M. ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd Abū ʾl-Ḥasan (ed.). Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn. Beirut: al-Maktaba al-Aṣriyya, 1990.
• Abū ʾl-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī. Khalīl al-Mays (ed.). al-Muʿtamad fi uṣūl al-fiqh, 5 vols. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1991.
• Al-Āmidī, Sayf al-Dīn. A Farīdī (ed.). Ghāyat al-marām fī ʿilm al-kalām. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2004.
• Asnawī, Jamāl al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Raḥīm al-. Shaʿbān Muḥammad Ismāʿīl (ed.). Asnawī, Jamāl al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Raḥīm. Nihāyat al-sūl fī sharḥ minhāj al-wuṣūl ilā ʿilm al-uṣūl. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 1999.
• Baghdādī, ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-. Kitāb uṣūl al-dīn. Istanbul: Madrasat al-Ilāhiyāt Bi-Dār al-Funūn, 1928.
• Bāqillānī, Abū Bakr b. Tạ yyib. Kitāb Tamhīd al-awāʾil wa-talkhīṣ al-dalāʾil, ʿImad al-Dīn Aḥmad b. Ḥaydar (ed.). Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Kutub al-Thaqāfiyya, 1993.
• Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. al-Mankhūl min taʿlīqāt al-uṣūl. M.H. Haytū (ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Ḥadīth. 1971.
• Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. al-Maqṣad al-asnā sharḥ asmāʾ Allāh al-ḥusnā. Muḥammad al-Nawāwī (ed.). Cairo: Maktabat al-Fajr al-Jadīd, 2006.
• Ibn ʿAsākir, Abū ʾl-Qāsim ʿAlī b. al-Ḥasan. Tabyīn Kadhib al-muftarī fīmā nusiba ilā al-imām Abī ʾl-Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī, 1991.
• Ibn Fāris, Abū ʾl-Ḥusayn Aḥmad b. Zakariyyāʾ. n.d. al-Ṣāḥibī fī fiqh al-lugha ʾl- ʿarabiyya wa-sunan al-ʿArab fī kalāmihā. Aḥmad Ṣaqr (ed.). Cairo: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Kutubal-ʿArabiyya.
• Ibn Fūrak, Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan. Mujarrad maqālat al-shaykh Abīʾl-Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī: (expose de la doctrine d’al-Ashʿarī). D. Gimaret (ed.). Beirut: Darel-Machreq, 1987.
• Ibn Ḥazm, Abū Muḥammad ʿAlī b. Aḥmad. al-Fiṣal fīʾl-milal wa’l-ahwāʾ waʾlniḥal. 4 vols. Muḥammad Naṣr and ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-ʿUmayra(ed.). Beirut: Dāral-Jīl, 1985.
• Ibn Jinnī, Abū ʾl-Fatḥ ʿUthmān. al-Khaṣāʾiṣ. Muḥammad ʿAlī al-Najjār(ed.). Cairo: Maṭbaʿat Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyya, 1952.
• Ibn Qayyim, Shams al-Dīn Abī ʿAbd Allāh. Al-Ṣawāʾiq al-mursala ʿalā al-jahmiyya wa’l-muʿaṭṭila. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1990.
• Ibn Taymiyya, Aḥmad b. ʿAbd al-Ḥalīm. Kitāb al-Īmān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutubal-ʿIlmiyya, 1983.
• Isfarāyīnī, Abū ʾl-Muẓaffar. al-Tabṣīr fīʾl-dīn wa-tamyīz al-firqa al-nājiya ʿan al-firaq al-hālikīn. Muḥammad al-Kawtharī (ed.). Cairo: Al-Maktaba al-Azhariyya lil’l-Turāth, 1999.
• Jurjānī, al-Sharīf ʿAlī b. Muḥammad. Sharḥ al-Mawāqif. 4 vols. in 8 parts. Maḥmūd ʿAmr al-Dimyāṭī (ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah. 1998.
• Juwaynī, Abū’l-Maʿālī ʿAbd al-Malik. al-Shāmil fī uṣūl al-dīn. Sāmī al-Nashshār, Fayṣal Budayr ʿAwn, Suhayr Muḥammad Mukhtār (ed.). Alexandria: Munshaʾat al-Maʿārif, 1969.
• Juwaynī, Abū’l-Maʿālī ʿAbd al-Malik. Kitāb al-Irshād ilā qawāṭiʿ al-adilla fī uṣūl al-iʿtiqād. Asʿad Tamīm (ed.). Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Kutub al-Thaqāfiyya, 1996.
• Mānkdīm Shashdīw, Aḥmad b. al-Ḥusayn. Kitāb sharḥ al-usūl al-khamsa. Commentary by Mānkdīm Shashdīw, Aḥmad b. al-Ḥusayn. ʿAbd al-Karīm ʿUthmān (ed.). Cairo: Maktabat Wahba, 1965. (The text is often attributed to ʿAbd al-Jabbār)
• Naysābūrī, Abū Rashīd Saʿīd b. Muḥammad ibn Saʿīd. al-Masāʾil fī’l-khilāf baynal-Baṣriyīn waʾl-Baghdādiyīn. M. Ziyāda and R. al-Sayyid (ed.). Beirut: Maʿhad al-Inmāʾ al-ʿArabī, 1979.
• Qurṭubī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad al-Anṣārī. al-Jāmiʿ lī aḥkām al-Qurʾān. 21 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1988.
• Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar. al-Maḥṣūl fī ʿilm al-uṣūl, 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1988.
• Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar. Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb. 16 vols. 32 parts. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1981–83.
• Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. al-Muzhir fī ʿulūm al-lugha wa-anwāʿihā. 2 vols. (ed.). Jād al-Mawlā, M.A., al-Bajāwī, A.M., Ibrāhīm, M.A. Cairo: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Kutub al-ʿArabiyya, 1970.
• Tạbarī, Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad b. Jarīr. Jāmiʿ al-Bayāan ʿan taʾwīl āy al-Qurʾān. 16 vols. (ed.). Aḥmad Muḥammad Shākir. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif, 1969.
• Zarkashī, Badr al-Dīn Muḥammad b. Bahādir b. ʿAbd Allāh. Al-Baḥral-muḥīt ̣ fī uṣūl al-fiqh. 8 vols. (ed.). ʿAbd al-Qādir al-ʿĀnī. Kuwait: Wazārat al-Awqāf Waʾl-Shuʾūn al-Islāmiyya. 2nd edition, 1992.
• Assmann, Jan. Religion and Cultural Memory: Ten Studies. trans. Rodney Livingstone. California: Stanford University Press, 2006.
• Brunner, Rainer. “The Role of ḥadīth as Cultural Memory in Shīʿī History”. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 30 (2005), 318–60.
• Burrell, D. - Daher, N. Al-Ghazālī: the Ninety-Nine Beautiful Names of God. A Translation of al-Maqṣad al-asnā fī sharḥ asmāʾ Allāh al-ḥusnā. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society, 6th edition, 2004.
• Carter, Michael. “Language Control as People Control in Medieval Islam: The Aims of the Grammarians in their Cultural Context”. In Arab Language and Culture. (ed.). Ramzi Baalabaki. Beirut: American University of Beirut, 1983, 65–84.
• Frank, Richard. “Elements in the Development of the Teaching of al-Ashʿarī”. Le Museon 104 (1991), 141–90.
• Frank, Richard. Beings and Their Attributes: the Teaching of the Basrian School of the Muʿtazila in the Classical Period. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1978.
• Gimaret, Daniel. Les noms divins en Islam: exegese lexicographique et theologique. Paris: Cerf, 1988.
• Heinrichs, Wolfhart. “On the Genesis of the ḥaqīqa-majāz Dichotomy”. Studia Islamica 59 (1984), 111–40.
• Heinrichs, Wolfhart. “Contacts between Scriptural Hermeneutics and Literary Theory in Islam: the Case of Majāz”. Zeitschrift fur Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenschaften/Majallat Taʾrīkh al-ʿUlūm al-ʿArabiyya wa’l-Islamiyya 7 (1992), 253–84.
• Kopf, Lothar. “Religious Influences on Mediaeval Arabic Philology”. Studia Islamica 5 (1956), 33–59.
• Lepschy, Giulio (ed.). History of Linguistics: the Eastern Traditions of Linguistics. Vol. I. London, New York: Longman, 1994.
• Loucel, Henri. “L’origine du langage d’apres les grammairiens arabes”. Arabica 10(1963), 188–208 and 253–81.
• Madelung, Wilferd. “The Origins of the Controversy Concerning the Creation of the Qurʾān”. In Orientalia Hispanica: sive studia F M Pareja octogenario dicata. (ed.). Felix M. Pareja Casanas. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 504–25, 1974.
• Makdisi, George. “Ashʿarī and the Ashʿarites in Islamic Religious History”. Studia Islamica 17 (1962), 37–80.
• Makdisi, George. “The Juridical Theology of Shāfiʿī: Origins and Significance of Uṣūl al-fiqh”. Studia Islamica 59 (1984), 5–47.
• Peters, J.R. God’s Created Speech: a Study in the Speculative Theology of the Muʿtazilī Qāḍī al-Quḍāt Abū l-Ḥasan ʿAbd al-Jabbār ibn Aḥmad al-Hamadānī. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1976.
• Shah, Mustafa. “The Philological Endeavours of the Early Arabic Linguists: Theological Implications of the tawqīf-iṣṭilāḥ Antithesis and the majāz Controversy”. (Part II) Journal of Quranic Studies 2 (2000), 44–66.
• Shah, Mustafa. “Trajectories in the Development of Islamic Theological Thought: the Synthesis of Kalām”. Religion Compass 2 (2007), 430–454. www.blackwell.com/ religioncompass.
• van Ess, Josef. “Muʿtazila”. In Encyclopedia of Religion. (ed.). Mircea Eliade. 6317–25. New York: Macmillan Press, 1987.
• Vasalou, Sophia. “Their Intention was Shown by Their Bodily Movements: The Basran Muʿtazilites on the Institution of Language”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2009), 201–21.
• Versteegh, Kees. Greek Elements in Arabic Linguistic Thinking. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1977.
• Versteegh, Kees. “The Linguistic Introduction to Rāzī’s Tafsīr”. In Studies on Near East Languages and Literatures. Memorial Volume Karel Patracek, ed. Petr Vavrousek and Petr Zemanek. Prague: Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, BCS Printing, 1996a, 589–603.
• Versteegh, Kees. “Linguistic Attitudes and the Origin of Speech in the Arab World”. In Understanding Arabic: Essays in Contemporary Arabic Linguistics in Honor of El-Said Badawi. (ed.). Alaa El-Gibali, Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press, 1996b, 15–31.
• Versteegh, Kees. Landmarks in Linguistic Thought III: the Arabic Linguistic Tradition. London, New York: Routledge, 1997.
• Watt, William Montgomery. The Formative Period of Islamic Thought. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 1998. (reprint of the 1973 edition).
• Weiss, Bernard. “Medieval Muslim Discussions of the Origin of Language”. Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenlandischen Gesellschaft 124 (1974), 33–41.
• Weiss, Bernard. ʿIlm al-waḍ ʿ: an Introductory Account of a Later Muslim Philological Science”. Arabica 34 (1987), 339–56.