THE IMPACT OF SCHOOL CHOICE ON EMPLOYMENT IN OECD COUNTRIES

Öz

Education is crucial in preparing individuals with the skills needed for the labor market. Understanding how different types of institutions contribute to employment is vital for policymakers. This paper examines the relationship between student enrollment in different types of institutions and employment in OECD countries from 1998 to 2017. It focuses on tertiary, post-secondary, and upper secondary levels, in public and private institutions. Using the two-step System GMM, the study finds that enrollment in both private and public schools positively affects employment at all education levels, with public schools making the most significant contribution. This paper fills an empirical gap by analyzing the relationship between employment and school choice rather than relying on standardized test scores. Unlike most studies, it covers multiple education levels and compares results across countries, providing a broader and more comprehensive perspective.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Institutions
• Employment
• Education

OECD ÜLKELERİNDE OKUL TERCİHLERİNİN İSTİHDAM ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Öz

Eğitim, bireyleri iş gücü piyasasında ihtiyaç duyulan becerilerle donatmada hayati bir rol oynar. Farklı türdeki kurumların istihdama nasıl katkıda bulunduğunu anlamak, politika yapıcılar için büyük önem taşır. Bu çalışma, 1998-2017 yılları arasında OECD ülkelerinde farklı eğitim kurumlarına kayıtlı öğrenci sayısı ile istihdam arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Çalışma, kamu ve özel kurumlarda yükseköğretim, ortaöğretim sonrası ve üst ortaöğretim seviyelerine odaklanmaktadır. İki aşamalı sistem GMM yöntemini kullanan çalışma hem özel hem de kamu okullarına kayıtların tüm eğitim seviyelerinde istihdamı olumlu etkilediğini ve kamu okullarının en büyük katkıyı sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışma, standart test sonuçlarına dayanmaktan ziyade, istihdam ile okul tercihlerinin ilişkisini analiz ederek ampirik bir boşluğu doldurmaktadır. Çoğu çalışmadan farklı olarak, birden fazla eğitim seviyesini kapsamakta ve ülkeler arasında sonuçları karşılaştırarak daha geniş ve özgün bir perspektif sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kurumlar
• İstihdam
• Eğitim

Kaynakça

1. Agasisti, T., & Bertoletti, A. (2020). Higher education and economic growth: A longitudinal study of European regions 2000-2017. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 81 (C), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100940.
2. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. doi:10.2307/2297968.
3. Arellano M., & Bover O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics ,68(1), 29–51. doi:/10.1016/0304-4076 (94)01642-D.
4. Apostu, S.M., Mukli, L., Panait, M., Gigauri,I., &Hysa (2022). Economic growth through the lenses of education, entrepreneurship, and innovation. Administrative Sciences, 12(74),2-14. doi:10.3390/admsci12030074
5. Baum, C.F. (2013). Dynamic panel data estimators. EC 823: Applied Econometrics, Boston College, Spring. Retrieved October 20, 2024, from http://fmwww.bc.edu/EC-C/S2013/823/EC823.S2013.nn05.slides.pdf
6. Bedi, A.S, &Garg, A. (2000). The effectiveness of private versus public schools: the case of Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 61(2), 463-494. doi:10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00065-1.
7. Bizenjo, S. (2020). Education in Pakistan: Are low-cost private schools closing the gender gap? International Journal of Educational Development, 77(C), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102209.
8. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8.

9. Bouzid, B.N. (2016). Dynamic relationship between corruption and youth unemployment: empirical evidence from a system GMM approach. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper,7842.
10. Chudgar, A., & Quin, E. (2012). Relationship between private schooling and achievement: Results from rural and urban India. Economics of Education Review, 31(4),376-390. doi:10.1016/S0304-3878(00) 00065-110.1016/j.econedurev.2011.12.003.
11. Cox, D., &Jimenez, E. (1990). The relative effectiveness of private and public schools: Evidence from two developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 34(1-2),99-121. doi:10.1016/0304-3878(90)90078-P.
12. Dronkers, J., & Robert, P. (2003). The effectiveness of public and private schools from a comparative perspective. European University Institute (EUI) Working Paper,13, 1-65.
13. Georgieva, D. (2024). What do demographic changes mean for labor supply? Retrieved October 20,2024, from: https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/developmenttalk/what-do-demographic-changes-mean-for-labor-supply.
14. Green, F., Machin, S., Murphy, R., & Zhu, Y. (2010). The changing economic advantage from private school. IZA Discussion Paper, 5018,1-36.
15. Habibi, F., & Zabardast, M.A. (2020). Digitalization, education and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Middle East and OECD countries. Technology in Society, 63(C), 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101370.
16. Hanushek, E.A., &Woessman, L. (2010). Education and economic growth. Retrieved November 9, 2024, from https://hanushek.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Hanushek%2BWoessmann%202021%20OxfResEncEcoFin.pdf
17. Jin, H., & Rubin, D.B. (2009). Public schools versus private schools: causal inference with partial compliance. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34(1), 24-45. doi:10.3102/1076998607307475.
18. Kripfganz, S., & Schwarz, C. (2015). Estimation of linear dynamic panel data models with time-invariant regressors. European Central Bank (ECB) Working Paper, 1838, 1-53.
19. Kumar, D., & Choudhury, P.K. (2020). Determinants of private school choice in India: all about the family backgrounds? Journal of School Choice, 15(4), 576-602. doi: 10.1080/15582159.2020.1852517.
20. Lachenmaier,S.,& Rottmann, H. (2015). Effects of innovation on employment: A dynamic panel analysis. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29(2), 210-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.05.004
21. Lockheed, M., & Jimenez, E. (1994). Public and private secondary schools in developing countries: what are the differences and why do they persist? The World Bank ESP Discussion Paper Series, 33,1-38.
22. Lassibille, G., & Tan, J.P. (2001). Are private schools more efficient than public schools? Evidence from Tanzania. Education Economics, 9(2), 145-172. doi:10.1080/09645290110056985.
23. Marquez-Ramos, L., & Mourelle, E. (2019). Education and economic growth: an empirical analysis of nonlinearities. Applied Economic Analysis, 27(79),21-45. doi: 10.1108/AEA-06-2019-0005.
24. Moulin, L. (2022). Do private schools increase academic achievement? Evidence from France. Education Economics, 31(2), 247-274. doi:10.1080/09645292.2022.2061428.
25. Nguyen, H. T., Le, A. N.N.,Le, H.V., & Duong, K.D. (2024). Foreign direct investment and employment in Asia Pacific nations: The moderating role of labor quality. Heliyon, 10(9), 1-12.doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2024.e30133.
26. OECD (2011). The effects of taxation on employment: An overview. OECD Publishing, 13-47. doi:10.1787/9789264120808-en
27. OECD (2024). Education at a glance 2024: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/c00cad36-en.
28. OECD (2024). Education indicators in focus. OECD Publishing.doi:10.1787/22267077.
29. OECD (2024). Economic & social outcomes. Retrieved November 9, 2024, from https://gpseducation.oecd.org/revieweducationpolicies/#!node=41761&filter=all
30. Pfeffermann, D., & Landsman, V. (2011). Are private schools better than public schools? appraisal for Ireland by methods for observational studies. Annals of Applied Statistics, 5(3), 1726–1751. doi:10.1214/11-AOAS456
31. Piper, A.T. (2014). The benefits, challenges and insights of a dynamic panel assessment of life satisfaction. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 59556, 1-31.
32. Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9, 86-136. doi:10.1177/1536867X0900900106.
33. Shakeel, M.D., & Dills, A.K. (2024). The effects of private schooling on pupil achievement: A global systemic analysis. Comparative Education, 8(2),259–277. doi:10.1080/03050068.2023.2265280
34. Serifoglu, M.M., & Öge Güney, P. (2022). The effect of different fields of tertiary education on economic growth. Review of Economic Analysis, 14(4),543-571. doi: 10.15353/rea. v14i4.4053.
35. Solow, R.M. (1994). Perspectives on growth theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives ,8 (1), 45–54. doi:10.1257/jep.8.1.45.
36. Soto, M. (2009). System GMM estimation with a small sample. Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series,95, 1-28.
37. Stepanok, I. (2022). FDI and unemployment, a growth perspective. Review of International Economics, 31(2), 761-783.doi:10.1111/roie.12643.
38. Su, T.D., &Nguyen,C.P.(2020). Foreign financial flows, human capital and economic growth in African developing countries. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(3), 3010-3031.doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2310.
39. Suwandaru, A., Alghamdi,T.,& Nurwanto,N.(2021). Empirical analysis on public expenditure for education and economic growth: Evidence from Indonesia. Economies, 9(146), 1-13. doi:10.3390/ economies9040146
40. Tsai, C.L., Hung, M.C., & Harriott, K. (2010). Human capital composition and economic growth. Social Indicators Research, 99,41-59. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9565-z.
41. Wu,X. & Blake,A. (2023). Does the combination of models with different explanatory variables improve tourism demand forecasting performance? Tourism Economics, 29(8), 2032-2056. doi: 10.1177/13548166221132645.
42. Ziberi, B.F., Rexha, D., Ibraimi, X., & Avdiaj,B.(2022). Empirical analysis of the impact of education on economic growth. Economies,10(89), 1-10. doi.org/10.3390/economies10040089