TARIMSAL KATMA DEĞERİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME: E7 ÜLKELERİ ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Gelişen ülkelerin kalkınmalarına eşlik eden yapısal dönüşüm süreçlerinde, emek-yoğun teknolojiye ve düşük katma değere sahip olan tarımsal üretimden ve doğal kaynağa dayalı büyümeden, katma değeri yüksek ve ileri teknolojiye dayalı büyüme sürecine geçilmesi gerekmektedir. Üretim sürecinin ve tüketimin bu denli küresel bir boyuta ulaştığı günümüz dünyasında, gelişen ekonomilerin en zorunlu ihtiyaçlarından olan tarımsal ürün talebinin göz ardı edilmemesi gerekmektedir. Gelişmiş ve gelişen ülkelerin tarımsal ürün üretimindeki farklı katma değer yapıları nedeniyle, yükselen ekonomilerin tarımsal üretimdeki mevcut durumunu ve bu ülkelerin sektördeki etkinliğini belirleyen faktörlerin tespiti, çalışmanın temel amacıdır. Bu kapsamda,  ekonomik karmaşıklık endeksi, politik istikrar endeksi, hükümet etkinliği endeksi ile tarımsal katma değer arasındaki ilişkiler nedensellik analizi ile incelenmektedir. Sonuç olarak; hükümet etkinliği endeksi hem ekonomik karmaşıklık endeksini hem de tarımsal katma değeri etkilerken, politik istikrardan hükümet etkinliğine nedensellik bulunmuştur. Ekonomik karmaşıklık endeksinin tarımsal ürün katma değeri etkilemesinin yanı sıra tarımsal katma değerden de hükümet etkinliği endeksine bir nedensellik bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tarımsal Katma Değer,Yapısal Dönüşüm,Politik İstikrar,İhracat Sofistikasyonu

Kaynakça

1. Acemoğlu, D. & Robinson, J. A. (2010). The role of institutions in growth and development. Review of Economics and Institutions, 1(2), 1-33. Akal, M., Kabasakal, A. & Gökmenoğlu, S. M. (2012). OECD ülkelerinin rekabet gücünü açıklayıcı kurumsal ve karma modeller. Business and Economics Research Journal, 3(1), 109-130.Archer, D. W., Dawson, J., Kreuter, U. P., Hendrickson, M. & Halloran, J. M. (2006). Social and political influences on agricultural systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems: 23(4), 272–284.Asteriou, D. & S. Price (2001). Political instability and economic growth: UK time series evidence. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48(4), 383–399.Birleşmiş Milletler, 20 Mart 2019 tarihinde https://comtrade.un.org/ adresinden erişildi.Breuer, J.B., Mcnown, R. & Wallace, M. (2002). Series-specific Unit Root Tests with Panel Data.Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64 (5), 527-546.Campos, E. Lien, D. & Pradhan, S. (1999). The impact of corruption on investment: Predictability matters. World Development, 27(6):1059-1067Can, M. & Doğan, B. (2017). The effects of economic structural transformation on employment: An evaluation in the context of economic complexity and product space theory. F. Yenilmez ve E. Kılıç (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Unemployment and Labor Market Sustainability in the Era of Globalization, içinde (ss.275-306). IGI Global.Correa, P. & Schmidt, C. (2014). Public research organizations and agricultural development in brazil: how did embrapa get it right?, The World Bank, Economic Premise, No: 145.Dünya Bankası (2008). World Development 2008: Agriculture for development, The World Bank: Washington, DC. 05 Şubat 2019 tarihinde https://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDRS/Resources/477365-1327599046334/8394679-1327614067045/WDROver2008-ENG.pdf adresinden erişildi. Dünya Bankası (2019). 05 Şubat 2019 tarihinde https://databank.worldbank.org/data/indicator adresinden erişildi. Dünya Bankası (2019). 17 Mart 2019 tarihinde http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#home adresinden erişildi. Eaton, J. & S. Kortum. (2002). Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica, (70)5, 1741-1779.Echevarria, C. (1997). Changes in sectoral composition associated with economic growth. International Economic Review, 38(2), 431-52.Edwards, S. (1994). The political economy of inflation and stabilization in developing countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 42, 235–66.Feng, Y. (2001). Political freedom, political instability and policy uncertainty: A study of political institutions and private investment in developing countries. International Studies Quarterly, 45, 271–294.Fortunato, P. & Razo, C. (2014). Export sophistication, growth and the middle-income trap. Transforming Economies – Making Industrial Policy Work for Growth, Jobs & Development, ILO, 267-287.Gardner, B. (2000). Economic growth and low income agriculture. Am. J. Agric.Econ. 82, 1059–1074.Gardner, B. (2003). Causes of rural economic development. Durban, South Africa: Document Transfer Technologies. Gordon, P. & L. Wang (2004). Does Economic Performance Correlate with Big Government?. Econ Journal Watch, 1(2), 192–221.Gopinath, M., & Kennedy, P. L. (2000). Agricultural trade and productivity growth: A State-Level analysis. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 82(5), 1213-1218.Hall, R. E. & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83-116.Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S. Coscia, M. Chung, S. Jimenez, J. Simoes A. & Yıldırım, M. A. (2011), The atlas of economic complexity mapping paths to prosperity, Center for International Development at Harvard University.Hawksworth, J. & Cookson, G. (2008). The World in 2050. 15 Mart 2019 tarihinde https://www.pwc.com/la/en/publications/assets/world_2050_brics.pdf adresinden erişildi. Huffman, W. E., & Evenson, R. E. (2006). Do formula or competitive grant funds have greater ımpacts on state agricultural productivity?, Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 88(4), 783-798.Hurlin, C. & Dumitrescu, E. (2012). Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels. HAL Archives, No: halshs-00224434.Hwa, E. C. (1988). The contribution of agriculture to economic growth: some empirical evidence. World Development, 16 (11), 1329 – 1339.Kaufmann, D. & Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430. Krueger,A., Schiff, M. & Valdes, A. (1991). Political economy of agricultural pricing policy, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Lio, M. & Liu, M-C. (2008). Governance and agricultural productivity: A Cross-National Analysis, Food Policy, Vol. 33, 504-512.Martin,W. & Warr, P. (1992). The declining economic importance of agriculture: A supply-side analysis for Thailand.Working Paper in Trade and Development 92/1. Australian University, Research School of Pacific Studies, Canberra.Martin,W. & Warr, P. (1993). Explaining the relative decline of agriculture: A supply-side analysis for Indonesia. The World Bank Research Observer 7(3), 381–401.Matsuyama, K. (1992). Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage and economic growth. J. Econ. Theory 58(2), 317-331.
2. Olson, M. (1996). Big bills left on the side walk: Why some nations are rich,and others poor. Perspectives, Vol.10, 3-24.
3. Pan, C., Chang, T. & Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2015). Military spending and economic growth in the Middle East Countries: Bootstrap Panel Causality Test. Defence and Peace Economics 26 (24), 443-456.Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CWPE, 0435.Pineres, A. D. (1999). Externalities in the agricultural export sector and economic growth: A developing country perspective. Agric. Econ. 21, 257–267.
4. Schultz, T. (1964). Transforming traditional agriculture. The Economic Journal, 74(296), 996-999.
5. Taylor, M.P. & Sarno, L. (1998). The behavior of real exchange rates during the Post-Bretton Woods Period. Journal of International Economics, 46, 281-312.Tiffin, R. & Irz, X. (2006). Is agriculture the engine of growth?. Agricultural Economics 35, 79-89.Timmer, C.P. (1969). The turnip, the new husbandry, and the English agricultural revolution. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 83, 375-395.Timmer, C.P. (1979). Issues of production and consumption: A review of T.W. Schultz, Science, 205, 385-386.Timmer, C.P. (1981). Is there 'curvature' in the Slutsky matrix?. Review of Economics and Statistics, 62, 395-402.Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2013). İleri panel veri analizi Stata uygulamalı (2.b). İstanbul:Beta.Zeren, F. & Arı A. (2013). Trade Openness and Economic Growth. International Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 4(9), 317-324.https://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/rankings/country/eci/