Thematic Content Analysis of National Graduate Theses on Scientific Reasoning Skills

Öz

Given its importance, there is a perceived necessity to conduct an in-depth examination of studies on scientific reasoning skills and to create a guided map based on these examinations. This study aims to establish a general framework by examining national postgraduate theses related to scientific reasoning skills, revealing their current state, and updating any hidden or misunderstood skills. The research sample includes 74 national postgraduate theses from Türkiye, which are accessible through the National Thesis Center database of the Council of Higher Education (CoHE). These theses were analyzed in-depth using thematic content analysis, a qualitative research method. The examined national postgraduate theses were analyzed across 13 themes: “year”, “thesis type”, “field of education”, “research design/method model”, “type of experimental research”, “learning method”, “sample type”, “sample size”, “data collection methods/tools”, “data analysis technique”, “scientific reasoning skills included in the research”, “results” and discussions”, and “recommendations”. The findings revealed that most of these were written in 2019. The predominant thesis type was a master's thesis, and the most common field of education was mathematics education. The most frequent research design/method model was experimental, with quasi-experimental design being the most common type of experimental research. Middle school students were the most frequent sample type, with sample sizes most commonly ranging from 0-25. Tests were the most frequently used data collection methods/tools, and validity was the most employed data analysis technique. Argumentation-based learning was the preferred learning method. The most addressed scientific reasoning skill in the research was mathematical reasoning, specifically focused on mathematical reasoning skills. The results and discussions frequently highlighted improvements in students' scientific reasoning skills. The recommendations often advised researchers to develop applications aimed at enhancing scientific reasoning skills.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• National Graduate Theses
• Scientific Reasoning Skills
• Thematic Content Analysis

Bilimsel Muhakeme Becerileri ile İlgili Ulusal Lisansüstü Tezlerin Tematik İçerik Analizi

Öz

Bilimsel muhakeme becerileri hakkında yapılan çalışmaların derinlemesine incelenmesinin ve bu incelemeler sonucunda yol gösterici bir haritanın oluşturulmasının gerekliliği düşünülmektedir. Bu çalışmada, bilimsel muhakeme becerisi ile ilgili ulusal lisansüstü tezler incelenerek genel bir çerçeve oluşturulması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK) Ulusal Tez Merkezi veri tabanından erişilebilen Türkiye genelindeki 74 ulusal lisansüstü tez oluşturmaktadır. Bu tezler, nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden tematik içerik analizi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. İncelenen ulusal lisansüstü tezler 13 tema altında analiz edilmiştir: “yıl”, “tez türü”, “eğitim alanı”, “araştırma tasarımı/yöntem modeli”, “deneysel araştırma türü”, “öğrenme yöntemi”, “örneklem türü”, “örneklem büyüklüğü”, “veri toplama yöntemleri/araçları”, “veri analiz tekniği”, “araştırmaya dâhil edilen bilimsel muhakeme becerileri”, “sonuçlar” ve “öneriler”. Bulgular, tezlerin çoğunun 2019 yılında yazıldığını ortaya koymuştur. Tez türlerinin çoğunluğu yüksek lisans tezi, eğitim alanlarının en sık matematik eğitimi olduğu görülmüştür. En sık araştırma tasarımı/yöntem modeli deneysel, en sık yarı deneysel tasarım ise deneysel araştırma türüdür. Ortaokul öğrencileri en sık kullanılan örneklem türüydü ve örneklem büyüklükleri çoğunlukla 0-25 arasındadır. Testler en sık kullanılan veri toplama yöntemleri/araçlarıydı ve geçerlilik en çok kullanılan veri analiz tekniğiydi. Argümantasyona dayalı öğrenme en çok tercih edilen öğrenme yöntemiydi. Araştırmada en sık ele alınan bilimsel muhakeme becerisi, özellikle matematiksel muhakeme becerilerine odaklanan matematiksel muhakemedir. Sonuçlar ve tartışmalar, öğrencilerin bilimsel muhakeme becerilerindeki gelişmeleri sıklıkla vurguladı. Önerilerde, araştırmacılara genellikle bilimsel muhakeme becerilerini geliştirmeyi amaçlayan uygulamalar geliştirmeleri tavsiye edilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bilimsel Muhakeme Becerileri
• Tematik Analiz
• Ulusal Lisansüstü Tezler

Kaynakça

1. Abate, T., Tarekegn, G., Alemu, M., Michael, K., & Angell, C. (2024). A theoretical model for measuring upper primary school learners’ scientific reasoning abilities in science. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 28(2), 236-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2024.2386505
2. Abdullah, S., & Shariff, A. (2008). The effects of inguiry-based computer simulation with cooperative learning on science thinking and conceptual understanding of gas laws. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(4), 387-398. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75365
3. Akay, K. (2017). The effect of chess educati̇on gi̇ven duri̇ng the preschool age on chi̇ldrens cogni̇ti̇ve and soci̇al behavi̇ors examining [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
4. Akaydın, Ş., & Çeçen, M. A. (2015). A content analysis on articles related to reading skills. Education and Science, 40(178), 183-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4139
5. Altıparmak, K., & Öziş, T. (2005). An investigation upon mathematical proof and development of mathematical reasoning. Ege Journal of Education, 6(1), 25-37.
6. Aslan Sürek, D. (2023). The effect of intelligence games on verbal reasoning skills [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Kütahya Dumlupınar University.
7. Ateş, S. (2019). Bilimsel muhakeme (Akıl yürütme) (1.Baskı). Palme Yayınevi.
8. Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523

9. Aydın, Ö., & Kaptan, F. (2014). Effect of argumentation on metacognition and logical thinking abilities in science-technology teacher candidate education and opinions about argumentation. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 4(2), 163-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/jesr.2014.42.10
10. Baba, A., Zorlu, Y., & Zorlu, F. (2022). Investigation of the effectiveness of augmented reality and modelling based teaching in "Solar System and Eclipses" unit. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(2), 283-298. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1040095
11. Bağcı, V. (2015). The comparison of different designs in generalizability theory with Classical Test Theory in the measurement of mathematical reasoning [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi University.
12. Beck, C. W., & Blumer, L. (2012). Inquiry-based ecology laboratory courses improve student confidence and scientific reasoning skills. Ecosphere, 3(12), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES12-00280.1
13. Benford, R., & Lawson, A. E. (2001). Relationships between effective inquiry use and the development of scientific reasoning skills in college biology labs [Master thesis, Arizona State University]. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED456157.pdf
14. Bruckermann, T., Greving, H., Schumann, A., Stillfried, M., Börner, K., Kimming, S., Hagen, R., Brandt, M., & Harms, U. (2022). Scientific reasoning skills predict topic-specific knowledge after participation in a citizen science project on urban wildlife ecology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(9), 1915-1941. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21835
15. Büyükbayraktar Ersoy, F. N. (2015). The effect of physics instruction with active learning on high school students’ scientific reasoning skills and academic performance [Unpublished phD thesis]. Atatürk University.
16. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (Ed.), Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2020). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (28th edition). Pegem Akademi Publishing.
17. Ceylan, E., & Bozkurt, O. (2017). Effects of GEMS program on achievement, self efficacy, attitudes and science reasoning capability of preservice science teachers. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 14 (38), 45-70.
18. Choowong, K., & Worapun, W. (2021). The development of scientific reasoning ability on concept of light and image of grade 9 students by using inquiry-based learning 5E with prediction observation and explanation strategy. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(5), 152-159. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n5p152
19. Council of Higher Education (CoHE) Thesis Center. (2024). Thesis Center. Retrieved June 10, 2024 from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
20. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Karma yöntem araştırmalarına giriş. Sözbilir, M. (Ed.) (1st edition). Pegem Akademi.
21. Çalık, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2014). Parameters of content analysis. Education and Science, 39(174), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2014.3412
22. Çınar, D. (2013). The effect of argumentation based science instruction on 5th grade students’ learning outcomes [Unpublished phD thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
23. Çoban, H. (2010). Investigating the relationship between the level of students using mathematical reasoning skills and using metacognitive learning strategies [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University.
24. Danişman, Ş. (2011). Determining the mathematical learning profiles of primary school fifth grade students and their relationship with the learning styles [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University.
25. Demircioğlu, T., & Uçar, S. (2014). Investigation of written arguments about Akkuyu nuclear power. Elementary Education Online, 13(4), 1373-1386. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2014.31390
26. Demirel, R., & Özcan, H. (2021). The effect of argumentation based science and engineering practices on 7th grade students achievement about light topic. Aksaray University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 5(1), 100-111. https://doi.org/10.38122/ased.912508
27. Deveci, İ. (2018). Comparison of 2013 and 2018 science curricula in terms of basic elements in Turkey. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(2), 799-825. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.342260
28. Dinç Bilgin, S., & Zorlu, Y. (2023). The effect of teaching based on 2D and 3D supported modeling on students' academic achievement and 21st century skills in “Pure Substances and Mixtures” unit. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 25(4), 601-616. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.1302334
29. Diola, W. Y., Jalon Jr, J. B., & Prudente, M. S. (2025). Exploring the use of claim-evidence-reasoning in promoting scientific reasoning skills of elementary school students. Anatolian Journal of Education, 10(1), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2025.10115a
30. Doğankollu, N. (2022). Examination of research on global warming: A meta-synthesis study [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi University.
31. Doğru Oral, S., & Bozkurt, O. (2021). The influence of argumentation-based classroom activities on 5th grade studensts’ academic success, logical thinking skills and willingness to discuss. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 58, 624-644. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.631239
32. Dökme, İ. (Ed.) (2019). Bilimsel muhakemenin fen başarısı ile ilişkisi (1st edition). Anı Publishing.
33. Dönmez, İ., & Gülen, S. (2021). Current research trends in science education in Turkey: Examination of postgraduate theses in 2020. Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Journal of Education Faculty, 22(3), 1884-1924. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.884907
34. Er, G., & Biber, A. Ç. (2020). Examining postgraduate experimental theses in mathematics education: A meta-analysis study. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Journal of Education [MSKU Journal of Education], 7(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.646744
35. Er, S. (2012) Examination of auditory reasoning and processing skills of 5-6 year old children having different conceptual tempo [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Selçuk University.
36. Erdem, E. (2011) An investigation of the seventh grade students mathematical and probabilistic reasoning skills [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Adıyaman University.
37. Ergün, Z., Tümoğlu, E., Şahin, D., & Kabataş Memiş, E. (2023). Analysis of dissertations on scientific reasoning in Türkiye: A meta-synthesis study. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 102-119. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1188680
38. Erlina, N., Susantini, E., Wasis Wicaksono, I., & Pandiangan, P. (2018). The effectiveness of evidence-based reasoning in inquiry-based physics teaching to increase students' scientific reasoning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 972-985.
39. Eşkin, H. (2008). Effect of argumentation on students’ reasoning skills [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Marmara University.
40. Fettahlıoğlu, P. (2018). Fen bilgisi öğretmeni adaylarının mantıksal düşünme becerilerinin öğrenme stillerine göre analizi. International Journal of Active Learning (IJAL), 3(1), 44-56.
41. Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A., & Marek, E. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching, procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535-549.
42. Getahun, D. A. (2023). Scientific reasoning among teachers and teacher trainees: The case in Ethiopian schools and teacher training colleges. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 2261-2277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10347-6
43. Gökçe, H., & Saraçoğlu, S. (2018). The effect of computer assisted instruction on eighth grade students’ academic achievement, logical thinking ability and attitude, related to the unit of acid and bases. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(4), 1383-1394. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.434178
44. Gül, F. S. (2015). Examination of auditory reasoning and processing skills of 5-6 years of old children in terms of the explanatory reasoning and cognitive stimulation behaviors of mothers [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Selçuk University.
45. Gülmez Güngörmez, H. (2018). The effect of nature of science activities embedded in process oriented guided inquiry leraning method on seventh grade students’ conceptual changes and their scientific reasoning skills [Unpublished phD thesis]. Adıyaman University.
46. Hadi, W. P., Muharrami, L. K., & Utami, D. S. (2021). Identifikasi kemampuan penalaran ilmiah berdasarkan gender. Wahana Matematika Dan Sains: Jurnal Matematika, Sains, Dan Pembelajarannya, 15(2), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.23887/wms.v15i2.34047
47. Han, J. (2013). Scientific reasoning: Research, development, and assessment [Doctoral thesis, Ohio State University]. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/etd/r/1501/10?clear=10&p10_accession_num=osu1366204433
48. Hardman, D., & Macchi, L. (Eds.) (2003). Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making (1st edition). John Wiley & Sons.
49. Houssart, J., & Sams, C. (2008). Developing mathematical reasoning through games of strategy played against the computer. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 15(2), 59-71.
50. İnal, G. (2010). Determining the validity and reliability of cognitive abilities test form-6 and investigation of the effect of reasoning education program on six year old childrens cognitive abilities [Unpublished phD thesis]. Gazi University.
51. İnam, A., & Güven, S. (2019). Analysis of experimental studies using argumentation method: A meta-synthesis study. The Journal of International Lingual, Social and Educational Sciences, 5(1), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.34137/jilses.584642
52. İnci, A. M. (2023). Trends of studies in realistic mathematics education between 2000-2002: A systematic review study [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
53. Kabaoğlu, Ş. (2023). Developing scientific reasoning types test in the context of a science course [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi University.
54. Kara, F., & Kefeli, N. (2018). The effect of using concept maps on student’s success, logical thinking and attitudes towards science. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 594-619. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.506475
55. Karamustafaoğlu, O., & Değirmenci, S. (2018). Method tendecy analysis of science education papers published in education faculties journals. Caucasian Journal of Science, 5(2), 50-64.
56. Karamustafaoğlu, O., Boz, Ö., & Değirmenci, S. (2020). Science education papers published in TR indexed journals: Method analysis since 2015. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, 39(1), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.636488
57. Karlı, M. G. (2019). Investigation of the 7th grade students’ proportional thinking skills with SOLO taxonomy [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University.
58. Kartal, Ş., & Öztürk, A. (2023). The analysis of the republican period primary school science course curricula in terms of the elements of the currciulum. Milli Eğitim Journal, 52(239), 1707-1750. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1135407
59. Kılıçarslan, S. (2019). A study on the distinctiveness validity of the Anadolu-Sak Intelligence Scale (ASISI) among groups of special education [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Anadolu University.
60. Kiras, B., & Bahar, M. (2021). Trends and methodological analysis of theses in the field of science education in Turkey between 1990-2017. Kocaeli University Journal of Education, 4(2), 333-354. https://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.951253
61. Kocagül Sağlam, M. (2019). Developing science teachers’ scientific reasoning skills and its effects to classroom environment [Unpublished phD thesis]. Dokuz Eylül University.
62. Kocagül Sağlam, M., & Ünal Çoban, G. (2020). Identifying science teachers’ needs about developing students’
63. scientific reasoning skills. Pamukkale University Journal of Education (PAU Journal of Education), 50, 399-425. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.595490
64. Kocagül, M., & Ünal Çoban, G. (2022a). A case study for evaluating scientific reasoning skills training program. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education, 62, 405-430. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1033790
65. Kocagül, M., & Ünal Çoban, G. (2022b). An evaluation on science teachers’ scientific reasoning skills. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 11(2), 361-373. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1017938
66. Koyunlu Ünlü, Z., Babayiğit, Ö., & Ünlü, V. (2024). Development of preservice elementary teachers scientific reasoning skills through scientific inquiry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 43(2), 656-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2332720
67. Köseoğlu, S., & Eroğlu Doğan, E. (2020). Analysis of postgraduate theses completed in the field of science teacher education between the years 2010 and 2017 in Turkey. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 19(75), 1122- 1147. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.654747
68. Krell, M., Redman, C., Mathesius, S., Krüger, D., & Driel, J. V. (2020). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ scientific reasoning competencies. Research in Science Education, 50, 2305-2329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9780-1
69. Lawson, A. E. (1978). The development and validation of a classroom test of formal. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(1), 11-24.
70. Lawson, A. E. (1985). A review of research on formal reasoning and science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(7), 569-617.
71. Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking (1st edition). Wadsworth Publishing Company.
72. Lohman, D.F., & Hagen, E. (2003). Interpretive guide for teachers and counselors: cognitive abilities test Form 6-all levels. Itasca, Illinois: Riverside Publishing.
73. McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7st edition). Pearson Education.
74. Memiş, Y. (2022). Examination of secondary school textbooks from Turkey, Singapore and Canada in the context of proportional thinking [Unpublished phD thesis]. Anadolu University. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.B. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis (2nd edition). Sage Publications.
75. Ministry of National Education (MoNE), (2013). Science course curriculum. Ankara: Education and Training Board. Retrieved from https://ridvansoydemir.wordpress.com/2013-fen-bilimleri-ogretim-programi/ on June 10, 2024.
76. Ministry of National Education (MoNE), (2018). Science course curriculum. Ankara: Education and Training Board. Retrieved from https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=325 on June 10, 2024.
77. Ministry of National Education (MoNE), (2024a). Common text of Turkey's century education model curriculum. Ankara: Education and Training Board. Retrieved from https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ on June 13, 2024.
78. Ministry of National Education (MoNE), (2024b). Science course curriculum. Ankara: Education and Training Board. Retrieved from https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ on 13 June 2024.
79. Nugraha, M. G., Kirana, K. H., Utari, S., Kurniasih, N., Nurdini, N., & Sholihat, F. N. (2017). Problem solving-based experiment untuk meningkatkan keterampilan penalaran ilmiah mahasiswa fisika. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03203
80. Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006
81. Othman, M., Hussain, F. M., & Nikman, K. (2010). Enhancing logical thinking among computer science students through cooperative learning. Gading Business Management Journal, 14(1), 1-10.
82. Öz, T., & Işık, A. (2017). Pre-service elemantary mathematics teachers’ views on “mathematical reasoning” skills. Erzincan University Journal of Education, 19(2), 228-249. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.292622
83. Özdeniz, Y. (2021). The effect of application of science modüle designed according to integrated curriculum model in blended learning environment on scientific reasoning and scientific process skills of gifted students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Aydın Adnan Menderes University.
84. Özdeniz, Y., Aktamış, H., & Bildiren, A. (2023). The effect of differentiated science module application on the scientific reasoning and scientific process skills of gifted students in a blended learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 45(10), 827-849. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2175627
85. Polat, H., & Emre, F. B. (2020). The effect of argumentation method on critical thinking tendecy, logical thinking abilities and academic achievement of science teacher candidates. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(10), 210-227. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i10.3296
86. Polat, S., & Ay, O. (2016). The effect of argumentation method on critical thinking tendecy, logical thinking abilities and academic achievement of science teacher candidates. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(2), 52-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.4c2s3m
87. Ramirez, H. J., & Monterola, S. (2022). Co-creating scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning and its effects on students’ logical thinking in earth science. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(5), 908-921. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1702063
88. Reith, M., & Nehring, A. (2020). Scientific reasoning and views on the nature of scientific inquiry: Testing a new framework to understand and model epistemic cognition in science. International Journal of Science Education, 42(16), 2716-2741. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1834168
89. Rantong, T., & Sarnkong, R. (2025). Using context-based learning to enhance Thai grade 6 student scientific reasoning abilities. Higher Education Studies, 15(1), 136-143. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v15n1p136
90. Remigo, K. B., Yangco, R., & Espinosa, A. (2014). Analogy-enhanced instruction: effects on reasoning skills in science. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 2(2), 1-9.
91. Sert Çıbık, A., & Emrahoğlu, N. (2008). Proje tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımının fen bilgisi dersinde öğrencilerin mantıksal düşünme becerilerinin gelişimine etkisi. Ç.U. Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 17(2), 51-66.
92. Sevencan, A. (2019). Investigation of theses and dissertations in the field of mathematics education in Turkey [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
93. Sperber, D. (Ed.) (2000). Metarepresentations in a evolutionary perspective. Metarepresentations: A multidisciplinary perspective (1st edition, pp. 117-139). Oxford University Press.
94. Şaşmaz Ören, F., & Tezcan, R. (2008). The effectiveness of the learning cycle approach on learners’ achievement and logical thinking ability in seventh grade science clasess of elementary school. Uludağ University Journal of Education, 21(2), 427-446.
95. Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenirlik ve geçerlilik (1st edition). Seçkin Publishing.
96. Tanrıöğen, A. (Ed.) (2021). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (5th edition). Anı Publishing. Türk Dil Kurumu (Turkish Language Society) (TDK), (2024). Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlükleri. Retrieved April 4, 2024 from https://sozluk.gov.tr/
97. Tüzüngüç, B. (2019). Investigation of socio-scientific reasoning skills of high school students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Marmara University.
98. Ulutaş, F., & Ubuz, B. (2008). Research and trends in mathematics education: 2000 to 2006. Elemantary Education Online, 7(3), 614-626.
99. Uyanık, G. (2023). Fen bilimleri eğitiminde düşünme becerileri. Erdoğan F. (Ed.), Matematik ve Fen Bilimleri Eğitiminde Yeni Yaklaşımlar 2023-II (1st edition, pp. 81-93). Efe Akademik Publishing.
100. Varlı, B. (2018). The effect of inquiry based learning approach to science success, inquiry, self regulation and meta cognitive skills [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Amasya University.
101. Wulandari, E. D., Efwinda, S., Hakim, A., Syam, M., & Damayanti, P. (2025). Identification of scientific reasoning ability of junior high school students. Jurnal Eduscience (JES), 12(4), 988-998. https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v12i4.6996
102. Yalçın, S., Yavuz, H. Ç., & İlgün Dibek, M. (2015). Content analysis of papers published in educational journals with high impact factors. Education and Science, 40(182), 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4868
103. Yaman, S. (2005). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde probleme dayalı öğrenmenin mantıksal düşünme becerisinin gelişimine etkisi. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 2(1), 56-70. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (Eds.) (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (12th edition). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
104. Yılmaz, Ş. (2017). Science teachers’ belief systems and reasonings about question production [Unpublished phD thesis]. Uludağ University.
105. Yüceer, D. (2020). Thinking and philosophy education in early childhood: Children are questioning [Unpublished phD thesis]. Sakarya University.
106. Yüksel, İ. (2019). The effects of research-inquiry based learning on the scientific reasoning skills of prospective science teachers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(4), 273-278. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i4.4020
107. Yüksel, İ. & Ateş, S. (2017). The effect of two approaches to developing reasoning skills of preservice science teachers. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 8(3), 19-35.
108. Yüksel, İ. & Ateş, S. (2019). Developing scientific reasoning skills test. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 8(3), 635-650. http://doi.org/10.30703/cije.520612
109. Yüzüak, A. V., & Dökme, İ. (2019). Science reasoning levels of prospective science and primary teacher. Hacettepe University Journal of Education (H.U. Journal of Education), 34(3), 586-601. http://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018046314
110. Zimbardi, K., Bugarcic, A., Colthorpe, K., Good, J., & Lluka, L. (2013). A set of vertically integrated inquiry-based practical curticula that develop scientific thinking skills for large cohorts of undergraduate students. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(4), 273-441. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00082.2012
111. Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20(1), 99-149. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1999.0497
112. Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001
113. Zorlu, F., & Zorlu, Y. (2022). The investigation of preservice science teachers’ analogical reasoning skills from thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100981
114. Zorlu, Y., & Sezek, F. (2019). Investigation of the effects of group research method of applying modeling based teaching method in the particle structure and properties of matter unit on constructivist learning. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 9(3), 455-475. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.481295
115. Zorlu, Y., & Sezek, F. (2020). An investigation of the effect of students' academic achievement and science process skills application together with cooperative learning model and the modeling based teaching method in teaching science courses. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(4), 135-157. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.268.9