ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ FACEBOOK KULLANIMLARI VE FACEBOOK’UN MESLEKİ GELİŞİMLERİNDEKİ YERİ KONUSUNDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ

Öz

Bu çalışmada bilişim teknolojileri öğretmen adaylararının Facebook kullanımlarını ve Facebook?un mesleki gelişimlerindeki yeri konusundaki görüşlerini değerlendirmek için açıklayıcı karma araştırma yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Nicel kısımda, Facebook kullanım anketi yoluyla, Türkiye?deki üç temsili devlet üniversitesinin Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümlerindeki toplam 338 lisans öğrencisinden veriler toplanmıştır. Anket sonuçları öğretmen adaylarının Facebook?u beğendiklerini ve Facebook?dan yararlandıklarını göstermiştir. Ancak, daha ayrıntılı verilere ulaşmak için, nicel veri analizi sonuçları, kasıtlı seçilmiş dört öğretmen adayı ile yapılacak olan planlanmış bir görüşmenin hazırlanmasında kullanılmıştır. Görüşmeler sonucu toplanan verilerin anlamlı gruplandırılması için kodlama yapılarak veriler içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Bu açıklayıcı araştırma sonuçlarına göre Facebook?un özellikle iletişim, paylaşım ve sosyalleşmedeki kapasitesi, Facebook?un bir mesleki gelişim aracı olarak kullanılmasında önemli bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal Ağlar,Facebook,Öğretmenlerin Mesleki Gelişimi,İletişim

Preservice Teachers’ Facebook Usage and Their Perspectives about Facebook as a Professional Development Tool

Abstract

In this study, an explanatory mixed method design was employed to evaluate preservice information technology teachers‟ Facebook usage and their perspectives about Facebook as a professional development tool. In quantitative phase, data were collected through a Facebook usage survey on a total number of 338 undergraduate Computer Education and Instructional Technology CEIT students from three representative state universities in Turkey. Survey results indicated that preservice teachers favored and utilized Facebook. To find out more in-depth data, the results of quantitative data analysis were used to develop a structured interview to be done with four preservice teachers who were selected purposefully. The data collected from the interviews were subjected to content analysis where coding was conducted to create meaningful organization of the data. According the results of this explanatory study especially communication, sharing and socializing capacity of Facebook were found important in terms of using Facebook as a professional development tool

Keywords

• Social Networking Sites,Facebook,Teacher Professional Development,Communication

Kaynakça

1. Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006) Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In P. Golle & G. Danezis (Eds.), Proceedings of 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (pp. 36-58). Cambridge, UK: Robinson College.
2. Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education
3. Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning?, Educause, 41(2), 32-44.
4. Aragon, S. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 57‐68.
5. Bosch, T. E. (2009). Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. Communicatio, South African Journal of Communication Theory and Research,35(2), 185-200.
6. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. Retrieved http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html 25, 2009, from
7. Cain J. (2008). Online Social Networking Issues Within Academia and Pharmacy. Education American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2008; 72 (1), 10.
8. Carosu B. J. & Salaway G. (2008) The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology Key Findings EDUCAUSE Center For Applied Reseach.

9. Creswell, J W., & Clark, V. L. C. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn A., & Hughes B. N., (2009) Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 83-108.
11. Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 129- 136.
12. Griffith, S & Liyanage, L. (2008). An introduction to the potential of social networking sites in education, Paper presented at the Emerging Technologies Conference, University of Wollongong, 18-21 June 2008.
13. Grosseck G. (2009). The use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 1, 478–482.
14. Gunawardena C. N. & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11 (3) 8-26.
15. Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social Preence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1 (2/3), 147-166.
16. Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276-279
17. Harris A., L., & Rea A. (2009), Web 2.0 and Virtual World Technologies: A Growing Impact on IS Education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20 (2), 137-144.
18. Hu, H. & Wang, X. (2009) Evolution of a large online social network, Physics Letters A, 373 (12/13), 1105-1110.
19. Kekwaletswe, R. M. (2007). Social presence awareness for knowledge transformation in a mobile learning environment. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT)
20. Koca, A. (2009). Facebook 2008 değerlendirmesi ve artan Türk popülasyonu. Retreieved December 3, 2010 from http://www.webrazzi.com/2009/01/15/facebook-2008- degerlendirmesi-ve-artan-turk-populasyonu/
21. Kumar S. (2009). Undergraduate Perceptions of the Usefulness of Web 2.0 in Higher Education: Survey Development, Proceedings of 8th European Conference on E-learning (ECEL) (pp. 308-314). Italy.
22. Locker L. & Patterson J. (2008) Integrating social networking technologies in education: a case study of a formal learning environment. Eight IEEE International Conference on advance Learning Technologies, (pp.529-533)
23. Matthews, D. and Schrum, L. (2003). High-speed Internet use and academic gratifications in the college residence. The Internet and Higher Education, 6 (2), 125-144.
24. MoNE (2008). Öğretmen Yeterlilikleri Öğretmenlik Mesleği Genel ve Özel Alan Yeterlilikleri. Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü. Ankara.
25. Muñoz, C. L. & Towner, T. L., (2009). Opening Facebook: How to Use Facebook in the College Classroom. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009. (p. 2623-2627). Charleston, South Carolina.
26. Peluchette J., Karl K.(2008). Social Networking Profiles: An Examination of Student Attitudes Regarding Use and Appropriateness of ContentCyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 95-97.
27. Pysz, D. R. (2008). Student Affairs Administrators' Perspectives on the Legal and Safety Issues Associated with Students' Use of Online Social Networks on College and University Campuses: A National Study (Doctoral dissertation, University Califronia, 2008). (UMI No. 3356531).
28. Santos, L, Hammond, M., Durli, Z., & Chou, S-Y. (2009). Is there a role for social networking sites in education? In A. Tatnall & A. Jones (Eds.), Education and technology for a better world: Proceedings of the 9th IFIP TC 3 World Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 321-330). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
29. Scarpetta, F. (2008). Practices to display social presence: A study in a shared mediated environment. PsychNology Journal, 6 (1), 27-59.
30. Shen J., & Eder B. L. (2009). Intention to use virtual world for education. Journal of Information Systems, 20 (2), 225-233.
31. Silverman, S. C. (2007). Creating community online: The effects of online social networking communities on college students' experiences. How can student affairs professionals best respond to this emergent phenomenon (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Califronia, 2007). (UMI No. 3291809)
32. Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S., M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza G., (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29 (6), 420-433.
33. Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students' Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14 (4), 875-901.
34. Yıldırım, A, and Şimşek H. (2008), 6th Ed. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.