OTANTİK BİLİMSEL UYGULAMALARA SOSYOLOJİK BİR BAKİS VE OKULLARDAKİ FEN ÖGRETİMİ

Öz

Bu çalışma kapsamında, bilimin antropolojik ve sosyolojik açıları ile temellendirilen „otantik bilim uygulamalarını? vurgulamakta ve fen eğitimi için önerilerinden bahsetmekteyiz. Geleneksel fen eğitiminin sadece „olağan bilim? olarak öğretilmesinin problemli olduğunu belirterek „bilimsel uygulamaların? sosyolojik özelliklerini yansıtmadan öğretildigine dikkat çekmekteyiz. Bilimin antropolojik ve sosyolojik özelliklerini kısaca tartıştıktan sonra fen öğrenme ortamlarını tasarlamada ve bilimin doğasının ilkelerini öğretmede bilimin sosyal esaslarını ve „uygulama toplulukları? kavramını içermesi gerektiğini önermekteyiz. Daha sonra, yakın zamanda yapılan çalışmalarda „otantik bilim uygulamalarının? özelliklerini ele almaktayız ve araştırmacıların bu çalışmalarda „otantik bilim uygulamalarını? nasıl kullanılabilir hale getirdiklerini tetkik etmekteyiz. Son olarak ise bilimin antropolojik ve sosyolojik açılarını kullanarak „otantik bilim uygulamaları? hakkında öğrencilerin ve öğretmenlerin farkındalıklarını artırmak için önerilerde bulunmaktayız.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Otantik bilim,bilimsel araştırma,bilimsel okuryazarlık,bilim antropolojisi,bilim sosyolojisi,bilimin doğası

A Sociological Standpoint to Authentic Scientific Practices and its Role in School Science Teaching

Abstract

In this paper we place an emphasis on authentic science practices grounded by anthropological and sociological lenses of science and discuss their implications for science teaching. We highlight the problem of typical science teaching as teaching merely about the “normal science” and ignoring the sociological characteristics of scientific practice. After briefly reviewing the sociological and anthropological perspectives of science, we propose including the social characteristics of science and the notion of communities of practice in designing science learning environments and considering them as essential components of the nature of science teaching practices. Next, we discuss the characteristics of authentic scientific practices as reported in recent studies and examine how researchers operationalized authentic science practices in their educational studies. Finally we suggest some implications for practice in augmenting students‟ and teachers‟ awareness about authentic science practices using the anthropological and sociological lenses

Keywords

• Authentic science,scientific inquiry,scientific literacy,anthropology of science,sociology of science,the nature of science

Kaynakça

1. Abd-El Khalick, F., Lederman, N.G., & Bell, R. L. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education 82, 417- 436.
2. Abd-El Khalick, F. (1999). Teaching science with history. The Science Teacher, 66(9), 18-23.
3. Abd-El Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). The influence of history of science course on students‟ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 1057-1095.
4. Aikenhead, G. & Ryan, A.G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: “Views on science-technology-society” (VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477-491.
5. Akerson, V.L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers‟ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295-317.
6. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Barab, S.A., & Hay, K.E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprentice camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 70-102.

9. Bell, R., Abd-El Khalick, F., Lederman, N.G., McComas, W.F., & Matthews, M.R. (2001). The nature of science and science education: A bibliography. Science and Education, 10, 187-204.
10. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
11. Brown, C.M. (2000). Learning to become a member of a community of scientists: An ethnographic study of student participation in weather research in two middle school classes. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of California, CA, USA.
12. Buxton, C.A. (2006a). Modeling science teaching on science practice? Painting a more accurate picture through an ethnographic lab. study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 387-407.
13. Buxton, C.A. (2006b). Creating contextually authentic science in a low-performing urban elementary school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 695-721.
14. Carlsen, W.S. (2001, March). The sociological context of environmental science and its use in rethinking scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
15. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic reasoning in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218.
16. Cunningham, C.M., & Helms, J.V. (1998). Sociology of science as a means to a more authentic, inclusive science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 483-499.
17. Cunningham, C.M., Meyer, D.Z., & Avery, L. (2001, March). Promoting sociologically authentic inquiry in school science communities. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
18. Edelson, D. (1998). Realising authentic science learning through the adaptation of scientific practice. In Fraser, B.J., & Tobin, K.G. (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 317-331). Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. Griffing, L.R. (2003, April). Engaging teachers in authentic science research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.
20. Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: towards a personalized approach. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
21. Irwin, A.R. (2000). Historical case studies: Teaching the nature of science in context. Science and Education, 84(1), 5-26.
22. Kaya, A. (2007). Fen eğitiminde bilim tarihi destekli öğretimin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bilim doğasına ilişkin görüşlerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. [English: The evaluation of the effect of history of science supported teaching on pre-service primary science teachers‟ views about the nature of science in science education]. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi [Master of Science Thesis], Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey.
23. Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders‟ views of nature of science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578.
24. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1995). Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.). Handbook of science and technology studies, (pp. 140-166). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
25. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.) Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
26. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Lederman, N.G., Abd-El Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R.S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners‟ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
28. Lin, H.S., & Chen, C.C (2002). Promoting pre-service chemistry teachers‟ understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 773-792.
29. Lee, H.S, & Songer, N.B. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science education, 25(8), 923-948.
30. Merton, R.K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. McComas, W.F., Clough, M.P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W.F. McComas (Ed.). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and Strategies, (pp. 3-39). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32. McComas, W.F., & Olson, J.K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W.F. McComas (Ed.). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and Strategies, (pp. 41-52). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33. Webster (2002).Webster‟s universal encyclopedic dictionary. New York: Barnes & Noble.
34. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. Niaz, M. (2010). Science curriculum and teacher education: The role of presuppositions, contradictions, controversies and speculations vs. Kuhn‟s „normal science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 891-899.
36. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2002). Authentic activities and online learning. Retrieved October 17, 2008 http://www.herdsa.org.au/wpcontent/uploads/conference/2002/papers/Reeves.pd f
37. Roth, M-W. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
38. Sadler, T.D, Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M. & Allspaw, K.L. (2006). Socio-science and ethics in science classroom: Teachers perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 353-376.
39. Schwartz, R.S. & Crawford, B.A. (2004). Authentic scientific inquiry as context for teaching nature of science: Identifying critical elements of success. In Flick, L.B. , & Lederman, N.G. (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education, (pp. 331-355). Netherland: Kluwer.
40. Scallon, J. M. (2006). Comparative study of authentic scientific research versus guided inquiry in affecting middle school students‟ abilities to know and do genetics. Unpublished Master of Science Thesis, Texas A&M University, TX, USA.
41. Seker, H., & Welsh, L.C. (2006). The use of history of mechanics in teaching motion and force units. Science & Education, 15, 55-89.
42. Thompson, B.M., & Parrott, J.L. (2003, April). Investigating the impact of the authentic science experiences in the Information Technology in Science (ITS) Center for teaching and learning on teachers‟ beliefs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.
43. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45. Yalvac, B., Carlsen, S.W., & Bauchspies, W. (2006, April). Online peer-review and students‟ understanding of the Nature of Science, Paper presented at the annual NARST meeting, San Francisco, CA.
46. Zeidler, D.L, Walker, K. A., & Ackett, W. A. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socio-scientific dilemmas, Science Education 86, 343-367.