FEN VE TEKNOLOJİ ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN BİLİMİN DOĞASI HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ

Öz

Bu arastırma, fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin bilimin doğasına yönelik görüslerinin saptanması amacıyla gerçeklestirildi. Arastırmanın verileri daha önce Aikenhead, Ryan ve Fleming 1989 tarafından gelistirilen Bilim, Teknoloji ve Toplum Üzerine Görüsler Views on Science Technology and Society, VOSTS anketi kullanılarak ve yarı-yapılandırılmıs görüsmeler yoluyla toplandı. Anketten elde edilen verilerin betimsel analiz yapılarak yüzde ve frekans olarak verilmis ve görüsmelerden elde edilen veriler kodlanarak içerik analizi yapıldı. Analizler sonucunda; bilimin tanımı, gözlemlerin doğası bilimsel bilginin değiskenliği, önerme, kuram ve yasaların yapısı ve bilimsel yöntemle ilgili olarak fen ve teknoloji öğretmelerinin yetersiz ve yanlıs bir takım görüslere sahip oldukları görüldü.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fen Eğitimi,Fen Okuryazarlığı,Bilimin Doğası,Öğretmen Görüsleri

The Views of the Teachers of the Science and Technology on the Nature of Science

Abstract

This investigation was practiced by the aim of identifying the views of the science and technology teachers on the nature of science. Data in this research were collected by using the questionnaire “Views on Science Technology and Society VOSTS ” improved by Aikenhead, Ryan and Fleming 1989 and by semi-structured views. Content analysis of data obtained by the questionnaire was done by coding data, which was given as a percentage and frekans, and by coding data, which was obtained via interviews. As a result of these analyses, it is realized that science and technology teachers have wrong or insufficient knowledge concerning the definition of science, the nature of observations, the tentativeness of scientific knowledge, the structure of hypotheses, theories and laws, and the scientific method

Keywords

• Science Education,Scientific Literacy,Nature of Science,Teachers’ Views

Kaynakça

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. and BouJaoude, S. (1997). An Exploratory Study of the Knowledge Base for Science Teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (7), 673-699.
2. Aikenhead, G. S. and Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: “Views onscience technology-society“ (VOSTS). Science Education,76,477-491
3. Aikenhead, G. S., Fleming, R. W. and Ryan, A.G. (1989). CDN 5 form of VOSTS, (Online). Erişim Tarihi 15.10.2006. http://www.usask.ca/education/people/aikenhead/vosts.pdf
4. Bell, R. L. (2008). Teaching the Nature of Science through Process Skills. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
5. Başlantı, U. (2000). Bilimsel Okur-Yazarlık İlkeleri Açısından Fen Bilgisi Ders Kitapları İçerik Analizi. IV. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Kongresi, 6-8 Eylül, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi: Ankara.
6. Doğan Bora, N. (2005). Türkiye Genelinde Ortaöğretim Fen Branşı Öğretmen ve Öğrencilerinin Bilimin Doğası Üzerine Görüşlerinin Araştırılması. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
7. Erdoğan, R. (2004). Investigation Of The Preservice Science Teachers’ Views On Nature Of Science. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
8. Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and Practicing Secondary School Science Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs About the Philosophy of Science. Science Education, 75, 121-133.

9. Kahyaoğlu, E. (2004). Turkish Preservice Science Teachers’ Views on STS: Characteristics of Scientists’ Work. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
10. King, B. B. (1991). Beginning Teachers' Knowledge of and Attitude toward History and Philosophy of Science, Science Education, 75 (1), 135-141.
11. Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future. In S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Mccomas, W. F. (2000). The Principal Elements of The nature of Science: Dispelling the Myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education. Rationales and Strategies. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
13. MEB. (2005). İlköğretim 6. ve 7. ve 8. Sınıf Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi Öğretim Programları. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
14. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Pres.
15. Rubba, P. A. and Harkness, W. L. (1993). Examination of Preservice and In-Service Secondary Science Teachers’ Beliefs about Science-Technology-Society Interactions. Science Education,77 (4), 407-431.
16. Rubba, P. A., Bradford, C. S. and Harkness, W. L. (1996). A new scoring procedure for the views on science-technology- society instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 387–400.
17. Yakmaci, B. (1998). Science (biology, chemistry and physics) Teachers’ Views on the Nature of Science as a Dimension of Scientific Literacy. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.