YARATICI ÖĞRETMEN VE YARATICI OKUL KAVRAMLARINA İLİŞKİN OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN METAFORİK ALGILARI

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3, 1203 - 1238, 01.01.2019

Mevsim Zengin

Öz

Bu araştırma okul müdürlerinin yaratıcı öğretmen ve yaratıcı okul kavramlarına ilişkin metaforik algılarını belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmaya Van ilinde, kolay ulaşılabilir durum örneklemesi yoluyla belirlenmiş 33 okul müdürü katılmıştır. Nitel araştırma ile desenlenen bu araştırmada olgu bilim deseni uygulanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde ise içerik analizi tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre okul müdürlerinin yaratıcı öğretmen kavramına ilişkin “İşleyerek şekillendiren, bilge, yenilikçi, rehber, araştırmacı” olmak üzere 5 kategoride toplam 33 metafor oluşturdukları belirlenmiştir. Yaratıcı okul kavramına ilişkin ise “Bireysel farklılıklar, bütüncül gelişim, bilimsel, hayatın bilgisi, eğlendirici” olmak üzere 5 kategoride toplam 33 metafor oluşturulmuştur. Araştırmada ayrıca yaratıcı öğretmen kavramında “mimar”, yaratıcı okul kavramında ise “elbise dükkânı” metaforlarının çok kullanılan metaforlar olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

yaratıcı öğretmen, yaratıcı okul, metafor, yaratıcılık.

YARATICI ÖĞRETMEN VE YARATICI OKUL KAVRAMLARINA İLİŞKİN OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN METAFORİK ALGILARI

Öz

Kaynakça

• Akan, D., Yalçın, S., and Yıldırım, İ.(2014). Metaphoric perceptions of teachers about the concept of school principal. Elementary School Online, 13(1), 169‐179
• Amabile, T.M., Conti, R. Coon, H. Lazenby, J., and Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi. org/10.5465/256995
• Amabile, T.M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/41165921
• Amabile, T.M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review 5(3), 77-87.
• Azevedo, I. (2007). Creativity and school career: a study with young people from elementary school (PhD thesis). Minho's University.
• Azzam, A. M. (2009). Why creativity now? A conversation with Sir Ken Robinson. Educational Leadership. 67 (1), 22-26.
• Balay, R.(2010). Creativity in management. New Approaches in Management (Edt.Memduhoğlu, H.B., Yılmaz, K.). Ankara: Pegem Publishing
• Balcı, A. (1999). Metaphorical images of school: school perceptions of students, teachers and parents from four selected schools. Thesis, ODTÜ, Ankara.
• Cardoso, A.P., Malheiro, R., Rodrigues, P., Felizardo, S., and Lopes, A. (2014). Assessment and creativity stimulus in school context. Social and Behavioral Sciences 171, 864–873. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.202
• Cinque M. (2010). Creative action: theory, training and practice of personal innovation. Milan: Franco Angeli.
• Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Cropley, A. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The Creativity Research Handbook 1, 83-114.
• Cropley. A. (2009). Creativity in education and learning – a guide for teachers and educators. New York: Routledge Falmer.
• Cremin, T. (2009). Creative teachers and creative teaching. In Anthony Wilson (ed), Creativity in Primary Education, 2nd ed. (pp. 36-46), Exeter: Learning Matters Ltd.
• Çapan, B.E. (2010). Pre-service teachers' metaphoric perceptions of gifted students. International Journal of Social Sciences, 3 (12), 140-154.
• Dikici, A., and Soh, K. (2015). Indexing creativity fostering teacher behaviour: replication and modification. Higher Education of Social Science, 9 (3), 1-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3968/7486
• Fasko, D. (2001) Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 317-327. https://doi. org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_09
• Fitriah, F. (2017). Teachers’ belıefs about creatıvıty ın efl classrooms ın ındonesıan hıgher educatıon. Thesis, University of Canberra, Australia.
• Fitriah, F. (2018). The Role of technology ın teachers’ creatıvıty development ın Englısh teachıng practıces. TEFLIN Journal 29 (2), 177-193. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v29i2/ 177-193
• Frossard, F., Barajas, M., and Trifonova, A. (2012). A learner-centred game-design approach: impacts on teachers’ creativity. Digital Education Review 21, 13-22.
• Fautley. M and Savage, J. (2007). Creativity ın secondary education. Exeter: learning Matters Lda.
• Florida, R. (2006). The flight of the creative class: the new global competition for talent. Liberal Education, 92(3), 22-29.
• Harris, A. (2009). Creative leadership developing future leaders. British Educational Leadership, Management&Administration Society, 23(1), 9-11. DOI: 10.1177/089202 0608099076
• Jeffrey, B. and Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creativey and teachingfor creativty. Distinction and relationships. Educational Studies, 30(1), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569 032000159750
• Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (2005). Metaphors: life, meaning and language. (Çev. G. Y. Demir). İstanbul: Paradigma Publishing
• Lapeniene, D. and Dumciene, A. (2013). Teachers’ creativity: different approaches and similar results. Social and Behavioral Sciences 116, 279–284. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro. 2014.01.208
• Memduhoğlu, H.B., Uçar, R., and Uçar, H.İ. (2017). Creativity in education with sample applications. Ankara: Pegem Academi
• Memduhoğlu, H.B., Uçar, R., and Uçar, H.İ. (2019). Creativity in education from the perspective of 2023 education vision. Yüzüncü Yıl University 19-21 March Proceedings Booklet.119-120.
• Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M.(1994).Qualitative data analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research And Evaluation Methods (3rd Ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Patton, M.Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3. Translation) M. Bütün ve S. B. Demir (Çev Ed) Pegem Akademi PublishingPecheanu, I.S.E. and Tudorie, C.(2014). Initiatives towards an education for creativity. Social and Behavioral Sciences 180, 1520 – 1526. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.301
• Resnick, M. (2007). Sowing the Seeds for a More Creative Society. International Society for Technology in Education, 35(4), 18–22.
• Saliceti, F.(2015). Educate for creativity: new educational strategies. Social and Behavioral Sciences 197, 1174 – 1178. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.374
• Sanchez, A, Jose, M. B., and Victor, M. (2000). Desing of virtual reality systems for education. A Cognitive Approach. Education and Information Technologies 5 (4).
• Sternberg, R. J., and Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J.
• Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Rogers, C. R. (1972). Towards a theory of creativity. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity. Middlesex:Penguin Books.
• Saban, A. (2008). Metaphors of School. Educational Administration in Theory and Practice 55, 459-496.
• Torrance, E. P., Ball, O. E., and Safter, H. T. (1992). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: Streamlined scoring and interpretation guide for Figural forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
• Töremen, F.(2003). Creative school and administration. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice 3 (1) , 248-25
• Yıldırım, A., and Şimşek, H. (2013). Metaphors of School. Educational Administration in Theory and Practice. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
• Yılmaz, S.(2011). Perceptions of fourth grade students about working together. Ahi Evran University Journal of Education Faculty, 12(1), 1-14.