Araştırma Makalesi

Investigation of SACs High School Mathematics Material Based on PISA Proficiency Levels and Contexts

Cilt: 32 Sayı: 4 28 Ekim 2024
PDF İndir
EN

Investigation of SACs High School Mathematics Material Based on PISA Proficiency Levels and Contexts

Öz

Purpose: This study’s primary aim is to categorize questions from the activity forms of the algebra and number theory module in the High School Mathematics Auxiliary Course Material, published by the Ministry of National Education (MoNE) in 2021 for SACs. This categorization was based on the PISA mathematics proficiency levels and mathematical literacy contexts. Design/Methodology/Approach: The document analysis technique, a qualitative research method, was employed for this investigation. A cumulative count of 199 questions from the activity forms of 19 activities within the auxiliary course material were examined. Findings: Based on the PISA Mathematics proficiency levels, the majority of the questions were at Level 2 (41.11%), while the fewest were at Level 5 (8.12%). Regarding context, the fewest questions were in the societal context (1.01%), and the vast majority were in the scientific context (90.80%). Highlights: The study concluded that the levels and contexts of questions in the course material were not evenly distributed, even though questions from every level and context were present. It is recommended that future course materials intended for gifted students should place a greater emphasis on ensuring a balanced distribution and include a higher number of questions that demand advanced skills.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mathematical Literacy, Mathematics Proficiency Levels, Mathematical Literacy Contexts, SAC, Gifted Students

Kaynakça

  1. Akkaya, R. & Durmuş, S. (2006). The Effectiveness of Worksheets on Overcoming Misconceptions Related to Algebra Learning Domain of Sixth Grade Elementary School Students. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 27 (8-26).
  2. Al Cihan, Ş. (2023). Investigation of geometry and measurement problems in middle school mathematics course books in terms of PISA mathematics literacy levels. [Unpublished Master's Thesis]. Marmara University, İstanbul.
  3. Albayrak, H. B., Tarım, K., & Baypınar, K. (2023). Investigation of mathematical literacy self-efficacy perceptions and mathematical literacy achievement of gifted students. Trakya Education Journal, 13(1), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.1012064.
  4. Altun, M., & Bozkurt, I. (2017). A new classification proposal for mathematical literacy problems. Journal of Education and Science, 42 (190), 171-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6916.
  5. Baştürk Şahin, B. N., & Altun, M. (2019). Investigating Mathematical Literacy Problems That Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers Posed by Means of Mathematical Processes. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(2), 146-161.
  6. Bernardino, K. J. (2023). Pedagogical Practices of Elementary Teachers in Promoting Numeracy Skills Amidst Pandemic. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4(4), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0265.
  7. Charalambous, C.Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H.-Y. & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12 (2), 117-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903460070.
  8. Conklin, M.A. (2004). Found in translation: a comparison of American, German, and Japanese mathematics texts and exercises. [Master's thesis], University of Maryland, USA.
  9. Coştu, S., Arslan, S., Çatlıoğlu, H., & Birgin, O. (2009). Perspectives of elementary school teachers and their students about relating and contextualizing in mathematics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1692-1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.300.
  10. EARGED (Eğitim Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı [Departmant of Research and Development of Education, Ministry of National Education of Turkey (MoNE)]. (2010). Uluslararası Öğrenci Değerlendirme Programı PISA 2009 Ulusal Ön Raporu [PISA 2009-National Preliminary Report]. Ankara: MEB Eğitimi Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı [MoNE: Departmant of Research and Development of Education].

Kaynak Göster

APA
Karabulut, E., & Tarım, K. (2024). Investigation of SACs High School Mathematics Material Based on PISA Proficiency Levels and Contexts. Kastamonu Education Journal, 32(4), 678-691. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574382
AMA
1.Karabulut E, Tarım K. Investigation of SACs High School Mathematics Material Based on PISA Proficiency Levels and Contexts. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2024;32(4):678-691. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1574382
Chicago
Karabulut, Ecem, ve Kamuran Tarım. 2024. “Investigation of SACs High School Mathematics Material Based on PISA Proficiency Levels and Contexts”. Kastamonu Education Journal 32 (4): 678-91. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574382.
EndNote
Karabulut E, Tarım K (01 Ekim 2024) Investigation of SACs High School Mathematics Material Based on PISA Proficiency Levels and Contexts. Kastamonu Education Journal 32 4 678–691.
IEEE
[1]E. Karabulut ve K. Tarım, “Investigation of SACs High School Mathematics Material Based on PISA Proficiency Levels and Contexts”, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, c. 32, sy 4, ss. 678–691, Eki. 2024, doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.1574382.
ISNAD
Karabulut, Ecem - Tarım, Kamuran. “Investigation of SACs High School Mathematics Material Based on PISA Proficiency Levels and Contexts”. Kastamonu Education Journal 32/4 (01 Ekim 2024): 678-691. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574382.
JAMA
1.Karabulut E, Tarım K. Investigation of SACs High School Mathematics Material Based on PISA Proficiency Levels and Contexts. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2024;32:678–691.
MLA
Karabulut, Ecem, ve Kamuran Tarım. “Investigation of SACs High School Mathematics Material Based on PISA Proficiency Levels and Contexts”. Kastamonu Education Journal, c. 32, sy 4, Ekim 2024, ss. 678-91, doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1574382.
Vancouver
1.Ecem Karabulut, Kamuran Tarım. Investigation of SACs High School Mathematics Material Based on PISA Proficiency Levels and Contexts. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 01 Ekim 2024;32(4):678-91. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1574382