The Impact of Design-Based Research Method Science Activities on Middle School Students' Creative and Critical Thinking Skills: A Classroom Experimental Study
Öz
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of science activities prepared through the design-based research (DBR) method on middle school students' creative and critical thinking skills.
Design/Methodology/Approach: A quasi-experimental design was employed. The study group consisted of 80 middle school students in Kastamonu, Turkey, randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. Design-based science activities were applied in the experimental group, while the control group followed traditional science instruction. Data were collected through pre-tests and post-tests using the Marmara Creative Thinking Dispositions Scale and Marmara Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale.
Findings: Results indicated significant improvements in creative and critical thinking dispositions of students in the experimental group compared to the control group. The DBR activities provided students with active problem-solving opportunities, enhancing their ability to generate creative ideas and critically evaluate their work.
Highlights: The study highlights that the design-based research approach in science education is more effective than traditional teaching methods in enhancing creative and critical thinking skills. It is recommended for educators and curriculum developers to integrate DBR-driven activities into educational programs.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Design-Based Research, Experimental Implementation, Science Education, Creative Thinking, Critical Thinking
Kaynakça
- Aguilera-Hermida, A. P. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011
- Amabile, T.M., Pratt, M.G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
- Ayyıldız, P., & Yılmaz, A. (2021). 'Moving the kaleidoscope' to see the effect of creative personality traits on creative thinking dispositions of pre-service teachers: The mediating effect of creative learning environments and teachers' creativity fostering behavior. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100879, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100879
- Ayyıldız, P., & Yılmaz, A. (2023). A New Chapter is Being Written About Writing Instruction: Instructional Leadership at K-12 Levels in The Age of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 18(4), 82-101. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2023.631.4
- Azizan, S.A., & Shamsi, A.N. (2022). Design-based learning as a pedagogical approach in an online learning environment for science undergraduate students. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.860097
- Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
- Baron, C., & Daniel-Allegro, B. (2019). About adopting a systemic approach to design connected embedded systems: a MOOC promoting systems thinking and systems engineering. Systems Engineering, 23, 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21513
- Baum-Combs, L., Cennamo, K.S., & Newbill, P.L. (2009). Developing critical and creative thinkers: Toward a conceptual model of creative and critical thinking processes. Educational Technology, 49(5), 3-14.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.
- Bybee, R. 2010. The teaching of science: 21st-century perspectives. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.