Determining The Factors That Influence Peer Asessment in Microteaching Practices
Öz
This study aimed to determine, characteristics affecting the peer review in micro-teaching
practices. Sequential exploratory design, in mixed method was used. The study group on the
qualitative dimension has been comprised of 16 preservice Science teachers of in Kafkas
University Faculty of Education in the academic year 2014-2015. The sample size of the
quantitative dimension has been comprised of 222 preservice teachers in different departments
has realized the micro teaching practice. Criterion sampling was used in the study. Data were
collected from interviews form the qualitative dimension and Data on quantitative dimension
were collected from “Factors in Microteaching Peer Assessment Scale (FMPAS)” prepared
in the light of data obtained from the literature. Content analysis was used and frequency
calculations were performed for data analysis.at the end of this study was observed that the
close friendship relations is one of the important factors that influence the peer review.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Allen, D. W. (1980). Micro-teaching: Personal review. Britisch Journal of Teacher Education, 6(2), 147-151.
- Akiyama, T. (2012, Ağustos). A close look at english teacher employment examinations: how do raters assess? Paper presented at the 8th International Symposium on Teaching English at Tertiary Level And The 17th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, Beijing, Chine. Abstract retrieved March 12, 2015, from: http://paal.kr/download/PAAL2012_Proceedings.pdf
- Azarnoosh, M. (2013). Peer assessment in an EFL context: attitudes and friendship bias. Language Testing in Asia, 3(1), 1-10.
- Bellmore, A. D., Nishina, A., Witkow, M. R., Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (2007). The influence of classroom ethnic composition on same‐and other‐ethnicity peer nominations in middle school. Social Development, 16(4), 720-740.
- Bozkurt, E., ve Demir, R. (2012). Öğrenci görüşleriyle akran değerlendirme: Bir örnek uygulama. İlköğretim Online, 11(4), 966-978.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (8. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akedemi.
- Chou, C., ve Tsai, C. C. (2002). Developing web-based curricula: Issues and challenges. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(6), 623-636
- Ellington, H., Earl, S., & Cowan, J. (1997). Making effective use of peer and self assessment. The Robert Gordon University.
- Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 175–187
- Falchikov, N., ve Magin, D. (1997). Detecting gender bias in peer marking of students’ group process work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 385-396.