Araştırma Makalesi

Opinions of Classroom Teacher Candidates on STEM Education

Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1 28 Şubat 2022
PDF İndir
EN TR

Opinions of Classroom Teacher Candidates on STEM Education

Öz

Purpose: Scientific and technological developments in the last century have undoubtedly been realized in the light of new
paradigms that have taken place in education programs. Especially advances in science, technology, engineering and
mathematics have been transformed into new inventions and products. From this point of view, STEM, which has become an
important education discipline by combining the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics, has enabled
learners to absorb, synthesize and apply the information they have acquired with an interdisciplinary perspective. It is
considered important and necessary to learn. Based on this idea, this study was conducted in order to examine the opinions of
teacher candidates studying in the primary school teaching department about STEM education after STEM education.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This research is a qualitative study aimed at determining the opinions of teacher candidates
on STEM education. The study was conducted based on a case study, one of the qualitative research methods. Working group
of the study consisted of 57 teacher candidates educating at a state university in southern Turkey. The sample of the study was
determined by the criterion sampling method, one of the purposeful sampling methods.
Findings: It was concluded that the classroom teacher candidates generally thought that STEM education was related to
science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields, that it included daily life lesson problems, that it gave teacher skills,
provided permanent learning and gained perspectives. In addition, it was concluded that in the case of applying STEM activities
in mathematic lessons, both teachers and teaching time management may have problems in the context of preparing headings
individually.
Highlights: According to these results, applied trainings can be given to both in-service processes and teacher candidates and
teachers to solve such problems. In addition, this study turned out to be about the participants following education in the
classroom teaching department. In cooperation with students studying in mathematics, science and engineering departments
on STEM education, new studies can also be conducted to examine their thoughts on STEM education and applications.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Stem, Stem Education, Teacher Candidate, Classroom teacher candidate

Proje Numarası

SYL-2018-10216

Kaynakça

  1. Akaygün, S., & Aslan Tutak, F. (2016). STEM images revealing STEM conceptions of pre-service chemistry and mathematics teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, 4(1), 56-71. doi: 10.18404/ijemst.44833.
  2. Akgündüz, D., & Ertepınar, H. (2015). STEM eğitimi Türkiye raporu: “günün modası mı? Yoksa gereksinim mi?. İstanbul: STEM Merkezi ve Eğitim Fakültesi, İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi.
  3. Bakırcı, H., & Kutlu, E. (2018). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin FeTeMM yaklaşımı hakkındaki görüşlerinin belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 367-389. doi: 10.16949/turkbilmat.417939.
  4. Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education 12(5&6), 23-37.
  5. Bergsten, C., & Frejd, P. (2019). Preparing pre-service mathematics teachers for STEM education: an analysis of lesson proposals. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 941-953. doi: 10.1007/s11858-019-01071-7.
  6. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in p-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387.
  7. Buyruk, B., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2018). Teacher candidates’ stem awareness levels. Participatory Educational Research, 2016(III), 272-279. http://www.partedres.com.
  8. Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70 (1), 30-35.
  9. Capraro, R. M. ve Slough, S. W. (2008). Project-based learning: an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Approach. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  10. Cho, B., & Lee, J. (2013). The effects of creativity and flow on learning through the STEAM education on elementary school contexts. Paper presented at the International Conference of Educational Technology, Sejong University, South Korea.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Bal, P. (2022). Opinions of Classroom Teacher Candidates on STEM Education. Kastamonu Education Journal, 30(1), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.827003
AMA
1.Bal P. Opinions of Classroom Teacher Candidates on STEM Education. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2022;30(1):196-204. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.827003
Chicago
Bal, Pınar. 2022. “Opinions of Classroom Teacher Candidates on STEM Education”. Kastamonu Education Journal 30 (1): 196-204. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.827003.
EndNote
Bal P (01 Şubat 2022) Opinions of Classroom Teacher Candidates on STEM Education. Kastamonu Education Journal 30 1 196–204.
IEEE
[1]P. Bal, “Opinions of Classroom Teacher Candidates on STEM Education”, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, c. 30, sy 1, ss. 196–204, Şub. 2022, doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.827003.
ISNAD
Bal, Pınar. “Opinions of Classroom Teacher Candidates on STEM Education”. Kastamonu Education Journal 30/1 (01 Şubat 2022): 196-204. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.827003.
JAMA
1.Bal P. Opinions of Classroom Teacher Candidates on STEM Education. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2022;30:196–204.
MLA
Bal, Pınar. “Opinions of Classroom Teacher Candidates on STEM Education”. Kastamonu Education Journal, c. 30, sy 1, Şubat 2022, ss. 196-04, doi:10.24106/kefdergi.827003.
Vancouver
1.Pınar Bal. Opinions of Classroom Teacher Candidates on STEM Education. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 01 Şubat 2022;30(1):196-204. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.827003