STEM Eğitimi Uygulamalarına Yönelik Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Görüşleri

Yıl 2022, , 196 - 204, 28.02.2022

Pınar Bal

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.827003

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik alanlarının birleştirilmesiyle önemli bir eğitim disiplini halini alan STEM eğitimi uygulamalarına yönelik görüşlerinin belirlenmesidir. Araştırma nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden durum çalışmasına dayalı olarak tasarlanmıştır. Çalışma, amaçlı örneklem yöntemlerinden ölçüt örnekleme yöntemi ile belirlenen 57 katılımcı ile yürütülmüştür. Veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen STEM konusunda yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analiz sürecinde ise betimsel analiz tekniği kullanılmıştır. Bu kapsamda öncelikle araştırma sorularından yola çıkarak genel bir çerçeve oluşturulmuştur ve elde edilen verilerin hangi kategorilerde olabileceği belirlenmiştir. Araştırmanın sonucunda sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının genel olarak STEM eğitiminin fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik alanları ile ilgili olduğunu, günlük hayatla ilişkili problemleri kapsadığını, öğrencilere çeşitli beceriler kazandırdığını, kalıcı öğrenme sağladığını ve farklı bakış açısı kazandırdığını düşündükleri sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca, STEM etkinliklerinin matematik derslerinde uygulanabilme durumunda hem öğretmenlerin hem de öğrencilerin zaman yönetimi, bireysel farklılıklarla başa çıkma, etkinlik hazırlama bağlamında sorunlar yaşayabilecekleri sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

STEM, STEM eğitimi,, öğretmen adayı

Destekleyen Kurum

Çukurova Üniversitesi BAP birimi

Proje Numarası

SYL-2018-10216

Opinions of Classroom Teacher Candidates on STEM Education

Öz

Purpose: Scientific and technological developments in the last century have undoubtedly been realized in the light of new
paradigms that have taken place in education programs. Especially advances in science, technology, engineering and
mathematics have been transformed into new inventions and products. From this point of view, STEM, which has become an
important education discipline by combining the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics, has enabled
learners to absorb, synthesize and apply the information they have acquired with an interdisciplinary perspective. It is
considered important and necessary to learn. Based on this idea, this study was conducted in order to examine the opinions of
teacher candidates studying in the primary school teaching department about STEM education after STEM education.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This research is a qualitative study aimed at determining the opinions of teacher candidates
on STEM education. The study was conducted based on a case study, one of the qualitative research methods. Working group
of the study consisted of 57 teacher candidates educating at a state university in southern Turkey. The sample of the study was
determined by the criterion sampling method, one of the purposeful sampling methods.
Findings: It was concluded that the classroom teacher candidates generally thought that STEM education was related to
science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields, that it included daily life lesson problems, that it gave teacher skills,
provided permanent learning and gained perspectives. In addition, it was concluded that in the case of applying STEM activities
in mathematic lessons, both teachers and teaching time management may have problems in the context of preparing headings
individually.
Highlights: According to these results, applied trainings can be given to both in-service processes and teacher candidates and
teachers to solve such problems. In addition, this study turned out to be about the participants following education in the
classroom teaching department. In cooperation with students studying in mathematics, science and engineering departments
on STEM education, new studies can also be conducted to examine their thoughts on STEM education and applications.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Stem, Stem Education, Teacher Candidate, Classroom teacher candidate

Proje Numarası

SYL-2018-10216

Kaynakça

• Akaygün, S., & Aslan Tutak, F. (2016). STEM images revealing STEM conceptions of pre-service chemistry and mathematics teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, 4(1), 56-71. doi: 10.18404/ijemst.44833.
• Akgündüz, D., & Ertepınar, H. (2015). STEM eğitimi Türkiye raporu: “günün modası mı? Yoksa gereksinim mi?. İstanbul: STEM Merkezi ve Eğitim Fakültesi, İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi.
• Bakırcı, H., & Kutlu, E. (2018). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin FeTeMM yaklaşımı hakkındaki görüşlerinin belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 367-389. doi: 10.16949/turkbilmat.417939.
• Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education 12(5&6), 23-37.
• Bergsten, C., & Frejd, P. (2019). Preparing pre-service mathematics teachers for STEM education: an analysis of lesson proposals. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 941-953. doi: 10.1007/s11858-019-01071-7.
• Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in p-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387.
• Buyruk, B., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2018). Teacher candidates’ stem awareness levels. Participatory Educational Research, 2016(III), 272-279. http://www.partedres.com.
• Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70 (1), 30-35.
• Capraro, R. M. ve Slough, S. W. (2008). Project-based learning: an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Approach. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
• Cho, B., & Lee, J. (2013). The effects of creativity and flow on learning through the STEAM education on elementary school contexts. Paper presented at the International Conference of Educational Technology, Sejong University, South Korea.
• Cotabish, A., Dailey, D. Robinson, A., & Hunghes, G. (2013). The effects of a STEM intervention on elementary students’ science knowledge and skills. School Science and Mathematics, 113(5), 215-226. doi: 10.1111/ssm.12023.
• Çepni, S. (2017). Kuramdan uygulamaya STEM eğitimi (Editör: S. Çepni). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Du Plessis, A. E. (2018). The lived experience of out-of-field STEM teachers: A quandary for strategising quality teaching in STEM?. Research in Science Education, 50, 1465-1499. doi: 10.1007%2Fs11165-018-9740-9.
• Evans, E. M. (2015). Preparing elementary pre-service teachers to integrate STEM: A mixed-methods study. Unpublished doctor of education. Northern Illinois University, Illinois.
• Geiger, V. (2019). Using mathematics as evidence supporting critical reasoning and enquiry in primary science classrooms. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education 51(1), 929-940. doi: 10.1007/s11858-019-01068-2.
• Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi J. (2012). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Primer. Congressional Research Service. http://www.stemedcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/STEM-Education-Primer.pdf.
• Gümüş, E. B. (2019). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin STEM eğitimine yönelik ilgi ve görüşlerinin belirlenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Karademir Coşkun, T., Alakurt, T. & Yılmaz, B. (2020). Bilişim teknolojileri öğretmenlerinin perspektifinden STEM eğitimi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (2), 820-836. doi: 10.17240/aibuefd.2020..-536856
• Kennedy, T.J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3). 246-258. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1044508.pdf.
• Kızılay, E. (2018). Pre-service science teachers’ opinions about the relationship of STEM fields. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 5(2), 174-186. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/612427.
• Kim, G., & Choi, S. Y. (2012). The effect of creative problem solving ability and scientific attitude through the science-based STEAM program in the elementary gifted students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(2), 216-226. doi: 10.15267/keses.2012.31.2.216.
• Lacey, T. A., & Wright, B. (2009). Occupational employment projections to 2018. Monthly Labor Review, 82-109.
• Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. California: SAGE Publications.
• MEB, (2016). STEM Eğitimi Raporu. Ankara: SESAM Grup.
• Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber. Selahattin Turan (Çeviri Editörü). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Miller, J. (2019). STEM education in the primary years to support mathematical thinking: using coding to identify mathematical structures and patterns. ZDM, 51, 915–927. doi: /10.1007/s11858-019-01096-y.
• Özbilen, A. (2018). STEM eğitimine yönelik öğretmen görüşleri ve farkındalıkları. Scientific Educational Studies, 2(1), 1-21.
• Park, H., Byun, S.,Sim, J., Han, H., & Baek, Y. S. (2016). Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of STEAM Education in South Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(7), 1739-1753. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1531a
• Rockland, R., Bloom, D. S., Carpinelli, J., Burr-Alexander, L., Hirsch, L. S., & Kimmel, H. (2010). Advancing the “E” in K-12 STEM education. Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), 53-64. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/55436/.
• Sanders, M. E. (2008). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania, The Technology Teacher, December/January 2009,20-29. https://www.teachmeteamwork.com/files/sanders.istem.ed.ttt.istem.ed.def.pdf
• Stolhmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-college Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28-34. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jpeer/vol2/iss1/4/
• Şahin, A., Ayar, M. C., ve Adıgüzel, T. (2014). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik içerikli okul sonrası etkinlikler ve öğrenciler üzerindeki etkileri. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 297-322.
• Wang, H. H. (2012). A new era of science education: science teachers’ perceptions and class room practices of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) integration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Minnesota University, Minnesota.
• Wang, J., Guo, D., & Jou, M. (2015). A study on the effects of model-based inquiry pedagogy on students‘ inquiry skills in a virtual physics lab. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 658-669. doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.043
• Weber, M. L. (2015). The Role of Globalization, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Project-Based Learning, and The National Science and Technology Fair Mandate in Creating 21st-Century-Ready Students in Schools in Costa Rica. Unpublished dissertation, University of Southern California, UMI No.3704262.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2003). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
• Yıldırım, B. (2018). STEM Uygulamalarına Yönelik Öğretmen Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 42-53. http://ekuad.com/articles/stem-uygulamalarina-yonelik-ogretmen-goruslerinin-incelenmesi.pdf.
• Yıldırım, B., & Altun, Y. (2015). STEM eğitim ve mühendislik uygulamalarının fen bilgisi laboratuvar dersindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi. El-Jezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(2), 28-40.
• Yıldırım, B., & Türk, C. (2018). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının STEM eğitimine yönelik görüşleri: uygulamalı bir çalışma. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8 (2), 195-213. doi:10.24315/trkefd.310112
• Yıldırım, P. (2017). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik (STEM) entegrasyonuna ilişkin nitel bir çalışma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 31-55. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunikkefd/issue/33367/351798.
• Zarske, M., Sullivan, J., Carlson, L., & Yowell, J. (2004). Teachers teaching teachers: Linking K-12 engineering curricula with teacher professional development. Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT. doi: 10.18260/1-2—13304.