Üst-Bilişsel 7E Öğrenme Döngüsünün Öğrencilerin Fizikteki Epistemolojik Anlayışlarına Etkisi

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2, 603 - 618, 15.07.2016

Sevda Yerdelen-damar Ali Eryılmaz

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, üst-bilişsel olarak iyileştirilmiş 7E öğrenme döngüsünün onuncu sınıf öğrencilerinin epistemolojik anlayışlarına etkisini araştırmaktır. Çalışmaya, Ankara’da bulunan iki devlet lisesindeki 107 (49 Kız, 58 Erkek) onuncu sınıf öğrencisi katılmıştır. Çalışmada yarı deneysel dizayn kullanılmıştır. Her bir okuldan iki sınıf, kontrol ve deney gruplarına rastgele atanmıştır. Kontrol grubu geleneksel öğretimle öğretilirken, deney grubu üst-bilişsel olarak iyileştirilmiş 7E öğrenme döngüsü ile öğretilmiştir. Çalışma, 2009-2010 akademik yılında yapılmıştır. Fizik Beklentileri Anketi, öğrencilerin epistemolojik anlayışlarını değerlendirmek için kullanılmıştır. Öğrencilerin ön-epistemolojik anlayışlarının kontrol edildikten sonra, üst-bilişsel olarak iyileştirilmiş 7E öğrenme döngüsünün öğrencilerinin epistemolojik anlayışlarına etkisini test etmek için Kovaryans Analizi (ANCOVA) kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonucu, deney ve kontrol grubu öğrencilerinin epistemolojik anlayış puanlarının ortalaması arasında deney grubu lehinde anlamlı bir farkın olduğunu göstermiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fizik eğitimi, kişisel epistemoloji, üst-biliş, 7E öğrenme döngüsü, bilimsel sorgulama

The Impact of The Metacognitive 7E Learning Cycle on Students’ Epistemological Understandings

Öz

This study investigated the effect of metacognitively stimulated 7E learning cycle on tenth grade students’ epistemological understandings in physics. The participants of the study included 107 (49 Female, 58 Male) tenth grade students at two public high schools in Ankara. A quasi-experimental with matching-only pretest-posttest control group design was employed. Two intact classes of each school were randomly assigned to the experimental and control group. The experimental group was instructed based on the metacognitive 7E learning cycle while the control group was taught with the teacher-centered instruction. The Turkish Physics Expectation Survey was applied to probe the students’ epistemological understandings in physics. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was employed to examine the effect of the instruction relied on the metacognitive 7E learning cycle on the students’ epistemological understandings when their pre-epistemological understandings were controlled. The result indicated that there was a significant difference between two groups’ post epistemological understandings in favor of the experimental group.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Physics education, personal epistemology, metacognition, scientific inquiry, 7E learning cycle

Kaynakça

• Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. (2009). The influence of metacognitive training on pre- service elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2161-2184.
• Abraham, M.R. (2003). The learning cyle approach as a strategy for instruction in sicence. In B. J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.). International handbook of science education (pp. 513- 524). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
• Açışlı, S., & Turgut, Ü. (2011). The examination of the influence of the materials generated in compliance with 5E learning model on physics laboratory applications. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 562-593
• Ağgül-Yalçın, F., & Bayrakçeken, S. (2010). The effect of 5E learning model on pre-service science teachers’ achievement of acids-bases subject. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 2(2), 508-531.
• Appamaraka, S., Suksringarm, P., & Singseewo, A. (2009). Effects of learning environmental education using the 5Es-learning cycle approach with the metacognitive moves and the teacher’s handbook approach on learning achievement, integrated science process skills and critical thinking of high school (grade 9) students. Pakistan Journal of Social Scien- ces, 6(5), 287-291.
• Ates, S. (2005). The effectiveness of the learning-cycle method on teaching dc circuits to prospective female and male science teachers. Research in Science & Technological Edu- cation, 23(2), 213-227.
• Baird, J. R., & White, R. T. (1984). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: A classroom study. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 249250)
• Baker, L. (1991). Metacognition, reading, and science education. In C.M. Santa and D.E. Alvermann (Eds.), Science learning: Processes and applications (pp. 2-13) Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Balci, S., Cakiroglu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Engagement, exploration, explanation, ex- tension, and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(3), 199-203.
• Barman, C. R., Barman, N. S., & Miller, J. A. (1996). Two teaching methods and students’ understanding of sound. School Science and Mathematics, 96(2), 63-67.
• Bektas, O. (2010). The effect of 5E learning cycle model on tenth grade students’ understan- ding in the particulate nature of matter, epistemological beliefs and views of nature of science. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
• Blank, L. M. (2000). Metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for students understan- ding. Science Education, 84, 486- 506.
• Brownlee, J., Purdie, N., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2001). Changing epistemological beliefs in pre-service teacher education students. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 247-268.
• Bulbul, Y. (2010). Effects of 7E learning cycle model accompanied with computer animations on understanding of diffusion and osmosis concepts. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
• Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Cakiroglu, J. (2006). The effect of learning cycle approach on students’ achievement in scien- ce. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 22, 61-73.
• Ceylan, E., & Geban, O. (2009). Facilitating conceptual change in understanding state of matter and solubility concepts by using 5E learning cycle model. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 36, 41-50.
• Cherry, G. R. (2011).Analysis of Attitude and Achievement using the 5E Instructional Model in an Interactive Television Environment. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQu- est Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No.3455283)
• Cobern, W. W., Schuster, D., Adams, B., Applegate, B., Skjold, B., Undreiu, A., & Gobert, J. D. (2010). Experimental comparison of inquiry and direct instruction in science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(1), 81-96.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
• Dikici, A., Türker, H. H., & Özdemir, G. (2010). 5E öğrenme döngüsünün anlamlı öğrenmeye etkisinin incelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(39), 100-128.
• Dogru-Atay, P., & Tekkaya, C. (2008). Promoting students’ learning in genetics with the lear- ning cycle. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(3), 259-280.
• Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expending 5E model: A proposed 7E model emphasizes “ transfer of learning and importance of eliciting prior understanding. The Science Teacher, 70(6), 56- 59.
• Elby, A. & Hammer, D. (2010). Epistemological resources and framing: A cognitive frame- work for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students’ epistemologies. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal Epistemology in the Classroom: Theory, Research, and Implications for Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 409-434.
• Elby, A. (2001). Helping physics students learn how to learn. American Journal of Physics, Physics Education Research Supplement, 69(7), S54–S64.
• Elby, A., McCaskey, T., Lippmann, R. and Redish, E. F. (2001). Retrieved from http://www. physics.umd.edu/perg/tools/attsur.htm
• Farrell, J.J., Moog, R.S., & Spencer, J.N. (1999). A guided inquiry general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 570–574.
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step By Step: A Simple Guide and Refe- rence (11.0 Update). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Georghiades, P. (2004). Making pupils’ conceptions of electricity more durable by means of situated metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 85-99.
• Georghiades, P. (2006). The role of metacognitive activities in the contextual use of primary pupils’ conceptions of science. Research in Science Education, 36(1), 29-49.
• Gill, M. G., Ashton, P. T., & Algina, J. (2004). Changing preservice teachers’ epistemological beliefs about teaching and learning in mathematics: An intervention study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 164-185.
• Hammer, D. M. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Ins- truction, 12(2), 151-183.
• Harurluoğlu, Y., & Kaya, E. (2011). The effect of learning cycle model on the achievements and retention levels of pre-service science teachers in seed-fruit-flower topics. Iğdır Uni- versity Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 1(4), 43-50
• Hennessey, M. (1993). Students’ ideas about their conceptualization: Their elicitation through instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Rese- arch in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.
• Hennessey, M. G. (1999). Probing the dimensions of metacognition: implications for concep- tual change teaching-learning. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 446921).
• Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Re- search, 67(1), 88-140.
• Hogan, K. (1999). Relating students’ personal frameworks for science learning to their cogni- tion in collaborative contexts. Science Education, 83(1), 1-32.
• Kanli, U., & Yagbasan, R. (2008). The effects of a laboratory based on the 7E learning cycle model with verification laboratory approach on students’ development of science process skills and conceptual achievement. Essays in Education, 22 143-153.
• Karplus, R., &. Their, H .D. (1967). A New Look at Elementary School Science. Chicago: Rand McNally.
• Kaynar, D., Tekkaya, C., & Cakiroglu, J. (2009). Effectiveness of 5E learning cycle instructi- on on students’ achievement in cell concept and scientific epistemological beliefs. Hacet- tepe University Journal of Education, 37, 96-105.
• Kienhues, D., Bromme, R., & Stahl, E. (2008). Changing epistemological beliefs: The unex- pected impact of a short‐term intervention. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 545-565.
• Köseoğlu, F., & Tümay, H. (2010). The effects of learning cycle method in general chemistry laboratory on students’ conceptual change, attitude and perception. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 11(1), 279-295.
• Lin, X., & Lehman, J. D. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer‐based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thin- king. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 837-858.
• Liu, T. C., Peng, H., Wu, W. H., & Lin, M. S. (2009). The effects of mobile natural-science learning based on the 5E learning cycle: A case study. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), 344–358.
• Marek, E.A., & Cavallo, A. M. L. (1997). The learning cycle: Elementary school science and beyond. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Mecit, O. (2006). The effect of 7E learning cycle model on the improvement of fifth grade stu- dents’ critical thinking skills, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
• Michalsky, T., Mevarech, Z. R., & Haibi, L. (2009): Elementary School Children Reading Scientific Texts: Effects of Metacognitive Instruction. The Journal of Educational Rese- arch, 102:5, 363-376
• Mittlefehldt, S., & Grotzer, T. A. (2003, March). Using metacognition to facilitate the transfer of causal models in learning density and pressure. Paper presented at National Association of Research in Science Teaching Conference.
• Muis, K. R., & Duffy, M. C. (2012, August 13). Epistemic Climate and Epistemic Chan- ge: Instruction Designed to Change Students’ Beliefs and Learning Strategies and Imp- rove Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0029690
• Parker, V., & Gerber, B. (2000). Effects of a Science Intervention Program on Middle‐Grade Student Achievement and Attitudes. School Science and Mathematics, 100(5), 236-242.
• Peters, E., & Kitsantas, A. (2010). The effect of nature of science metacognitive prompts on science students’ content and nature of science knowledge, metacognition, and self‐regu- latory efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 110(8), 382-396.
• Polyiem, T., Nuangchalerm,P., & Wongchantra, P. (2011). Learning achievement, science pro- cess skills, and moral reasoning of ninth grade students learned by 7E learning cycle and socioscientific issue-based learning. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(10): 257-564,
• Redish, E. F., & Hammer, D. (2009). Reinventing college physics for biologists: Explicating an epistemological curriculum. American Journal of Physics, 77(7), 629- 642.
• Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M., & Steinberg, R. N. (1998). Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66, 212–224.
• Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656.
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science edu- cation: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.
• Siribunnam, R., & Tayraukham, S. (2009). Effects of 7-E, KWL and conventional instruction on analytical thinking, learning achievement and attitudes toward chemistry learning. Jo- urnal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 279-282.
• Sornsakda, S., Suksringarm, P., & Singseewo, A. (2009). Effects of learning environmental education using the 7E-learning cycle with metacognitive techniques and the teacher’s handbook approaches on learning achievement, integrated science process skills and cri- tical thinking of mathayomsuksa 5 students with different learning achievement. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 297-303.
• Sriwattanarothai, N., Jittam, P., Ruenwongsa, P., & Panijpan, B.(2009) From research on local materials to the learning of science: An inquiry-based laboratory for undergraduates. The International Journal of Learning, 16(6), 459-473.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. (Fifth Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
• Temel, S., Dincol-Ozgur,S., & Yilmaz, A (2012). The effect of learning cycle model on pre- service chemistry teachers’ understanding of oxidation reduction topic and thinking skills. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Educa- tion, 6(1), 287-305.
• Tien, L. T. (1998). Fostering expert inquiry skills and beliefs about chemistry through the MORE laboratory experience. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Disserta- tions and Theses database. (UMI No. 9902256).
• Trowbridge, L.W., Bybee, R.W., & Powell, J.C. (2004). Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
• Turgut, U., & Gurbuz, F (2011). Effects of teaching with 5E model on students’ behaviors and their conceptual changes about the subject of heat and temperature. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 679-706.
• White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, Modeling and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible To All Students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118
• Yerdelen-Damar, S., Elby, A., & Eryilmaz, A. (2012). Applying beliefs and resources frame- works to the psychometric analyses of an epistemology survey. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(1), 010104.
• Yildiz, E. (2008). The effects of metacognition during the instruction based on conceptual change used with 5e model: an application regarding the force and motion subject in the 7th grade. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
• Yuruk, N., Beeth, M. E., & Andersen, C. (2009). Analyzing the effect of metaconceptual teaching practices on students’ understanding of force and motion concepts. Research in Science Education, 39(4), 449-475.