ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNDE PROBLEMLİ İNTERNET KULLANIMI, YALNIZLIK VE ALGILANAN SOSYAL DESTEK

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1, 281 - 292, 15.01.2015

Vesile Oktan

Öz

Günümüzde internetin bir iletişim, eğlence ve bilgi kaynağı aracı olarak kullanımı hızlı bir biçimde artış göstermektedir. İnternet insan yaşamını olumlu yönde etkilemekle birlikte, bazı olumsuzlukları da beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu çalışmada, üniversite öğrencilerinin problemli internet kullanımı ile yalnızlık ve algılanan sosyal destek düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada araştırma grubunu, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi’nin çeşitli bölümlerinde öğrenim gören 319 kız 144 erkek olmak üzere toplam 463 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Veriler, Problemli İnternet Kullanımı Ölçeği, Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği veUcla Yalnızlık Ölçeği ile elde edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde çoklu regresyon analiz yöntemlerinden hiyerarşik regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, bir günde internette geçirilen süre vecinsiyet gibi bireysel özellikler, algılanan sosyal destek ve yalnızlık değişkenlerinin, problemli internet kullanımının anlamlı yordayıcıları olduklarını göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Problemli internet kullanımı, yalnızlık, algılanan sosyal destek

PROBLEMATIC INTERNET USE, LONELINESS AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL SUPPORT AMONG UNİVERSITY STUDENTS

Öz

Nowadays, the use of the internet as a communication and information source has been rapidly increasing. As much as the internet has a positive impact on human life, it also brings about some problems. This study aims to explore the relationship between the university students’ problematic internet use, loneliness and their perceived support scores. In this study, the participants were a total of 463 students (319 females and 144 males) studying in different departments at Karadeniz Technical University. Problematic Internet Usage Scale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Support, and UCLA Loneliness Scale were utilized as the measuring instruments. According to the results are a significant predicting problematic internet usage, perceived social support, loneliness, gender, and time spent on-the-net per day.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Problematic internet use, Loneliness, Perceived social support

Kaynakça

• Amichai-Hamburger, Y. & Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and internet use. Computers in Hu- man Behavior, 19, 71–80.
• Armstrong, L.,Phillips, J.G., &Saling, L.L. (2000). Potential determinants of heavier internet usage. International Journal of Human-ComputerStudies, 53, 537-550.
• Bayraktar, F.,& Gün, Z. (2007). Incidence and correlates of internet usage among adolescents in North Cyprus. CyberPsychology&Behavior, 10, 191-197.
• Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behaviour, 18, 553-575.
• Caplan, S. E. (2006). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic internet use. CyberPsychology&Behavıor, 10 (2), 234-242.
• Ceyhan, E., Ceyhan, A. A. & Gürcan, A. (2007). Problemli internet kullanımı ölçeği’nin geçerlik ve gü- venirlik çalışmaları [The validity and reliability of the problematic ınternet usage scale]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi[Educational Sciences: Theory&Practice], 7 (1), 387-416.
• Ceyhan, A.,& Ceyhan, E. (2008). Loneliness, depression, and computer self-efficacy as predictors of problematic internet use. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11(6), 699–701.
• Chen, X., Li, F. H.,&Long, L. L. (2007). Prospective study on the relationship between social sup- port and internet addiction. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 21(4), 240-243.
• Chou, C.,&Hsiao, M.C.(2000). Internet addiction, usage, gratification, and pleasureexperience: TheTaiwan college students’ case. Computers and Education, 35, 65–80.
• De JongGierveld, J. (1998). A review of loneliness : Conceptand definitions, determinants and con- sequences. Review in Clinical Geontology, 8, 73-80.
• Demir, A. (1989). UCLA yalnızlık ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. [Validity and reliability of the UCLA loneliness scale]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi [Turkish Journal of Psychology], 7, 14–18.
• Durndell, A. & Haag, Z.(2002). Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the internet and reported experience with the internet, by gender, in an East Europen sample. Com- puters in Human Behavior, 18, 521-535.
• Eker, D.,Arkar, H., &Yaldız, H.(2001). Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği’nin Gözden Geçirilmiş Formunun Faktör Yapısı, Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği [Factorialstructure, validity, and- reliability of revised form of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support]. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi[TurkishJournal Of Psychiatry],12, 17-25.
• Engelberg, E.,&Sjöberg, L. (2004). Internet use, social skills, and adjustment. CyberPschology and Behaviour, 7, 41-47.
• Ferraro G.,Caci B., D’Amico A., &Blasi M. (2007). Internet addiction disorder: An Italian study. CyberPsychology&Behavior, 10 (2), 170-175.
• Griffiths, M.D.,&Dancaster, I. (1995). The effect of type a personality on physiologicalarousal whi- le playing computer games. Addiction Behaviours. 20, 543-548.
• Griffiths, M.D.(1996). Behavioral addictions: An issue for everybody?.Journal of Workplace Lear- ning, 8, 19-25.
• Hills, P. &Argyle, M. (2003). Uses of the internet and their relationships with individual differences in personality. Computers in Human Behavior,19, 59–70.
• Jang, K.S., Hwang, S. Y. & Choi, J. Y. (2008). Internet addiction and psychiatric symptoms among Korean adolescents. Journal of School Health, 78,165-171.
• Kiesler, S.,&Kraut, R. (1999). Internet use and ties that bind. AmericanPsychologist, 54(9), 783-784.
• Kim, H. K.,&Davis, K. E. (2009). Toward a comprehensive theory of problematic internet use: Evalua- ting the role of self-esteem, anxiety, flow, and the self-rated importance of internet activities. Compu- ters in Human Behavior, 25, 490-500.
• Kraut, R.,Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., &Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and Psychological well-being?. American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031.
• Kraut, R.,Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., Crawford, A. (2002). internet para- dox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49–74.
• Koch, W. H.,&Pratarelli, M. E. (2004). Effects of intro/extraversion and sex on social internet use. North American Journal of Psychology, 6, 371-382.
• Lepore, S.J.,Evans, G.W. &Schneider, M.L. (1991). Dynamic role of social support in the link between chro- nic stress and psychological distress. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 61(6), 899-909.
• Li, S-M.,&Chung, T.-M. (2006). Internet functionand internet addictive behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 1067–1071.
• Moody, E. J. (2001). Internet use and its relationship to loneliness. CyberPschology and Behaviour. 4(3), 393-401.
• Morahan-Martin, J. (1999). The relationship between loneliness and internet use and abuse. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2, 431–440.
• Morahan-Martin, J.,&Schumacher, P. (2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 13-29.
• Morahan-Martin, J.,&Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 659-671.
• Mossbarger, B. (2008). Is internet addiction addressed in the classroom? A survey of Psychology text books. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 468–474.
• Mythily, S.,Qiu, S., &Winslow, M. (2008). Prevalence and correlates of excessive internet use among youth in Singapore. Annals Academy of Medicine, 37(1), 9-14.
• Nalwa, K.,&Anand, A. (2003). Internet addiction in students: a cause of concern. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 6 (6), 653- 656.
• O’Reilly, M.(1996). Internet addiction: A new disorder enters the medical lexicon.Canadian Medi- cal Association Journal, 54, 1882-1883.
• Özcan, N.K.,& Buzlu, S. (2005). An assistive tool in determining problematic internet use: validity and reliability of the “online cognition scale” in a sample of university students. Journal of Dependence, 6, 19–26.
• Özcan, N.K.,& Buzlu, S. (2007). Internet use and its relation with the psychosocial situation for a sample of university students. Cyberpschology and Behaviour, 10, 767-772.
• Pawlak, C. (2002). Correlates of internet use and addiction in adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities&Social Sciences, 63(5-A), 1727.Rotunda, R.,Kass, S.J., Sutton, M.A. at all.(2003). Internet use and misuse: Preliminary findings from a new assesment instrument. Behaviour Modification, 27, 484-504.
• Sanders, C.E.,Field, T.M., Diego, M., & Kaplan, M. (2000). The relationship of internet to depressi- on and social isolation among adolescents. Adolescence, 35 (138), 237-242.
• Shaw, L.H.,&Gand, L. M. (2002). Indefense of theınternet: The relationship between ınternet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology&Behavior, 5(2), 157-171.
• Silverman, T. (1999). The Internet and relational theory. American Psychologist, 54, 780–781.
• Subrahmanyam, K.,& Lin, G. (2007). Adolescents on the net: Internet use andwell-being. Adoles- cence, 42, 659-677.
• Şahin, M. (2012). The relationship between the cyberbullying/cybervictmization and loneliness amang adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 834-837.
• TUIK (Turkish Statistical Institute). (2007). Hane Halkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanımı Araştır- ması. [Information technology usage survey house holds]. Retrived on 18.01.2012 from. News Bulletin. http://www.tuik.gov.tr.
• Whang, L.S-M., Lee, S., &Chang, G. (2003). Internet over-users’ psychological profiles: A behavior sampling analysis on internet addiction. CyberPsychology&Behavıor, 6 (2), 143-150.
• Winzelberg, A. (1997). The Analysis of an electronic support group for individuals with eating disorders. Computers in Human Behavior, 13(3), 393-407.
• Wu, Y-T.,&Tsai, C.C. (2006). University students internet attitudes and internet self-efficacy: A study at three universities in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology&Behavıor, 9 (4), 441-450.