COMPARISON of ADOLESCENTS in URBAN and RURAL AREAS IN TERMS of SELF-CONSTRUALS

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 81 - 96, 01.01.2012

Yalçın Özdemir

Öz

In this study autonomous-seperate self, heteronomous-related self and autonomousrelated self-construal was examined in terms of living in rural and urban areas and gender among adolescents. The research group consisted of 352 students, 74% 261 of whom from the urban high schools and 26% 91 from rural area. Adolescents were 14 to 18 years of age M=16.26, SD=1.06 . The participants responded to the items of personel information sheet and “Autonomous-related Self-in Family Scales”. Results showed that while adolescents’ heteronomous-relational self-construal did not vary with their rural or urban backgrounds, autonomous-seperate and autonomous-relational self-construal was fond to be higher among adolescents from urban areas. Results also indicated that autonomous self-construal scores did not vary with the gender of adolescents, but heteronomous-relational and autonomous- 82 Yalçın ÖZDEMİR ... Ocak 2012 Cilt:20 No:1 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi relational self-construal scores of girls higher than males. Findings were discussed in the contex of self-construal development and culture

Anahtar Kelimeler

Self-construal, autonomous-seperate self, heteronomous-related self, autonomous-related self

Kırsal Kesimde ve Kentte Yaşayan Ergenlerin Benlik Kurguları Açısından Karşılaştırılması

Öz

Bu çalışmada özerk-ayrık, bağımlı-ilişkisel ve özerk-ilişkisel benlik kurgusunun ergenlerin yaşadıkları yere ve cinsiyete göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığı incelenmiştir. Araştırmaya % 74’ü 261 kentteki liselerden ve % 26’sı 91 kırsal bölgeden olmak üzere 352 öğrenci katılmıştır. Araştırmaya katılan öğrencilerin 205’ ini % 58 kız, 147’sini % 42 erkek öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Araştırma gurubundaki ergenlerin yaş ortalaması 16.28 SS=1.10 ve yaş aralığı 14-19’dur. Bu öğrenciler demografik bilgi formunu ve “Ailede Özerk-ilişkisel Benlik Ölçekleri” ni doldurmuşlardır. Sonuçlar ergenlerin bağımlı-ilişkisel benlik kurgularının kırsal kesimde ya da kentte yaşamaya göre farklılık göstermediğini, ancak kentte yaşayan ergenlerin özerk-ayrık ve özerk-ilişkisel benlik kurgusu puan ortalamalarının daha yüksek olduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuçlardan ergenlerin özerk-ayrık benlik kurgusu puan ortalamaları cinsiyet açısından farklılık göstermezken, kızların bağımlı-ilişkisel ve özerk-ilişkisel benlik kurgusu puan ortalamalarının erkek ergenlerin ortalamalarında daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuçlar benlik kurgusu gelişimi ve kültür bağlamında tartışılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Benlik kurgusu, özerk-ayrık benlik, bağımlı-ilişkisel benlik, özerkilişkisel benlik.

Kaynakça

• 1. Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of interdependent and independent selfconstrual. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.
• 2. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
• 3. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
• 4. Sampson, E. E. (2000). Reinterpreting individualism and collectivism. American Psychologist, 55, 1425–1432.
• 5. Singelis, T.M., Bond, M.H., Sharkey, W.F., & Lai, C. (1999). Unpacking culture’s influence on self-esteem and embarrassability. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 30(3), 315–341.
• 6. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness ın cultural context Implications for self and family. Journal Of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 4, 403-422. 92 Yalçın ÖZDEMİR ... Ocak 2012 Cilt:20 No:1 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
• 7. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good but relevance is excellent: Autonomy affecting teacher behaviors that predict students’ engagement in learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261-278.
• 8. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
• 9. Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
• 10. Kitayama, S., Markus, H.R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1245-1267.
• 11. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.
• 12. İmamoğlu, E. O., Küller, R., İmamoğlu, V., & Küller, M. (1993). The social psychological worlds of Swedes and Turks in and around retirement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 26–41.
• 13. İmamoğlu, E. O. (2002). Doğu-Batı kavşağında benlik: Dengeli Ayrışma-Bütünleşme Modeli. 12. Psikoloji Kongresinde Sunulan Bildiri, Ankara, Türkiye.
• 14. Karadayı, F. (1998). İliskili özerklik: Kavramı, ölçülmesi, gelişimi ve toplumsal önemi, gençlere ve kültüre özgü değerlendirmeler. Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi Basimevi.
• 15. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). Özerk-ilişkisel benlik: Yeni bir sentez. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 11, 36-44.
• 16. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2000). Kültürel psikoloji: Kültür bağlamında insan ve aile. İstanbul: Evrim Yayınevi.
• 17. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2007). Family, Self, and Human Development Across Cultures, Theory and Applications (2nd ed.). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• 18. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1982). Old-age security value of children: Cross-national socio-economic evidence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 29-42.
• 19. Arnett, J. (1992). Socialization and Adolescent Reckless Behavior: A Reply to Jessor. Developmental Review, 12, 391-409.
• 20. Ekşi, A. (1990). Çocuk, Genç, Anababalar. İstanbul: Bilgi Yayınevi.
• 21. Göregenli, M. (1997). Individualist and collectivist tendencies in a Turkish sample. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 787-793.
• 22. Mascolo, F.M., Misra, G. & Raisardi, C. (2004). Individual and relational conceptions of Self in India and the United States. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 104, 9-26.
• 23. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., & Ataca, B. (2005). Value of children and family change: A three-decade portrait of from Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(3), 317-137.
• 24. Imamoğlu, E. O. (1987). An interdependence model of human development. In Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 138–145). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
• 25. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construal theory and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37. Kırsal Kesimde Ve Kentte Yaşayan Ergenlerin Benlik Kurguları Açısından ... 93 January 2012 Vol:20 No:1 Kastamonu Education Journal
• 26. Bumpus, M. F., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2001). Parental autonomy granting during adolescence: exploring gender differences in context. Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 163-173.
• 27. Byers,W., & Goossens, L. (1999). Emotional autonomy, psychosocial adjustment, and parenting: Interactions, moderating, and mediating effects. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 753–769.
• 28. Fuligni, A. (1998). Authority, autonomy, and parent-adolescent conflict and cohesion: A study of adolescents from Mexican, Chinese, Filipino, and European backgrounds. Developmental Psychology, 34, 782-792.
• 29. Feldman, S. S., & Rosenthal, D. A. (1991). Age expectations of behavioral autonomy in Hong Kong, Australian and American youth: The influence of family variables and adolescents’ values. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 1–23.
• 30. Valentine, G., (1997). A safe place to grow up? Parenting perceptions of children’s safety and the rural idyll. Journal of Rural Studies, 13 (2), 137–148.
• 31. Matthews, H., Taylor, M., Sherwood, K., Tucker, F., & Limb, M., (2000). Growing-up in the countryside:children and the rural idyll. Journal of Rural Studies, 16 (2), 141–153.
• 32. Glendinning A., Nuttall M., Hendry L.,, Kloep, M. & Wood S. (2003). Rural communities and well-being: a good place to grow up?. The Sociological Review, 129-156.
• 33. Karasar, N. (2004). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dagıtım.
• 34. Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
• 35. Özdemir, Y. & Çok, F. (2011). “Ailede Özerk-İlişkisel Benlik Ölçeklerinin” lise öğrencileri için uyarlanması ve psikometrik özellikleri. İlköğretim Online, 10(1), 121-132.
• 36. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1984). Socialization in traditional society: A challenge to psychology. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 145-157.
• 37. Çileli, M. (2000). Change in value orientations of Turkish youth from 1989 to 1995. The Journal of Psychology, 134, 297-305.
• 38. Göregenli, M. (1995). Kültürümüz açısından bireycilik-toplulukçuluk eğilimleri: Bir başlangıç çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 10, 1-14.
• 39. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. (2002). Self-construals, perceived parenting styles and wellbeing in different cultural and socio-economic contexts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
• 40. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z., & İmamoğlu, E. O. (2002). Value domains of Turkish adults and university students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 333-351.
• 41. İmamoğlu, E. O., & Karakitapoğlu-Aygun, Z. (1999). 1970’lerden 1990’1ara değerler: Üniversite düzeyinde gözlenen zaman, kuşak ve cinsiyet farklılıkları. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14(44), 1-22.
• 42. Çelen, N., Çok, F., Bosma, H. A., & Zijsling, D. H. (2006). Perceptions of decisional autonomy of Turkish adolescents and their parents. Paideia, 16(35),349-364).
• 43. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• 44. Rastogi, M., & Wampler, K. S. (1999). Adult daughters’ perceptions of the mother- 94 Yalçın ÖZDEMİR ... Ocak 2012 Cilt:20 No:1 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi daughter relationship: A cross-cultural comparison. Family Relations, 48, 327-336
• 45. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. (2004). Self, Identity, and Emotional Weil-Being Among Turkish University Students. The Journal of Psychology, 138(5) 457-478.
• 46. Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H.C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3), 240-275.
• 47. Kashima, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Kim, U., Choi, S. C., Gelfand, J. H., & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender, and self: Aperspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 925-937.
• 48. Kashima, E. S., & Hardie, E. A. (2000). The development and validation of the Relational, Individual and Collective Self-Aspects (RIC) Scale. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 19-48.
• 49. Li, H. Z. (2002). Culture, gender and self-close-other(s) connectedness in Canadian and Chinese samples. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 93-104.
• 50. Lam, B. T. (2006). Self-construal and socio-emotional development among VietnameseAmerican adolescents: An examination of different types of self-construal. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(1), 67–75.