CITY BASE ANALYSIS OF OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT IN TURKEY

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 289 - 300, 01.01.2009

H.güran Ünal Arif Gök Kadir Gök

Öz

Occupational accidents cause fatalities and serious health problem all over the world. Costs of psychological and economical effects of occupational accident have investigated frequently for last decade. For prevent accidents it requires to improve reports and records of accident and determine the accident characteristic relatively. In this study, occupational accidents which are at official records in Turkey were analyzed to city base. Occupational accidents statistics of 5 years 2001-2005 were investigated. It determined number of accidents and fatality in 81 cities. It was aimed to establish prior cities as work safety and labor healthy with these results. It was determined that Bilecik, Karabük, Zonguldak, Manisa, Kocaeli, Şanlıurfa, Bartın, Kırklareli, Kayseri, Kütahya are at the first ranks by accident rate and Siirt, Iğdır, Bingöl, Gümüşhane, Karaman, Bolu, Kastamonu, Şanlıurfa, Van, Kars are at the first ranks by fatality rate

Anahtar Kelimeler

Occupational accident, occupational fatality, injury, occupational safety, accident rate, fatality rate

TÜRKİYE’DE İŞ KAZALARININ İL BAZINDA ANALİZİ

Öz

İş kazaları tüm dünyada ciddi sağlık sorunlarına ve ölümlere sebep olmaktadır. İş kazalarının maddi ve manevi sonuçları son on yılda daha yoğun olarak incelenmeye başlanmıştır. İş kazalarının önlenebilmesi için kaza rapor ve kayıtlarının düzgün tutulması ve kaza karakteristiğinin karşılaştırmalı olarak ortaya konması gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de resmi kayda giren iş kazalarının ve ölüm olaylarının il bazında analizi yapılmıştır. 2001–2005 dönemini kapsayan 5 yıllık iş kazası istatistikleri incelenmiştir. 81 ildeki kaza ve ölüm oranları saptanmıştır. Bu veriler ışığında iş güvenliği ve işçi sağlığı gibi konularda öncelikle çalışılması gerekli illerin tespiti amaçlanmıştır. Kaza oranlarında Bilecik, Karabük, Zonguldak, Manisa, Kocaeli, Şanlıurfa, Bartın, Kırklareli, Kayseri ve Kütahya, ölüm oranlarında ise Siirt, Iğdır, Bingöl, Gümüşhane, Karaman, Bolu, Kastamonu, Şanlıurfa, Van ve Kars illerinin ilk sıraları aldığı tespit edilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

İş kazası, ölümcül kaza, yaralanma, iş güvenliği, kaza oranı, ölüm oranı

Kaynakça

• 1. Zwi, A.B., Forjuoh, S., Murugusampillay, S., Odero, W., Watts, C. ‘Injuries in developing countries: policy response needed now’ T. R. Soc. Trop. Med. H. 90, 593–595. 1996.
• 2. Leigh, J., Macaskill, P., Kuosma, E., Mandryk, J. ‘Global burden of disease and injury due to occupational factors’ Epidemiology 10 (5), 626–631. 1999. 3. Takala, J. ‘Global estimates of fatal occupational accidents’ Epidemiology 10, 640–646. 1999.
• 4. Herbert, R., Landrigan, P.J. ‘Work-related death a continuing epidemic’ American Journal of Public Health 90, 541–545. 2000.
• 5. Hamalainen, P., Takala J., Saarela, K.L. ‘Global estimates of occupational accidents’ Safety Science 44 : 137–156. 2006.
• 6. Leigh, J.P. ‘Causes of Death in the Workplace’ Quorum Books, Westport, Connecticut. 1995.
• 7. Toscano, G. ‘Dangerous jobs’ Comp. Work Cond. 2 (2. 1997.
• 8. Bailer, A.J., Stayner, L.T., Stout, N.A., Reed, L.D., Gilbert, S.J. ‘Trends in occupational fatal injury rates in the US (1983–1992)’ The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 55, 485–498. 1998.
• 9. Toscano, G., Windau, W.D. ‘Fatal work injuries: results from the 1992 national census’ Monthly Labour Rev. 116 (10), 39–48. 1993.
• 10. Buck, P.C. ‘Slipping, tripping and falling accidents at work a national picture’ Ergonomics, (28): 949–958. 1985.
• 11. Leigh, J.P., Marcin, J.P., Miller, T.R. ‘An estimate of the US governments undercount of nonfatal occupational injuries’ The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 46, 10–18. 2004.
• 12. Andersson, R., Lagerlof, E. ‘Accident data in the new Swedish information system on occupational injuries’ Ergonomics 26, 33–42. 1983.
• 13. Biering-Sorensen, F. ‘National statistics in Denmark –back trouble versus occupation’ Ergonomics 28, 5–29. 1985.
• 14. Hettinger, T. ‘Statistics on diseases in the Federal Republic of Germany with particular reference to diseases of the skeletal system’ Ergonomics 28, 17–20. 1985.
• 15. Metzler, F. ‘Epidemiology and statistics in Luxembourg’ Ergonomics 28, 21–24. 1985.
• 16. Nicholon, A.S. ‘Accident information from four British industries’ Ergonomics 28,31–43. 1985.
• 17. Zuidema, H. ‘Risk of individual occupations in the Netherlands’ Ergonomics 28, 45–49.1985.
• 18. Lawlor, M.G. and Chevoya, R.A. ‘Fatal occupational injuries in Rhode Island’ Rhode Island Medicine. 78, 204. 1995.
• 19. Driscoll. T.R., Ansari, G., Harrison, J.E., Frommer, MS., Ruck, E.A. ‘Traumatic work related fatalities in commercial fishermen in Austria’ The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 51, 612–616. 1994.
• 20. Marshall, S.W., Kawachi, I., Cryer, P.C., Wright, D., Slappendel, C., Laid, I. ‘The epidemiology of forestry work-related injuries in New Zealand’ New Zealand Medicine Journal. 107, 434–437. 1994.
• 21. Madery-Wygonic, G., Brondum, J., Parker, D. ‘The Minnesota fatal accident circumstances and epidemiology study, Surveillance of occupational fatalities’ Minnesota Medicine. 75, 22–24. 1992.
• 22. Suruda, A. and Halperin, W. ‘Work-related deaths in children’ American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 19, 739–745. 1991.
• 23. Meyrs, J.R. ‘National surveillance of occupational fatalities in agriculture’ American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 18, 163- 168. 1990.
• 24. Trent, R.B. and Wyant, W.D. ‘Fatal hand tool injuries in construction’ International Occupational Medicine. 32, 71 1-714. 1990.
• 25. Byung, Y. J. ‘Comparisons of variables between fatal and nonfatal accidents in manufacturing industry’ International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 23, 565–572. 1999.
• 26. Byung, Y. J. ‘Characteristics of occupational accidents in the manufacturing industry of South Korea’ International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 20, 301–306. 1997.
• 27. Güven, E. ‘Disability assessment in terms of forensic medicine’ (Specialization Thesis) T.R. Istanbul: Ministry of Justice Forensic Medicine Head Office; p. 28–32. 1986.
• 28. Asıcıoglu, F., Okudan, M., Umut, S. and Suyugul, N. ‘Disability assessments of eye-related trauma cases’ International forensic medicine congress, November 1–4, Istanbul, Congress Book; p. 171–7. 1994.
• 29. Forst, L.S., Hryhorczuk, D., Jaros, M. ‘A state trauma registry as a tool for occupational Injury Surveillance’ The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 41(6):514–20. 1999.
• 30. Jacinto, C. and Aspinwall, E. ‘A survey on occupational accidents reporting and registration systems in the European Union’ Safety Science 42, 933–960. 2004.
• 31. Anonim. SSK 2001 İstatistik Yıllığı. Ankara.
• 32. Anonim. SSK 2002 İstatistik Yıllığı. Ankara.
• 33. Anonim. SSK 2003 İstatistik Yıllığı. Ankara.
• 34. Anonim. SSK 2004 İstatistik Yıllığı. Ankara.
• 35. Anonim. SSK 2005 İstatistik Yıllığı. Ankara.
• 36. Angela, C. M., Ines, L. S. 2005. Analysis of occupational accidents in Portugal between 1992 and 2001. Safety Science (43), 269–286