THE EFFECT OF NOTE-TAKING ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LISTENING COMPREHENSION OF LECTURES

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 47 - 56, 01.01.2009

Ferit Kılıçkaya Derya Çokal-karadaş

Öz

The study investigated the effect of note-taking on comprehension of lectures by 44 undergraduate EFL students who are in the first year of their undergraduate level in the Department of Foreign Language Education in Middle East Technical University. The participants were divided into two groups, namely experimental and control groups. The experimental group practiced listening to lectures being allowed to take notes while the control group practiced listening to the same lectures without being allowed to take notes. The scores obtained by these two groups were statistically analyzed. The results showed that participants being allowed to take notes significantly did better than the those not allowed to take notes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Listening comprehension, note-taking

NOT ALMANIN, ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN DERSLERİ ANLAMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Öz

Bu çalışma, not almanın Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi’nde İngilizce Öğretmenliği bölümünde eğitim gören 44 lisans öğrencisinin dersleri anlamaları üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktadır. Katılımcılar, kontrol ve deney gruplarına ayrılmıştır. Deney grubuna, not alarak alıştırma yapmışlardır. Kontrol grubunun not almasına izin verilmemiştir. İki grubun almış olduğu puanlar istatiksel açıdan değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, not almalarına izin verilen grubun, not almalarına izin verilmeyen gruba göre istatiksel açıdan daha başarılı olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dinlediğini anlama, not alma

Kaynakça

• 1. Benson, M. J. (1989). The academic listening tasks: A case study. TESOL Quarterly,23, 421- 449.
• 2. Bermundo, C. B., Dy, E. T., Ballester, R. C., & A. B. Bermundo. Test Checker and Item Analyzer (Version 2.0). [Computer Software]
• 3. Carrell, P. L., Dunkel, P. A., & Mollaun, P. (2002). The effects of note taking, lecture length and topic on the listening component of TOEFL 2000. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
• 4. Dunkel, P. (1988). The content of Ll and L2 students’ lecture notes and its relation to test performance. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 259-281.
• 5. Dunkel, P., & Davey, S.(1989). The heuristic of lecture notetaking: Perceptions of American and international student regarding the value and practice of notetaking. English For Specific purposes, 8,33-50.
• 6. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
• 7. Hale, G., & Courtney, R. (1994). The effect of note taking on listening comprehension in the Test of English as a Foreign Language. Language Testing, 11, 29-47.
• 8. Heaton, J. B. (1990). . New York: Writing English language tests New York: Longman.
• 9. Mendelsohn, D. (1998). Teaching listening. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 81-101.
• 10. Morley, J. (2001). Aural comprehension instruction: Principles and Practices. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or foreign language (3rd ed.), pp. 67- 85. USA: Heinle & Heinle.
• 11. Nunan, D. (2002). Listening in language learning. In J. C. Richards and W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, pp. 238- 241. USA: CUP.
• 12. Peterson, P. W. (2001). Skills and strategies for proficient listening. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or foreign language (3rd ed.), pp. 87-100. USA: Heinle & Heinle.
• 13. Philips, D. (1996). Longman preparation course for the TOEFL test: Skills and strategies. N.Y. Longman.
• 14. Rickards, J. P., Fajen, B. R., Sullivan, J. F., & Gillespie, G. (1997). Signalling, note taking and field dependence-dependence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (3), 508-517.
• 15. Rost, M. (2001). Listening. In R. Carnter and D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to speakers of other languages, pp. 7-13. CUP.
• 16. Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of notetaking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 (3), 323-338.