A Gifted High School Student’s Abstraction Process of Divisibility Rules

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1, 1 - 16, 28.01.2025

Esra Karataş Güler , Fadime Ulusoy

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1628219

Öz

Purpose: Gifted students are often motivated by complex mathematical tasks. Mathematical abstraction allows access to gifted students’ cognitive processes in knowledge construction. The question “How and why do the divisibility rules work?” evokes in them an intellectual need for constructing the working principle of a divisibility rule. Hence, this research focused on a gifted high school student’s abstraction process of divisibility rules. By examining mathematical abstraction through observable actions, this study presents a deeper insight into the gifted student’s thoughts, difficulties, and strategies regarding the working principle of divisibility rules.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The data was obtained from a 9th-grade gifted high school student through clinical interviews in a case study research design. The data were analyzed using the RBC+C abstraction theoretical framework's epistemic actions: Recognizing, Building-with, Constructing, and Consolidating.
Findings: The gifted student could recognize and use the necessary prior knowledge about divisibility to abstract the divisibility rules. In the construction process, the student explored the complex divisibility rules based on the place values of numbers with different digits.
Highlights: The student needed guidance in the process of creating more complex divisibility rules. With the researcher's help, the student could understand even more complicated divisibility rules and consolidate the cognitive way.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Divisibility, Gifted student, Mathematical abstraction, RBC+C, Qualitative study

Etik Beyan

Ethical approval for the current study was taken from the Social Sciences & Humanities Ethics Committee at the University of Kastamonu (02/02/2022).

Kaynakça

• Altun, M. & Durmaz, B. (2013). A case study of process in generating knowledge of linear relationship. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(2), 423–438.
• Altun, M. & Yılmaz, A. (2010). High school students’ processes of constructing and reinforcing piecewise function knowledge. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 311–337.
• Aydemir-Özdemir, D., & Işıksal-Bostan, M. (2021). Mathematically gifted students’ differentiated needs: What kind of support do they need? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 52(1), 65–83.
• Baykoç, N., Aydemir, D., & Uyaroğlu, B. (2014). Inequality in educational opportunities of gifted and talented children in Türkiye. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 1133-1138.
• Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Bozkurt, A. & Polat, S. (2018). An examination of the teacher’s questions for revealing students’ mathematical thinking. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 72–96.
• Brigandi, C. B., Gilson, C. M., & Miller, M. (2019). Professional development and differentiated instruction in an elementary school pullout program: A gifted education case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(4), 362-395.
• Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer Academic.
• Butuner, N., & Ipek, J. (2023). Examination of the Abstraction Process of Parallelogram by Sixth-Grade Students According to RBC+ C Model: A Teaching Experiment. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(2), 101-125.
• Chakraborty, S. (2007). Divisibility by 4 and 8 for smaller natural numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(5), 699–701.
• Claessens, A., & Engel, M. (2013). How important is where you start? Early mathematics knowledge and later school success. Teachers College Record, 115(6), 1-29.
• COŞAR, M. Ç., & KEŞAN, C. (2021). Self-regulation behaviours of a gifted student in mathematical abstraction process. Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance & Counselling, 10(2), 152-168.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). SAGE.
• Çıldır, M. (2014). A special case study on the concept of equation with two gifted students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116, 650–654.
• Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. (2001). The collaboration of mathematically gifted students on challenging tasks. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25(1), 7–31.
• Dreyfus, T. (2007). Processes of abstraction in context the nested epistemic actions model. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 195–222.
• Dimitriadis, C. (2011). Developing mathematical ability in primary school through a “pull-out” programme: A case study. Education 3-13, 39, 467–482.
• Dinamit, D., & Ulusan, S. (2023). Investigation of Gifted Students' Mathematical Proving Processes. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 16(2), 49-69.
• Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R. & Schwarz, B. (2001). Abstraction in context II: The case of peer interaction. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1(3/4), 307–368.
• Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R. & Schwarz, B. (2015). The nested epistemic actions model for abstraction in context: theory as methodological tool and methodological tool as theory. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp.9–13), Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
• Dreyfus, T., & Kidron, I. (2014). Introduction to abstraction in context (AiC). Networking of theories as a research practice in mathematics education, 85-96.
• Dreyfus, T., & Tsamir, P. (2004). Ben's consolidation of knowledge structures about infinite sets. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(3), 271-300.
• Eisenberg, T. (2000). On divisibility by 7 and other low valued primes. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(4), 622-626.
• Fitrianti, Y. & Suryadi, D. (2020). Analysis of difficulties for pre-service mathematics teacher in problem solving of division and divisibility based on theory of action, process, object, and schemes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), 032007. IOP Publishing.
• Girit-Yildiz, D. & Durmaz, B. (2021). A gifted high school student’s generalization strategies of linear and nonlinear patterns via Gauss’s approach. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(1), 56–80.
• Gofer, D. (1986). Mathematics for Gifted Third and Fourth Graders. Gifted Education International, 4(1), 59-61.
• Güçyeter, Ş., Kanlı, E., Özyaprak, M., & Leana-Taşcılar, M. Z. (2017). Serving gifted children in developmental and threshold countries—Turkey. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1332839.
• Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B. & Dreyfus, T. (2001). Abstraction in context: Epistemic actions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 195–222.
• İlgün, Ş., Altıntaş, E., Şimşekler, Z. H. & Ezentaş, R. (2018). A case study on mathematical abstraction of gifted students, Turkish Studies, 13(4), 707–727.
• İnan, E. (2019). An activity sample of differentiated maths programme for the gifted students. Bilim Armonisi Dergisi, 2(2), 15–23.
• Johnsen, S. K. (2021). Definitions, models, and characteristics of gifted students. In Identifying gifted students (pp. 1-32). Routledge.
• Johnson, D. T. (2000). Teaching mathematics to gifted students in a mixed-ability classroom. Reston, VA: Eric Clearinghouse.
• Kanlı, E. & Özyaprak, M. (2016). Stem education for gifted and talented students in Turkey. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 3(2), 1–10.
• Katrancı, Y. & Altun, M. (2013). Constructing and consolidating process of the second level students of primary schools for their knowledge of probability. Kalem Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 11–58.
• Kobak-Demir, M. & Gür, H. (2019). The effect of teachers on constructing parabola knowledge process of high school students. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 12(1), 151–184.
• Leikin, R. (2011). The education of mathematically gifted students: Some complexities and questions. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(1), 167–188.
• Maggio, M. R., & Sayler, M. (2013). Trying out acceleration for mathematically talented fifth graders. Gifted Child Today, 36(1), 20-26.
• Matz, M. (1982). Towards a process model for high school algebra errors. In D. Sleeman & J. S. Bro (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 25-50). London: Academ
• Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks.
• Miller, A. (1990). The untouched key: Tracing childhood trauma in creativity and destructiveness. Doubleday.
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2018a). Middle school (5-8th graders) mathematics curriculum.http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201813017165445MATEMAT%C4%B0K%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI%202018v.pdf
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2018b). High school (9-12th graders) mathematics.http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201821102727101OGM%20MATEMAT%C4%B0K%20PRG%2020.01.2018.pdf Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2018b). Science high school (9-12th graders) mathematics.https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201821102457808OGM%20FEN%20L%C4%B0SES%C4%B0%20MATEMAT%C4%B0K%20PRG%2020.01.2018.pdf
• Mofield, E. L. (2020). Benefits and barriers to collaboration and co-teaching: Examining perspectives of gifted education teachers and general education teachers. Gifted Child Today, 43(1), 20-33.
• Monaghan, J., & Ozmantar, M. F. (2006). Abstraction and consolidation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(3), 233–258.
• Nahir, Y. (2008). On divisibility tests and the curriculum dilemma. Sutra International Journal of Mathematical Science Education. Technomathematics Research Foundation, 1(1), 16–29.
• National Association for Gifted Children (US), & Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. (2005). State of the States: A Report by the National Association for Gifted Children and the Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. National Association for Gifted Children..
• Ozmantar, M. F. (2004). Scaffolding, abstraction, and emergent goals. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 24(2), 83–89.
• Ozmantar, M. F. & Monaghan, J. (2007). A dialectical approach to the formation of mathematical abstractions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(2), 89–112.
• Özçakır-Sümen, Ö. (2019). Primary school students' abstraction levels of whole-half-quarter concepts according to RBC theory. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 251–264.
• Özdemir, D. A., & Işiksal Bostan, M. (2021). Mathematically gifted students’ differentiated needs: what kind of support do they need?. International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 52(1), 65-83.
• Perrone, K. M., Wright, S. L., Ksiazak, T. M., Crane, A. L., & Vannatter, A. (2010). Looking back on lessons learned: Gifted adults reflect on their experiences in advanced classes. Roeper Review, 32(2), 127–139.
• Potgieter, P. & Blignaut, P. (2018). The effect of learners’ knowledge of the divisibility rules on their gaze behaviour. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 22(3), 351–362.
• Schwarz, B. B., Dreyfus, T., & Hershkowitz, R. (2009). The nested epistemic actions model for abstraction in context. In B. B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 11–41). Routledge.
• Shekatkar, S. M., Bhagwat, C., & Ambika, G. (2015). Divisibility patterns of natural numbers on a complex network. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 1-10.
• Sezgin-Memnun, D., Aydın, B., Özbilen, Ö., & Erdoğan, G. (2017). The abstraction process of limit knowledge. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17, 345–371.
• Sheffield, L. J. (1994). The development of gifted and talented mathematics students and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics standards. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
• Siegle, D., Rubenstein, L. D., & Mitchell, M. S. (2014). Honors students’ perceptions of their high school experiences: The influence of teachers on student motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(1), 35–50.
• Siegler, R. S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., ... & Chen, M. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological science, 23(7), 691-697.
• Tsamir, P., & Dreyfus, T. (2002). Comparing infinite sets—a process of abstraction: The case of Ben. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(1), 1–23.
• VanTassel-Baska, J. & Brown, E. F. (2007). Toward best practice: An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted Education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 342–358.
• VanTassel-Baska, J., Hubbard, G. F., & Robbins, J. I. (2021). Differentiation of instruction for gifted learners: Collated evaluative studies of teacher classroom practices. Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the Asia-Pacific, 945-979.
• Williams, G. (2007). Abstracting in the context of spontaneous learning. Mathematics Education Research Journal 19(2), 69–88.
• Yin, R., 2014. Case Study Research. Sage Publications.
• Zazkis, R. (2008). Divisibility and transparency of number representations. In M. Carlson and C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics (pp. 81-92), Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
• Zazkis, R. (1999). Divisibility: A problem solving approach through generalizing and specializing. Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal, 21, 34–38
• Zazkis, R., & Campbell, S. (1996). Divisibility and multiplicative structure of natural numbers: Preservice teachers' understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(5), 540–563.
• Zazkis, R., Sinclair, N., & Liljedahl, P. (2013). Lesson play in mathematics education: A tool for research and professional development. Springer.