Validation of the Green Work Engagement Scale in Turkish

Öz

Green work engagement (GWE) is a critical concept that represents individuals’ conscious, voluntary, and active participation in achieving environmental sustainability goals in the workplace. With the growing emphasis on sustainability-oriented practices in the business world, employees’ awareness of environmental responsibility and their contributions to sustainable work processes have become key elements of organizational performance. In recent years, academic interest in GWE has significantly increased in the international literature. However, scale development and validation studies on this concept remain quite limited in Turkish literature. To date, no research has examined the validity of the GWE Scale in Turkish. To bridge this gap, the present research conducts the Turkish adaptation of the GWE Scale. Data were collected from a sample of 304 employees working in the manufacturing sector within an organized industrial zone. To assess the construct validity of the scale, CFA was conducted. The analyses confirmed that a reliable measurement tool, consisting of six items and preserving the unidimensional structure of the original scale, was successfully adapted into Turkish. The findings provide strong evidence that the version prepared in Turkish of the GWE Scale serves as a reliable and valid tool to assess green employee engagement across different sectors in Türkiye. This study not only contributes to the Turkish adaptation of the scale but also lays a solid foundation for future research in sustainability-oriented human resource management and organizational behavior. Furthermore, the scale offers valuable support for the development of policies and practices that promote environmental sustainability in the business world, making a significant contribution to the Turkish literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Work engagement
• Green work engagement
• Scale adaptation
• Validity
• Reliability

Yeşil Çalışan Katılımı (Green Work Engagement) Ölçeği Türkçe Geçerlemesi

Öz

Yeşil çalışan katılımı; bireylerin iş yerinde çevresel sürdürülebilirlik hedeflerine yönelik bilinçli, gönüllü ve aktif katılımını ifade eden kritik bir kavramdır. İş dünyasında sürdürülebilirlik odaklı uygulamaların giderek artmasıyla birlikte, çalışanların çevresel sorumluluk bilinciyle hareket etmeleri ve sürdürülebilir iş süreçlerine katkıda bulunmaları, örgütsel performans açısından önemli bir unsur haline gelmiştir. Son yıllarda uluslararası literatürde yeşil çalışan katılımına yönelik akademik ilginin arttığı görülmektedir. Ancak, Türkçe literatürde bu konuyla ilgili ölçek geliştirme ve geçerlilik çalışmaları oldukça sınırlıdır. Bu bağlamda, Yeşil Çalışan Katılımı (YÇK) Ölçeği’nin geçerliliğini inceleyen bir çalışmaya rastlanmamaktadır. Bu araştırma, söz konusu boşluğu gidermeyi ve YÇK Ölçeğini Türkçe’ye kazandırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında, organize sanayi bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren üretim sektöründen 304 çalışandan oluşan bir örneklem kullanılmıştır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliliğini analiz etmek gayesiyle Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) uygulanmıştır. Analizler neticesinde, orijinal ölçeğin tek boyutlu yapısını koruyan ve altı maddeden oluşan güvenilir bir ölçme aracı Türkçe’ye uyarlanmıştır. Araştırma bulguları, YÇK Ölçeğinin Türkiye’de farklı sektörlerde yeşil çalışan katılımını ölçmede geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olarak kullanılabileceğine dair güçlü kanıtlar sunmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, çalışma yalnızca ölçeğin Türkçe’ye uyarlanmasına katkı sağlamakla kalmayıp, sürdürülebilirlik odaklı insan kaynakları yönetimi ve örgütsel davranış alanlarında yapılacak gelecekteki araştırmalar için de sağlam bir temel oluşturmaktadır. Ölçek, iş dünyasında çevresel sürdürülebilirliği teşvik eden politika ve uygulamaların geliştirilmesine yönelik önemli destek sunarak, Türkçe literatüre değerli bir katkı sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çalışan katılımı
• Geçerlik
• Güvenirlik
• Ölçek Uyarlama
• Yeşil çalışan katılımı.

Kaynakça

1. Abdou, A.H., Hassan, T.H., Salem, A.E., Albakhit, A.I., Almakhayitah, M.Y. ve Salama, W. (2022). The Nexus between Environmentally Sustainable Practices, Green Satisfaction, and Customer Citizenship Behavior in Eco-Friendly Hotels: Social Exchange Theory Perspective. Sustainability, 14(19), 2-20.
2. Aboramadan, M., Albashiti, B., Alharazin, H. ve Dahleez, K. A. (2019). Human resources management practices and organiza- tional commitment in higher education: The mediating role of work engagement. International Journal of Educational Manage- ment, 34(1), 154–174.
3. Aboramadan, M. (2020). The effect of green HRM on employee green behaviors in higher education: the mediating mechanism of green work engagement. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(1), 7-23.
4. Aboramadan, M., Kundi, Y. M., ve Becker, A. (2022). Green human resource management in nonprofit organizations: effects on employee green behavior and the role of perceived green organizational support. Personnel Review 51(7), 1788-1806.
5. Aboramadan, M. (2022). The effect of green HRM on employee green behaviors in higher education: The mediating mechanism of green work engagement. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 30, 7–23.
6. Agina, M.F., Khairy, H.A., Abdel Fatah, M.A., Manaa, Y.H., Abdallah, R.M., Aliane, N., Afaneh, J. ve Al-Romeedy, B.S. Distributive Injustice and Work Disengagement in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry: Mediating Roles of the Workplace Negative Gossip and Organizational Cynicism. Sustainability 2023, 15(20), 2-24.
7. Ahmad, S. (2015). Green Human Resource Management: Policies and practices. Cogent Business & Management, 2(1), 1-13
8. Al Amri, F. H., Das, A. ve Ben-Ayed, O. (2019). The impact of per- ceived corporate social responsibility on employee engagement: The case of Qatar. Business Strategy & Development, 2(3), 180–191.

9. Alpar R. Uygulamalı istatistik ve geçerlik-güvenirlik. 2. Baskı. Anakara: Detay Yayıncılık, 2013.
10. Alshaabani, A. ve Rudnak, I. (2020). Impact of diversity Management Practices on Organizational Climate- An Egyptian Study. Vadyba Journal of Management, 1(36), 7-17.
11. Amjed, Q. U.A., Ali, M. ve Ali, M. (2021). Effect Of Work Engagement On Employee Performance: Investigating The Moderating Role Of Polychronicity. International Journal of Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity, 12(1), 310–320.
12. Ángel del Broí , J., Junquera, B. ve Ordiz, M. (2008). Human resources in advanced environmental approaches –a case analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 46(21), 6029-6053.
13. Bakker, A. B., ve Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. The Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223.
14. Baykul, Y. (2015). Eğitimde ve psikolojide ölçme: klasik test teorisi ve uygulaması. Pegem Akademi.
15. Bennett, R.J. ve Robinson, S.L. (2000). Development of a measure of work-place deviance. J Appl Psychol, 85(3),349.
16. Berthon, P., Ewing, M. ve Hah, L. L. (2005). Captivating company: dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding. International Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 151-172.
17. Bhutto, T.A., Farooq, R., Talwar, S., Awan, U. ve Dhir, A. (2021). Green inclusive leadership and green creativity in the tourism and hospitality sector: Serial mediation of green psychological climate and work engagement. J. Sustain. Tour., 29, 1716–1737.
18. Boiral, O., Talbot, D. ve Paillé, P. (2015). Leading by example: A model of organizational citizenship behavior for the environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 532–550.
19. Brislin, R.W., Lonnerwalter J. ve Thorndike R.M. (1973). Cross-Cultural research methods. New York: John Wiley-Sons Publication.
20. Chan, E. S. ve Hsu, C. H. (2016). Environmental management research in hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(5), 886–923.
21. Corvalan, A. (2018). How to rank rankings? Group performance in multiple-prize contests. Social Choice and Welfare, 51(2), 361–380.
22. Çop, S., Olorunsola, V. O. ve Alola, U. V. (2021). Achieving environmental sustainability through green transformational leadership policy: Can green team resilience help?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 671-682.
23. Dajani, M. A. Z. (2015). The Impact of Employee Engagement On Job Performance and Organisational Commitment In The Egyptian Banking Sector. Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 3(5), 138-147.
24. Darvishmotevali, M. ve Altinay, L. (2022). Green HRM, environmental awareness and green behaviors: The moderating role of servant leadership. Tour Manag 88, 1-12.
25. Das, S.C. ve Singh, R.K. (2016). Green HRM and organizational sustainability: an empirical review, Kegees Journal of Social Science 8(1), 227–236.
26. Dinh, L. Determinants of employee engagement mediated by work-life balance and work stress. Manag. Sci. Lett., 10, 923–928.
27. Dumont, J., Shen, J. ve Deng, X. (2017). Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: the role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 613-627.
28. Fan, S., Yu, Z., Zheng, X. ve Gao, C. (2023). Relationship between psychological adaptability and work engagement of college teachers within smart teaching environments: The mediating role of digital information literacy self-efficacy. Front. Psychol., 14, 1-12.
29. Farooq, M. S. ve Salam, M. (2020). Nexus between CSR and DSIW: A PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86, 1-21.
30. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Gilal, F.G., Ashraf, Z., Gilal, N.G., Gilal, R.G. ve Chaana, N.A. (2019). Promoting environmental performance through green human resource management practices in higher education institutions: a moderated mediation model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,6, 1579-1590.
32. Jabbour, C. J. C., Santos, F. C. A. ve Nagano, M. S. (2008). Environmental management system and human resource practices: is there a link between them in four Brazilian companies? Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(17), 1922-1925.
33. Jung, H.S. ve Yoon, H.H. (2012). The effects of emotional intelligence on counterproductive work behaviors and organizational citizen behaviors among food and beverage employees in a deluxe hotel. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 31(2),369–378.
34. Kahn RL, 1964. Organizational Stress: Studies In Role Conflict And Ambiguity. New York: Wiley
35. Karatepe, T., Öztüren, A., Karatepe, O., Uner, M.M ve Kim, T.T. (2022). Management commitment to the ecological environment, green work engagement and their effects on hotel employees’ green work outcomes. Int. J. Contemp. Hospit. Manag. 34 (8), 3084–3112.
36. Khairy, H.A., Agina, M.F., Aliane, N. ve Hashad, M.E. (2023). Internal Branding in Hotels: Interaction Effects of Employee Engagement, Workplace Friendship, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Sustainability 2023, 15(5), 2-16.
37. Kim, A., Kim, Y., Han, K., Jackson, S. E. ve Ployhart, R. E. (2017). Multilevel influences on voluntary workplace green behavior: Individual differences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1335–1358.
38. Kim, Y. J., Kim, W. G., Choi, H. M. ve Phetvaroon, K. (2019). The effect of green human resource management on hotel employees’ eco-friendly behavior and environmental performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 76, 83-93.
39. Li, X., Sanders, K. ve Frenkel, S. (2012). How leader–member exchange, work engagement and HRM consistency explain Chinese luxury hotel employees’ job performance. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 31(4),1059–1066.
40. Li, K.X., Jin, M. ve Shi, W. (2018). Tourism as an important impetus to pro- moting economic growth: A critical review. Tour Manag Perspect, 26.135–142.
41. Luu, T.T. (2019), Building employees’ organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: the role of environmentally-specific servant leadership and a moderated mediation mechanism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(1), 406-426.
42. Masri, H.A. ve Jaaron, A.A. (2017). Assessing green human resources man- agement practices in Palestinian manufacturing context: An empirical study. J Clean Prod 143, 474–489.
43. Mazzi, A., Toniolo, S., Mason, M., Aguiari, F. ve Scipioni, A. (2016), “What are the benefits and difficulties in adopting an environmental management system? The opinion of Italian organizations”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 139, pp. 873-885.
44. McDonald, F.V. (2014). Developing an integrated conceptual framework of pro-environmental behavior in the workplace through synthesis of the current literature. Adm. Sci., 4(3), 276–303.
45. Michel, J.S. ve Bowling, N.A. (2013). Does dispositional aggression feed the narcissistic response? The role of narcissism and aggression in the prediction of job attitudes and counterproductive work behaviors. J. Bus. Psychol., 28:93–105.
46. Norton, T. A., Parker, S. L., Zacher, H., ve Ashkanasy, N. M. (2015). Employee green behavior: A theoretical framework, multilevel review, and future research agenda. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 103–125.
47. Ones, D. S., ve Dilchert, S. (2012). Environmental sustainability at work: A call to action. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 444–466.
48. Özdamar, K. (2017). Ölçek ve test geliştirme yapısal eşitlik modellemesi IBM SPSS, IBM SPSS AMOS ve MINTAB uygulamalı. Eskişehir: Nisan Kitabevi.
49. Paillé, P., Chen, Y., Boiral, O. ve Jin, J. (2014). The Impact of Human Resource Management on Environmental Performance: An Employee-Level Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(3), 451-466.
50. Patwary, A.K., Mohd Yusof, M.F., Bah Simpong, D., Ab, Ghaffar, S.F. ve Rahman, M.K. (2022). Examining proactive pro-environmental behaviour through green inclusive leadership and green human resource management: An empirical investigation among Malaysian hotel employees. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights, 6(22), 2-10.
51. Quan, D., Tian, L. ve Qiu, W. (2022). The Study on the Influence of Green Inclusive Leadership on Employee Green Behaviour. J. Environ. Public Health, 2, 1-12.
52. Rich, B.L., Lepine, J.A. ve Crawford, E.R. (2010). Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance, Acad. Manag. J., 53 (3). 617–635.
53. Robertson, J.L. ve Barling, J. (2013). Greening Organizations Through Leaders' Influence on Employees' Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 176–194.
54. Saeed, A., Rasheed, F., Waseem, M. ve Tabash, M. I. (2021). Green human resource management and environmental performance: the role of green supply chain management practices. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(9), 2881-2899.
55. Sandhya, S. ve Sulphey, M. (2019). An assessment of contribution of employee engagement, psychological contract and psychologi- cal empowerment towards turnover intentions of IT employees. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 5(1), 22–31.
56. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. ve Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 3(1), 71–92.
57. Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B. ve Salanova, M. (2006), The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
58. Seçer, İ. (2018). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Anı Yayıncılık.
59. Simon, D., Kriston, L., Loh, A., Spies, C., Scheibler, F., Wills, C. ve Härter, M. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the Autonomy‐Preference‐Index (API). Health expectations, 13(3), 234-243.
60. Suliman, M.A., Abdou, A.H., Ibrahim, M.F., Al-Khaldy, D.A.W., Anas, A.M., Alrefae, W.M.M. ve Salama, W. (2023). Impact of green trans- formational leadership on employees’ environmental performance in the hotel industry context: Does green work engagement matter?. Sustainability, 15, 2-18.
61. Sungmala, N. ve Verawat, A. (2021). The Impact of Employee Engagement on Employee Performance: A Case Study of Multinational Corporations in Thailand. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(5), 1091-1097.
62. Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2015). Çok değişkenli istatistiklerin kullanımı (Çev. Ed. M. Baloğlu). Ankara: Nobel Akademik.
63. Tang, G., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Paillé, P. ve Jia, J. (2018). Green human resource management practices: scale development and validity. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(1), 31-55.
64. Tavşancıl, E. (2005). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS İle Veri Analizi. Ankara, Nobel Basımevi.
65. Thompson, B. (2008). Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
66. Tisu, L., Lupșa, D., Vîrgă, D. ve Rusu, A. (2020). Personality characteristics, job performance and mental health: The mediating role of work engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 153, 2-23.
67. Ural, A. ve Kılıç, İ. (2006). Bilimsel Araştırma Süreci ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. (Genişletilmiş İkinci Baskı), Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
68. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G. ve Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guide- lines and empirical illustration. MIS Q,177–195.
69. Wong, A. ve Carlbäck, J. (2018). A Study on Factors Influencing Acceptance of Using Mobile Electronic Identification Applications in Sweden.