The Impact of the Red Sea Crisis on Container Shipping: A Comparison between the Suez Canal and the Cape of Good Hope Route
Abstract
The Panama Canal, the Suez Canal, and the Malacca Strait are strategically important maritime chokepoints enabling global trade. However, disruptions occurring in these locations have adverse implications for both regional and global levels. The Suez Canal is indispensable for container trade between Asia and Europe, and the Ever Given accident temporarily paralyzed its functions and cost the world economy $10 billion. Furthermore, since 2023, the Red Sea crisis has caused a significant portion of commercial vessels to divert their routes to the Cape of Good Hope (CoGH), leading to changes in freight rates and chartering markets, as well as a reallocation of fleet capacity. Although the subject has been addressed at the industry level, academic interest remains quite limited. To address this gap, the current study explores the effects of the Red Sea crisis on maritime transportation based on reliable secondary data and descriptive longitudinal comparative analysis. Deriving insights from the ongoing Red Sea disruption, the primary findings suggest that maritime fleet size and capacity substantially contribute to maritime resilience. Moreover, port, terminal, and canal authorities, key elements of maritime supply chains, must invest in critical infrastructure and enhance operational capabilities to be prepared for future disruptions. The research findings significantly enhance the literature by illustrating the importance of maritime fleet and capacity planning in mitigating the impact of global maritime disruptions.
Keywords
container shipping , maritime transportation , Red Sea , Suez Canal , supply chain
Kaynakça
- Arıcan, O. H., & Unal, A. U. (2025). The impact of sustainable collaboration on the business performance of Turkish shipping companies: The role of linking strategies. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 23(1), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.11611/yead.1562395
- Arıcan, O. H., Toprakçı, O., Ünal, A. U., & Özbağ, G. K. (2025). Analyzing carbon regulation impacts on maritime sector using Fuzzy Delphi–DEMATEL–ISM approach. Systems, 13(11), 955. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13110955
- Biggs, H., & Kelly, M. (2024, February 28). Red Sea war risks and insurance implications. Gard. https://gard.no/insights/red-sea-war-risks-and-insurance-implications/
- Caruana, E. J., Roman, M., Hernández-Sánchez, J., & Solli, P. (2015). Longitudinal studies. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 7(11), E537-E540. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.63
- Clarksons. (2025). Shipping Intelligence Network. https://sin.clarksons.net/
- Çelik, Y., & Yorulmaz, M. (2024). Yeşil liman ve sürdürülebilir liman çalışmalarında çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Sistematik literatür araştırması. Uluslararası Bankacılık Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 36–61. https://doi.org/10.52736/ubeyad.1513586
- Drewry. (2025, January 7). The momentum of high earnings will continue in 2025 for crude tanker owners. https://www.drewry.co.uk/maritime-research-opinion-browser/maritime-research-opinions/the-momentum-of-high-earnings-will-continue-in-2025-for-crude-tanker-owners
- EIA. (2024, June 27). Panama Canal traffic to increase as drought conditions ease. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=62408
- Essallamy, M., Abdel Bari, A., & Kotb, M. (2020). Spectral fatigue analyses comparison study: Suez Canal vs. Cape of Good Hope Arab Academy for Science, Technologies and Maritime Transport (AASTMT). Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology, 19(4), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2019.1572703
- Euronews. (2025, April 17). Number of ships passing through the Suez Canal from 1976 to 2024 [Graph]. In Statista. Retrieved March 06, 2026, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1252568/number-of-transits-in-the-suez-cana-annually/