Kentsel Lojistik Operasyonlarında Elektromobilite: Fırsatlar ve Zorluklar

Öz

Elektromobilite (e-Mobilite), geleneksel içten yanmalı motorlu araçlara önemli bir alternatif olarak öne çıkan elektrikli araçları, iletişim teknolojilerini ve bağlantılı altyapıları kapsayan yenilikçi bir alan olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, elektromobilite konusunu kentsel lojistik bağlamında incelemek ve öne çıkan içgörüleri keşfederek sektörün gelişimine katkı sunmaktır. Bu anlamda, çalışmanın araştırma soruları; “1) Kentsel lojistik operasyonlarında e-mobilite hangi açılardan ele alınmaktadır ve önündeki fırsat ve zorluklar nelerdir?” ve “2) Hangi koşullarda e-mobilite kentsel lojistik operasyonlarının performansını arttırır?” olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırma yöntemi olarak sistematik literatür taraması uygulanmış ve “Web of Science” ve “Scopus” veri tabanları üzerinden elde edilen 37 makale değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen makaleler, tematik analiz tekniği benimsenerek NVivo programı dahilinde incelenmiş ve konuya ilişkin temalar keşfedilmiştir. İnceleme sonucunda, elektromobilite konusunun kentsel lojistik operasyonlar bağlamında incelenmesinde öne çıkan temalar; “ekonomi”, “çevre”, “sosyal”, “politika ve teşvikler” ve “teknoloji ve performans” başlıkları altında toplanmış ve her bir tema kentsel lojistik operasyonlarına yönelik fırsat ve zorluklar açısından değerlendirilmiştir. E-mobilitenin kentsel lojistik performansına yönelik değerlendirilmesi kapsamında, yenilenebilir enerji payının yüksek olduğu, güçlü şarj altyapısı ve etkin teşviklerin bulunduğu metropol alanlarda faydanın arttığı; altyapı eksiklikleri, yüksek batarya maliyetleri ve politika belirsizlikleri koşullarında bu etkinin sınırlandığı görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• : Elektromobilite
• E-Mobilite
• Elektrikli Araçlar
• Kentsel Lojistik
• Sistematik Literatür Taraması

Electromobility in Urban Logistics Operations: Opportunuties and Challenges

Öz

Electromobility (e-Mobility) is considered an innovative field encompassing electric vehicles, communication technologies, and connected infrastructures, which stand out as a significant alternative to traditional internal combustion engine vehicles. This study aims to examine the issue of electromobility in the context of urban logistics and contribute to the sector's development by identifying key insights. In this sense, the research questions of the study are: "(1) In what aspects is e-mobility addressed in urban logistics operations and what are the opportunities and challenges it faces?" and "(2) Under what conditions does e-mobility increase the performance of urban logistics operations?" A systematic literature review was employed as the research method, and 37 articles were obtained from the "Web of Science" and "Scopus" databases for evaluation. The obtained articles were examined using the NVivo program, employing a thematic analysis technique, and related themes were identified. As a result of the review, the prominent themes in examining the issue of electromobility in the context of urban logistics operations are; The data were grouped under the headings "economy," "environment," "social," "policy and incentives," and "technology and performance," and each theme was evaluated in terms of opportunities and challenges for urban logistics operations. The assessment of e-mobility on urban logistics performance found that benefits increased in metropolitan areas with a high share of renewable energy, robust charging infrastructure, and effective incentives; however, this impact was limited in conditions of infrastructure deficiencies, high battery costs, and policy uncertainty.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Electromobility
• E-Mobility
• Electric Vehicles
• Urban Logistics
• Systematic Literature Review

Kaynakça

1. Alp, O., Tan, T., & Udenio, M. (2022). “Transitioning to sustainable freight transportation by integrating fleet replacement and charging infrastructure decisions”, Omega, 109,102595.
2. Ankara Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2024, Eylül). “Ankara’da 23 EGO otobüsünün elektrikli otobüse dönüştürülmesi için hazırlıklar başladı”. https://www.ankara.bel.tr/haberler/ankarada-23-ego-otobusunun-elektrikli-otobuse-donusturulmesi-icin-hazirliklar-basladi-14419
3. Anosike, A., Loomes, H., Udokporo, C. K., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2021). “Exploring the challenges of electric vehicle adoption in final mile parcel delivery”, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 1-25.
4. Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2016). “Research on business operating model of new energy battery electric vehicles used as urban logistics cars”, Int. J. Multimed. Ubiquitous Eng, 11, 387-400.
5. Dadashzada, I., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Roy Ghatak, R., & Gonzalez-Aleu, F. (2024). “An investigation into the major barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles in last-mile deliveries for sustainable transport”, The International Journal of Logistics Management.
6. de Mello Bandeira, R. A., Goes, G. V., Gonçalves, D. N. S., Márcio de Almeida, D. A., & de Oliveira, C. M. (2019). “Electric vehicles in the last mile of urban freight transportation: A sustainability assessment of postal deliveries in Rio de Janeiro-Brazil”, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 67, 491-502.
7. Ehrler, V. C., Schöder, D., & Seidel, S. (2021). “Challenges and perspectives for the use of electric vehicles for last mile logistics of grocery e-commerce–Findings from case studies in Germany”, Research in Transportation Economics, 87, 100757.
8. Elvsaas Nordtømme, M., Andersen, J., Bjørgen Sund, A., Roche-Cerasi, I., & Levin, T. (2015). “Green urban distribution: Evaluation of adapted measures for the city of Oslo”, Green urban distribution: evaluation of adapted measures for the city of Oslo, 61-88.

9. Fortis Enerji. (2023, Ağustos). “20 soruda Elektrikli Araç Şarj İstasyonu mevzuatı”. https://www.fortisenergy.com/tr-TR/Media/20-soruda-elektrikli-arac-sarj-istasyonu-mevzuati/21
10. Giordano, A., Fischbeck, P., & Matthews, H. S. (2018). “Environmental and economic comparison of diesel and battery electric delivery vans to inform city logistics fleet replacement strategies”, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 64, 216-229.
11. Hassan, S. E., Andruetto, C., & Posch, A. (2024). “The role of battery electric vehicles in off-peak hour deliveries: Sustainability assessment of a case study in Stockholm”, Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 13, 100175.
12. Iwan, S., Nürnberg, M., Jedliński, M., & Kijewska, K. (2021). “Efficiency of light electric vehicles in last mile deliveries–Szczecin case study”, Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103167.
13. İmre, Ş., Celebi, D., & Koca, F. (2021). “Understanding barriers and enablers of electric vehicles in urban freight transport: Addressing stakeholder needs in Turkey”, Sustainable Cities and Society, 68, 102794.
14. İmre, Ş., Çelebi, D., & Asan, U. (2024). “Estimating potential adoption rate of electric vehicles in urban logistics”, Transportation Planning and Technology, 47(3), 370-399.
15. İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2025, Haziran). “Akıllı Mobilite Stratejisi”. https://www.akillisehir.istanbul/akilli-mobilite/
16. İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2019, Ocak). “İzmir Ulaşım Ana Planı (UPİ 2030)”. https://iztovakfi.org/front/upload/yarisma/UP%C4%B0%202030.pdf
17. Jaegler, A., Randrianarisoa, L. M., & Yahyaoui, H. (2024). “Policy decision-support for inland waterway transport in sustainable urban areas: an analysis of economic viability”, Annals of Operations Research, 1-19.
18. Juvvala, R., & Sarmah, S. P. (2021). “Evaluation of policy options supporting electric vehicles in city logistics: a case study”, Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103209.
19. Karakikes, I., & Nathanail, E. (2020). “Using the Delphi method to evaluate the appropriateness of urban freight transport solutions”, Smart Cities, 3(4), 1428-1447.
20. Kin, B., Hopman, M., & Quak, H. (2021). “Different charging strategies for electric vehicle fleets in urban freight transport”, Sustainability, 13(23), 13080.
21. Kłos, M. J., & Sierpiński, G. (2023). “Strategy for the Siting of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations for Parcel Delivery Service Providers”, Energies, 16(6), 2553.
22. Lebeau, P., De Cauwer, C., Van Mierlo, J., Macharis, C., Verbeke, W., & Coosemans, T. (2015a). “Conventional, hybrid, or electric vehicles: which technology for an urban distribution centre?”, The Scientific World Journal, 2015.
23. Lebeau, P., Macharis, C., & Van Mierlo, J. (2016). “Exploring the choice of battery electric vehicles in city logistics: A conjoint-based choice analysis”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 91, 245-258.
24. Lebeau, P., Macharis, C., & Van Mierlo, J. (2019). “How to improve the total cost of ownership of electric vehicles: An analysis of the light commercial vehicle segment”, World Electric Vehicle Journal, 10(4), 90.
25. Lebeau, P., Macharis, C., Van Mierlo, J., & Lebeau, K. (2015b). “Electrifying light commercial vehicles for city logistics? A total cost of ownership analysis”, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 15(4).
26. Malima, G. C., & Moyo, F. (2023). “Are electric vehicles economically viable in sub-Saharan Africa? The total cost of ownership of internal combustion engine and electric vehicles in Tanzania”, Transport Policy, 141, 14-26.
27. Marmiroli, B., Venditti, M., Dotelli, G., & Spessa, E. (2020). “The transport of goods in the urban environment: A comparative life cycle assessment of electric, compressed natural gas and diesel light-duty vehicles”, Applied energy, 260, 114236.
28. Melo, S., & Baptista, P. (2017). “Evaluating the impacts of using cargo cycles on urban logistics: Integrating traffic, environmental and operational boundaries”, European transport research review, 9(2), 1-10.
29. Mirhedayatian, S. M., & Yan, S. (2018). “A framework to evaluate policy options for supporting electric vehicles in urban freight transport”, Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 58, 22-38.
30. Moll, C., Plötz, P., Hadwich, K., & Wietschel, M. (2020). “Are battery-electric trucks for 24-hour delivery the future of city logistics? A german case study”, World Electric Vehicle Journal, 11(1), 16.
31. Morton, C., & Ali, Y. (2025). “The impact of congestion charging on car ownership: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment”, Transport Policy, 160, 181-191.
32. PwC Türkiye. (2025, Ocak). “Elektrikli araçlar için şarj istasyonu sektörüne genel bakış”. https://www.pwc.com.tr/tr/sektorler/otomotiv/elektrikli-arac-sarj-istasyonu-sektorune-genel-bakis-2025.pdf
33. Ribeiro, C. G., & Silveira, S. (2024). “The impact of financial incentives on the total cost of ownership of electric light commercial vehicles in EU countries”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 179, 103936.
34. Roumboutsos, A., Kapros, S., & Vanelslander, T. (2014). “Green city logistics: Systems of innovation to assess the potential of E-vehicles”, Research in Transportation Business & Management, 11, 43-52.
35. Sarmiento, L., Wägner, N., & Zaklan, A. (2023). “The air quality and well-being effects of low emission zones”, Journal of Public Economics, 227, 105014.
36. Sendek-Matysiak, E., Pyza, D., Łosiewicz, Z., & Lewicki, W. (2022). “Total cost of ownership of light commercial electrical vehicles in city logistics”, Energies, 15(22), 8392.
37. Settey, T., Gnap, J., Beňová, D., Pavličko, M., & Blažeková, O. (2021). “The growth of e-commerce due to COVID-19 and the need for urban logistics centers using electric vehicles: Bratislava case study”, Sustainability, 13(10), 5357.
38. Siragusa, C., Tumino, A., Mangiaracina, R., & Perego, A. (2022). “Electric vehicles performing last-mile delivery in B2C e-commerce: An economic and environmental assessment”, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 16(1), 22-33.
39. Taefi, T. T. (2016). “Viability of electric vehicles in combined day and night delivery: A total cost of ownership example in Germany”, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 16(4).
40. Teoh, T. (2022). “Electric vehicle charging strategies for Urban freight transport: concept and typology”, Transport Reviews, 42(2), 157-180.
41. Teoh, T., Kunze, O., Teo, C. C., & Wong, Y. D. (2018). “Decarbonisation of urban freight transport using electric vehicles and opportunity charging”, Sustainability, 10(9), 3258.
42. Tsakalidis, A., Krause, J., Julea, A., Peduzzi, E., Pisoni, E., & Thiel, C. (2020). “Electric light commercial vehicles: Are they the sleeping giant of electromobility?”, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, 102421.
43. TÜBİTAK. (2025, Ağustos). “1001 Programının 2025 Yılı 2. Dönem Başvuruları Alınmaya Başlandı”. https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tr/duyuru/ardeb-1001-programinin-2025-yili-2-donem-basvurulari-alinmaya-baslandi
44. UN-Habitat. (2022). “World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities”, United Nations Human Settlements Programme, Nairobi.
45. Wei, H., Callegari, C., Fiorini, A. C. O., Schaeffer, R., & Szklo, A. (2024). “Technical and economic modelling of last-mile transport: A case for Brazil”, Case Studies on Transport Policy, 16, 101219.
46. Yan, Z., Ding, H., & Chen, L. (2023). “The analyzing the role of electric vehicles in urban logistics: A case of China”, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1128079.
47. Zhang, H., Irfan, M., Ai, F., Al-Aiban, K. M., & Abbas, S. (2024). “Analyzing barriers to the adoption and development of electric vehicles: A roadmap towards sustainable transportation system”, Renewable Energy, 233, 121136.