Azerbaycan Cumhuriyeti'nin Denizyolu Yükümlülüğünde Taşıyıcının Sorumluluğunun Hariç Tutulmasına İlişkin Uluslararası Normları ve Mevzuatı

Öz

Makale, uluslararası standartların iç hukukta uygulanmasının temelleri olan deniz taşımacılığına ilişkin uluslararası standartları ve yerel mevzuatı incelemektedir. Uluslararası hukuk sözleşmelerinin normlarının iç hukuk alanında gereği gibi uygulanması sağlanmadan uluslararası hukuk düzenleme mekanizmalarının etkin işleyişinin mümkün olmadığı belirtilmektedir. Uluslararası anlaşmalar, yalnızca farklı kurallar belirlendiğinde veya bir çelişki ortaya çıktığında geçerli değildir. İlişkilerin düzeyine, özellikle uluslararası nitelikteki ilişkilere bağlı olarak, mevzuat, uluslararası ticaret geleneklerini bir kaynak olarak göstermeyi ve uluslararası anlaşmaların doğrudan uygulanma olasılığını tanımayı önermektedir. Azerbaycan'ın tarihi İpek Yolu üzerindeki konumunun, modern multimodal sözleşmelere (örneğin, Rotterdam Kurallarını iç hukuka dâhil ederek) katılmayı gerekli kıldığı gerçeğine ve dolayısıyla uygulama için kabul yönteminin seçimine dikkat çekilmektedir. Uluslararası anlaşmaların sayısı entegrasyon politikası için yeterli değildir. Bağışıklıklar kataloğuna göre taşıyıcının sorumluluğunu hariç tutan Rotterdam kuralları, sadece Lahey kurallarını değil, Hamburg kurallarının da bazı kurallarını uygulamıştır. Bu anlamda bir sentez eylemi olarak Rotterdam kurallarının yasama kriteri olarak benimsenmesi gerekmektedir. Ayrıca, “uluslararası anlaşmaların doğrudan uygulanmasına ilişkin” Medeni Kanun’un Formül 3.1’i AR'nin CMS'sinde sabitlenmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uluslararası hukuk
• Hamburg kuralları
• Rotterdam kuralları
• uluslararası taşımacılık
• deniz taşımacılığı

International Norms and Legislation of The Azerbaijan Republic for Exclusion of Carrier’s Liability in Maritime Freight

Öz

The article examines international standards and domestic legislation on maritime freight, the foundations of the implementation of international standards in domestic law. It is noted that the effective functioning of mechanisms of international legal regulation is impossible without ensuring the implementation of international legal treaty norms in the field of domestic law in the proper manner. International treaties apply not only when different rules are identified, or a contradiction arises. Depending on the level of relations, especially relations of an international character, the legislation proposes to indicate international business customs as a source and recognize the possibility of direct application of international treaties. Attention is drawn to the fact that the location of Azerbaijan on the historic Silk Road makes it necessary to participate in modern multimodal conventions (for example, by incorporating the Rotterdam Rules into domestic law), and therefore the choice of the reception method for the implementation of international treaties is not enough for integration policy. Rotterdam rules excluding liability of the carrier according to the catalog of immunities implemented not only The Hague rules, but also certain rules of the Hamburg rules. In this sense, as an act of synthesis, the Rotterdam rules should be adopted as a criterion for legislation. Also, Formula 3.1 of the Civil Code “on the direct application of international treaties” should be fixed in the CMS of the AR.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• International law
• Hamburg rules
• Rotterdam Rules
• international carriage
• carriage of goods by sea

Kaynakça

1. Alekseeva, S. S. (1987). Problems of the Theory of State and Law. Textbook / M., " Юрид.литер ", 448 pp. (in Russian).
2. Aliev, E. A. (2006). International Transport Legal Relations in the Era of Globalization. M.: LLC "Р-СТИЛЬ" 2006, 340 p. (in Russian).
3. Anufrieva, L.P. (2000). Private International Law. In 3 volumes. Volume 1. General Part; Textbook. M: Publishing House BEK, 288 p. (in Russian).
4. Baatz, Y. (2014). Maritime Law. Fourth Edition. Abington: Informa Law from Routledge. 578 p.
5. Borinov, I. I. (1988). Commentary on Judicial and Arbitration Practice in Maritime Matters. M.: Transport, p. 24 (in Russian).
6. Butakova, N. A. (2014). Actual Problems of The Regulation of International Shipping of Goods Based on the Rotterdam Rules / Yurist, No. 4, pp. 30-34 (in Russian).
7. Chartseva, N. E. (2004). Agreement on the International Carriage of Goods by Bill of Lading in Liner Shipping: National Legal and International Legal Regulation. Abstract of a Candidate of Legal Sciences. M. 32 p. (In Russian).
8. Chernichenko, S. V. (1999). Theory of International Law. In 2 volumes. T.1: Modern theoretical problems. M., ed. NIMP, 336 p. (in Russian).

9. Chiristy, P. B. (1991). Negotiating Investment in the GATT: A Call for Functionalism / Michigan Journal of International Law Summer 1991, №12. P. 786-791.
10. Davis, I. (1998). Perils of the Sea: the “Bunga Seroja” Case. Journal Maritime Studies.vol.1998, Issue103, pp.27-31.
11. Forse, R., Martin, D. and Yiannopoulos, A. N. (2018). Admiralty and Maritime Law. Practitioners Edition, Volume 1. Washington: Beard Books D.C. 518p.
12. Fujita, T., Sturley, M. F. and Ziel, G. V. (2010). The Rotterdam Rules. The UN Convention on Contract for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly of Partly by Sea. Sweet & Maxwell 2010, pp.62-63.
13. Galenskaya, L. N. (1996). The Operation of The General Principles of International Law in The Field of Private International Law.. M., No. 1-2, pp. 3-4 (in Russian).
14. Galligan, T. C., Maraist, F. L., and Maraist, C. M. (2003). Maritime Law. American Casebook Series. Thomson/West Luisiana, 860 p.
15. Gardner, J. P. (1994). Krueger H.C. Does the Convention Machinery Distinguish Between States Which Have and Have Not Incorporated It? In: Aspects of Incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into Domestic Law, London, and pp. 13-27.
16. Gutsulyak, V. N. (2003). International Law of the Sea (Public and Private) M.: Tsentr Morskoqo prava, 2003, 416 p. (in Russian).
17. Haverdovsky, A. S. (1980). Implementation of International Law. Kiev: Visha Schola, 320 p. (in Russian).
18. Healy, J. N., Sharpe, D. J., Sharpe, D. B. and Winship, P. (2013). Cases and Materials on Admiralty. Fifth Edition. West Academic Publishing: 2011, 931p.
19. Huseynov, L. G. (1998). Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Human Rights and International Law / Beynəlxalq Hüquq Jurnalı, No. 1, pp. 16-46 (in Russian).
20. Ignatyev, I. A. (2001). The Ratio of Sources of Environmental Law: Environmental Legislation and International Treaties/. No. 2, pp. 41-50 (in Russian).
21. International Transport in the Period of Globalization: Legal Aspects. Monograph. (2006). Baku: Publishing and printing company Zərdabi-LTD LLC. 360 p. (in Azerbaijani).
22. Ignatenko, G. V. and Tiunov, O. I. (2002). International Law: Textbook for Universities. 2nd ed. rev. and add. Ed. Publishing House (Group NORMA INFRA-M), 592 p. (in Russian).
23. Ivanov, G. G. (2008). Sea Shipping in Anticipation of New Regulations, Possibly The Rotterdam Rules /. No. 4. pp. 5-9. (In Russian).
24. Ivanov, G. G. and Makovsky, A. L. (1984). Private International Law. p. 32 (in Russian).
25. Lukashuk, I. I. (1999). International Law. Special Part: Textbook. M.: Publishing House БЕК, 384 p. (in Russian).
26. Lunts, L. A. (1973). The Course of Private International Law: T.1 M.: "Spark", 1007 p. (in Russian).
27. Mahmoudova, O. A. (2013). Private International Legal Regulation of Turkish-Azerbaijani Relations. Baku: Bakı Çap Evi, 220 p. (in Azerbaijani).
28. Mankababy, S. (1978). The Hamburg Rules on the Carriage of Goods by Sea. Leiden and Boston: A.W. Sijtho FF 1978, AJIL, Volume 74, Issue 3, pp.727-730.
29. Marysheva, N.I. (2000). Private International Law / Ed. M.: “Contract - Infra”, 532 p. (in Russian).
30. Maslennikov, L. N. (1978). Kendall L.K. Economics and Organization of the Fleet. Cambridge (USA), 1973. Translation from English 264 p. (in Russian).
31. Mullerson, R. A. (1982). The Ratio of International and National Law. M., International Relations. 136 p. (in Russian).
32. Neshataeva, T. N. (2001). International Civil Procedure: Textbook. Allowance. - M.: (in Russian).
33. Sadikov, O. N. (1981). Legal Regulation of International Transport. M.: 288 p. (in Russian).
34. Snopkov, V. I. (2001). The technology of transportation of goods by sea. St. Petersburg: Publishing House ANO NGO “Мир и семья”, 520 p. (in Russian).
35. Tikhomirov, Y. A. (1997). Public Law. Textbook. M.: БЕК, 496 p. (in Russian).
36. Torsky, V. G. (2002). SOLAS 74 Convention Key points and comments (practical guide). Odessa: Астропринт, 288p. (In Russian).
37. Zemlyansky, P. L. (2004). The essence and classification of multimodal transport/Transportnoye pravo. No2 pp.29-35 (In Russian).
38. Zimnenko, B. L. (2003). The norms of international law in the judicial practice of the Russian Federation. M., RAP, p. 188. (In Russian).