Predicting Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) Spins with an Different Alternative Method Instead of Using the Breit-Wigner Approach

Duygu Yıldırım

doi:10.31466/kfbd.1517746

EN TR

Predicting Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) Spins with an Different Alternative Method Instead of Using the Breit-Wigner Approach

Öz

The heavy quark symmetries play a necessary role in understanding heavy hadron states. If the Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) states are indeed 〖D ̅^* Σ〗_c^ molecules, they can be classified as heavy quark spin symmetry partners. These acceptances pave the way to clarify spin states that are not determined experimentally. Despite detailed studies on the Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) states, their spin states remain undetermined. While the Breit-Wigner parameterization is the conventional method for obtaining resonance parameters, it is unsuitable for near-threshold resonances such as the Pc(4312), Pc(4440), and Pc(4457) due to its failure to account for the threshold effect. To rectify this limitation, the recently proposed alternative distribution called the Sill is employed to predict their spin states. The use of the Sill values for the Pc(4312), Pc(4440), and Pc(4457) may assist in determining the spin states of the Pc(4440) and Pc(4457).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Pc(4440), Pc(4457), HQSS, Hadronic molecule

Kaynakça

Aaij, R. et al. (2015). Observation of J/ψp Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ0 → J/ψK−p Decays. Phys. Rev. Lett., 115:072001.
Aaij, R. et al. (2019). Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122(22):222001.
Aubert, B. et al. (2008). A Study of B → X(3872)K, with X(3872) → J/Ψπ+π−. Phys. Rev. D, 77:111101.
Bondar, A. et al. (2012). Observation of two charged bottomoniumlike resonances in Υ(5s) decays. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:122001.
Chen, Y. H., Daub, J. T.,Guo, F.-K., Kubis, B, Meißner, U.-G., and Zou, B.-S. (2016). Effect of Zb states on Υ(3s) → Υ(1s)ππ decays. Phys. Rev. D, 93:034030.
Chen, H. X., Chen, W., and Zhu, S. L. (2019). Possible interpretations of the Pc(4312), Pc(4440), and Pc(4457). Phys. Rev. D, 100(5):051501(R).
Cheng, J. B., and Liu, Y. R. (2019). Pc(4457)+, Pc(4440)+, and Pc(4312)+: Molecules or compact pentaquarks?. Phys. Rev. D, 100:054002.
Cho, P. (1994). Heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory. Nucl.Phys. B, 421(3):683–686.
Choi, S. K. et al. (2020). Observation of a narrow charmoniumlike state in exclusive B± → K±π+π−j/ψ decays. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91:262001.
Cleven, M., Guo, F.-K., Hanhart, C., and Meissner, U.-G. (2011). Bound state nature of the exotic Zb states. Eur. Phys. J. A, 47:120.

Cleven, M. (2013). Systematic Study of Hadronic Molecules in the Heavy-Quark Sector (Doctoral dissertation). Bonn University.
Du, M. L., Baru, V., Guo, F. K., Hanhart, C., Meißner, U. G., Oller, J., and Wang, Q. (2020). Interpretation of the LHCb Pc states as hadronic molecules and hints of a narrow Pc(4380). Phys. Rev. Lett., 124:072001.
Eides, M. I., Petrov, V. Y., and Polyakov, M. V. (2020). New LHCb pentaquarks as hadrocharmonium states. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 35(18):2050151.
Falk, A. F., and Luke, M. (1992). Strong decays of excited heavy mesons in chiral perturbation theory. Phys. Lett. B, 292(1):119– 127.
Fernandez-Ramirez, C. A., Pilloni, M., Albaladejo, A., Jackura, V., Mathieu, M., and Szczepaniak, A. P. (2019). Interpretation of the LHCb Pc(4312)+ signal. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123:092001.
Giacosa, F., Okopinska, A., and Shastry, V. (2021). A simple alternative to the relativistic Breit–Wigner distribution. Eur. Phys. J. A, 57(12):336.
Grinstein, B., Jenkins, E. E. , Manohar, A. V. Savage, M. J. and Wise M. B.(1992). Chiral perturbation theory for fD(s)/ fD and BB(s) / BB. Nucl. Phys. B 380 (1992), 369-376.
Kang, X.-W., Guo, Z.-H., and Oller, J. A. (2016). General considerations on the nature of Zb(10610) and Zb(10650) from their pole positions. Phys. Rev. D, 94(1):014012.
Kang, X.-W., and Oller, J. A. (2017). Different pole structures in line shapes of the X(3872). Eur. Phys. J. C, 77(6):399.
Karliner, M., and Rosner, J. L. (2015). New exotic meson and baryon resonances from doubly heavy hadronic molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett., 115(122001).
Liu, M. Z., Peng, F. Z., Sanchez, M. S., and Valderrama, M. P. (2018). Heavy-quark symmetry partners of the Pc(4450) pentaquark. Phys. Rev. D, 98:114030.
Liu, M. Z., Wu, T. W., S´anchez , M. S., Valderrama, M. P., Geng, L. S., and Xie, J. J. (2021). Spin-parities of the Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) in the one-boson-exchange model. Phys. Rev. D, 103:054004.
Liu, Z. W., Lu, J.-X., Liu, M.-Z., and Geng, L.-S. (2023). Distinguishing the spins of Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) with femtoscopic correlation functions. Phys. Rev. D, 108:L031503.
Lu , J. X., Geng, L. S. and Valderrama, M. P.(2019). Heavy baryon-antibaryon molecules in effective field theory. Phys.Rev. D 99 no.7, 074026.
Neubert, M. (1994). Heavy-quark symmetry. Physics Reports, 245(5):259–395.
Nieves, J. and Valderrama, M. P. (2012). The Heavy Quark Spin Symmetry Partners of the X(3872). Phys. Rev. D 86 056004.
Pimikov, A., Lee, H. J., and Zhang, P. (2020). Hidden-charm pentaquarks with color-octet substructure in QCD sum rules. Phys. Rev. D, 101:014002.
Valderrama, M. P. (2019). One pion exchange and the quantum numbers of the Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) pentaquarks. Phys. Rev. D, 100:094028.
Weng, X. Z., Chen, X. L., Deng, W. Z., and Zhu, S. L. (2019). Hidden-charm pentaquarks and Pc states. Phys. Rev. D, 100:016014.
Workman, R. L., and et al. (2022). Review of Particle Physics. PTEP, 2022:083C01.
Xiang, J. B.,Chen, H. X.,Chen, W., Li, X. B., Yao, X. Q., and Zhu, S. L. (2019). Revisiting hidden-charm pentaquarks from QCD sum rules. Chin. Phys. C, 43(3):034104.
Xiao, C. W., Nieves, J., and Oset, E. (2019). Heavy quark spin symmetric molecular states from D(∗)Σ(∗) and other coupled channels in the light of the recent LHCb pentaquarks. Phys. Rev. D, 100:014021.
Yamaguchi, Y., Garcia-Tecocoatzi, H., Giachino, A., Hosaka, A., Santopinto, E., Takeuchi, S., and Takizawa, M. (2020). Pc pentaquarks with chiral tensor and quark dynamics. Phys. Rev. D, 101(9):091502(R).
Yıldırım, D. (2023). Spin partners of the B(∗)B ̅(∗) resonances with a different approach than the Breit–Wigner parameterization. Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (2023) no.7, 148.
Zhang, Z., Liu, J., Hu, J., Wang, Q., and Meißner,U.-G. (2023) Revealing the nature of hidden charm pentaquarks with machine learning. Science Bulletin, 68(10):981–989.
Zyla, P. A. et al. (2020). Review of Particle Physics. PTEP, 2020(8):083C01.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Klasik Fizik (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Duygu Yıldırım ^*
0000-0001-5499-9727
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Mart 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

17 Temmuz 2024

Kabul Tarihi

24 Şubat 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31466/kfbd.1517746

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA27JU45PX

APA

Yıldırım, D. (2025). Predicting Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) Spins with an Different Alternative Method Instead of Using the Breit-Wigner Approach. Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(1), 171-181. https://doi.org/10.31466/kfbd.1517746

AMA

1.Yıldırım D. Predicting Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) Spins with an Different Alternative Method Instead of Using the Breit-Wigner Approach. KFBD. 2025;15(1):171-181. doi:10.31466/kfbd.1517746

Chicago

Yıldırım, Duygu. 2025. “Predicting Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) Spins with an Different Alternative Method Instead of Using the Breit-Wigner Approach”. Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 15 (1): 171-81. https://doi.org/10.31466/kfbd.1517746.

EndNote

Yıldırım D (01 Mart 2025) Predicting Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) Spins with an Different Alternative Method Instead of Using the Breit-Wigner Approach. Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 15 1 171–181.

IEEE

[1]D. Yıldırım, “Predicting Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) Spins with an Different Alternative Method Instead of Using the Breit-Wigner Approach”, KFBD, c. 15, sy 1, ss. 171–181, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.31466/kfbd.1517746.

ISNAD

Yıldırım, Duygu. “Predicting Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) Spins with an Different Alternative Method Instead of Using the Breit-Wigner Approach”. Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 15/1 (01 Mart 2025): 171-181. https://doi.org/10.31466/kfbd.1517746.

JAMA

1.Yıldırım D. Predicting Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) Spins with an Different Alternative Method Instead of Using the Breit-Wigner Approach. KFBD. 2025;15:171–181.

MLA

Yıldırım, Duygu. “Predicting Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) Spins with an Different Alternative Method Instead of Using the Breit-Wigner Approach”. Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 15, sy 1, Mart 2025, ss. 171-8, doi:10.31466/kfbd.1517746.

Vancouver

1.Duygu Yıldırım. Predicting Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) Spins with an Different Alternative Method Instead of Using the Breit-Wigner Approach. KFBD. 01 Mart 2025;15(1):171-8. doi:10.31466/kfbd.1517746

Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisinde yayınlanan makaleler Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International kapsamında lisanslanmıştır.

Predicting Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) Spins with an Different Alternative Method Instead of Using the Breit-Wigner Approach

Predicting Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) Spins with an Different Alternative Method Instead of Using the Breit-Wigner Approach

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Breit-Wigner Yaklaşımından Farklı Bir Yöntemle Pc(4440) ve Pc(4457) Spinlerinin Tahmin Edilmesi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster