Yıl 2019, Cilt 11 , Sayı 20, Sayfalar 260 - 278 2019-05-29

BİLGİ YÖNETİM YETENEĞİ VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK STRATEJİSİ GELİŞTİRME YETENEĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Cenk Tufan [1] , Özlem Yaşar Uğurlu [2]


Bu çalışmanın amacı organizasyonlarda bilgi yönetim yeteneği ve girişimcilik stratejisi geliştirme yeteneği arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktır. Türkiye’deki mevcut ve faal durumda olan 18 serbest bölgedeki üretim, patent ve Ar-Ge çalışması yapan inovatif-girişimci işletmeler bu çalışmanın evrenini oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmaya katılan işletmelere mail yoluyla anket gönderilmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemini oluşturan 206 işletmeden elde edilen verilere LISREL 8.8. programı kullanılarak yol analizi yapılmıştır. Tanımlayıcı istatistikler ile araştırmada kullanılan ölçeklerin güvenirlik analizlerinde SPSS 20.0 programından yararlanılmıştır. Yol analizi sonucunda, organizasyonlarda bilgi yönetim yetenekleri ve girişimcilik stratejisi geliştirme yeteneği arasındaki ilişki ampirik olarak kanıtlanmıştır.

Bilgi yönetimi, bilgi yönetim yeteneği, girişimcilik stratejisi geliştirme yeteneği, yol analizi
  • Alavi, M. ve Leidner, D. (2001). ‘‘Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues’’ MIS Quarterly, 25 (1): 107-136.
  • Armistead, C. (1999). ‘‘Knowledge management and process performance’’ Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(2): 143-154.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991). ‘‘Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage’’ Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
  • Barquin R.C.,Bennet A., ve Remez S.G. (2001). ‘‘Knowledge Management: The Catalyst for E-Government’’, Vienna, Management Concepts, Inc.
  • Beveren, J.V. (2003). ‘‘Does Health Care for Knowledge Management?’’ Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 90-97.
  • Byrne, B. (2010). ‘‘Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming’’ New York, Routledge.
  • Clarke, T. (2001). ‘‘The Knowledge Economy’’ Education & Training, 43(4/5): 189-196
  • Covin, J. G. Ve Slevin, D. P. (1989). ‘‘Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environment’’ Strategic Management Journal, 10 (1): 75-81.
  • Çakar,D.,Yıldız, S. ve Dur, S. (2008). ‘‘Bilgi Yönetimi ve Örgütsel Etkinlik İlişkisi: Örgüt Kültürü Ve Örgüt Yapısının Temel Etkileri’’ Ege Akademik Bakış, 10 (1) 2010: 71-93.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). ‘‘Sosyal Bilimler Için Çok Değişkenli Istatistik: Spss ve Lisrel Uygulamalari’’ İstanbul: Pegem Akademi.
  • Darroch, J. (2005). ‘‘Knowledge Management, Innovation and Firm Performance’’ Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 (3), 101-115.
  • Davenport, T. H. ve Prusak, L. (1998). ‘‘Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know’’, Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
  • Davenport, T., Delong, D. ve Beers, M. (1998, Winter). ‘‘Successful Knowledge Management Programs’’ Sloan Management Review, 3 (9) : 43-57.
  • De Long, D.W. ve Fahey, L. (2000) ‘‘Diagnosing Cultural Barriers to Knowledge Management’’ The Academy of Management Executive, 14 (4) : 113-127.
  • Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T. ve Covin, J. G. (1997). ‘‘Entrepreneurial Strategy Making and Firm Performance: Tests of Contingency and Configurational Models’’, Strategic Management Journal, 18(9): 677-695.
  • DeTienne, K. B., Dyer, G., Hoopes, C.,ve Harris, S. (2004). ‘‘Toward a Model of Effective Knowledge Management and Directions for Future Research: Culture, Leadership, and CKOs’’ Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(4): 26-43.
  • Emadzade, M. K., Mashayekhi, B. ve Abdar, E. (2012). ‘‘Knowledge Management Capabilities and Organizational Performance’’ Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(11): 781-790.
  • Gefen,D., Sttraub,D.W. ve Boudreau, M. (2000). ‘‘Structured Equation Model and Regression: Guidleness for Research Practice’’ Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7): 1-77.
  • Gloet, M., ve Berrel,M. (2003). ‘‘The Dual ParadigmNature of Knowledge Management: Implications for Achieving Quality Outcomes in Human Resource Management’’ Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1) : 78- 89.
  • Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A. ve Segars, A. H. (2001). ‘‘Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective’’ Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1): 185-214.
  • Grant, R. M. (1991). ‘‘The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implication for Strategy Formulation’’ California Management Review, 33(3) : 114-135.
  • Grant, R. M. (1996). ‘’Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm’’ Strategic Management Journal, 77(special issue) : 109-122.
  • Grant, R. M. ve Baden-Fuller, C. (1995). ‘‘A Knowledge-Based Theory of İnter-Firm Collaboration’’ Academy of Management Journal Best Paper Proceedings: 1995(1): 17-21.
  • Hall, R., (1991). ‘‘The Contribution of İntangible Resources to Business Success’’ Journal of General Management, 16(4): 41-52.
  • Helfat,C.E. ve Peteraf,, M.A. (2003.) ‘‘The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability Lifecycles’’ Strategic Management, 24 (10) : 997-1010.
  • Henderson, J. C. ve Venkatraman, N. (1999). ‘‘Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations’’ IBM Systems Journal, 32 (1): 472-484.
  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D. Camp , S. M. ve Sexton, D. L.(2001). ‘‘Entrepreneurıal Strategıes for Wealth Creatıon’’ Strategic Management Journal, 22: 479-491.
  • Holsapple, C. W.,ve Joshi, K. D. (2001). ‘’Knowledge Management: A Three-Fold Framework’’ Information Society, 18(1),47-64.
  • Hooper, D, Coughlan, J. ve Mullen, M. (2008). ‘‘Structural Equation Modelling: Guedelines for Determining Model Fit’’ Electronic Journal on Business Research, 6 (1): 53-59.
  • Janson, M. A. ve Wrycza, S., (1999), “Information Technology and Entrepreneurship: Three Cases from Poland” International Journal of Information Management (19):351–367.
  • Kipping, M. ve Caılluet, L. (2010). ‘‘Mintzberg’s Emergent and Deliberate Strategies: Tracking Alcan’s Activities in Europe 1928–2007’’ Business History Review No. 84, 79–104.
  • Kline, R. B. (2015). ‘‘Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling’’ New York, Guilford Publications.
  • Lam, W. ve Chua, A. 2005. ‘‘Knowledge Management Dynamic Abandonment: an Exploratory Examination of Root Causes’’ Communications of the Association for Information Systems,16 (35): 723-743.
  • Lee, M. R., Lan, Y. C. (2011). ‘‘Toward a Unified Knowledge Management Model for SMEs’’ Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1): 729-735.
  • Lee, K. ve Lim, C. (2001), 'Technological Regimes, Catching-up andLeapfrogging: the Findings from Korean Industries’’ Research Policy, 30(3): 459-483.
  • Leonard, D. (1995). ‘‘Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Source of Innovation MA’’ Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
  • Li, H.,Yan,Z. ve Tsang-Sing,C.( 2005). ‘’Entrepreneurial Strategy Making and Performance in China’s New Technology Ventures – Contingency Effect of Environments and Firm Competences’’, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 16 (1): 7-57.
  • Liu, P. L., Chen, W. C., ve Tsai, C. H. (2004). ‘‘An Empirical Study on the Correlation Between Knowledge Management Capability and Competitiveness in Taiwan’s Industries’’ Technovation, 24(12): 971-977.
  • Low, M. B., ve MacMillan, I. C. (1988). ‘‘Entrepreneurship: Past Research and Future Challenges’’Journal of Management, 14(2): 139-161.
  • Lumpkin, G.T. ve Dess, G.G(1995). ‘‘Simplicity as a Strategy Making Process: The Effects of Stage of Organizational Development and Environment on Performance’’ Academy of Management Journal, 38(5): 1386-1407.
  • Maier, R. ve Remus, U. (2002).‘‘Defining Process- Oriented Knowledge Management Strategies’’ Knowledge and Process Management ,9 (2): 103-118.
  • McKenna, R. (1999). ‘‘New Management’’ Sydney, McGraw-Hill.
  • McGrath RG. ve MacMillan I. (2000). ‘‘The Entrepreneurial Mindset’’ Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
  • Medsker, G.J., Williams, L.J. ve Holahan, P.J(1994). ‘‘A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research’’ Journal of Management, 20(2): 43–64.
  • Meydan, C.H. ve Şeşen, H. (2011). ‘‘Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları’’ Ankara, Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D. ve Coleman, H. J. (1978). ‘‘Organizational Strategy, Structure and Processes’’ Academy of Management Review, 3(3): 546-562.
  • Miller, D. (1983). ‘‘The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms’’, Management Science, 29(7): 770–791.
  • Miller, D.ve Friesen, P. (1983). ‘‘Strategy-making and Environment: The Third Link’’ Strategic Management Journal, 4, 221-235.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). ‘‘The Structuring of Organization’’, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.
  • Nonaka, I., ve Takeuchi, H. (1995). ‘‘The Knowledge Creation Company: How Japanese Companies Create The Dynamics of Innovation’’, New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Ofek, E., ve M. Sarvary (2001). ‘‘Leveraging the Customer Base: Creating Competitive Advantage Through Knowledge Management’’ Management Science Informs, 47 (11): 1441-1456.
  • Pandey, S.C. ve Dutta, A. (2013). ‘‘Role of Knowledge Infrastructure Capabilities in Knowledge Management’’ Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3): 435-453.
  • Pascale, R.T, (1984). ‘‘Perspectives on Strategy: The Real Story Behind Honda’s Success’’ California Management Review, 26(3): 47-72.
  • Peachey T. ve Hall D.(2005). IEEE 2005. ‘‘Knowledge Management and the Leading IS Journals: An Analysis of Trends and Gaps in Published’’. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan 6, Big Island (HI): IEEE Xplore Digital Library.
  • Porter-Libeskind, J. (1996). ‘‘Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm’’ Strategic Management Journal, 17: 93-107.
  • Sabherwal, R. ve Chan, Y. E. (2001). ‘‘Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders’’ Information Systems Research, 12(1): 11-33.
  • Sanchez, R. ve Mahoney, J. T. (1996). ‘‘Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product and Organization Design’’ Strategic Management Journal, 17: 63-76.
  • Schumacker, R. E. ve Lomax, R. G. (1996). ‘‘A Beginner’s Guide to SEM’’. Mahwah, Lawrence.
  • Skyrme, D. (1997). ‘‘Knowledge Networking: Creating the Collaborative Enterprise’’ Boston, Butterworth-Heinemann
  • Smith,T.A. (2006). ‘‘Knowledge Management and Its Capabılıtıes Lınked to the Business Strategy for Organizational Effectiveness’’, Dissertation, Davie (FL): Nova Southeastern University.
  • Stopford J. (2001). ‘‘Should Strategy Makers Become Dream Weavers?’’ Harvard Business Review 79(1): 165-169.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. ve Osterlind, S. J. (2001). ‘‘Using Multivariate Statistics’’, Boston, Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
  • Tiwana.A.,(2003). ‘‘Bilginin yönetimi’’ İstanbul, Dışbank kitapları-5.
  • Tzortzaki,A.M. ve Mihiotis,A. (2014). ‘‘A Review of Knowledge Management Theory and Future Directions’’ Knowledge and Process Management. 21(1) : 29-41.
  • Van Buren, M. (1999). ‘‘A Yardstick for Knowledge Management’’ Training Development, 53(5): 71-77.
  • Verkasalo, M., ve Lappalainen, P. (1998). ‘‘A Method of Measuring the Efficiency of the Knowledge Utilization Process’’ IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45: 414-423.
  • Villar, C., Alegre, J., ve Pla-Barber, J. (2014). ‘‘Exploring the Role of Knowledge Management Practices on Exports: A Dynamic Capabilities View’’ International Business Review, 23(1): 38-44
  • Zack, M. H. (1999). ‘‘Managing Codified Knowledge’’ Sloan Management Review, 40(4) : 45-58.
  • Zaim,H.(2006). ‘‘Knowledge Management Implementation in IZGAZ’’,Journal of Economic and Social Research, 8: 1-25.
Birincil Dil tr
Konular İşletme Finans
Bölüm KONFERANS BİLDİRİLERİ
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0002-2809-3996
Yazar: Cenk Tufan (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: GÜMRÜK VE TİCARET BAKANLIĞI
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0001-5165-5603
Yazar: Özlem Yaşar Uğurlu
Kurum: GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Ülke: Turkey


Tarihler

Yayımlanma Tarihi : 29 Mayıs 2019

Bibtex @konferans bildirisi { kilisiibfakademik450311, journal = {Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD)}, issn = {1309-3762}, eissn = {2149-1585}, address = {}, publisher = {Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi}, year = {2019}, volume = {11}, pages = {260 - 278}, doi = {10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.450311}, title = {BİLGİ YÖNETİM YETENEĞİ VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK STRATEJİSİ GELİŞTİRME YETENEĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ}, key = {cite}, author = {Tufan, Cenk and Yaşar Uğurlu, Özlem} }
APA Tufan, C , Yaşar Uğurlu, Ö . (2019). BİLGİ YÖNETİM YETENEĞİ VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK STRATEJİSİ GELİŞTİRME YETENEĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD) , 11 (20) , 260-278 . DOI: 10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.450311
MLA Tufan, C , Yaşar Uğurlu, Ö . "BİLGİ YÖNETİM YETENEĞİ VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK STRATEJİSİ GELİŞTİRME YETENEĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ". Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD) 11 (2019 ): 260-278 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kilisiibfakademik/issue/45504/450311>
Chicago Tufan, C , Yaşar Uğurlu, Ö . "BİLGİ YÖNETİM YETENEĞİ VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK STRATEJİSİ GELİŞTİRME YETENEĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ". Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD) 11 (2019 ): 260-278
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - BİLGİ YÖNETİM YETENEĞİ VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK STRATEJİSİ GELİŞTİRME YETENEĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ AU - Cenk Tufan , Özlem Yaşar Uğurlu Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - doi: 10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.450311 DO - 10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.450311 T2 - Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD) JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 260 EP - 278 VL - 11 IS - 20 SN - 1309-3762-2149-1585 M3 - doi: 10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.450311 UR - https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.450311 Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD) BİLGİ YÖNETİM YETENEĞİ VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK STRATEJİSİ GELİŞTİRME YETENEĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ %A Cenk Tufan , Özlem Yaşar Uğurlu %T BİLGİ YÖNETİM YETENEĞİ VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK STRATEJİSİ GELİŞTİRME YETENEĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ %D 2019 %J Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD) %P 1309-3762-2149-1585 %V 11 %N 20 %R doi: 10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.450311 %U 10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.450311
ISNAD Tufan, Cenk , Yaşar Uğurlu, Özlem . "BİLGİ YÖNETİM YETENEĞİ VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK STRATEJİSİ GELİŞTİRME YETENEĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ". Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD) 11 / 20 (Mayıs 2019): 260-278 . https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.450311
AMA Tufan C , Yaşar Uğurlu Ö . BİLGİ YÖNETİM YETENEĞİ VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK STRATEJİSİ GELİŞTİRME YETENEĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD). 2019; 11(20): 260-278.
Vancouver Tufan C , Yaşar Uğurlu Ö . BİLGİ YÖNETİM YETENEĞİ VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK STRATEJİSİ GELİŞTİRME YETENEĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD). 2019; 11(20): 278-260.