NATIONAL SECURITIES OF SMALL STATES IN THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 2008 Sayı: 1, 135 - 149, 01.03.2008

Editörden İdris Demir

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

ULUSLARARASI SİSTEM İÇERİSİNDE KÜÇÜK ÜLKELERİN ULUSAL GÜVENLİĞİ

Öz

Üst otorite olarak hareket eden bir yapının olmamasından dolayı uluslararası ilişkiler disiplinin bazen anarşik bir alan olarak tanımlanır. Ulus devletler de bu anarşik ortamda vatandaşları için barış ve güvenlik sağlamaya çalışırlar. Büyük ve güçlü devletler uluslararası sistemi kendi hükümranlıkları ve çıkarları doğrultusunda yönlendirmede çok etkili olmuşlardır. Ancak, küçük ülkeler uluslararası sistem konusunda farklı bir yaklaşıma sahiptirler. Vatandaşları için bazı zamanlarda yalnız başlarına sağlayamadıkları güvenlik algılaması için bazı stratejiler geliştirmek zorundadırlar. Küçük ülkeler bölgesel ittifaklar kurma yoluna gitmişler, uluslararası kuruluşların üyesi olmuşlar veya uluslararası sistemdeki en güçlü ülkelerle kuvvetli bağlantılar geliştirmektedirler. Bu bağlamda, Baltık ülkelerinin güvenlik algılamaları küçük ülkelerin güvenlik hesaplamalarının mantıksal temellerini içerisinde barındırmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ulusal Güvenlik , Uluslararası Sistem , Tehdit Algılaması , Baltık Ülkeleri

Kaynakça

• ARTHUR, O. (2000), ‘Small States in a Changing World’, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, Vol.24, No.2.
• BİFULCO, M. (1998), In Search of an Identity for Europe, Center for European Integration Studies, Bonn.
• BREZEZİNSKİ, Z. (September/October 1997), ‘A Geostrategy for Eurasia’, Foreign Affairs, Vol.76, No.5.
• CANBAŞ, F. (1999), ‘Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Dönemde Rusya’nın Avrupa Güvenlik Politikası, Avrasya Dosyası, Vol.5, No.4.
• COTTEY, A. (2000), ‘Europes’ New Subregionalism’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol.23, No.1.
• CRAFT, S. (Autumn 2000), ‘The EU, NATO and Europanization: The Return of Architectural Debate’, European Security, Vol.9, No.3. Dougherty J.E. and Pfaltzgraff, R.L(1981), Contending Theories of International Relations, Harper and Row Publishers, New York.
• FRANCE, C. (1996), ‘Belgium: The Importance of Foreign Policy to European Political Union’, The Actors in Europes’ Foreign Policy (Edited By Christopher Hill), Routledge, London and New York.
• GFOELLER, T. (Spring 2000), ‘Diplomatic Initiatives: An Overview of the Northern European Initiative’, European Security, Vol.19, No.1.
• HANDEL, M. (1990), Weak States in the International System, Frank Cass, London.
• HEURLİN, B. (1996), ‘Denmark, A New Activism in Foreign and Security Policy’, The Actors in Europes’ Foreign Policy (Edited By Christopher Hill), Routledge, London and New York.
• JARVE, P. (1996), ‘Security Choices of a Re-independent Small State: An Estonian Case’, Small States and the Security Challenge in the New Europe (Edited By Werner Bauens, Armand Clesse and Olav Knudsen), Brasseys, London and Washington.
• KAPLAN, M (1969), ‘Balance of Power, Bipolarity and Other Models of International System’, International Politics and Foreign Policy, (Edited By James Rosenau), The Free Press, New York.
• KATZENSTEİN, P. (1996), ‘Alternatives Perspectives on National Security’, The Culture of National Security (Edited By Peter Katzenstein ), Columbia New York Press, New York.
• KNUDSEN, O. (1996), ‘Analysing Small-State Security: The Role of External Factors’, Small States and the Security Challenge in the New Europe (Edited By Werner Bouwens, Armand Clessese and Olav Knudsen), Brasseys, London and Washington.
• MCCLLEAND, C.A (1966), Theory and International System, McMillan Press, London.
• MOLLER, B. (1997), ‘Small States, Non Offensive Defense and Collective Security’, The National Security of Small States in a Changing World (Edited By Efraim Inbar and Gabriel Sheffter), Frank Cass, London.
• MOTTOLA, K. (1996), ‘Nordic Security Policy Cooperation: A New Regional Role in the Making in Werner Bonwens’, Small States and the Security Challenge in the New Europe (Edited By Armand Clesse and Olav Knudsen), Brasseys, London and Washington.
• Mungan, Belgin (1998), Avrupa’nın Etnik Parselasyonu, YGS, Istanbul.
• RİCHMOND, O.(2000), ‘Emerging Concepts of Security in the European Order: Implications for Zones of Conflict at the Fringers of EU’, European Security, Vol.9, No.1.
• ROSENAU, J. (1969), ‘International Politics and Foreign Policy’, International Politics and Foreign Policy (Edited By James Rosenau), The Free Press, New York.
• SENS, A. (1996), ‘Small State Security in Europe: Threats, Anxitiies and Strategies After the Cold War’, Small States and the Security Challenge in the New Europe (Edited By Werner Bouwens, Armand Clessese and Olav Knudsen), Brasseys, London and Washington.
• SHEPHERD, A. (Summer 2000), ‘Top-Dawn or Bottom-Up: Is Security and Defence Policy in the EU a Question of Political Will or Military Capability?’, European Security, Vol.9, No.2.
• SHUSTOV, V. (2000), ‘Russian-American Concord and European Security’, International Affairs, Vol.46, No.4, 2000.
• Singer, D. (1969), ‘The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations’ International Politics and Foreign Policy (Edited By J.N.Rosenau), The Free Press, New York.
• TANRISEVER, O. (1997), ‘Yönetim Sorunu: Gelenekselcilik, Davranışsalcılık Tartışması’, Devlet, Sistem ve Kimlik, (Edited By Attila Eralp), İleşitim, Istanbul.
• VAYRYNEN, R. (1997), ‘Small States: Persisting Despite Doubts’, The National Security of Small States in a Changing World, (Edited By Efraim Inbar and Gabriel Sheffter), Frank Cass, London.
• WALTZ, K. (1979), Theory of International Relations, AddisonWesley, London.
• WEBBER, M. (Summer 2000), ‘A Tale of A Decade: European Security Governance and Russia’, European Security, Vol.9, No.2.
• WİBERG, H. (1996), ‘Security Problems of Small Nations’, Small States and the Security Challenge in the New Europe (Edited By Werner Bavens, Armand Clesse and Olav Knudsen), Brasseys, London and Washington.
• WYLLİE, J. (1997), European Security in the New Political Environment, Longman Publishing, New York.
• YALVAÇ, F. (1997), ‘Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramında Yapısalcı Yaklaşımlar’, Devlet, Sistem ve Kimlik (Edited By Attila Eralp), İleşitim, Istanbul.
• YURDUSEV, N. (1994), ‘The Concept of International System as a Unit of Analysis’ METU Studies in Development, Vol.21, No.1.
• YURDUSEV, N.i (1993), ‘Level of Analysis and United of Analysis: A Case for Distinction’, Millenium: Journal of International Studies, Vol.22, No.1.