Ölçek Ekonomisinde Kapsam Ekonomisi: Katma Değer Faaliyetlerinin Ertelenmesi Yoluyla Ürün Çeşitliliğinin Yönetimi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

ÖLÇEK EKONOMİSİNDE KAPSAM EKONOMİSİ: KATMA DEĞER FAALİYETLERİNİN ERTELENMESİ YOLUYLA ÜRÜN ÇEŞİTLİLİĞİNİN YÖNETİMİ

Öz

Artan müşteri heterojenliği ve ekonomik sistemin ülke sınırlarını aşarak küreselleşmesi nedeniyle birçok firma ürün çeşitliliğini artırmak zorunda kalmıştır. Ürün çeşitliliğini artırmanın rekabet üstünlüğü sağlamada ve korumada olumlu bir etkisi olsa da ürün çeşitliliği iyi yönetilmediği taktirde çeşitli operasyonel sorunlar yaratarak kapsam ekonomisi kazanımlarını yok edebilmektedir. Artan rekabet nedeniyle firmalar üretim ve dağıtım faaliyetlerini daha etkin ve verimli bir şekilde yürütmek zorunda kalmışlardır. Ölçek ekonomisinde kapsam ekonomisine ulaşma çabası olarak ifade edilebilecek bu zorunluluk sonucunda kitlesel ürün özelleştirme (mass customization) stratejisi geliştirilmiştir. Kitlesel ürün özelleştirme stratejisinde katma değer faaliyetlerinin ertelenmesi önemli bir rol oynar. Erteleme, önemli katma değer faaliyetlerinin üretim ve dağıtım süreci boyunca müşteri talebine ilişkin bilgiler belirginleşinceye kadar bekletilmesidir. Bu çalışmada ürün çeşitliliğinin etkin yönetimi ve katma değer faaliyetlerinin ertelenmesi yoluyla ölçek ekonomisi ile kapsam ekonomisi arasında nasıl denge kurulabileceği açıklanmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kitlesel ürün özelleştirmesi, ürün çeşitliliği, erteleme, kapsam ekonomisi

Kaynakça

1. ALDERSON, W., (1950). “Marketing Efficiency and the principle of postponement”, Cost and Profit Outlook, 3(4), ss.15-18.
2. Anderson, S.W., (1995). “Measuring the impact of product mix heterogeneity on manufacturing overhead cost”, Accounting Review, 70(3), ss.363-387.
3. BAKER, K.R., Magazine, M.J. ve Nuttle, H.L.W., (1986). “The effect of commonality on safety stock in a simple inventory model”, Management Science, 32(8), ss.982-988.
4. BALDWİN, C.Y. ve Clark, K.B., (1997). “Managing in an age of modularity” Harvard Business Review, September–October, ss.84–93. BROWN, S.L. ve Eisenhardt, K.M., (1995). “Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions”, Academy of Management Review, 20(2), ss.343-378.
5. BUCKLİN, L.P., (1965). “Postponement, Speculation, and the Structure of Distribution Channels”, Journal of Marketing Research, February, ss.26-31.
6. CHİLD, P., Diedrichs, R., Sanders, F. ve Wisniowski, S., (1991). “SMR Forum: The Management of Complexity”, Sloan Management Review, 33 (1), ss.73-80.
7. CHİLDERHOUSE, P., Aitken, J. ve Towill, D.R., (2002). “Analysis and design of focused demand chains”, Journal of Operations Management, 20(6), ss.675–689.
8. DA SİLVEİRA, G., (1998). “A framework for the management of product variety”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(3), ss.271-285.

9. DİCKSON, P.R., (1982). “Person-Situation: Segmentation's Missing Link”, Journal of Marketing, 46(4), ss.56-64.
10. ERENS, F. ve Verhulst, K., (1997). “Architectures for product families”, Computers in Industry, 33(2-3), ss.165-178.
11. FEİTZİNGER, E. ve Lee, H.L., (1997). “Mass Customization at Hewlett Packard”, Harvard Business Review, 75(1), ss.116–121.
12. FİNE, C.H., 1998. Clockspeed-Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. Perseus Books, Reading, MA. (“Boardman, J.T. ve Clegg, B.T., 2001. Structured engagement in the extended enterprise, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21, No. 5/6, pp. 795-811” içinde)
13. FİSHER, M.L. ve Ittner, C.D., (1999). “The impact of product variety on automobile assembly operations: empirical evidence and simulation analysis”, Management Science, 45(6), ss.771-786.
14. GARUD, R., ve Kumaraswamy, A., (1995). “Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution”, Strategic Management Journal, 16(special issue), ss.93–109.
15. GERWİN, D. (1993), “Manufacturing flexibility: a strategic perspective”, Management Science, 39(4), ss.395-410.
16. GOLDHAR, J.D. ve Jelinek, M., (1983). ”Plan for economies of scope”, Harvard Business Review, November-December, ss.141-148. Johnson, M.E. ve Anderson, E., (2000). “Postponement strategies for channel derivatives”, International Journal of Logistics Management, 11(1), ss.19-35.
17. KEKRE, S. ve Srinivasan, K. (1990). “Broader product line: a necessity to achieve success?”, Management Science, 36(10), ss.1216- 1231.
18. KOTHA, S., (1995). “Mass customization: implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage”, Strategic Management Journal, 16(summer, special issue), ss.21–42.
19. LEE H.L., (2002). “Aligning Supply Chain Strategies with Product Uncertainties”, California Management Review, 44(3), ss.105-119.
20. LEE, H.L. ve Tang, C.S., (1997). “Modelling the costs and benefits of delayed product differentiation”, Management Science, 43(1), ss.40- 53.
21. LEE, H.L., (1996). “Effective inventory and service management through product and process redesign”, Operations Research, 44(1), ss.151-159.
22. LEE, H.L., Billington, C. ve Carter, B., (1993). “Hewlett Packard gains control of inventory and service through design for localization”, Interfaces, 23(4), ss.1-11.
23. MACDUFFİE, J.P., Sethuraman, K. ve Fisher, M.L. (1996), “Product Variety and manufacturing performance: evidence from the international automotive assembly plant study”, Management Science, 42(3), ss.350-369.
24. MAİSTER, D.H., (1976). “Centralisation of Inventories and the Square Root Law”, International Journal of Physical Distribution, 6(3), ss.124-134.
25. MCCUTCHEON, D.M., Raturi, A.S. ve Meredith, J., (1994). “The Customization-responsiveness squeezee”, Sloan Management Review, 35(2), ss.89-99.
26. PAGH, J.D. ve Cooper, M.C., (1998). “Supply chain postponement and speculation strategies: How to choose the right strategy”, Journal of Business Logistics, 19(2), ss.13-33.
27. PARKER, R.P. ve Wirth, A., (1999). “Manufacturing flexibility: Measures and relationships”, European Journal of Operational Research, 118(3), ss. 429-449
28. PİNE, J., Victor, B. ve Boynton, A.C., (1993). “Making mass customization work”, Harvard Business Review, September-October, ss.108–119.
29. SALHIEH, S.M. ve Kamrani A.K., (1999). “Macro level product development using design for modularity”, Robotics and Computer Integrated-Manufacturing 15(4), ss.319-329.
30. SANCHEZ, R. ve Mahoney, J.T., (1996). “Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design”, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (winter special issue), ss.63–76.
31. SANCHEZ, R., (1999). “Modular architectures in the marketing process”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 63, Special Issue, ss.92–111.
32. SCHILLING, M. A., (2000). “Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity”, Academy of Management Review, 25(2), ss.312–334.
33. SHEU, C. ve Wacker, J., (1997). “The effects of purchased parts commonality on manufacturing lead-time”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 17 (7-8), ss.725–745.
34. SLACK, N. (1994). “The importance-performance matrix as a determinant of improvement priority”, International Journal of Production & Operations Management, 14(5), ss.59-75.
35. SWAMINATHAN, J.M. ve Tayur, S., (1998). “Managing broader product lines through delayed diffrentation using vanilla boxes”, Management Science, 44(12), ss.161-172.
36. SWAMINATHAN, J.M., (2001). “Enabling customization using standardized operations”, California Management Review, 43(3), ss.125-135.
37. WALLER M.A., Dabholkar P.A. ve Gentry J.J., (2000). “Postponement, product customization, and market-oriented supply chain management”, Journal of Business Logistics, 21(2), ss.133-159. WALLER, M.A., Dabholkar, P.A. ve Gentry, J.J., (2000). “Postponement, product customization, and market-oriented supply chain management”, Journal of Business Logistics, 21(2), ss.133-159. ZİNN, W. ve Bowersox, D., (1988). “Planning physical distrubution with the principle of postponement”, Journal of Business Logistics, 9(2), ss.117-136.