THE ROLE OF MOTIVATION TYPES AT WORK: MEDIATOR ROLE OF MOTIVATION IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED LEADERSHIP STYLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT

Öz

This study began with the curiosity to see how differing types of motivation, according to Self-Determination Theory, work within an organizational context and aims to investigate if motivation types mediate the relationship between perceived leadership styles and organizational commitment. Self-determination theory with differing types of extrinsic motivation depending on their level of internalization makes it possible to apply motivation in many life domains including work settings. 470 participants from companies in the international transportation sector were involved in this research. The mediating role of motivation types is analyzed with hierarchical regression analysis. According to research findings, autonomous motivation partially mediated the relationship between authoritarian leadership style and identified commitment; amotivation partially mediated the relationship between laissez-faire leadership style and commitment results from a lack of alternatives.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Motivation
• Self Determination
• Leadership
• Organizational Commitment

İŞ'DE FARKLI GÜDÜLENME TİPLERİNİN ROLÜ: GÜDÜLENMENİN ALGILANAN LİDERLİK TARZLARI VE ÖRGÜTE BAĞLILIK İLİŞKİSİNDEKİ ARACI ROLÜ

Öz

Bu çalışma Özerk İrade Teorisi (Self-Determination Theory) çerçevesinde ele alınan farklı güdülenme tiplerinin örgüt ortamında nasıl işlediğini görme merakı ile başlamış, güdülenme tiplerinin algılanan liderlik tarzları ve örgüte bağlılık ilişkisindeki ara değişken rolü incelenmiştir. Özerk İrade Teorisi, dış kaynaklı güdülenmeyi içselleştirme derecesine göre farklı tiplerde ele alan yaklaşımı ile güdülenmenin iş yerleri dahil hayatın pek çok alanına uygulanmasına olanak tanımaktadır. Araştırma verileri uluslararası taşımacılık sektöründe faliyet gösteren şirketlerde çalışan 470 katılımcıdan toplanmıştır. Hiyerarşik regresyon analizi uygulanarak güdülenme tiplerinin ara değişken rolü sınanmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre özerk güdülenmenin otoriter liderlik tarzı ve içşelleştirilmiş bağlılık ilişkisinde, güdülenmemenin ise serbest bırakıcı liderlik tarzı ve zorunlu bağlılık ilişkisinde kısmi ara değişken rolü oynadığı saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Güdülenme
• Motivasyon
• Özerk İrade
• Liderlik
• Örgüte Bağlılık

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, verileri 2020 yılından önce toplanıp, analiz edilmiş ve yazarın doktora tez çalışmasından üretilmiştir. Araştırma etiğine uygun bir şekilde katılımcılar gönüllülük esasına göre çalışmaya dahil edilmiş, anketin ilk sayfasında, katılımcılara araştırmanın amacı ve katılımın gönüllülük esasına dayandığı, cevapların saklı kalacağı (bu nedenle özellikle isim gibi kişisel bilgilerini yazmamaları istenmiştir) sadece bilimsel araştırma amaçlı kullanılacağı bilgisi verilmiştir.

Kaynakça

1. Addae, H. M. ve Wang, X. (2006). Stress at Work: Linear and Curvilinear Effects of Psychological-, Job-, and Organization-related Factors: An Exploratory Study of Trinidad and Tobago. International Journal of Stress Management, 13, 476−493.
2. Allen, N. J. ve Meyer, 1. P. (1990). The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
3. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R.N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G. ve Khurshid, A. (2000). Impact of Culture on Human Resource Management Practices: A Ten Country Comparison. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(1), 192–220.
4. Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. R. (2004). Intrinsic Need Satisfaction: A motivational Basis of Performance and Well-Being in Two Work Settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2045−2068.
5. Baron, R.M. ve Kenny, D.A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-82.
6. Bass, B.M. ve Riggio, R.E. (2006), Transformational Leadership, 2nd ed., Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Bass, B.M. ve Avolio, B.J. (2004), Transformational Leadership Development: Manual for The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
8. Bass, B.M. ve Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire for Research: Permission Set. Redwood City, CA: Mindgarden.

9. Bass, B. M. ve Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Bass, B.M. (1999), Current Developments in Transformational Leadership: Research and Applications. Psychologist Manager Journal, 3(1), 5-21.
11. Beaumeister, R. ve Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497−529.
12. Brown, M.E., Trevino, L.K. ve Harrison, D.A. (2005). Ethical Leadership: A Social Learning Perspective for Construct Development and Testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Desicion Processes, 97(2), 117-134.
13. Cooper-Hakim, A. ve Viswesvaran, C. (2005). The Construct of Work Commitment: Testing an Integrative Framework. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 241−259.
14. Çağlar, E. S. (2011). Çalışanları Güçlendirmenin, Güçlenme Aracılığıyla İşe Tutkunluğa Etkisinde Liderlik Tarzları ve Çalışma Amaçarının Rolü. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, SBE, Organizational Behavior Bilim Dalı, İstanbul.
15. Çalışkan, S.C. (2009). Turizm İşletmelerinde Liderlik Tarzlarının ve Lider-Üye Etkileşimi Kalitesi (LÜE) Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(2), 219-241.
16. Dale, K. ve Fox, M.L.(2008). Leadership Style and Organizational Commitment: Mediating Effect of Role Stress. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20(1), 109-130.
17. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J. ve Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need Satisfaction, Motivation, and Well-Being in the Work Organizations of a Former Eastern Bloc Country: A Cross-Cultural Study of Self-Determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930−942.
18. Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P. ve Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-Determination in a Work Organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 580–590.
19. Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Publishing Co.
20. Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105–115.
21. deCharms, R. (1968). Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior. New York: Academic Press.
22. Durmuş, B., Yurtkoru, E.S. ve Çinko, M.(2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS’le Veri Analizi. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
23. Ebby, L.T., Freeman, D.M., Rush, M.C. ve Lance, C.E. (1999). Motivational Bases of Affective Organizational Commitment: A Partial Test of an Integrative Theoretical Model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 463-83.
24. Epitropaki, O. ve Martin, R. (2005). From Ideal to Real: A Longitudinal Study of the Role of Implicit Leadership Theories on Leader–Member Exchanges and Employee Outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 659−676.
25. Frone, M. R. (2007). Interpersonal Conflict at Work and Psychological Outcomes: Testing a Model Among Young Workers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 246−255.
26. Gagne, M., Chemolli, E., Forest, J. ve Koestner, R. (2008). A Temporal Analysis of the Relation between Organizational Commitment and Work Motivation. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 219−241.
27. Gagne, M. ve Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 262−331.
28. Gagne, M., Koestner, R. ve Zuckerman, M. (2000). Facilitating Acceptance of Organizational Change: The Importance of Self-Determination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1843−1852.
29. Gökçay, E. (2011). The Relationship among Leadership Style,Ttrust, and Organizational Commitment. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, SBE, Management and Organization Bilim Dalı, İstanbul.
30. Grawitch, M. J., Trares, S. ve Kohler, J. M. (2007). Healthy Workplace Practices and Employee Outcomes. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 275−293.
31. Greguras, G. J. ve Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). Different Fits Satisfy Different Needs: Linking Person–Environment Fit to Employee Commitment and Performance using Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 465−477.
32. Gül, H. (2003). Karizmatik Liderlik ve Örgütsel Bağlılık İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma.(Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, SBE, İşletme Anabilim Dalı. Gebze.
33. Kanat-Maymon, Y., Elimelech, M. ve Roth, G. (2020). Work Motivations as Antecedents and Outcomes of Leadership: Integrating Self-Determination Theory and Full Range Leadership Theory. European Management Journal, 38, 555-564.
34. Kazak, Z. (2004). Sporda Güdülenme Ölçeğinin – SGÖ- Türk Sporcuları için Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik Çalışması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi/ Hacettepe J. Of Sport Sciences, 15(4), 191-206.
35. Koestner, R. ve Losier, G. F. (2002). Distinguishing Three Ways of Being Internally Motivated: A Closer Look at Introjection, Identification, and Intrinsic motivation. Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (Ed.), Handbook of Self- Determination Research içinde (ss.101–121). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
36. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün Z., Gumusluoglu L., Erturk A. ve Scandura T.A. (2021) Two to Tango? A Cross-Cultural Investigation of the Leader-Follower Agreement on Authoritarian Leadership. Journal of Business Research, 128, 473-485.
37. Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L. ve Griffin, M. L. (2008). Being the Good Soldier: Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Commitment among Correctional Staff. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 56−68.
38. Mathieu, J. E. ve Zajac, D. M. (1990). A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organizational Commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171−194.
39. Mayer, D. M., Priesemuth, M, Brown, M. ve Kuenzi, M. (2009). Antecedents and Consequences of Employee- Supervisor Agreement on Ethical Leadership Fit. Best Paper Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago.
40. Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E. ve Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee Commitment and Motivation: A Conceptual Analysis and Integrative Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 991−1007.
41. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L. ve Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20−52.
42. Meyer, J. P. ve Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the Workplace: Toward a General Model. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299−326.
43. Meyer, J. P. ve Allen, N. (1997). Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. ve Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three-Component Conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538-551.
45. Meyer, J. P. ve Allen, N. (1991). A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61−89.
46. Meyer, J. P., Parfyonova, N. ve Stanley, L. J. (2010). Profiles of Commitment and Their Implications for Employee Behavior and Well-Being. The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada: Unpublished manuscript.
47. Meyer, J.P. ve Maltin, E.R. (2010). Employee Commitment and Well-Being: A Critical Review, Theoretical Framework and Research Agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 323-337.
48. Mowday, R.T. (1998). Reflections on the Study and Relevance of Organizational Commitment. Human Resources Management Review, 8(4), 387-401.
49. Nielsen, K., Yarker, J., Brenner, S.O., Randall, R. ve Borg, V. (2008). The Importance of Transformational Leadership Style for the Well-Being of Employees Working with Older People, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 6(5), 465-75.
50. Parfyonova, N. (2009). Employee Motivation, Performance, and Well-Being: The Role of Managerial Support for Autonomy, Competence and Relatedness Needs. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario.
51. Paşa, S.F., Kabasal, H. ve Bodur, M. (2001). Society, Organizations, and Leadership in Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4), 559-589.
52. Paşa, S.F. (2000). Leadership Influence in a High Power Distance and Collectivist Culture. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21/8, 414-426.
53. Pelletier, L.G., Fortier, M.S., Vallerand, R.J., Tuson, K.M., Briere, N.M. ve Blais, M.R. (1995). Toward a New Measure of Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Amotivation in Sport: The Sports Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 17(2), 35-53.
54. Richardson, A. M., Burke, R. J. ve Martinussen, M. (2006). Work and Health Outcomes among Police Officers: The Mediating Role of Cynicism and Engagement. International Journal of Stress Management, 13, 555−574.
55. Riketta, M. (2002). Attitudinal Organizational Commitment and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 257−266.
56. Robbins, S.P. ve Judge, T.A. (2015). Örgütsel Davranış-Organizational Behavior, (Çev. Ed. Erdem, İ., 14.Basımdan çeviri). Nobel Yayınları.
57. Ryan, R.M. ve Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
58. Ryan, R. M. ve La Guardia, J. G. (2000). What is Being Optimized?: Self-Determination Theory and Basic Psychological Needs. S. H. Qualls ve N. Abeles (Ed.), Psychology and the Aging Revolution: How We Adapt to Longer Life içinde (ss. 145–172). American Psychological Association.
59. Ryan, R.M. (1995). Psychological Needs and the Facilitation of Integrative Processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397-427.
60. Schaubroeck J.M., Shen Y. ve Chong S. (2017). A Dual-Stage Moderated Mediation Model Linking Authoritarian Leadership to Follower Outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 203–214.
61. Shen Y, Chou W.J. ve Schaubroeck J.M. (2019) The Roles of Relational Identification and Workgroup Cultural Values in Linking Authoritarian Leadership to Employee Performance. European Journal of Work Organizational Psychology, 28, 498-509.
62. Stone, D.N., Deci, E.L. ve Ryan, R.M. (2009). Beyond Talk: Creating Autonomous Motivation through Self- Determination Theory. Journal of General Management, 34, 75-91.
63. Sipahi, B., Yurtkoru, E.S. ve Çinko, M. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS’le Veri Analizi. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
64. Türker, Mine (2013). The Mediating Role of Motivation Types in Employees’ Organizational Commitment and Perceived Leadership Styles Relationship. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Organizational Behavior Bilim Dalı. İstanbul.
65. Tremblay, M.A., Blanchard, C.M., Taylor, S., Pelletier L. G. ve Villeneuve, M. (2009). Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its Value for Organizational Psychology Research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41(4), 213-226.
66. Ünler, E. (2006). Örgüte Bağlılığın İşin Nitelikleri ve Davranış Düzeltme Uygulamasıyla İlişkisi. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4 (1), 98-123
67. Vallerand, R. J. ve Fortier, M. S. (1998). Measures of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Sport and Physical Activity: A Review and Critique. Duda, J.(Ed.) içinde, Advancements in Sport and Exercise Psychology Measurement (83–100). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
68. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation Reconsidered: The Concept of Competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297−333.
69. Williams, G. C. ve Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of Biopsychosocial Values by Medical Students: A Test of Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767–779.
70. Yukl, G. (2006), Leadership in Organizations, 4th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
71. Yurdun, Ö.A. (2011). The Relationship Between Mobbing and Organizational Commitment and the Moderating Role of Paternalistic Leadership. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, SBE, Organizational Behavior Bilim Dalı. İstanbul.