THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOR SCALE

Öz

This study, aiming to adapt the Counterproductive Work Behavior Scale developed by Kelloway, Loughlin, Barling, and Nault (2002) into Turkish, was conducted by gathering data from two distinct samples. In this context, in the first research conducted by collecting data from 421 teachers, the factor structure of the scale was revealed by explanatory factor analysis. In addition, item analysis and internal consistency coefficient were calculated to determine the internal consistency of the scale, and the factor structure was tested with confirmatory factor analysis. In the second study, data were collected from 502 private sector employees and the discriminant, convergent and criterion-dependent validities of the scale were determined using the positive work behaviors, job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior scales. In the study, Cronbach Alpha coefficient was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the scales, and the internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.95. The results derived from the explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the Counterproductive Work Behavior Scale is reliable and valid for use in Turkish studies (χ2=51,02; df=35; χ2/df=1,46; TLI=0.99; CFI=0,99; RMSEA=0,033).

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Counterproductive Behavior Scale
• Validity
• Reliability

ÜRETKENLİK KARŞITI İŞ DAVRANIŞLARI ÖLÇEĞİNİN GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

Kelloway, Loughlin, Barling ve Nault (2002) tarafından geliştirilen Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları Ölçeği’nin Türkçe uyarlamasının yapılması amaçlanan bu çalışma iki farklı örneklemden veri toplanarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu kapsamda 421 öğretmenden veri toplanarak gerçekleştirilen birinci araştırmada açıklayıcı faktör analizi yapılarak ölçeğin faktör yapısı ortaya konulmuştur. Ayrıca ölçeğin iç tutarlılığını tespit etmek üzere madde analizi ve iç tutarlılık katsayısı hesaplanmış ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile faktör yapısı test edilmiştir. İkinci çalışmada 502 özel sektör çalışanından veri toplanmış ve olumlu iş davranışları, iş tatmini ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları ölçekleri kullanılarak ölçeğin ayrışma, birleşme ve ölçüt bağımlı geçerlilikleri belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada kullanılan Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları Ölçeği’nin iç tutarlılığı Cronbach Alfa katsayısı kullanılarak hesaplanmış ve 0,95 bulunmuştur. Yapılan açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri sonucunda elde edilen bulgular Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları Ölçeği’nin Türkçe çalışmalarda kullanmak üzere güvenilir ve geçerli olduğu ortaya konulmuştur (χ2=51,02; df=35; χ2/df=1,46; TLI=0.99; CFI=0,99; RMSEA=0,033).

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Üretkenlik Karşıtı Davranış Ölçeği
• Geçerlik
• Güvenirlik.

Etik Beyan

“Üretkenlik Karşıtı Davranış Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması” başlıklı bu çalışma için Adana Alparslan Türkeş Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulu’ndan 28.02.2024 tarihi ve 02-5 sayılı karar ile izin alınmıştır. Bu doğrultuda çalışmada bilimsel araştırma ve yayın etği kurallarına uyulmuştur.

Kaynakça

1. Aquino, K., Lewis, M. U. ve Bradfield, M. (1999). Justice Constructs, Negative Affectivity, and Employee Deviance: A Proposed Model and Empirical Test. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1073-1091.
2. Baron, R. A. ve Neuman, J. H. (1996). Workplace Violence and Workplace Aggression: Evidence on Their Relative Frequency and Potential Causes. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 161-173.
3. Baron, R. A., Neuman, J. H. ve Geddes, D. (1999). Social and Personal Determinants of Workplace Aggression: Evidence for the Impact of Perceived Injustice and the Type A Behavior Pattern. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 281- 296.
4. Bennett, R. J. ve Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a Measure of Workplace Deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360.
5. Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., ve Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal Deviance, Organizational Deviance, and Their Common Correlates: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 410-424.
6. Bies, R. J., Tripp, T. M., ve Kramer, R. M. (1997). At The Breaking Point: Cognitive and Social Dynamics of Revenge in Organizations. R. A. Giacalone ve J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial Behavior In Organizations içinde (ss. 18– 36). Sage Publications, Inc.
7. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., ve Klesh, J. (1983). Assessing the Attitudes and Perceptions of Organizational Members. S. Seashore (Ed.), Assessing Organizational Change içinde (ss. 71-138). Wiley.
8. Chen P.Y. ve P.E. Spector (1992). Relationship of Work Stressors with Aggression, Withdrawal, Theft and Substance Use: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(3), 177–184.

9. Czarnota-Bojarska, J. (2015). Counterproductive Work Behavior and Job Satisfaction: A Surprisingly Rocky Relationship. Journal of Management ve Organization, 21, 460-470.
10. Dalal, R.S. (2005). A Meta-Analysis of The Relationship Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Counterproductive Work Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241-1255.
11. Doğan, S. ve Kılıç, S. (2014). Algılanan Örgütsel Etik İklim ve Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 269-292.
12. Flores, A. (2023). Addressing Counterproductive Work Behaviors in a Behavioral Health Organization. (PhD Thesis). Walden University, USA.
13. Fox, S. ve Spector, P. E. (1999). A model of Work Frustration-Aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6), 915–931.
14. Fox, S., Spector, P. E., ve Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB) in Response To Job Stressors and Organizational Justice: Some Mediator and Moderator Tests for Autonomy and Emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 291–309.
15. Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee Theft as a Reaction to Underpayment Inequity: The Hidden Cost of Pay Cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561-568.
16. Gotlib, T. (2011). Multifoci Organizational Justice, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Mediating Effects of Emotions. (PhD Thesis). Florida Institute of Technology, USA.
17. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., ve Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
18. Hepworth, W., ve Towler, A. (2004). The Effects of Individual Differences and Charismatic Leadership on Workplace Aggression. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(2), 176-185.
19. Hershcovis, M.S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K.A., Dupré, K.E., Inness, M., et al. (2007). Predicting Workplace Aggression: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 228-238.
20. Kanafa-Chmielewska, D. (2019). The Two Faces of an Employee: Explorıng The Relationships Between Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, Counterproductive Work Behaviour and Job Satisfaction. Argumenta Oeconomica, 1(42), 317-336.
21. Kanten, P. ve Ülker, F. (2014). Yönetim Tarzının Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışlarına Etkisinde İşe Yabancılaşmanın Aracılık Rolü. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 32, 16-40.
22. Kaplan, H. B. (1976). Self-attitudes and Deviant Response. Social Forces, 54(4), 788–801.
23. Kelloway, E. K., Loughlin, C., Barling, J., ve Nault, A. (2002). Self-Reported Counterproductive Behaviors and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Separate but Related Constructs. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1-2), 143-151.
24. Lau, V. C. S., Au, W. T., ve Ho, J. M. C. (2003). A Qualitative and Quantitative Review of Antecedents of Counterproductive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(1), 73–99.
25. Lehman, W. E., ve Simpson, D. D. (1992). Employee Substance Use and On-The-Job Behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 309-321.
26. Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and Psychological Terror at Workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5, 119-126.
27. Merdan, E., Erdem, A.T., Gümüşsoy, Y. (2022). Boreout Sendromunun Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışı Üzerine Etkisinde Sanal Kaytarmanın Aracılık Rolü, Business & Management Studies: An International Journal (BMIJ), 10 (1), 176-191,
28. Mount, M., Ilies, R., ve Johnson, E. (2006). Relationships of Personality Traits and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Effects of Job Satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 59, 591-622.
29. Mercado, B. K., Dilchert, S., Giordano, C., ve Ones, D. S. (2018). Counterproductive Work Behaviors. D. S. Ones, N. Anderson, C. Viswesvaran, ve H. K. Sinangil (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology: Personnel Psychology and Employee Performance içinde (2nd ed., pp. 109–211), Sage Reference.
30. Nunnally, J. C., ve Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed). McGraw-Hill.
31. Ones, D. S., ve Dilchert, S. (2013). Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Concepts, Measurement, and Nomological Network. K. F. Geisinger, B. A. Bracken, J. F. Carlson, J.-I. C. Hansen, N. R. Kuncel, S. P. Reise, ve M. C. Rodriguez (Eds.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 1. Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organizational psychology içinde (ss. 643–659). American Psychological Association.
32. O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Griffin, R. W. ve Clew, D. J. (1996). Organization-Motivated Aggression: A Research Framework. Academy of Management Review, 21, 225-253.
33. Polatcı, S. ve Özçalık, F. (2015). Çalışanların Örgütsel Adalet Algıları ile Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları Etkileşiminde Pozitif ve Negatif Duygusallığın Aracılık Etkisi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(2), 215-234.
34. Penney, L.M., ve Spector, P.E. (2005). Job Stress, Incivility, and Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB): The Moderating Role of Negative Affectivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 777-796.
35. Rayner, C., Hoel, H., ve Cooper, C. L. (2002). Workplace Bullying: What We Know, Who is to Blame and What Can We Do? London: Taylor Francis.
36. Robinson, S. L. ve Bennett, R. J. (1995). A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572.
37. Robinson, S. L. ve O'Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey See, Monkey Do: The Influence of Work Groups on The Antisocial Behavior of Employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 658-672.
38. Sackett, P. R., ve DeVore, C. J. (2001). Counterproductive Behaviors at Work. N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. Sinangil Kepir, ve C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology: Vol. 1. Personnel psychology içinde (pp. 145–164). London, England: Sage.
39. Salgado, J.F. (2002). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Counterproductive Behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(2), 117-125.
40. Sezici, E. (2015). Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları Üzerinde Kişilik Özelliklerinin Rolü. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies. 7(14), 1-22.
41. Skarlicki, D. P. ve Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the Workplace: The Roles of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434–443.
42. Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., ve Tesluk, P. (1999). Personality as a Moderator in The Relationship Between Fairness and Retaliation. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 100–108.
43. Spector, P. E. (1978). Organizational frustration: A Model and Review of The Literature. Personnel Psychology, 31, 815–829.
44. Spector, P. E. (1975). Relationships of organizational frustration with reported behavioral reactions of employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(5), 635–637.
45. Spector, P.E., ve Fox, S. (2002). An Emotion-Centered Model of Voluntary Work Behavior: Some Parallels Between Counterproductive Work Behavior and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 269-292.
46. Spector, P. E., ve Fox, S. (2005). The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behavior. S. Fox ve P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive Work Behavior: Investigations of Actors and Targets içinde (pp. 151–174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47. Spector, P. E., ve Fox, S. (2010). Counterproductive Work Behavior and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Are They Opposite Forms of Active Behavior?. Applied Psychology: An International Review, ,59(1), 21–39.
48. Spector, P. E., Fox, S. ve Domagalski, T. (2005). Emotions, Violence and Counterproductive Work Behaviour. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 66, 438-456.
49. Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., ve Kessler, S. (2006). The Dimensionality of Counterproductivity: Are All Counterproductive Behaviors Created Equal?. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 446–460.
50. Sprung, J. M. (2011). Work Locus of Control as a Moderator of The Relationship Between Work Stressors and Counterproductive Work Behavior. (Master Thesis), Bowling Green State University, USA.
51. Storms, P. L., ve Spector, P. E. (1987). Relationships of organizational frustration with reported behavioral reactions: The moderating effect of perceived control. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60, 227–234.
52. Suroso, A., Gal, T. ve Anggraeni, A. I. (2020). Work Stress and Counterproductive Work Behaviour. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(12), 1334-1346.
53. Sypniewska, B. A. (2020). Counterproductive Work Behavior and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. 16(4), 321-328
54. Szostek, D. (2018). Counterproductive Work Behavior. Comparison of The Public and Private Sector. Journal of Positive Management, 9(1), 3–17.
55. Szostek, D., Balcerzak, A. P., Rogalska, E., Pelikánová, R., M. (2022). Personality Traits and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Moderating Role of Demographic Characteristics. Economics & Sociology, 15(4), 231-263.
56. Tepper, B.J. (2007). Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261-289.
57. Williams, L. J., ve Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.
58. Zapf, D. (1999). Organisational, Work Group Related and Personal Causes of Mobbing at Work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1-2), 70-85.