BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

“Olimpiyat Kenti”nden “Olimpiyat Devleti”ne

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 2010 Sayı: 1, 73 - 80, 01.03.2010

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Andranovich, G., Burbank, M. J. ve Heying, C. H. (2001), “Olmypic Cities: Lessons Learned from Mega-Events Politics”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 23 (2): 113-131.
  • Austrian, Z. ve Rosentraub, M. S. (2002), “Cities, Sports, and Economic Change: A Retrospective Assessment”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 24 (5): 549- 563.
  • Beriatos, E. ve Gospodini, A. (2004), “‘Glocalising’ Urban Landscapes: Athens and the 2004 Olympics, Cities, 21 (3): 187-202.
  • Burbank, M. J., Andranovich, G. ve Heying, C. H. (2002), “Mega-Events, Urban Development and Public Policy”, The Review of Policy Research, 19 (3): 179-202.
  • Chalkley, B ve Essex, S. (2009), “Urban development through hosting international events: a history of the Olympic Games”, Planning Perspectives, 14: 369–394.
  • Coşkun, V. (2009), Ulus-Devletin Dönüşümü ve Meşruluk Sorunu, Liberte Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Crowther, N. (2004), “The State of the Modern Olympics: Citius, Altius, Fortius?”, European Review 12 (3): 445-460.
  • Doğan, D. M. (Haz.) (1996), Büyük Türkçe Sözlük, İz Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Essex, S. ve Chalkley, B. (1998), “Olympic Games: Catalyst of Urban Change”, Leisure Studies, 17: 187-206.
  • Gratton, C., Shibli, S. ve Coleman, R. (2006), “The Economic Impact of Major Sports Events: A Review of Ten Events in the UK”, The Sociological Review, 54 (s2): 41-58.
  • Hall, C. M. (2006), “Urban Entrepreneurship, Corporate Interests and Sports Mega-Events: The Thin Policies of Competitiveness within the Hard Outcomes of Neoliberalism”, The Sociological Review, 54 (s2): 59-70.
  • Hiller, H. H. (2006), “Post-event Outcomes and the Post-modern Turn: The Olympics and Urban Transformations”, European Sport Management Quarterly, 6 (4): 317-332.
  • Horne, J. ve Manzenreiter, W. (2006), “An Introduction to the Sociology of Sports Mega-Events”, The Sociological Review, 54 (s2): 1-24.
  • http://www.olympic.org/Documents/Olympic%20 Charter/Charter_en_2010.pdf (24.03.2009).
  • http://www.olympic.org/uk/index_uk.asp (24.03.2009).
  • http://www.istanbul2010.org (24.03.2009).
  • Kasimati, E. (2003), “Economic Aspects and the Summer Olympics: A Review of Related Research”, International Journal of Tourism Research, 5: 433- 444.
  • Keleş, R. (2006), Kentleşme Politikası, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Leonardsen, D. (2007), “Planning of Mega Events: Experiences and Lessons”, Planning Theory & Practice, 8 (1): 11-30.
  • Liao, H. ve Pitts, A. (2006), “A Brief Historical Review of Olympic Urbanization”, The International Journal of the History of Sport, 23 (7): 1232-1252.
  • Matheson, V. A. ve Baade, R. A. (2004), “Mega-Sporting Events in Developing Countries: Playing the Way to Prosperity?”, The South African Journal of Economics, 72 (5): 1085-1096.
  • Muñoz, F. (2006), “Olympic Urbanism and Olympic Villages: Planning Strategies in Olympic Host Cities, London 1908 to London 2012”, The Sociological Review, 54 (s2): 175-187.
  • Newman, P. (2007), “‘Back the Bid’: The 2012 Summer Olmypics and the Governance of London”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 29 (3): 255-267.
  • Owen, K. A. (2002), “The Sydney 2000 Olympics and Urban Entrepreneurialism: Local Variations in Urban Governance”, Australian Geographical Studies 40 (3): 323-336.
  • Pleket, H. W. (2004), “The Olympic Games in Antiquity”, European Review, 12 (3): 401-413.
  • Poast, P. D. (2007), “Winning the Bid: Analyzing the International Olympic Committee’s Host City Selections”, International Interactions, 33:75–95.
  • Shoval, N. (2002), “A New in the Competition for the Olympic Gold: The London and New York Bids for the 2012 Games”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 24 (5): 583-599.
  • Xu, X. (2006), “Modernizing China in the Olympic Spotlight: China’s National Identity and the 2008 Beijing Olympiad”, The Sociological Review, 54 (s2): 90-107.
  • Weiler, I. (2004), “The predecessors of the Olympic movement, and Pierre de Coubertin”, European Review, 12 (3): 427–443.

“Olimpiyat Kenti”nden “Olimpiyat Devleti”ne

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 2010 Sayı: 1, 73 - 80, 01.03.2010

Öz

Olimpiyatlar, 1896 yılından sonra tekrar ulus devletlerin ilgi gösterdiği büyük olaylar haline gelmiştir ve ulus devletler olimpiyatlara ev sahipliği yapmak için birbiriyle yarış içine girmişlerdir. Bu makalede olimpiyatların ulus devlet, ulus inşası, ulusçuluk gibi kavramlardan bağımsız değerlendirilemeyeceği ileri sürülmektedir. Bu çerçevede tarihsel süreç içerisinde olimpiyatların siyasal boyutlarına işaret edilmiştir. Sonuçta, genel olarak büyük olayları, özel olarak da olimpiyatları çalışan birinin bunların siyasal yönlerini dikkate almasının zorunlu olduğuna vurgu yapılmıştır

Kaynakça

  • Andranovich, G., Burbank, M. J. ve Heying, C. H. (2001), “Olmypic Cities: Lessons Learned from Mega-Events Politics”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 23 (2): 113-131.
  • Austrian, Z. ve Rosentraub, M. S. (2002), “Cities, Sports, and Economic Change: A Retrospective Assessment”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 24 (5): 549- 563.
  • Beriatos, E. ve Gospodini, A. (2004), “‘Glocalising’ Urban Landscapes: Athens and the 2004 Olympics, Cities, 21 (3): 187-202.
  • Burbank, M. J., Andranovich, G. ve Heying, C. H. (2002), “Mega-Events, Urban Development and Public Policy”, The Review of Policy Research, 19 (3): 179-202.
  • Chalkley, B ve Essex, S. (2009), “Urban development through hosting international events: a history of the Olympic Games”, Planning Perspectives, 14: 369–394.
  • Coşkun, V. (2009), Ulus-Devletin Dönüşümü ve Meşruluk Sorunu, Liberte Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Crowther, N. (2004), “The State of the Modern Olympics: Citius, Altius, Fortius?”, European Review 12 (3): 445-460.
  • Doğan, D. M. (Haz.) (1996), Büyük Türkçe Sözlük, İz Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Essex, S. ve Chalkley, B. (1998), “Olympic Games: Catalyst of Urban Change”, Leisure Studies, 17: 187-206.
  • Gratton, C., Shibli, S. ve Coleman, R. (2006), “The Economic Impact of Major Sports Events: A Review of Ten Events in the UK”, The Sociological Review, 54 (s2): 41-58.
  • Hall, C. M. (2006), “Urban Entrepreneurship, Corporate Interests and Sports Mega-Events: The Thin Policies of Competitiveness within the Hard Outcomes of Neoliberalism”, The Sociological Review, 54 (s2): 59-70.
  • Hiller, H. H. (2006), “Post-event Outcomes and the Post-modern Turn: The Olympics and Urban Transformations”, European Sport Management Quarterly, 6 (4): 317-332.
  • Horne, J. ve Manzenreiter, W. (2006), “An Introduction to the Sociology of Sports Mega-Events”, The Sociological Review, 54 (s2): 1-24.
  • http://www.olympic.org/Documents/Olympic%20 Charter/Charter_en_2010.pdf (24.03.2009).
  • http://www.olympic.org/uk/index_uk.asp (24.03.2009).
  • http://www.istanbul2010.org (24.03.2009).
  • Kasimati, E. (2003), “Economic Aspects and the Summer Olympics: A Review of Related Research”, International Journal of Tourism Research, 5: 433- 444.
  • Keleş, R. (2006), Kentleşme Politikası, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Leonardsen, D. (2007), “Planning of Mega Events: Experiences and Lessons”, Planning Theory & Practice, 8 (1): 11-30.
  • Liao, H. ve Pitts, A. (2006), “A Brief Historical Review of Olympic Urbanization”, The International Journal of the History of Sport, 23 (7): 1232-1252.
  • Matheson, V. A. ve Baade, R. A. (2004), “Mega-Sporting Events in Developing Countries: Playing the Way to Prosperity?”, The South African Journal of Economics, 72 (5): 1085-1096.
  • Muñoz, F. (2006), “Olympic Urbanism and Olympic Villages: Planning Strategies in Olympic Host Cities, London 1908 to London 2012”, The Sociological Review, 54 (s2): 175-187.
  • Newman, P. (2007), “‘Back the Bid’: The 2012 Summer Olmypics and the Governance of London”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 29 (3): 255-267.
  • Owen, K. A. (2002), “The Sydney 2000 Olympics and Urban Entrepreneurialism: Local Variations in Urban Governance”, Australian Geographical Studies 40 (3): 323-336.
  • Pleket, H. W. (2004), “The Olympic Games in Antiquity”, European Review, 12 (3): 401-413.
  • Poast, P. D. (2007), “Winning the Bid: Analyzing the International Olympic Committee’s Host City Selections”, International Interactions, 33:75–95.
  • Shoval, N. (2002), “A New in the Competition for the Olympic Gold: The London and New York Bids for the 2012 Games”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 24 (5): 583-599.
  • Xu, X. (2006), “Modernizing China in the Olympic Spotlight: China’s National Identity and the 2008 Beijing Olympiad”, The Sociological Review, 54 (s2): 90-107.
  • Weiler, I. (2004), “The predecessors of the Olympic movement, and Pierre de Coubertin”, European Review, 12 (3): 427–443.
Toplam 29 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yusuf Şahin Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2010
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2010 Cilt: 2010 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Şahin, Y. . (2010). “Olimpiyat Kenti”nden “Olimpiyat Devleti”ne. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2010(1), 73-80.

     EBSCO        SOBİAD            ProQuest      Türk Eğitim İndeksi

18302 18303   18304  18305